We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMaddison Haymes
Modified over 2 years ago
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC QA – The Key to Taking Responsibility Being Responsible for your action (or inaction) knowing who will be affected by your action knowing the affects caring about them accepting praise or blame being accountable Can a responsible action be unethical ? Can a non-human be responsible ? a UC committee, a government The Stakeholder vs the Shareholder view
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC 1. The Gardener holding the garden stake that can really do you damage - the client 2. The Gambler at the table, chips on the felt, knows the game - investors, unions 3. The Victim impacted, but not an actor - customer, employees & their families 4. Gaia ecological, societal, governmental and economic systems Responsibility: recognising stakeholders
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC To have responsibility for an action (or not taking an action) in some situation, a person needs to have an element of: 1. Voluntariness - responsibility is diminished for an action that is a completely involuntary 2. autonomy - the person needs to have some capacity to choose between alternative actions 3. foresight - responsibility is reduced if its effect simply could not be foreseen and there needs to be a 4. causal influence between the action and the effect. (Bittner & Hornecker). Limits on Responsibility
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC Complex organisations & large systems diffuse and disguise responsibility: difficult for one person to take responsibility as effects emerge from a mix of actions and interactions that can't be attributed to a single person. Technology and the division of labour in systems developments means that responsibility for certain components may be clear, but liability for the whole is less clear. Impediments to Responsibility
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC Ethics and a Basis for QA in Projects Being responsible for the impact the system has on all stakeholders
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC The Product – Process Model Developmen t task product Documents: (Case Level) spec staff knowledge - attitudes policy / procedures / standards history (precedents) Tools & Techniques Task Resources: Task Management: time, scope, cost, plan review monitor organization / power structures responsibility / authority Task Context: Quality Who’s it for? What do they do with it? Who is Impacted ? 1 23
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC PMSS – Project Management Support System
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC PMSS – Configuration Management
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC PMSS – QA part of Document Template 6. Quality Assurance T his section specified the quality assurance for this document 6.1 Process of Document Development This document was constructed from a review of text books & meetings with the client comparing with other systems users manual content 6.2 Traceability Other documents that are related to this is the users manual. As they are both manuals, they both share the same target. To guide the user with using your system. 6.3 Verification This document was tested against other owners manual. All the stakeholders Even though the contents are different for each system, they both share the same meaning. 6.4 References Schwalbe K (2004) Information Technology Project Management Thomson Learning 6.5 Document History 1. OWNER’S MANUAL INTRODUCTION3 2. Measuring Systems Performance4 3. Cost - Benefit Measurement6 4. Risk Management7 5. Audit, Legal and other Compliance Issues8 6. Quality Assurance9
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC PMSS - Meetings Supporting
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC PMSS - Issues Management
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC PMSS – Configuration Management Stakeholders: Project team Re-developers business owner user system manager line manager
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC Project Evaluation Product System Owner: Various Operational users: Line Manager: External Stakeholder Next Developer: Systems Management Auditor: Process Evidence of : Project Planning, Modification & Review Team Management Information & configuration management Quality Process Risk prevention, detection, correction Reflection Individual, Peer Review client reviews Tutor’s Review Innovation, creativity
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC The Principles & Practice of Building QA into the Teaching & Assessment of Student Computer Systems Development Projects
© Craig McDonald 2005 UC Ethics and Systems Quality Craig McDonald School of Information Sciences and Engineering University of Canberra
Craig McDonald © 2007 Quality, by design. Craig McDonald © 2007 Quality is not a thing-in-itself it is a judgement of the attributes of something Quality.
Presented to President’s Cabinet. INTERNAL CONTROLS are the integration of the activities, plans, attitudes, policies and efforts of the people of an.
Internal Controls For Municipalities Vermont State Auditor’s Office – August 2008.
Corporate Social Responsibility- do we need a Statutory Instrument? Presented to the Zambia Alternative Mining Indaba conference- July 17, 2013 Sombo Chunda,
Project Quality Plans Gillian Sandilands Director of Quality
Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
What is Corporate Governance?
F8: Audit and Assurance. 2 Audit and Assurance Designed to give you knowledge and application of: Section A: Audit Framework and Regulation Section B:
Major Accident Prevention Policy (MAPP) and Safety Management System (SMS) in the Context of the Seveso II Directive.
The Business Environment
SOUTH AFRICAN BUREAU OF STANDARDS THE NEED FOR AN HIV/AIDS SYSTEM MANAGEMENT STANDARD ?? PRESENTED BY: DR ZEN FOURIE.
1 “Good Practices in Managing for Results” Workshop Santiago, Chile October 27 th and 28 th, 2010 Benjamin Nelson Managing Director for Quality Office.
1 CREATING A LEARNING ORGANIZATION AND AN ETHICAL ORGANIZATION STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT BUAD 4980.
Audit objectives, Planning The Audit
00 CHAPTER 1 Governance, Ethics, and Managerial Decision Making © 2009 Cengage Learning.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Management System Overview.
Welcome ISO9001:2000 Foundation Workshop.
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Creating Lasting Change for Your Business ISO 9001:2000 Management System Overview.
IS Audit Function Knowledge
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
The Audit as a Management Tool Vermont State Auditor’s Office – April 2009.
Example Incident Mgmt Initiation No recording of Incidents Users can approach different departments Solutions of previous incidents are not available.
SUNY Maritime Internal Control Program. New York State Internal Control Act of 1987 Establish and maintain guidelines for a system of internal controls.
[Organisation’s Title] Environmental Management System
Ch3. CP AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Course on Cleaner Production Middle East Technical University Department of Environmental Engineering Ankara.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Discussion on SA-500 – AUDIT EVIDENCE
PMP® Exam Preparation Course
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies 2010 Auditing Internal Control over Financial Reporting Chapter Seven.
PART II – Management Audit: Basic Standards, Values and Norms Shared by Pratap Kumar Pathak.
Environmental Management System Implementation
KS3 Phase4 Client Server Monitoring System October 1, 2008 by Stephen, Seema, Kam, Shpetim.
Governance, Risk and Ethics. 2 Section A: Governance and responsibility Section B: Internal control and review Section C: Identifying and assessing risk.
Lecture #9 Project Quality Management Quality Processes- Quality Assurance and Quality Control Ghazala Amin.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
Purpose of the Standards
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Stakeholders and Ethics Organizational Stakeholders Stakeholders: people who have an interest, claim, or stake in an organization Inside stakeholders.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Evaluation February 16, 2005.
Section 1 Guidelines for Office of Inspector General Quality Control and Assurance Programs Peer Review Training – National Science Foundation August 16,
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies 2010 Internal Control in a Financial Statement Audit Chapter Six.
Chapter 4 - Internal Environment Management Structure 1. Senior or Executive Management High level responsibility, High level decision making 2. Middle.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
Chapter 7 Auditing Internal Control over Financial Reporting McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved.
SAM-101 Standards and Evaluation. SAM-102 On security evaluations Users of secure systems need assurance that products they use are secure Users can:
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Quality Assurance José Viegas Ribeiro IGF, Portugal SIGMA.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.