Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Doc.: IEEE 802.19-13/0060r0 Submission May 2013 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Initial review of comments related to new no votes Notice: This document has.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Doc.: IEEE 802.19-13/0060r0 Submission May 2013 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Initial review of comments related to new no votes Notice: This document has."— Presentation transcript:

1 doc.: IEEE /0060r0 Submission May 2013 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Initial review of comments related to new no votes Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Date: Authors:

2 doc.: IEEE /0060r0 Submission May 2013 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 2 Abstract This presentation contains draft results of validity analysis of comments received together with a new no vote –A vote is considered a new no vote if the voter has voted yes or abstain in the WG LB on DF3.02 and no in the WG re-circulation LB on DF3.03 –The analysis was done to check whether the new no votes were associated with at least one comment that relates to changes from the DF3.02 to the DF3.03

3 doc.: IEEE /0060r0 Submission New no votes Six new no votes were issued in the re-circulation ballot –William Carney (Abstain to No) –Hyunduk Kang (Yes to No) –Mika Kasslin (Yes to No) –Naotako Sato (Abstain to No) –Ryo Sawai (Abstain to No) –Chen Suo (Abstain to No) May 2013 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 3

4 doc.: IEEE /0060r0 Submission Comment validity review William Carney’s comments (CIDs 21, 52) relate to the parts of the draft that have changed from the DF3.02 to the DF3.03 => Valid new no vote Hyunduk Kang’s comments (e.g. CIDs 1, 2, 7) relate to the parts of the draft that have changed from the DF3.02 to the DF3.03 => Valid new no vote Mika Kasslin’s comments (e.g. CIDs 14, 16, 23) relate to the parts of the draft that have changed from the DF3.02 to the DF3.03 => Valid new no vote Naotako Sato’s comments (CIDs 11, 19, 24, 51) relate to the parts of the draft that have changed from the DF3.02 to the DF3.03 => Valid new no vote Ryo Sawai’s comments (CIDs 12, 46) relate to the parts of the draft that have changed from the DF3.02 to the DF3.03 => Valid new no vote Chen Suo’s comments (CIDs 20, 27, 30, 33) relate to the parts of the draft that have changed from the DF3.02 to the DF3.03 => Valid new no vote May 2013 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 4

5 doc.: IEEE /0060r0 Submission Summary All six new no votes appear to be valid as they are associated to at least one comment that relate to part of the draft that has changed from the DF3.02 to the DF3.03 May 2013 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 5


Download ppt "Doc.: IEEE 802.19-13/0060r0 Submission May 2013 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Initial review of comments related to new no votes Notice: This document has."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google