Presentation on theme: "NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3 through 8 and 11 September 6, 2007 For Haddonfield Public Schools."— Presentation transcript:
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3 through 8 and 11 September 6, 2007 For Haddonfield Public Schools
WHY CYCLE II RESULTS ? Cycle II information allows Haddonfield School District to compare its performance to other districts which have similar demographics, as in this Grade 8 GEPA DFG chart.
CYCLE II RESULTS 2007: AYP All Schools Made Adequate Yearly Progress 95% Participation Rate AYP Benchmark Targets for 4, 8, 11 Lang. Arts AYP Benchmark Targets for 4, 8, 11 Math Passing rate performance for 2007 exceeded the incremental increase due in spring 2008
More good news… District performance remains significantly higher than state performance in all areas District General Education performance surpassed that of other J districts for: –Gr. 3 LA & Math; Gr. 4 LA & Math; Gr. 5 LA; Gr. 6 LA & Math; Gr. 7 LA & Math; Gr. 8 Math & Science; Gr. 11 LA & Math District Special Education performance surpassed that of other J districts for: –Gr. 3 Math; Gr. 4 Science; Gr. 8 LA, Math, & Science; Gr. 11 LA & Math Students scoring Advanced Proficient exceeded 50% of the total number for: –Gr. 3 Math; Gr. 4 Math & Science; Gr. 8 Math & Science; Gr. 11 Math Some schools achieved 98-100% total student rates of proficiency: –Gr. 3 Math Haddon & Tatem: Gr. 4 LA, Math, Science Haddon; Gr. 5 LA & Math Haddon; Gr. 5 LA Tatem; Gr. 11 LA
11 th Grade HSPA 2007 General Ed. – Special Ed.
On the Horizon… Biology end-of-course test will replace HSPA Science May 08 NJDOE will pilot an Algebra II end-of-year course test May 08 NJ ASK 5-8: Summative assessments May 08 NJ ASK 3,4 assessments follow in May 09 Scores reported early June; increased web-based reporting EdAnalyzer for detailed information about student achievement Anticipated: Eventual inclusion of performance assessments Resources for locally administered ongoing diagnostic and benchmark assessments to guide instruction Professional development for teachers in assessment literacy
NJ SMART EDanalyzer Data Literacy Framework EDanalyzer will be available this fall for data analysis to… –Disaggregate data –Compile student profiles –Make cohort comparisons –Examine correlations among math, language arts and science scaled scores NJ assessment scores from 1998-1999 to the present are warehoused
State, J Districts, and Haddonfield Comparisons by Grade and School Detailed NJ ASK, GEPA, and HSPA results for data analysis… How did total student, general education, and special education results for grade levels and individual schools compare to results for the state and other J districts? What areas are in need of attention?
Additional Important Comparisons What is our Advanced Proficient rate as compared to other “J” Districts? What are our pass rates (total proficient and advanced proficient) as compared to other “J” Districts?
3 rd Grade NJ ASK – Total Students Percent Advanced Proficient
4 th Grade NJ ASK– Total Students Percent Advanced Proficient
5 th Grade NJ ASK–Total Students Percent Advanced Proficient
6 th Grade NJ ASK–Total Students Percent Advanced Proficient
7 th Grade NJ ASK–Total Students Percent Advanced Proficient
8 th Grade GEPA– Total Students Percent Advanced Proficient
11 th Grade HSPA– Total Students Percent Advanced Proficient
3 rd Grade NJ ASK Percent Passing -Total Students
4 th Grade NJ ASK Percent Passing -Total Students
5 th Grade NJ ASK Percent Passing -Total Students