Presentation on theme: "Implementation of the NICE Guidance (50) in Wales Chris Subbe, Wrecsam"— Presentation transcript:
1Implementation of the NICE Guidance (50) in Wales Chris Subbe, Wrecsam
2Changing clinical practice To ensure early identification of the acutely ill patient and prevent deterioration of clinical condition.To reduce patient mortality, morbidity and length of stay.To reduce ICU admissions and re-admission.NOTES FOR PRESENTERS:Any patient in hospital may become acutely ill. The ageing population, increasing complexity of medical and surgical interventions and shorter inpatient stays have meant that patients in hospital are at increasing risk of becoming acutely ill and may require admission to critical care areas.The 'National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death' (NCEPOD 2005) reported that the recognition of deteriorating health is often delayed and may be managed inappropriately. This may result in late referral and avoidable admissions to critical care. It may lead to unnecessary patient deaths, particularly when the initial standard of care is suboptimal.The guideline recommendations aim to improve the care of acutely ill patients in hospital by providing evidence based guidance on the best way to identify and manage this group of patients to reduce mortality, morbidity and length of stay both in the hospital overall and in a critical care area should they be admitted to critical care.It is apparent that such interventions could potentially have substantial health economic implications, through, for example, reductions in ICU admission and re- admission. The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death report (2005) found that admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) was thought to have been avoidable in 21% of cases, and that sub-optimal care contributed to about a third of the deaths that occurred.
3Sick patients & Cardiac arrests Near all arrests in patients known to be unstable.Patients with dyspnea are at increased risk.Sax FL, Medical patients at high risk for catastrophic deterioration, Critical Care Medicine, 198784% of cardiac arrests are proceeded by deterioration of respiratory and mental function Schein RMH, Clinical Antecedents to in-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Arrest, Chest, 199066% of cardiac arrests have documented deterioration 6 hours pre-arrest Franklin C, Developing strategies to prevent inhospital cardiac arrest, Critical Care Medicine, 1994We have been lucky, we did not have to start from scratch.If we want to identify Critically Ill patients, patients with Cardiac Arrest might serve as a useful Surrogate Marker1. Prospective study from New York: 544 pat./20 arrest2. Miami: 64 arrests: 38% Respirat., 11% Metabolic., 9% Cardiac., 6% Neurolog., 70% Resp or Mental changes within 8 hours prior to arrest, mean RR 29/min3. Chicago: 150 arrest, 91% deadICU admissions from Portsmouth and Southampton: 2 59% too late to ICU. Causes: failure of organisation, lack of knowledge, failure to appreciate clinical urgency, lack of supervision, failure to seek adviceLets translate McQ’s data into our ICU practice
6Abnormalities up to 72 hours pre-ICU Physiological abnormalities against predefined parameters were present for up to 72 hours prior to referral and admissions to intensive care
7100,000 Lives Campaign Rapid Response Team Acute Myocardial Infarction Adverse Drug Events (ADEs)Central Line InfectionsSurgical Site InfectionsVentilator-Associated PneumoniaDeploy Rapid Response Teams…at the first sign of patient declineDeliver Reliable, Evidence-Based Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction…to prevent deaths from heart attackPrevent Adverse Drug Events (ADEs)…by implementing medication reconciliationPrevent Central Line Infections…by implementing a series of interdependent, scientifically grounded stepsPrevent Surgical Site Infections…by reliably delivering the correct perioperative antibiotics at the proper timePrevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia…by implementing a series of interdependent, scientifically grounded steps
8Assessment and monitoring Adult patients in acute hospital settings, including patients in the emergency department for whom a clinical decision to admit has been made, should have:physiological observations recordeda clear written monitoring planPhysiological observations should be recorded and acted upon by staff who have been trained and are competent.NOTES FOR PRESENTERS:The guideline recommendation in full says:● Adult patients in acute hospital settings, including patients in the emergency department forwhom a clinical decision to admit has been made, should have:– physiological observations recorded at the time of their admission or initial assessment- a clear written monitoring plan that specifies which physiological observations should be recorded and how often.The plan should take account of the patient’s diagnosis, presence of comorbidities and agreed treatment plan.Physiological observations should be recorded and acted upon by staff who have been trained and are competent toundertake these procedures and understand their clinical relevance.
9Assessment and monitoring: physiological observations Initial assessment should include at least:heart raterespiratory ratesystolic blood pressurelevel of consciousnessoxygen saturationtemperature.NOTES FOR PRESENTERS:Initial assessment of the patient should include the above. The next slide indicates the monitoring frequency of these and other observations
10EWS - How to find the sick? Cytokine-cascadeUniform physiological responseGaps?Score = =7
11Sick patients & MET Medical Emergency Team replaces Arrest Team (1990) Criteria for Call outAnybody can callHourihan F, The medical emergency team: a strategy to identify and intervene in high risk patients, Clin Intensive Care, 1995Reduction in Cardiac Arrest Parr MJA, The Medical Emergency Team: 12 month analysis of reasons for activation, immediate outcome and not-for resuscitation orders, Resuscitation, 2001Criteria for MET alertAirway ThreatenedBreathing Respiratory arrestRR < 5, RR > 36Circulation Cardiac arrestPR < 40, PR > 140BP < 90 mmHgNeurology Sudden LOCGCS >2Repeat. or prolonged seizureOther Any U R seriously worried about
12Can we identify sick medical patients? Prospective studyMedical admissionsMEWS > 4: risk ofHDUICUDeath123456789HDUICUDeathScores
13NEW score“We recommend that the physiological assessment of all patients should be standardised across the NHS with the recording of a minimum clinical data set result in an NHS early warning (NEW) score.”To …”be used at all stages in the acute care pathway, including pre-hospital assessment, eg by the GP, ambulance service or other healthcare professionals.“
14Graded response strategy Low-score groupIncrease frequency of observations and alert the nurse in chargeMedium-score groupUrgent call to team with primary medical responsibility for the patientSimultaneous call to personnel with core competencies for acute illnessHigh-score groupEmergency call to team with critical care competencies and diagnostic skillsNOTES FOR PRESENTERS:For patients identified in the low-score group it is recommended that the frequency of observations is increased and the nurse in charge alerted.For patients identified in the medium-score group two responses are needed, firstly an urgent call to the team with primary medical responsibility for the patient, and simultaneously a call to personnel with core competencies for acute illness. These competencies can be delivered by a variety of models at a local level, such as a critical care outreach team, a hospital-at-night team or a specialist trainee in an acute medical or surgical specialty. Appropriate interventions should be initiated.For those identified with a high score, the response required is an emergency call to the team with critical care competencies and diagnostic skills. The team should include a medical practitioner skilled in the assessment of the critically ill patient, who possesses advanced airways management and resuscitation skills. There should be an immediate response and the appropriate interventions initiated.
15Critical Care Outreach Ward-randomized trial of phased introduction in a general hospitalYork, 800 bedded, 16 wards, 32 wksGradual introduction, paired wards7450 patients, 2903 eligiblePre/Post vs Control/InterventionHospital mortality 0.52 ( )Priestley et al. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:
16Hillman K, ICS State of the Art meeting 2004 MET & mortality VRCT of 23 hospitalsevents, patientsOutcomes [Control vs MET]Cardiac arrests 2.6 vs1.6/1000 admissionsICU admissions (unplanned) 4.9 vs 4.2Death 1.2 vs 1.1No significant difference ….. ButVery poor compliance with call-out criteria [50% of patients with adverse events]Hillman K, ICS State of the Art meeting 2004
17MERIT - Methods 23 Australian hospitals Cluster randomization Cardiac arrests vs MET2 month baselines, 4 months education, 6 months collectionImprovement in all hospitals re-CPR & unexpected admissions to ICUHillman et al, Lancet, 365:
18MET informed if 15 min abnormal? Control (no MET)Intervention(MET)Cardiac arrests96%95%Unplanned ICU9%30%Unexpected death25%8%
23Vital elements Reliable identification Trained staff Reliable response System that is credibleSensitivity/specificity?Trained staffMETOutreachALERTWard staff (?)Reliable response
24Training and competencies Staff need to be competent in using the locally agreed 'track and trigger' system.Use baseline assessment to check use of track and trigger systems.Use existing team and network meetings to communicate agreed response strategy.Use Department of Health competencies and training matrix to implement training plan for staff.NOTES FOR PRESENTERS:The delivery of education and training of ward staff is of key importance in ensuring that staff have the appropriate competencies to correctly measure the appropriate physiological variables, correctly use the 'track and trigger' system agreed locally and to identify and enact the correct response to a patient at risk of clinical deterioration. Staff working with acutely ill patients on general wards should also receive education and training that helps them to recognise and understand the physical, psychological and emotional needs of their patients on discharge from critical care areas and provide appropriate care.NICE implementation advice suggests that we:Use our baseline assessment to ensure that track and trigger systems used are multi-parameter or are aggregated weighted scoring systems.Use our existing team meetings and network meetings to ensure that the agreed local track and trigger system is communicated to staff and the graded response strategy is implemented effectively with the appropriate audiencesReview current education and training programmes for staff working within critical care and general medical and surgical ward areas to reflect recommendations including how to provide information to patients and work with local education and training providers in this area to ensure that future programmes are designed to reflect recommendationsNote: The Department of Health competencies and training matrix is due to be published late in 2007
27Conclusion No comparative data, but … Simple scores more reproducible Pros beat amateurs most times
28Resources from NICE www.nice.org.uk/CG050 Costing tools costing report costing templateImplementation adviceAudit criteriaNOTES FOR PRESENTERS: NICE has developed tools to help organisations implement this guidance, which can be found on the NICE website.Costing tools – a costing report giving the background to the national savings and costs associated with implementation, and a costing template to estimate the local costs and savings involved.• The implementation advice gives details of how to put the guidance into practice and national initiatives that support this locallyAudit criteria assist NHS trusts to determine whether the service is implementing, and is in compliance with, the NICE clinical guideline