Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Measurements of Coexistence between 802.11n 40MHz and Bluetooth SCO.

Published byAnais Penix Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Measurements of Coexistence between 802.11n 40MHz and Bluetooth SCO."— Presentation transcript:

1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Measurements of Coexistence between 802.11n 40MHz and Bluetooth SCO Date: 2008-09-10 Authors:

2 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 2 Abstract Over-the-air measurements of Bluetooth SCO voice performance in the presence of 802.11n 40 MHz link. Results show no difference in impact to quality of nearby Bluetooth SCO voice link due to neighboring 802.11n 40MHz link as that of 802.11n 20 MHz link

3 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 3 Setup: Test Case I Wired controlled network on Gigabit switch IxChariot 6.5 traffic is managed on controlled network WiFi link is 2.4GHz/40MHz capable SCO session is created over BT link with ability to control AFH on/off. Windows XP SP2 with Chariot endpoint is used for all stations Clean RF (2.40-2.48GHz) environment verified with spectrum analyzer

4 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 4 Setup: Test Case II Wired controlled network on Gigabit switch IxChariot 6.5 traffic is managed on controlled network WiFi link is 2.4GHz/40MHz capable SCO session is created over BT1 link with ability to control AFH on/off. BT2 link used as an additional source of interference. Windows XP SP2 with Chariot endpoint is used for all stations Clean RF (2.40-2.48GHz) environment verified with spectrum analyzer

5 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 5 Deployment Layout Test setup is contained entirely in screen room. Lab room is a basic room –15 ft x 15 ft

6 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 6 Test Procedure : Case I Controlled network: –All nodes are on the same network –Chariot management traffic is on the controlled network Bluetooth baseline procedure: –All WiFi nodes are powered down –Bi-directional SCO link using HV3 Voice traffic over SCO BT link from master to slave (~72sec standard reference wav file transmission) No silence cancellation, so there is still traffic from slave to master –MOS score calculated based on comparison of reference file sent and received file using Opticom’s OPERA v3.5 voice quality analyzer (PESQ Algorithm). –MOS score averaged over 5 iterations. Bluetooth with 802.11 traffic procedure: –Bluetooth procedures are the same as baseline –Add WiFi traffic for 90 Seconds –802.11n (max and 22mbps) traffic: 4 pairs – two per direction (Tx, Rx), high performance throughput.scr script –802.11n (1 mbps) traffic: 1 pairs – one per direction (Tx, Rx), throughput.scr script

7 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 7 Test Procedure : Case II Controlled network: –All nodes are on the same network –Chariot management traffic is on the controlled network Bluetooth baseline procedure: –All WiFi nodes are powered down –Bi-directional SCO link using HV3 Voice traffic over SCO BT link from master to slave (~72sec standard reference wav file transmission) No silence cancellation, so there is still traffic from slave to master –Bidirectional voice traffic on second BT link (1 pair Tx/Rx Chariot voice) as a source of interference. –MOS score calculated based on comparison of reference file sent and received file using Opticom’s OPERA v3.5 voice quality analyzer. –MOS score averaged over 5 iterations. Bluetooth with 802.11 traffic procedure: –Bluetooth procedures are the same as baseline –Add WiFi traffic for 90 Seconds –802.11n (max and 22mbps) traffic: 4 pairs – two per direction (Tx, Rx), high performance throughput.scr script –802.11n (1 mbps) traffic: 1 pairs – one per direction (Tx, Rx), throughput.scr script

8 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 8 Test Methodology Measurements made in accordance with test scenarios outlined in 08/971r0 Bluetooth devices comprised of two development platforms from leading BT vendor Bluetooth devices forming Bluetooth link separated by 1 m to model typical distance between headset and cell phone Bluetooth link separated from the 802.11 link by 0.5 m to model scenario where WLAN connectivity is being using simultaneously with Bluetooth voice call Test measurements conducted for 802.11n 40 MHz and 802.11n 20 MHz Test conducted with a range of 802.11 throughput –Max throughput for each 802.11 system –Comparable throughputs for each system to compare impact based on the same offered load –Minimum 802.11 throughput tested is 1 Mbps to model typical internet access

9 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 9 Measurement Baseline BT Mean Opinion Score (MOS) - No 802.11 present 802.11n Throughput – no BT present Test Scenario 14.040 MHz: 155 Mbps 20 MHz: 71 Mbps Test Scenario 24.0

10 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 10 Test Scenario 1 – AFH off 802.11 traffic type: TCP BT link same as baseline 11n 20 MHz: 44 Mbps 11n 40 MHz: 115 Mbps

11 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 11 Test Scenario 1 – AFH on 802.11 traffic type: TCP BT link same as baseline 11n 20 MHz: 55 Mbps 11n 40 MHz: 136 Mbps

12 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 12 Test Scenario 2 802.11 traffic type: TCP BT links same as baseline AFH offAFH on 11n 20 MHz Max TPT 11n 40 MHz Max TPT 11n 20 MHz Max TPT 11n 40 MHz Max TPT BT MOS2.62.43.93.7 802.11n TPT 42 Mbps90 Mbps52 Mbps105 Mbps BT MOS are identical to Test Scenario 1 802.11n throughput results degraded compared to Test Scenario 2

13 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 13 Analysis of Results All BT MOS measurements with AFH-on in the presence of 802.11n 40MHz are comparable to that of the BT baseline for both Test Case 1 and 2 BT MOS score improves with decreasing 802.11n offered load with AFH-off in Test Case 1 No measurable impact due to offered load with AFH-on in Test Case 1 No measurable difference between 802.11n 40 MHz and 802.11n 20 MHz with regards to BT performance No change in BT MOS score between Test Case 1 and 2 802.11n 20 MHz and 40 MHz max throughput is degraded by BT even with AFH on

14 doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 14 Conclusions Over-the-air measurements conducted to determine coexistence between 802.11n 40 MHz and Bluetooth SCO voice link Measurements demonstrate that neighboring 802.11n 40 MHz link has no difference in impact to quality of nearby Bluetooth SCO voice link as that of 802.11n 20 MHz link All BT SCO MOS measurements with AFH-on in the presence of 802.11n 40MHz are comparable to that of the BT SCO baseline

Download ppt "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1132r0 Submission September 2008 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Measurements of Coexistence between 802.11n 40MHz and Bluetooth SCO."

Similar presentations

Interference of Bluetooth and IEEE 802.11, MSWIM01 July 21, 01 1 Interference of Bluetooth and IEEE 802.11: Simulation Modeling and Performance Evaluation.

Interference of Bluetooth and IEEE , MSWIM01 July 21, 01 1 Interference of Bluetooth and IEEE : Simulation Modeling and Performance Evaluation.
Bluetooth / IEEE 802.11 Coexistence Reliability of IEEE 802.11 WLANs in Presence of Bluetooth Radios Jim Zyren

Bluetooth / IEEE Coexistence Reliability of IEEE WLANs in Presence of Bluetooth Radios Jim Zyren
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/309r0 Submission 2/8/2014 Michael Livshitz, MetalinkSlide 1 Issues With Off-channel TDLS Date: 2008-03-05 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /309r0 Submission 2/8/2014 Michael Livshitz, MetalinkSlide 1 Issues With Off-channel TDLS Date: Authors:
Doc.:802.19/0016r0 Submission Apr 2009 Richard Paine, SelfSlide 1 TV Whitespace Coexistence Use Cases Date: 2009-04-20 Authors:

Doc.:802.19/0016r0 Submission Apr 2009 Richard Paine, SelfSlide 1 TV Whitespace Coexistence Use Cases Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.15-10-0489-00-wng0 Submission September, 2010 Shoichi Kitazawa, ATRSlide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.

Doc.: IEEE wng0 Submission September, 2010 Shoichi Kitazawa, ATRSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/2456r0 Submission September 2007 Ganesh Venkatesan (Intel Corporation)Slide 1 What is Home CE Environment? Date: 2007-09-16 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /2456r0 Submission September 2007 Ganesh Venkatesan (Intel Corporation)Slide 1 What is Home CE Environment? Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/0818r2 Submission July 2008 Jing Zhu, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Managed Contention Access – A technique to improve Video Streaming.

Doc.: IEEE /0818r2 Submission July 2008 Jing Zhu, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Managed Contention Access – A technique to improve Video Streaming.
Doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/082r0 Submission January 2001 Anuj Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal.

Doc.: IEEE /082r0 Submission January 2001 Anuj Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/082r1 Submission January 2001 Anuj Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 An Intelligent Frequency Hopping Scheme for Improved Bluetooth.

Doc.: IEEE /082r1 Submission January 2001 Anuj Batra et al., Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 An Intelligent Frequency Hopping Scheme for Improved Bluetooth.
Doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/00143r0 Submission 3/01 Nada Golmie, NISTSlide 1 IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Interference Aware.

Doc.: IEEE /00143r0 Submission 3/01 Nada Golmie, NISTSlide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Interference Aware.
Doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/081r0 Submission January 2001 Shoemake, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.

Doc.: IEEE /081r0 Submission January 2001 Shoemake, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE 802.15-01/265r0 Submission June 2001 Robert F. Heile, Consultant Steve Shellhammer, Symbol Technologies Slide 1 IEEE P802.15 Working Group for.

Doc.: IEEE /265r0 Submission June 2001 Robert F. Heile, Consultant Steve Shellhammer, Symbol Technologies Slide 1 IEEE P Working Group for.
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE COEX 02/019r0 Submission May 2002 Art Astrin, Apple Computer Inc. Impact of Bluetooth on 802.11b and vice-versa.

Slide 1 doc.: IEEE COEX 02/019r0 Submission May 2002 Art Astrin, Apple Computer Inc. Impact of Bluetooth on b and vice-versa.
Doc.: IEEE 802.15- Submission January 2001 Shoemake and Lowry, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 IEEE 802.11B COEXISTENCE TESTING DATA Matthew B. Shoemake, Ph.D.

Doc.: IEEE Submission January 2001 Shoemake and Lowry, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 IEEE B COEXISTENCE TESTING DATA Matthew B. Shoemake, Ph.D.
1 Wireless LAN --which standard to follow? Avirup Dasgupta IT Department, Jadavpur University. Guide: Utpal K. Ray 29 th June,2004 www.geocities.com/asoke_dasgupta/termpaper2.doc.

1 Wireless LAN --which standard to follow? Avirup Dasgupta IT Department, Jadavpur University. Guide: Utpal K. Ray 29 th June,2004
IEEE 802.15.2 DRAFT RECOMMENDED PRACTICE Clause 14: Collaborative Coexistence Mechanism – IEEE 802.11 and 802.15.1 Steve Shellhammer (Symbol Technologies)

IEEE DRAFT RECOMMENDED PRACTICE Clause 14: Collaborative Coexistence Mechanism – IEEE and Steve Shellhammer (Symbol Technologies)
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-13/0880-01 Submission July 2013 Wei Hong, Renesas Mobile Corporation Considering In-Device Coexistence interference from WiFi point of.

Doc.: IEEE / Submission July 2013 Wei Hong, Renesas Mobile Corporation Considering In-Device Coexistence interference from WiFi point of.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0045r1 Submission Jan 2014 E-Education Analysis HEW SG Date: 2014-01 Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /0045r1 Submission Jan 2014 E-Education Analysis HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Technical discussion on Re-channelization Proposal for DSRC band coexistence Date: 2014-07-11.

Technical discussion on Re-channelization Proposal for DSRC band coexistence Date:
Doc.:IEEE 802.11-02/223r1 Submission March 2002 J. del Prado and S. Choi, Philips Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited Javier del Prado and.

Doc.:IEEE /223r1 Submission March 2002 J. del Prado and S. Choi, Philips Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited Javier del Prado and.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google