Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1
**Chapter 1: Introduction**

MGS3100 General Modeling Chapter 1: Introduction

2
**THE MODELING PROCESS Managerial Approach to Decision Making**

Manager analyzes situation (alternatives) These steps Use Spreadsheet Modeling Makes decision to resolve conflict Decisions are implemented Consequences of decision

3
**A Detailed View of the Modeling Process**

Diagnose the problem Select relevant aspects of reality Organize the facts; identify the assumptions, objectives, and decisions to be made Select the methodology Construct the model Solve the model (generate alternatives) Interpret results (in “lay” terms!) Validate the model (does it work correctly?) Do sensitivity analysis (does the solution change?) Implement the solution Monitor results

4
**THE MODELING PROCESS Model Results Management Situation Decisions**

Analysis Symbolic World Abstraction Interpretation Real World Management Situation Decisions Intuition

5
**The Modeling Process Managerial Judgment Model Results Management**

Analysis Model Results Symbolic World Managerial Judgment Abstraction Interpretation Real World Management Situation Decisions Intuition

6
**Reasons for Using Models**

Models force you to: Be explicit about your objectives Think carefully about variables to include and their definitions in terms that are quantifiable Identify and record the decisions that influence those objectives Identify and record interactions and trade-offs among those decisions

7
Reasons (cont.) Consider what data are pertinent for quantification of those variables and determining their interactions Recognize constraints (limitations) on the values that those quantified variables may assume Allow communication of your ideas and understanding to facilitate teamwork

8
Types of Models

9
**Building Models The “Black Box” View of a Model Model Endogenous**

Performance Measure(s) Decisions (Controllable) Parameters (Uncontrollable) Exogenous Variables Model Consequence Endogenous

10
**MODELING VARIABLES Management Lingo Modeling Term Formal Definition**

Example Decision Variable Lever Controllable Exogenous Investment Input Quantity Amount Parameter Gauge Uncontrollable Exogenous Interest Rate Input Quantity Consequence Outcome Endogenous Output Commissions Variable Variable Paid Performance Yardstick Endogenous Variable Return on Measure Used for Evaluation Investment (Objective Function Value)

11
**Examples of Decision Model Assumptions - Profit Models**

If it is beyond your control, do not consider it! Overhead costs - a convenient fiction - we ignore Sunk costs - we ignore Depreciation - only include if we can use to shield future taxes Costs are linear in the short term

12
**Building Models Symbolic Model Construction**

Mathematical relationships are developed from data. Graphing the variables may help define the relationship. Var. X Var. Y Cost A Cost B A + B

13
**Modeling with Data Consider the following data.**

Graphs are created to view any relationship(s) between the variables. This is the first step in formulating the equations in the model.

14
**Creating the Symbolic Model**

15
**DETERMINISTIC AND PROBABILISTIC MODELS Deterministic Models**

are models in which all relevant data are assumed to be known with certainty. can handle complex situations with many decisions and constraints. are very useful when there are few uncontrolled model inputs that are uncertain. are useful for a variety of management problems. allow for managerial interpretation of results. will help develop your ability to formulate models in general.

16
**DETERMINISTIC AND PROBABILISTIC MODELS**

Probabilistic (Stochastic) Models are models in which some inputs to the model are not known with certainty. uncertainty is incorporated via probabilities on these “random” variables. very useful when there are only a few uncertain model inputs and few or no constraints. often used for strategic decision making involving an organization’s relationship to its environment.

17
**ITERATIVE MODEL BUILDING**

Deductive Modeling focuses on the variables themselves before data are collected. variables are interrelated based on assumptions about algebraic relationships and values of the parameters. places importance on modeler’s prior knowledge and judgments of both mathematical relationships and data values. tends to be “data poor” initially. Inferential Modeling focuses on the variables as reflected in existing data collections. variables are interrelated based on an analysis of data to determine relationships and to estimate values of parameters. available data need to be accurate and readily available. tends to be “data rich” initially.

18
**ITERATIVE MODEL BUILDING**

DEDUCTIVE MODELING (‘What If?’ Projections, Decision Modeling Optimization) (‘What If?’ Projections, Decision Analysis, Decision Trees, Queuing) Decision Modeling Models Models Model Building Process PROBABILISTIC MODELS DETERMINISTIC MODELS Models Models Analysis, Statistical Analysis, (Forecasting, Simulation Data Analysis Parameter Estimation) Data Analysis (Data Base Query, Parameter Evaluation INFERENTIAL MODELING

19
**Philosophy of Modeling**

Realism A model is valuable if you make better decisions when you use it than when you don’t. Intuition A manager’s intuition arbitrates the content of the abstraction, resulting model, analysis, and the relevance and interpretation of the results.

20
**Chapter 11: Implementation**

MGS3100 General Modeling Chapter 11: Implementation

21
INTRODUCTION Just as knowledge of Excel is insufficient without modeling concepts, your knowledge of spreadsheet modeling alone is insufficient for truly affecting decision making in organizations. Creating a model itself, although an important first step, is far from sufficient in the process of systematically improving decision making in the real world of business enterprise. Inadequate modeling is just one of the reasons why decision-makers do not make good decisions.

22
The purpose of this chapter is to help you understand why improving the quality of modeling alone will not necessarily lead to improved real-world decisions. This chapter will cover critical oversights that users new to the concepts of modeling make in attempting to move forward to apply those ideas in actual decision-making situations. The upside and downside potential risks of applying modeling concepts will be discussed so that you will come away with a balanced perspective of the pros and cons of applying modeling in business practical situations.

23
**WHAT, AFTER ALL, IS A MODEL?**

It is difficult to define a model. One definition might be: A model is an abstraction of a business situation suitable for spreadsheet analysis to support decision making and provide managerial insights. To many managers, a model is exquisitely crafted and professionally polished in appearance, highly intuitive, self-documenting, easy to use, completely validated and generalizable enough to be applied in a variety of settings by many people. Consider the following evolution of a model:

24
**An Institutionalized Model Sustained by the Organization **

Integrated into Organization's Decision Processes Coordinated in Function with Other Models and Systems Useable by Other Managers Maintainable and Extensible by Others Need Data Supplied and Maintained by Others A Prototype Model Complete Debugged Runable by Its Author Validated with Test Data Believed to Deliver Value Effort: 1X Effort: 10X-100X A Modeling Application Usable by a Client Manager Well Documented Hardened to Reject Unusual Data Inputs Extendable by Author or Client Manager Validated with Real-World Data Known to Deliver Value An Institutionalized Modeling Application Effort: 10X Effort: 100X – 1000X

25
**The Separation of Players Curse**

This framework is a variation of one originally proposed by C. West Churchman, et. al. Modeler, Project Manager, Decision Maker, Client Curse of Player Separation Modeler Project Manager Maker

26
**The Curse of Scope Creep**

Narrow Modeling Project Single Model Single Objective Focused Activity Few Players Few Stakeholders Low Effort Low Cost Low Development Risk Informal Coordination & Project Management Low Project Visibility Scale Diseconomies in Information Systems for Model Scale Diseconomies in Model & Database Maintenance Deterioration in Model Use as Early Adopters Move on Low Potential Organization-wide Impact Wide Modeling Project Multiple (Replicated) Models Multiple Objectives Diffused Activity Many Players Many Stakeholders High Effort High Cost High Development Risk Formal Coordination & Project Management High Project Visibility Scale economies in Information Systems for Model Scale Economies in model & Database Maintenance Support for Model Use Independent of Early Adopters High Potential Organizational-wide Impact Curse of Scope Creep

27
**Other Frequent Sources of Implementation Failure**

Easily addressed issues in modeling failure are model logic, model inadequacy, etc. However, inadequate attention to political issues that arise from the use of a model is far more prevalent as a source of failure in modeling. When a model fails, it is all too common to blame the model when in fact, it was due to inadequacies of the whole process of developing and implementing the model.

28
Another problem is the potential loss of continuity either during the development of a model itself or later during implementation caused by departure of key players, or the loss of organizational memory of a successful model. A source of difficulty in modeling is the attempt to develop a modeling application before assessing issues of the data availability necessary to support that application. An important consideration early in the model development phase is the matching of available data to a possibly less-adequate model as a way of avoiding implementation problems later.

29
An infrastructure must be created that guarantees that the data and systems will be maintained in a way that serves the users of the model. A more subtle and insidious shortcoming of modeling concerns the identification of shortcomings at one level of an organization as being caused by failures or inadequacies at a higher, often more abstract, level of the organization. In this case, the best thing to do is to tune the model to work well given other organizational inadequacies that might be addressed more effectively at a later time.

Similar presentations

OK

ADM1300~W2 Chapter 1.I.B.M.~.T.S.M. JFA Thanks to the much appreciate collaboration of Prof. Matt Archibald and Prof. David Delcorde F’2011.

ADM1300~W2 Chapter 1.I.B.M.~.T.S.M. JFA Thanks to the much appreciate collaboration of Prof. Matt Archibald and Prof. David Delcorde F’2011.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google