Download presentation

1
**Substitution matrices**

2
**Outline Why do we need scoring matrices?**

Calculation of alignment costs Pairwise Multiple Database searches Phylogenetic distance calculations

3
**What is a Sequence Alignment?**

Given two nucleotide or amino acid sequences, determine if they are related (descended from a common ancestor) Technically, we can align any two sequences, but not always in a meaningful way

4
**What is a Sequence Alignment? (cont.)**

HIGHLY RELATED: HBA_HUMAN GSAQVKGHGKKVADALTNAVAHVDDMPNALSALSDLHAHKL G+ +VK+HGKKV A+++++AH+D LS+LH KL HBB_HUMAN GNPKVKAHGKKVLGAFSDGLAHLDNLKGTFATLSELHCDKL RELATED: HBA_HUMAN GSAQVKGHGKKVADALTNAVAHV---D--DMPNALSALSDLHAHKL H+ KV + +A L L+++H+ K LGB2_LUPLU NNPELQAHAGKVFKLVYEAAIQLQVTGVVVTDATLKNLGSVHVSKG SPURIOUS ALIGNMENT: HBA_HUMAN GSAQVKGHGKKVADALTNAVAHVDDMPNALSALSD----LHAHKL GS+ + G + +D L ++ H+ D+ A +AL D ++AH+ F11G11.2 GSGYLVGDSLTFVDLL--VAQHTADLLAANAALLDEFPQFKAHQE How to filter out the last one & pick up the second?

5
**Why Should We Care? Fragment assembly in DNA sequencing**

– Experimental determination of nucleotide sequences is only reliable up to about base pairs (bp) at a time – But a genome can be millions of bp long! – If fragments overlap, they can be assembled: ...AAGTACAATCA CAATTACTCGGA... – Need to align to detect overlap

6
**Why Should We Care? (cont.)**

Finding homologous proteins and genes – i.e. evolutionarily related (common ancestor) – Thus want to avoid the spurious alignment

7
**What do we do? Model evolutionary process -mutational changes to DNA**

Can you name some?

8
**Mutations Nothing happens Substitutions Insertions Deletions**

Transitions (A-G; C-T) Transversions (A-C, A-T, C-T, T-G) Insertions Deletions

9
**How do we do it? Choose a scoring scheme**

Choose an algorithm to find optimal alignment with respect to a scoring scheme Statistically validate alignment

10
Scoring Schemes Since goal is to find related sequences, want evolution-based scoring scheme Mutations occur often at the genomic level, but their rates of acceptance by natural selection vary depending on the mutation I.e. changing an AA to one with similar properties is more likely to be accepted Assume that all changes occur independently of each other and are Markovian (makes working with probabilities easier)

11
**If AA ai is aligned with aj, then aj was substituted for ai ...KALM... **

...KVLM... Was this due to an accepted mutation or simply by chance? If A or V is likely in general, then there is less evidence that this is a mutation Want the score sij to be higher if mutations more likely Take ratio of mutation prob. to prob. of AA appearing at random Generally, if aj is similar to ai in property, then accepted mutation more likely and sij higher

12
Mutations Only consider immediate mutations ai -> aj, not ai -> ak -> aj Mutations are undirected => scoring matrix is symmetric Markov assumptions

13
**Nucleic acid substitution matrices**

Uniform mutation rates Higher transitions (a) than transversions (b) Pyrimidines C T A G a b b b b a Purines

14
**Mutation matrices Uniform mutation rates**

A G T C A 0.99 G T C 3 fold higher transitions (a) than transversions (b) A G T C A 0.99 G T C 1% probability of change at each position (Mij values)

15
**log-odds ratio Alignment: ATC AGT Probability under match hypothesis:**

P(alignment | match) = P(A,A | match)P(T,G | match)P(C,T | match) Probability under random hypothesis: P(alignment | random ) = P(A,A | random )P(T,G | random)P(C,T | random) Relative probability (odds ratio) R(alignment) = P(alignment | match) / P(alignment | random ) = R(A,A)R(T,C)R(C,T) For computational reasons we take logarithms log R(alignment) = log R(A,A) + log R(T,G) + log R(C,T)

16
**log-odds ratio (cont.) Use mutation matrix to derive log odds matrix**

The probability (sij) of obtaining a match between nucleotides i and j, divided by the random probability of aligning i and j is given by sij = log (piMij / pipj) = log (Mij / pj) where Mij is the mutation matrix value and pi and pj are the fractional compositions of each nucleotide.

17
**Substitution matrices**

Uniform mutation rates A G T C A 2 G T C 3 fold higher transitions (a) than transversions (b) A G T C A 2 G T C 1% probability of change at each position, log base 2

18
Gap penalties Why?

19
**Gap penalties Modeling biology Insertions / deletions:**

Single nucleotide Unequal crossover Introns, transposons etc. Gap score wx for gap of length x consists of Gap opening (g) and gap extension (r) penalties. wx = g + rx

20
Protein matrices PAM BLOSUM

21
**The PAM Transition Matrices**

Dayhoff et al. started with several hundred alignments between very closely related proteins Compute the frequency with which each AA is changed into each other AA changes over a short evolutionary distance (short enough where only 1% AAs change) 1 PAM = 1% point accepted mutation (accepted by natural selection, i. e. not altering the function of the protein)

22
**Phylogenetic tree ACGH DBGH ADIJ CBIJ B-C A-D B-D A–C ABGH ABIJ**

I-G J-H ACGH DBGH ADIJ CBIJ

23
PAMs (cont.) Estimate pi with the frequency of AA ai over both sequences, i.e. # of ai’s/number of AAs Let fij = fji = # of ai <-> aj changes in data set, fi = Sj¹i fij and f = Si fi Define the scale to be the amount of evolution to change 1 in 100 AAs (on average) [1 PAM dist] Relative mutability of ai is the ratio of number of mutations to total exposure to mutation: mi = fi / (100fpi)

24
PAMs (cont.) If mi is probability of a mutation for ai, then Mii = 1 - mi is prob. of no change ai -> aj if and only if ai changes and ai -> aj given that ai changes, so Mij = Pr(ai -> aj) = Pr(ai -> aj | ai changed)Pr(ai changed) = (fij/fi)mi = fij/(100fpi) The 1 PAM transition matrix consists of the Mii’s and gives the probabilities of mutations from ai to aj

25
What About 2 PAM? How about the probability that ai -> aj in two evolutionary steps? It’s the prob. that ai -> ak (for any k) in step 1, and ak -> aj in step 2. This is SkMikMkj = Mij2

26
**k PAM Transition Matrix**

In general, the probability that ai -> aj in k evolutionary steps is Mijk As k -> ¥, the rows of Mk tend to be identical with the ith entry of each row equal to pi A result of our Markovian assumption of mutation

27
**Building a Scoring Matrix**

When aligning different AAs in two sequences, we want to differentiate mutations and random events We are thus interested in the ratio of transition probability to prob. of randomly seeing new AA Ratio > 1 if and only if mutation more likely than random event

28
**Building a Scoring Matrix (cont’d)**

When aligning multiple AAs, ratio of probs for multiple alignment = product of ratios: Taking logs will let us use sums rather than products

29
**Building a Scoring Matrix (cont’d)**

Final step: computation faster with integers than with reals, so scale up (to increase precision) and round: sij = C log2(Mij/pj) C is a scaling constant For k PAM, use Mijk

31
**PAM Scoring Matrix Miscellany**

Pairs of AAs with similar properties (e.g. hydrophobicity) have high pairwise scores, since similar AAs are more likely to be accepted mutations. In general, low PAM numbers find short, strong local similarities and high PAM numbers find long, weak ones. Often multiple searches will be run, using e.g. 40 PAM, 120 PAM, 250 PAM.

32
**BLOSUM Scoring Matrices**

Based on multiple alignments, not pairwise. Direct derivation of scores for more distantly related proteins. Only possible because of new data: multiple alignments of known related proteins.

33
BLOCKS database entry

34
**BLOSUM Scoring Matrices (cont’d)**

Started with ungapped alignments from BLOCKS database Sequences clustered at L% sequence identity This time fij = # of ai <-> aj changes between pairs of sequences from different clusters, normalizing by dividing by (n1n2) = product of sizes of clusters 1 and 2 fi = Sj fij and f = Si fi (different from PAM i=j) Then the scoring matrix entry is

35
BLOSUM 50 Scoring Matrix

36
**Substitution matrices: summary**

Nucleic acid matrices are model derived Amino acid matrices are derived from observed data PAM: closely related sequences BLOSUM: BLOCKS domain database ratio of odds: pr. of real / pr. of random match log-odds: additive scoring system

Similar presentations

OK

PAM250. M. Dayhoff Scoring Matrices Point Accepted Mutations or PAM matrices Proteins with 85% identity were used -> the function is not significantly.

PAM250. M. Dayhoff Scoring Matrices Point Accepted Mutations or PAM matrices Proteins with 85% identity were used -> the function is not significantly.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To ensure the functioning of the site, we use **cookies**. We share information about your activities on the site with our partners and Google partners: social networks and companies engaged in advertising and web analytics. For more information, see the Privacy Policy and Google Privacy & Terms.
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.

Ads by Google

Ppt on hr practices in banking sector Ppt on economic growth and development Ppt on layer 3 switching wiki Educational backgrounds for ppt on social media Ppt on financial services in india Ppt on file system in unix Mba ppt on job satisfaction Ppt on plants for grade 2 Ppt on review of literature definition Ppt on psu in india