Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byKristofer Perret Modified over 3 years ago

2
Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University of Nevada, Reno APRIL 3/4, 2006 Computer Program DFSAP Deep Foundation System Analysis Program Based on Strain Wedge Method

3
Pile and Pile Group Stiffnesses with/without Pile Cap

4
SESSION I STIFFNESS MATRIX FOR BRIDGE FOUNDATION AND SIGN CONVENTIONS How to Build the Stiffness Matrix of Bridge Pile Foundations (linear and nonlinear stiff. matrix)? How to Assess the Pile/Shaft Response Based on Soil-Pile-Interaction with/without Soil Liquefaction (i.e. Displacement & Rotational Stiffnesses)?

5
Y XX Z Z Y Foundation Springs in the Longitudinal Direction K 11 K 22 K 66 Column Nodes Longitudinal Transverse

6
Loads and Axis F1 F2 F3 M1 M2 M3 X Z Y F1F1 F2F2 F3F3 M1M1 M2M2 M3M3 X Z Y

7
K11 0 0 0 -K15 0 0 K22 0 K24 0 0 0 0 K33 0 0 0 0 K42 0 K44 0 0 -K51 0 0 0 K55 0 0 0 0 0 0 K66 x y z x y z Force Vector for x = 1 unit Full Pile Head Stiffness Matrix Lam and Martin (1986) FHWA/RD/86-102

8
= 0 Applied P Applied M Applied P Induced M A. Free-Head Conditions B. Fixed-Head Conditions = 0 Applied P = 0 Induced P Applied M Induced M C. Zero Shaft-Head Rotation, = 0 D. Zero Shaft-Head Deflection, = 0 Shaft/Pile-Head Conditions in the DFSAP Program Special Conditions for Linear Stiffness Matrix

9
Y XX Z Z Y Foundation Springs in the Longitudinal Direction K 11 K 22 K 66 Column Nodes Loading in the Longitudinal Direction (Axis 1 or X Axis ) Single Shaft K 22 Y P2P2 K 11 K 66 P1P1 M3M3 Y XX P2P2 K 22 K 33 K 44 P3P3 M1M1 Y Y ZZ Loading in the Transverse Direction (Axis 3 or Z Axis )

10
Steps of Analysis Using SEISAB (STRUDL), calculate the forces at the base of the fixed column (P o, M o, P v ) (both directions) Use DFSAP with special shaft head conditions to calculate the stiffness elements of the required (linear) stiffness matrix. K11 0 0 0 0 -K16 0 K22 0 0 0 0 0 0 K33 K34 0 0 0 0 K43 K44 0 0 0 0 0 0 K55 0 -K61 0 0 0 0 K66 F1 F2 F3 M1 M2 M3 123123123123

11
K11 = P Applied / K66 = M Applied / K61 = M Induced / K16 = P Induced / B. Zero Shaft-Head Deflection, = 0 = 0 Applied P = 0 Induced P Applied M Induced M A. Zero Shaft-Head Rotation, = 0 X-Axis LINEAR STIFFNESS MATRIX Longitudinal (X-X) KF1F1 = K11 = P applied / 1 (fixed-head, = 0) KM3F1 = K61 = M Induced / 1 KM3M3 = K66 = M applied / 3 (free-head, = 0) KF1M3 = K16 = P Induced / 3

12
Steps of Analysis Using SEISAB and the above spring stiffnesses at the base of the column, determine the modified reactions (P o, M o, P v ) at the base of the column (shaft head) K 11 0 0 0 0 -K 16 0 K 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 33 K 34 0 0 0 0 K 43 K 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 55 0 -K 61 0 0 0 0 K 66 1 2 3 1 2 3

13
Steps of Analysis Keep refining the elements of the stiffness matrix used with SEISAB until reaching the identified tolerance for the forces at the base of the column Why K F3M1 K M1F3 ? K F3M1 = K 34 = F 3 / 1 and K M1F3 = K 43 = M 1 / 3 Does the linear stiffness matrix represent the actual behavior of the shaft-soil interaction? KF1F1 0 0 0 0 -KF1M3 0 KF2F2 0 0 0 0 0 0 KF3F3 KF3M1 0 0 0 0 KM1F3 KM1M1 0 0 0 0 0 0 KM2M2 0 -KM3F1 0 0 0 0 KM3M3 F1F2F3M1M2M3F1F2F3M1M2M3 1 2 3 1 2 3

14
Laterally Loaded Pile as a Beam on Elastic Foundation (BEF)

15
Linear Stiffness Matrix K 11 0 0 0 0 -K 16 0 K 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 33 K 34 0 0 0 0 K 43 K 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 55 0 -K 61 0 0 0 0 K 66 F1 F2 F3 M1 M2 M3 Linear Stiffness Matrix is based on Linear p-y curve (Constant E s ), which is not the case Linear elastic shaft material (Constant EI), which is not the actual behavior Therefore, P, M = P + M and P, M = P + M 123123123123

16
Shaft Deflection, y Line Load, p y P, M > y P + y M yMyM yPyP y P, M y p (E s ) 1 (E s ) 3 (E s ) 4 (E s ) 2 p p p y y y (E s ) 5 p y MoMo PoPo PvPv Nonlinear p-y curve As a result, the linear analysis (i.e. the superposition technique ) can not be employed Actual Scenario

17
Applied P Applied M A. Free-Head Conditions K11 or K33 = P Applied / K66 or K44 = M Applied / Nonlinear (Equivalent) Stiffness Matrix

18
K 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 66 F1 F2 F3 M1 M2 M3 Nonlinear Stiffness Matrix is based on Nonlinear p-y curve Nonlinear shaft material (Varying EI) P, M > P + M K 11 = P applied / P, M P, M > P + M K 66 = M applied / P, M 123123123123

19
Pile Load-Stiffness Curve Linear Analysis Pile-Head Stiffness, K11, K33, K44, K66 Pile-Head Load, P o, M, P v P 1, M 1 P 2, M 2 Non-Linear Analysis

20
Linear Stiffness Matrix and the Signs of the Off-Diagonal Elements K F1F1 0 0 0 0 -K F1M3 0 K F2F2 0 0 0 0 0 0 K F3F3 K F3M1 0 0 0 0 K M1F3 K M1M1 0 0 0 0 0 0 K M2M2 0 -K M3F1 0 0 0 0 K M3M3 F1 F2 F3 M1 M2 M3 123123123123 Next Slide

21
F1F1 X or 1 Z or 3 Y or 2 Induced M 3 11 K 11 = F 1 / 1 K 61 = -M 3 / 1 X or 1 Z or 3 Y or 2 M3M3 33 K 66 = M 3 / 3 K 16 = -F 1 / 3 Induced F 1 Elements of the Stiffness Matrix Next Slide Longitudinal Direction X-X

22
F3F3 X or 1 Z or 3 Y or 2 Induced M 1 33 K 33 = F 3 / 3 K 43 = M 1 / 3 X or 1 Z or 3 Y or 2 11 K 44 = M 1 / 1 K 34 = F 3 / 1 M1M1 Induced F 3 Transverse Direction Z-Z

23
(Lam and Martin, FHWA/RD/86-102) Linear Stiffness Matrix for Pile group

24
Pile Load-Stiffness Curve Linear Analysis Pile-Head Stiffness, K11, K33, K44, K66 Pile-Head Load, P o, M, P v P 1, M 1 P 2, M 2 Non-Linear Analysis

25
(K L ) 1 (K L ) 2 (K L ) 3 (K v ) 2 (K v ) 1 (K v ) 3 (K L ) C (K v ) G (K L ) G (K R ) G (K L ) G = (K L ) i + (KL) C = P L / L L d ue to lateral/axial loads (K v ) G = P v / v v d ue to axial load (P v ) (K R ) G = M / d ue to moment (M) PLPL PvPv M Rotational angle Lateral deflection L Axial settlement v

26
PLPL PvPv M PvPv (p v ) M (p v ) Pv (p L ) PL PLPL PvPv M Pile Cap with Free-Head Piles x x z z (p v ) M (p v ) Pv PLPL M (p L ) PL Pile Cap with Fixed-Head Piles (Fixed End Moment)

27
PLPL PvPv M Rotational angle Lateral deflection L Axial settlement v Axial Rotational Stiffness of a Pile Group K 55 = GJ/LWSDOT M T = (3.14 D i ) D/2 (L i ) = z T / L K 55 = M T /

28
PLPL PvPv M (K22) (K11) (K66) x x K11 0 0 0 0 0 0 K22 0 0 0 0 0 0 K33 0 0 0 0 0 0 K44 0 0 0 0 0 0 K55 0 0 0 0 0 0 K66 123123123123 (K11) = P L / 1 (K22) = P v / 2 (K33) = M 3 Group Stiffness Matrix (p v ) M (p v ) Pv PLPL P v (1) M (p L ) PL (Fixed End Moment)

Similar presentations

Presentation is loading. Please wait....

OK

DESIGN OF MEMBERS FOR COMBINED FORCES

DESIGN OF MEMBERS FOR COMBINED FORCES

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google

Ppt on the topic online education Ppt on indian treasury bills Ppt on standing order act scores Ppt on social contract theory declaration Ppt on our changing earth Ppt on earth movements and major landforms in africa Ppt on regional transport office kerala Ppt on power factor meter Jit ppt on manufacturing industry Ppt on office 365