We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAiden Wagoner
Modified over 2 years ago
Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance Maxine Schache
Background Story Implications
Results Representative sample 64 Drip systems (49 flow rate variations) 59 Low level sprinklers
6.7% PV 7.4% DV
Results 70.4% PV 11.4% DV
Results 9.1% PV 2.4% DV
Results Drip 9/64 pressure 5/49 discharge Sprinkler 38/59 pressure 23/59 discharge 12/59 DU
Results GradeDripsLow level sprinklers A B C D FAIL
WHY SO BAD? PC
CID & Industry confidence & training
Caution!!! Unless n is extremely large, the large sample procedure performs poorly when p is near 0 or near 1. For instance ; p= and n=100 so that.
Older Workers: Employment Expectations CAUCE Conference 2012 Atlanta Sloane-Seale & Bill Kops University of Manitoba.
Evaluating performance of irrigated green space: A review of measures Geoff Connellan G&M Connellan Consultants. With information provided by Richard Dilena,
STATISTICS INTERVAL ESTIMATION Professor Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University.
GAELA / FELCA meeting – 4 September Surveys sent to associations on 1 July Associations asked to send to their members Response deadline of 24.
ECMWF Training Course 2008 slide 1 Influence matrix diagnostic to monitor the assimilation system Carla Cardinali.
A review of Centre Pivot and Lateral Move installations in the Australian Cotton Industry P Smith, J Foley, S Priest, S Bray, J Montgomery, D Wigginton,
Converting Data to Information. Know your data Know your audience Tell a story.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
The Kennewick Story The story of one district What are some similarities between your district and Kennewick? Where are you in this process? Where do you.
1 Assessing Evidence Reliability In Performance Audits NSAA April 14, 2008.
#____ _________________ u = dv= du= v= so = _____ __ - _____ __ Integration By Parts: u dv = u v - v du #____ _________________ u = dv= du=
1 Ethanol… The New Hazard In Town Part II: Foam Delivery Bill Ballantyne.
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR Unclassified 1 SAMPLE Program Title Name SSET Chair Name PCAG Chair Name Contracting Officer Name Price Analyst.
Essentials of Fire Fighting, 5 th Edition Chapter 16 Fire Detection, Alarm, and Suppression Systems Firefighter II.
1 Unit F: Soil Fertility and Moisture Management Lesson 3: Using Irrigation.
×1= 9 4 1×1= 1 5 8×1= 8 6 7×1= 7 7 8×3= 24.
Example 9.4 Estimating the Response to a New Sandwich Confidence Interval for a Proportion.
Methodological Issues in Physician-Level Measurement of Clinical Quality Elizabeth A. McGlynn, Ph.D. June 26, 2006.
1 GOVERNANCE AND VALUE: EVIDENCE FROM EMERGING MARKETS.
Why? Scope Of Operation Product Range LED Lighting Solutions How We Work Longer Term Energy Management Support Partner Of Choice Our offer to businesses.
IT benchmarking in the UK Anna Mathews Universities and Colleges Information Systems Association (UCISA) twitter.com/anna_mathews.
1 Chapter 12 Managing Production Operations. 2 Advanced Organizer Decision Making Planning Organizing Leading Controlling Management Functions Research.
Russian industrial firms: Absorptive Capacity and State Innovation Policy VI Knowledge Economy Forum: Technology Acquisition and Knowledge Networks VI.
Environment Environnement Canada Rob Kent National Water Quality Monitoring Office National Water Research Institute Environment Canada Rob Kent National.
STATISTICS HYPOTHESES TEST (I) Professor Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University.
Hack in the Box Conference April , 2005, Bahrain 1 Toward Architectural Challenges of Secured Mobile Devices Manzur Ashraf BRAC University, Bangladesh.
Chapter 13 Comparing Two Population Parameters AP Statistics Hamilton and Mann.
Leaders Impacting the GGap Dr. Jonathan A. Plucker CAGT Leadership Breakfast October 11,
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.