Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Windows Server 2003 Performance Benchmarks Compared to Microsoft Windows ® NT Server 4.0 and Microsoft Windows Server ™ 2000 Source: VeriTest.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Windows Server 2003 Performance Benchmarks Compared to Microsoft Windows ® NT Server 4.0 and Microsoft Windows Server ™ 2000 Source: VeriTest."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Windows Server 2003 Performance Benchmarks Compared to Microsoft Windows ® NT Server 4.0 and Microsoft Windows Server ™ 2000 Source: VeriTest

3 Contents File Server Performance File Server Performance Web Server Performance Web Server Performance  Static Mix  Dynamic (ISAPI) Mix  Dynamic (CGI) Mix  E-commerce (SSL ISAPI) Mix  E-commerce (SSL CGI) Mix Active Directory ® performance Active Directory ® performance

4 File Server Performance NetBench Benchmark File Server Performance: File Server Performance:  64% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on single-processor systems  148% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on eight-processor systems Requests per Second  59%  102%  148%  64% Windows NT 4.0 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition File Server Performance Measurement of how well a file server handles file I/O requests from 32-bit Windows clients through network file operations Measurement of how well a file server handles file I/O requests from 32-bit Windows clients through network file operations  Windows XP clients with Windows Server 2003  Windows 2000 clients with Windows 2000  Windows NT clients with Windows NT Up to 1.2 Gbps Netbench throughput over gigabit network adapters Up to 1.2 Gbps Netbench throughput over gigabit network adapters Up to 1.6 Gbps using network adapters that support TCP Offload Engine (TOE) technology Up to 1.6 Gbps using network adapters that support TCP Offload Engine (TOE) technology Hardware for all tests: Hardware for all tests:  HP ProLiant DL760  Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors  4 GB RAM  Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest Source: VeriTest

5 Web Server Performance WebBench Benchmark: Static Mix Static Web Server Performance: Static Web Server Performance:  162% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on single-processor systems  487% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on eight-processor systems Static Web Server Performance Requests per Second  162%  197%  296%  487% Windows NT 4.0 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition Small, cacheable static file set of 60 MB Small, cacheable static file set of 60 MB  2% of requests result in not-found responses (status 404) 6 KB average response size 6 KB average response size All requests non-keep-alive All requests non-keep-alive Hardware for all tests: Hardware for all tests:  HP ProLiant DL760  Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors  4 GB RAM  Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest Source: VeriTest

6 Web Server Performance WebBench Benchmark: Dynamic (ISAPI) Mix Dynamic (ISAPI-based) Web Server Performance: Dynamic (ISAPI-based) Web Server Performance:  109% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on single-processor systems  368% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on eight-processor systems Dynamic (ISAPI) Web Server Performance Requests per Second  134%  176%  368%  109% Windows NT 4.0 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition Small static file set of 60 MB Small static file set of 60 MB Simple dynamic ISAPI DLL that generates dynamic responses Simple dynamic ISAPI DLL that generates dynamic responses Request mix: Request mix:  80% of requests are for static data  20% of requests are for dynamic ISAPI- based content All requests non-keep-alive All requests non-keep-alive Hardware for all tests: Hardware for all tests:  HP ProLiant DL760  Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors  4 GB RAM  Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest Source: VeriTest

7 Web Server Performance WebBench Benchmark: Dynamic (CGI) Mix Dynamic (CGI-based) Web Server Performance: Dynamic (CGI-based) Web Server Performance:  39% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on single-processor systems  263% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on eight-processor systems Windows NT 4.0 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition Test Configurations Dynamic (CGI-based) Web Server Performance Requests per Second  84%  175%  263%  39% Small static file set of 60 MB Small static file set of 60 MB Simple dynamic CGI DLL that generates dynamic responses Simple dynamic CGI DLL that generates dynamic responses Request mix: Request mix:  80% of requests are for static data  20% of requests are for dynamic CGI- based content All requests non-keep-alive All requests non-keep-alive Hardware for all tests: Hardware for all tests:  HP ProLiant DL760  Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors  4 GB RAM  Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest Source: VeriTest

8 Web Server Performance WebBench: E-commerce (SSL ISAPI) Mix E-commerce (SSL ISAPI) Web Server Performance: E-commerce (SSL ISAPI) Web Server Performance:  74% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on single-processor systems  158% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on four-processor systems  110%  158%  152% (vs. Windows 2000)  74% Requests per Second Windows NT 4.0 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition E-commerce (SSL ISAPI) Web Server Performance Static file set of 60 MB with ISAPI and SSL requests Static file set of 60 MB with ISAPI and SSL requests Request mix very similar to dynamic mix: Request mix very similar to dynamic mix:  76% static content  16% dynamic ISAPI content  8% of requests are SSL (2% dynamic SSL, 6% static SSL) All requests non-keep-alive All requests non-keep-alive Hardware for all tests: Hardware for all tests:  HP ProLiant DL760  Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors  4 GB RAM  Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest Source: VeriTest

9 Test Configurations Requests per Second E-commerce (SSL CGI) Web Server Performance Windows NT 4.0 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition  85%  349%  330%  50% Web Server Performance WebBench: E-commerce (SSL CGI) Mix E-commerce (SSL CGI) Web Server Performance: E-commerce (SSL CGI) Web Server Performance:  50% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on single-processor systems  330% faster than Windows NT 4.0 on eight-processor systems Static file set of 60 MB with CGI and SSL requests Static file set of 60 MB with CGI and SSL requests Request mix very similar to dynamic mix: Request mix very similar to dynamic mix:  76% static content  16% dynamic CGI content  8% of requests are SSL (2% dynamic SSL, 6% static SSL) All requests non-keep-alive All requests non-keep-alive Hardware for all tests: Hardware for all tests:  HP ProLiant DL760  Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors  4 GB RAM  Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest Source: VeriTest

10 Active Directory Performance: Active Directory Performance:  102% faster than Windows 2000 on single-processor systems  439% faster than Windows 2000 on eight-processor systems Active Directory DirectoryMark Benchmark: Messaging Mix Simulates server’s use of a directory based on LDAP protocol Simulates server’s use of a directory based on LDAP protocol 1 million-user database with more than 10 organizational units 1 million-user database with more than 10 organizational units Hardware for all tests: Hardware for all tests:  HP DL760  Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors  4 GB RAM  Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest Source: VeriTest Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server  102%  116%  149%  439% P2P4P8P Searches/sec Active Directory (Messaging) Performance

11 Active Directory DirectoryMark Benchmark: Address Mix Active Directory Performance: Active Directory Performance:  10x faster than Windows 2000 on single-processor systems  19x faster than Windows 2000 on eight-processor systems Simulates users looking up names in address book and expanding group for based on LDAP protocol Simulates users looking up names in address book and expanding group for based on LDAP protocol 1 million-user database with more than 10 organizational units 1 million-user database with more than 10 organizational units Hardware for all tests: Hardware for all tests:  HP DL760  Intel Pentium III Xeon 900 MHz processors  4 GB RAM  Intel PRO/1000 MF Server Adapters Source: VeriTest Source: VeriTest Active Directory (Address Lookup) Performance P2P4P8P  10x  13x  17x  19x Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition Windows 2000 Advanced Server Searches/sec

12 © 2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. This presentation is for informational purposes only. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, in this summary.


Download ppt "Windows Server 2003 Performance Benchmarks Compared to Microsoft Windows ® NT Server 4.0 and Microsoft Windows Server ™ 2000 Source: VeriTest."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google