Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byMalia Weeden Modified over 2 years ago

1
Christopher Dougherty EC220 - Introduction to econometrics (chapter 4) Slideshow: the disturbance term in logarithmic models Original citation: Dougherty, C. (2012) EC220 - Introduction to econometrics (chapter 4). [Teaching Resource] © 2012 The Author This version available at: Available in LSE Learning Resources Online: May 2012 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License. This license allows the user to remix, tweak, and build upon the work even for commercial purposes, as long as the user credits the author and licenses their new creations under the identical terms.

2
1 THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS Thus far, nothing has been said about the disturbance term in nonlinear regression models.

3
2 For the regression results in a linearized model to have the desired properties, the disturbance term in the transformed model should be additive and it should satisfy the regression model conditions. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

4
3 To be able to perform the usual tests, it should be normally distributed in the transformed model. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

5
4 In the case of the first example of a nonlinear model, there was no problem. If the disturbance term had the required properties in the original model, it would have them in the regression model. It has not been affected by the transformation. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

6
5 In the discussion of the logarithmic model, the disturbance term was omitted altogether. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

7
6 However, implicitly it was being assumed that there was an additive disturbance term in the transformed model. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

8
7 For this to be possible, the random component in the original model must be a multiplicative term, e u. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

9
8 We will denote this multiplicative term v. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

10
9 When u is equal to 0, not modifying the value of log Y, v is equal to 1, likewise not modifying the value of Y. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

11
10 Positive values of u correspond to values of v greater than 1, the random factor having a positive effect on Y and log Y. Likewise negative values of u correspond to values of v between 0 and 1, the random factor having a negative effect on Y and log Y. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

12
v f(v)f(v) 11 Besides satisfying the regression model conditions, we need u to be normally distributed if we are to perform t tests and F tests. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

13
v f(v)f(v) 12 This will be the case if v has a lognormal distribution, shown above. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

14
13 The mode of the distribution is located at v = 1, where u = 0. v f(v)f(v) THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

15
14 The same multiplicative disturbance term is needed in the semilogarithmic model. v f(v)f(v) THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

16
15 Note that, with this distribution, one should expect a small proportion of observations to be subject to large positive random effects. v f(v)f(v) THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

17
16 Here is the scatter diagram for earnings and schooling using Data Set 21. You can see that there are several outliers, with the four most extreme highlighted. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

18
17 Here is the scatter diagram for the semilogarithmic model, with its regression line. The same four observations remain outliers, but they do not appear to be so extreme. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

19
18 The histogram above compares the distributions of the residuals from the linear and semi- logarithmic regressions. The distributions have been standardized, that is, scaled so that they have standard deviation equal to 1, to make them comparable. 0–1–2– THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

20
19 0–1–2– It can be shown that if the disturbance term in a regression model has a normal distribution, so will the residuals. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

21
20 0–1–2– It is obvious that the residuals from the semilogarithmic regression are approximately normal, but those from the linear regression are not. This is evidence that the semi- logarithmic model is the better specification. THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

22
21 What would happen if the disturbance term in the logarithmic or semilogarithmic model were additive, rather than multiplicative? THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

23
22 If this were the case, we would not be able to linearize the model by taking logarithms. There is no way of simplifying log( 1 X + u). We should have to use some nonlinear regression technique. 2 THE DISTURBANCE TERM IN LOGARITHMIC MODELS

24
Copyright Christopher Dougherty These slideshows may be downloaded by anyone, anywhere for personal use. Subject to respect for copyright and, where appropriate, attribution, they may be used as a resource for teaching an econometrics course. There is no need to refer to the author. The content of this slideshow comes from Section 4.2 of C. Dougherty, Introduction to Econometrics, fourth edition 2011, Oxford University Press. Additional (free) resources for both students and instructors may be downloaded from the OUP Online Resource Centre Individuals studying econometrics on their own and who feel that they might benefit from participation in a formal course should consider the London School of Economics summer school course EC212 Introduction to Econometrics or the University of London International Programmes distance learning course 20 Elements of Econometrics

Similar presentations

© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google