Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byPenelope Baskerville Modified over 4 years ago

1
1 Benoit Boulet, Ph.D., Eng. Industrial Automation Lab McGill Centre for Intelligent Machines Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering McGill University, Montreal Necessary conditions for consistency of noise-free, closed-loop frequency- response data with coprime factor models American Control Conference June 29, 2000

2
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 20002 Outline 1- Motivation: model validation for robust control 2- Coprime factor plant models 3- Consistency of closed-loop freq. resp. (FR) data with coprime factor models 4- Example: Daisy LFSS testbed 5- Conclusion

3
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 20003 1- Motivation: model validation for robust control K G Controller Plant + + + + + - reference Uncertainty Output dist./ Meas. noise Meas. output Input Dist. Typical feedback control systemTypical feedback control system

4
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 20004 Design stabilizing LTI K such that CL system is stable “robust stability” where is the space of stable transfer functions, and is a bound on the uncertainty: Robust control objective P K Motivation: model validation for robust control

5
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 20005 robust control P K Condition for robust stability as given by small-gain theorem: Motivation: model validation for robust control

6
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 20006 robust control P K Condition for robust stability provides the motivation to make (the uncertainty) as small as possible through better modeling Motivation: model validation for robust control

7
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 20007 robust control P K Conclusion: Robust stability is easier to achieve if the size of the uncertainty is small. Same conclusion for robust performance ( -synthesis) Motivation: model validation for robust control

8
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 20008 …uncertainty modeling is key to good control From first principles: Identify nominal values of uncertain gains, time delays, time constants, high freq. dynamics, etc. and bounds on their perturbations e.g., + , | |<bFrom first principles: Identify nominal values of uncertain gains, time delays, time constants, high freq. dynamics, etc. and bounds on their perturbations e.g., + , | |<b From experimental I/O dataFrom experimental I/O data Motivation: model validation for robust control

9
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 20009 2- Coprime factor plant models Perturbed left-coprime factorizationPerturbed left-coprime factorization Coprime factor plant modelswhere

10
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200010 Aerospace example: Daisy Daisy is a large flexible space structure emulator at Univ. of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies (46th-order model)Daisy is a large flexible space structure emulator at Univ. of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies (46th-order model) Coprime factor plant models

11
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200011 define Factor perturbationFactor perturbation Uncertainty setUncertainty set Family of perturbed plantsFamily of perturbed plants Coprime factor plant models

12
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200012 block diagram of open-loop perturbed LCF Coprime factor plant models

13
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200013 Block diagram of closed-loop perturbed LCF Coprime factor plant models

14
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200014 3- Consistency of closed-loop frequency- response data with coprime factor models Model/data consistency problem:Model/data consistency problem: Given noise-free, (open-loop,closed-loop) frequency-response data obtained at frequencies, could the data have been produced by at least one plant model in ? Given noise-free, (open-loop,closed-loop) frequency-response data obtained at frequencies, could the data have been produced by at least one plant model in ?

15
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200015 open-loop model/data consistency problem solved in: J. Chen, IEEE T-AC 42(6) June 1997 (general solution for uncertainty in LFT form)J. Chen, IEEE T-AC 42(6) June 1997 (general solution for uncertainty in LFT form) B. Boulet and B.A. Francis, IEEE T-AC 43(12) Dec. 1998 (coprime factor models)B. Boulet and B.A. Francis, IEEE T-AC 43(12) Dec. 1998 (coprime factor models) R. Smith and J.C. Doyle, IEEE T-AC 37(7) Jul. 1992 (uncertainty in LFT form, optimization approach)R. Smith and J.C. Doyle, IEEE T-AC 37(7) Jul. 1992 (uncertainty in LFT form, optimization approach) Consistency of closed-loop FR data with coprime factor models

16
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200016 closed-loop FR data case Consistency of closed-loop FR data with coprime factor models

17
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200017 Lemma 1 Lemma 2 (Schmidt-Mirsky Theorem) Consistency of closed-loop FR data with coprime factor models

18
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200018 Lemma 3 (consistency at ) Consistency of closed-loop FR data with coprime factor models

19
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200019 Theorem (consistency with CL FR data) Proof (using boundary interpolation theorem) Consistency of closed-loop FR data with coprime factor models

20
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200020 This condition is not sufficient. For sufficiency, the perturbation would have to be shown to stabilize to account for the fact that the closed-loop system was stable with the original controller(s) We can’t just assume this a priori as it would mean that the original controller(s) is already robust! Consistency of closed-loop FR data with coprime factor models

21
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200021 Example: Daisy LFSS testbed Nominal factorizationNominal factorization Bound on factor uncertaintyBound on factor uncertainty one of the plants in family of perturbed plants was chosen to be the actual plant generating the 50 closed-loop FR data points one of the plants in family of perturbed plants was chosen to be the actual plant generating the 50 closed-loop FR data points 23 first-order decentralized SISO lead controllers were used as the original controller23 first-order decentralized SISO lead controllers were used as the original controller Example: Daisy LFSS Testbed

22
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200022 Example (continued) Example: Daisy LFSS Testbed

23
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200023 Example (continued) Model/data consistency check:Model/data consistency check: Example: Daisy LFSS Testbed

24
Benoit Boulet, June 29, 200024 5- Conclusion Necessary condition for consistency of noise-free FR data with uncertain MIMO coprime factor plant model involves the computation of at the measurement frequenciesNecessary condition for consistency of noise-free FR data with uncertain MIMO coprime factor plant model involves the computation of at the measurement frequencies Bound on factor uncertainty can be reshaped to account for all FR measurementsBound on factor uncertainty can be reshaped to account for all FR measurements Sufficiency of the condition is difficult to obtain as one would have to prove that the factor perturbation, proven to exist by the boundary interpolation theorem, also stabilizes the nominal closed-loop system.Sufficiency of the condition is difficult to obtain as one would have to prove that the factor perturbation, proven to exist by the boundary interpolation theorem, also stabilizes the nominal closed-loop system.

25
25 Thank you!

Similar presentations

OK

1 A Lyapunov Approach to Frequency Analysis Tingshu Hu, Andy Teel UC Santa Barbara Zongli Lin University of Virginia.

1 A Lyapunov Approach to Frequency Analysis Tingshu Hu, Andy Teel UC Santa Barbara Zongli Lin University of Virginia.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google