Presentation on theme: "2-1 Early Trade Theories: Mercantilism and the Transition to the Classical World of David Ricardo Chapter 2."— Presentation transcript:
2-1 Early Trade Theories: Mercantilism and the Transition to the Classical World of David Ricardo Chapter 2
2-2 Course Learning Outcomes (1)To have a sound knowledge of the quantitative and qualitative methods that will help to examine the premises of different theories for an applied subject so that a contribution to solving current economic problems can be made. (7) To have sufficient practical and theoretical knowledge base in order to define the economic agents and their interaction both in the national and global level
2-3 Learning Objectives Describe Mercantilist concepts and policies. Examine Hume’s price-specie flow mechanism and its challenge to Mercantilist thought. Discuss Smith’s ideas of wealth and absolute advantage as foundations of international trade.
2-4 Mercantilism A collection of economic thought in Europe during the period between 1500 and 1750. Mercantilism is often called the political economy of state building.
2-5 The Mercantilist Economic System A country’s wealth is measured by its holdings of precious metals (specie). International trade is a zero sum game. A country should maintain a positive trade balance (that is, export more than it imports). Mercantilism employed the labor theory of value: commodities were valued relatively in terms of their relative labor content
2-6 3 Components of Economic System Manufacturing sector Rural sector Foreign colonies
2-7 Von Hornick’s Manifesto Every inch of a country’s soil be utilized for agriculture, mining or manufactoring All raw materials found in a country be used in domestic manufacture, since finished goods have a higher value than raw materials A large, working population be encouraged All export of gold and silver be prohibited and all domestic money be kept in circulation All imports of foreign goods be discouraged as much as possible
2-8 Von Hornick’s Manifesto cont. Where certain imports are indispensible they be obtained at first hand, in exchange for other domestic goods instead of gold and silver As much as possible, imports be confined to raw materials that can be finished at home Opportunities be constantly sought for selling a country’s surplus manufacturers to foreigners, so far as necessary, for gold and silver No importation be allowed if such goods sufficiently and suitably supplied at home
2-9 The Role of Government “Bullionism”: the control of government on the use and exchange of precious metals Substantial regulation of the domestic economy, including – governmental granting of monopolies, and – control of labor
2-10 The Role of Government Policies to ensure low wages, including – policies to discourage importation and encourage exportation, and – policies to discourage exportation of specie.
2-11 The Paradox of Mercantilism To be rich, a country needed to have a lot of poor people! Arthur Young (1771) “Everyone but an idiot knows that the lower classes must be kept poor or they will never be industrious.” Specie was accumulated at the expense of current consumption High spending of specie for protection
2-12 The Challenge to Mercantilism by Early Classical Writers In the early 1700s, questions began to emerge regarding the logic of mercantilism.
2-13 Hume’s Challenge: the Price- Specie Flow Mechanism Hume (mid-18 th century): maintaining a trade surplus forever is impossible. Trade surplus inflow of specie inflow of specie increased M s increased M s higher prices (and wages) higher prices lower exports and higher imports
2-14 Assumptions Formal link between money and prices as provided in the quantity theory of money M s V = PY Demand for traded goods is price elastic Perfect competition in both product and factor markets Gold standard exists
2-15 Smith’s Challenge: Absolute Advantage Smith believed trade to be a positive-sum game. Countries should export those goods which they can produce efficiently, and import those which they cannot. If countries trade according to this principle, all will gain from trade (trade will be mutually beneficial).
2-18 Smith’s Challenge A nation’s wealth is reflected in its productive capacity not in its holding of precious metals. Growth in productive capacity was fostered best in an environment where people were free to pursue their own interests Little need for government control Laissez faire (allowing individuals to pursue their own activities within bounds of law and order and respect property rights)
2-20 Absolute Advantage: An Example Suppose Turkey and Italy agree to trade at a ratio of 1W = 4C (or 1C = ¼ W). Suppose further that Italy will specialize in wine and Turkey in corn. From Turkey’s perspective: – Can now buy wine at a lower price (1W = 6C in autarky, but 1W = 4C in trade). – Can sell corn at a higher price (1C = 1/6 W in autarky, but 1C = ¼ W in trade).
2-21 Absolute Advantage: An Example From Italy’s perspective: – Can now sell wine at a higher price (1W = 5/3C in autarky, but 1W = 4C in trade). – Can buy corn at a lower price (1C = 3/5 W in autarky, but 1C = ¼ W in trade).
2-22 Absolute Advantage: An Example Bottom line: both countries gain from trade, even if certain industries (wine industry in Turkey, corn industry in Italy) stand to lose.
2-23 Limits to Smith’s Thinking If one country has an absolute advantage in the production of both (or all) goods, Smith would say that that country cannot gain from trade.
2-24 Absolute Advantage: The Limits to Smith’s Thinking
2-25 Limits to Smith’s Thinking If one country has an absolute advantage in the production of both (or all) goods, Smith would say that that country cannot gain from trade. But David Ricardo’s Principle of Comparative Advantage (1817) took Smith’s work farther: even in the above example, trade can be mutually beneficial!