We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTrent Larabee
Modified over 2 years ago
1 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND Synchronized Calls Concept and Funding Stakeholders’ perspectives Marja Makarow Vice-President Brussels 15 January, 2014
2 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND Public research funding in Finland
3 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND Government research budget 2013 = 2 B€ Total R&D investment 3,6% of GDP, public 1% of GDP Source: Statistics Finland 2013
4 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND Academy of Finland The research councils of Finland – fundamental research Tasks: Funding of scientific and artistic research, researcher training, research infrastructure Enhancement of international scientific cooperation Provision of expertise in science policy Four research councils covering all disciplines Culture and society Natural sciences and engineering Biosciences and environment Health Annually, ~5,000 researchers benefit from Academy funding Admin staff of ~130 and decreasing
5 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND Funding instruments
6 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND International peer review Open competition, fixed-term funding >3,700 applications/year, for > €1.5 billion Success rate for key instruments < 22%; for CoEs 11% Decisions based on Science policy lines adopted by the Academy Board Concretized in “Criteria for research funding decisions” document Transparent decision-making process, equal treatment of applicants Independent peer review (excellence), 1000 international scientists/year
7 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND International evaluation of the Academy of Finland Published September 2013 Selected points, relevant for today’s theme Assessment, in-house High quality peer review and decision-making processes Extremely cost-efficient (admin costs 2.8%) Staff highly competent and trusted amongst scientific community Recommendations Definition of ‘high risk’/groundbreaking` research, motivation for funding it, modalities for how to fund it Clarification of motivation for research programmes, criteria and procedures for selection of the themes (evaluation criteria beyond excellence for added-value of a programme, impact & outcomes) Extension of portfolio to strategic research funding outside responsive mode
8 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND Novel challenge and opportunity: Governance and funding of research on societal Grand Challenges Strategic Research Council to be founded and based at the Academy of Finland Broad brush themes (societal GCs) to be proposed by the Council and ratified by Government – horizon scanning & foresighting Themes to be broken down to long-term research programmes by the Council Consortia from universities and research institutes to self-assemble and apply for funding - cultural change for fundamental researchers (Horizon 2020) Peer review using excellence plus relevance as criteria Research findings to be fed to end-users and political decision-makers – assessment of outcomes and impact Funding 70 M€/ year, 22% increase in Academy of Finland’s budget as of 2015
9 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND Academy of Finland supports the initiative Synchronized Call In order to estimate the value of an independent organisation providing peer review services according to the highest quality Academy of Finland has experience in international joint peer review since 2004 Bi- and tri-lateral joint peer review SE, DFG, NSFChina,CONICYT Chile, NSF, CNPq Brasilia, RAS/RFBR Multi-lateral: Nordforsk (5), Water JPI (10) >30 ERANets, article 185 actions, JPIs Main challenges mostly practical: different dead-lines, admin practices, times-to- decision Work load higher than for national call due to negotiations and discussions to overcome cultural differences
10 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND Academy of Finland supports the initiative Synchronized Call pilot Why such a service provider? To harmonize best practices in Europe – many countries shifting from RPOs/state academies to RFOs (research councils) To facilitate direct cross-border collaboration - mutual trust on common understanding of quality evaluation To relieve HR pressure – public admin staff being reduced while numbers of applications grow Discussion platform for funding criteria: high risk research, programmes, societal relevance, infrastructure, outcomes & impact Other potentially interested “clients” beyond RFOs and RPOs: private foundations Council of Finnish Foundations – 153 members – 210 M€/year for research Strong need for high quality peer review services
11 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND Academy funding 1997–2012 2013: 336 2014: 310 2015: 357
1 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND Academy of Finland 2013: Research knows no boundaries Tiina Jokela PhD, Programme Manager, Programme Unit.
Making Good Use of Research Evaluations Anneli Pauli, Vice President (Research)
1 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND Academy of Finland 2015: Research funding for basic science Tiina Jokela PhD, Senior Science Adviser, Strategic Research.
Physical and Engineering Sciences (PESC) Professor Marja Makarow, Chief Executive Rome, April 2009.
1 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND Academy of Finland 2012: Research knows no boundaries Tiina Kotti PhD, Programme Manager, Programme Unit.
1 © ACADEMY OF FINLAND Academy of Finland 2014: Research knows no boundaries Tiina Jokela PhD, Senior Science Adviser, Strategic Research.
Dr Ritva Dammert Director Brussels May 27, 2009 Evaluation of the Finnish Centres of Excellence Programmes
Final evaluation of the Research Programme on Social Capital and Networks of Trust (SoCa) 2004 – 2007: What should the Academy of Finland learn.
Research Assessment Exercise 2005 (RAE2005) University of Helsinki Arto Mustajoki Based on the material of Vice-Rector Marja Makarow.
NordForsk Gunnel Gustafsson Strategies and tools for Grand Challenges responding Research Brussels February 28th 2012.
Finnish Research Landscape, Science Policy & Horizon 2020
Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Research and Innovation Research and Innovation SME support under HORIZON
Anna Drozd Policy advisor, EUROCITIES Newcastle 21 February 2014 EU transnational programmes related to employment – EaSI, Horizon 2020 and Erasmus+
1 Joint Research Centre (JRC) Annual Meeting of the EGTC Platform The EGTC-ready to use - Beyond cohesion policy Ulla Engelmann Interinstitutional and.
About the European Science Foundation 1. 2 ESF Member Organisations ESF is an independent association of 13 Member Organisations ● research funding organisations.
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
1 7th Framework Programme “Ideas” 2 Basic research has an important impact on economic performance Europe is not making the most of its research.
European Innovation Partnership on Water Durk Krol Director WssTP.
Date: in 12 pts Participation through Marie Sklodovska-Curie Actions: how to raise SME potential through EU researcher mobility Education and Culture Carmela.
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.