Presentation on theme: "WECC COMPLIANCE OUTREACH OPEN WEBINAR Thursday, September 19, 2013 2:00 pm MT."— Presentation transcript:
WECC COMPLIANCE OUTREACH OPEN WEBINAR Thursday, September 19, :00 pm MT
2 NERC Transition Guidance on CIP v.5 B. Castagnetto FERC Approval of RoP Change – TFE update B. Carr Confirming Scope During CMP Submittal K. Sarin Registration Tool Taylor Allred 2014 Actively Monitored List K. Israelsson Agenda
Brent Castagnetto CBRM, CBRA, MABR Manager, Cyber Security Audits & Investigations CIP Version 5 Transition Guidance September 2013 Open-Webinar September 19 th 2013
4 The WECC Cyber Security Audit Team will audit to Version 3 of the CIP Standards until such time as: o Version 4 becomes mandatory & enforceable (10/1/14) o FERC provides remand of V4, or approves V5 o NERC provides implementation plan guidance on V3 – V5 transition There will be opportunity to begin preparing for V5 Mandatory and Enforceable = V3
5 On April 18 th 2013 FERC issued a NOPR proposing to approve CIP V5 o Some changes were requested & NERC has responded On September 5 th 2013 NERC provided revised guidance related to CIP Version 5 o Transition Period is from 9/5/2013 to V5 mandatory and enforceable date (still unknown) NERC Version 5 Transition Guidance
6 On 7/18/2013, the “Trade Associations” filed a motion to delay the deadline for complying with V4. FERC granted a six month extension on V4 to 10/1/2014. Version 4 / 5 Update
7 “Prior to the date of mandatory enforcement of CIP Version 5, a Responsible Entity must continue to comply with the CIP Version 3 Standards (CIP through CIP-009-3) during the Transition Period” o An entity may continue to maintain and apply its CIP RBAM during the transition period or it may choose one of two options to identify and document Critical Assets in lieu of maintaining a RBAM (R1) and applying (R2) its CIP RBAM. CIP Version 5 Transition Guidance
8 On or after April 11 th 2013, Registered Entities may choose: o Option 1. Utilize the CIP Version 4 bright-line criteria in its entirety, with the exception of criterion 1.4 (Blackstart Resources) and criterion 1.5 (Cranking Paths), to identify assets subject to the controls in CIP through CIP-009-3, or CIP Version 5 Transition Guidance
9 On or after September 5 th 2013, Registered Entities may choose: o Option 2. Utilize the CIP Version 5 “High” and “Medium” Impact Ratings (see CIP Attachment 1: IRC, pp ) to identify assets subject to the controls in CIP through CIP CIP Version 5 Transition Guidance
10 Things to consider: o Entities choosing option 1 or 2 as a valid Critical Asset Identification [CAID] methodology may decide to remove Critical Assets previously identified under a CIP RBAM. o CIP Versions 4 and 5 contain requirements for asset identification that permit certain third parties to designate an asset as critical (Reliability Coordinators, Transmission Planners, Planning Coordinators, or Planning Authorities) CIP Version 5 Transition Guidance
11 Things to consider: o If option 1 (V4) is selected, be aware of Bright- Line Criteria 1.3, 1.8, 1.9, and 1.10 o If option 2 (V5) is selected, be aware of Impact Rating Criteria 2.3, 2.6 and 2.8 CIP Version 5 Transition Guidance
12 After the application of one of the two options to identify and document a list of Critical Assets, the entity must use the list of Critical Assets and apply its current CIP R3 Critical Cyber Asset Identification methodology [CCAID] to document a list of Critical Cyber Assets [CCAs] that are essential to the operation of the Critical Asset and meet one of the qualifying connectivity attributes (R3.1- R3.3). No change from the current CIP R3 process CIP R3
13 The CIP Senior Manager must also review and approve the list of Critical Assets and the list of Critical Cyber Assets, even if such lists are null, at least annually (R4). The only change to R4 is annual review and approval of the RBAM will not be required if the entity has chosen option 1 or 2. CIP R4
14 Based on the results of the application of the chosen CAID methodology, and subsequent application of the CCAID methodology to the list of Critical Assets, if the entity identifies a list of CCAs, the entity must continue to comply with all of CIP through CIP If the list of CCAs is null, the entity must continue to comply with CIP R1-R4 (with the changes identified above) and CIP R2. CIP through CIP-009-3
15 A Responsible Entity must identify the approach it is using for asset identification as part of its response to a pre-Compliance Audit Survey, a pre-Spot Check data request, or as otherwise requested pursuant to the Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Program o WECC will request information surrounding your approach in the audit / spot check notices in 2014 o A good practice to meet this data request is to have the CIP Senior Manager sign and date a statement declaring the entity’s choice of CAID methodology. CIP Version 5 Transition Guidance
16 Within the Transition Guidance Document there is reference to the CIP Version 5 Study o The study will collect and evaluate data from selected entities regarding implementation of CIP V5 o These results will be shared with industry upon completion of the study CIP Version 5 Transition Guidance
17 What is the purpose of Transition Implementation Study? o Determine compliance and enforcement expectations for the Industry during the transition from v3 to v5 o Determine technical challenges or compliance issues that limit the effective compliance to the CIP standards o Improve consistency, transparency and awareness of the newly approved CIP standards CIP Version 5 Transition Guidance
18 CIP Version 5 Transition Timeline
19 WECC will provide significant outreach beginning at the September CIP-101 and throughout 2014 on the CIP Version 5 audit approach. o Two Day outreach events will be held in various locations around the western interconnection to facilitate in person attendance. February 5-6 & March o Open webinar and CIPUG events will be used to advise WECC entities How will WECC Prepare for V5?
20 References used in this presentation o FERC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) on CIP Version 5 o Trade Associations Request o FERC Notice Granting Extension Of Time o NERC V5 Transition Guidance 20Guidance%20(Revised).pdf 20Guidance%20(Revised).pdf References
21 Dr. Joe Baugh (M) (O) Bryan Carr (O) (M) WECC CIP-002 Subject Matter Experts
Bryan Carr PMP, CISA Compliance Auditor – Cyber Security TFE Update – Revised Appendix 4D September 2013 Open Webinar September 19, 2013
24 FERC Docket No. RR – Sep. 3, 2013 o Order approving proposed revisions to Appendix 4D of the NERC Rules of Procedure o Two items require response from NERC Timing of submitting Material Change Reports Annual reports to FERC o Industry comments on changes due Oct. 31, 2013 Detailed Summary of Proposed Revisions Detailed Summary of Proposed Revisions Redline Version of Appendix 4D Redline Version of Appendix 4D FERC Approved Appendix 4D
25 Changes required to accommodate the revised process: o WebCDMS fields, workflow, and other processes o How you track, manage, and update TFEs and their associated Cyber Assets Who moved my cheese?
26 Read, re-read, and then read again revised Appendix 4D Until updates to webCDMS and other processes are complete, prepare to track TFEs and associated devices in spreadsheet or database WECC continues to work with NERC and will work with you during this transition process CIPUG Anaheim October 24, 2013 – presentation with additional details TFEs – Interim Steps
27 FERC Order: NERC Documents: Appendix_4D_ pdf evApp4D pdf WECC Presentations: CIPUG_Mesa.pdf FE_BC.pdf For More Information…
Bryan Carr PMP, CISA Compliance Auditor – Cyber Security Western Electricity Coordinating Council 155 N 400 W, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, UT Questions?
Keshav Sarin Manager, Enforcement O&P and CIP Confirming Scope during CMP submittal September 19, 2013
30 Completed Mitigation Plan Includes evidence that all actions identified in the Mitigation Plan were completed What’s a CMP?
31 We always ensure the complete scope of a violation has been identified o Violation Review o Mitigation Plan Review Confirming Violation Scope 31
32 During CMP submittal, please include a brief statement that the scope of the violation has not changed. o E.g. The scope of this violation has not changed since the mitigation plan was accepted by WECC What’s New? 32
Keshav Sarin Manager, Enforcement O&P and CIP (801) Questions?
Taylor Allred Associate Compliance Process Analyst Registration Tracking System September 19, 2013 Compliance Open Webinar
35 Benefits of the Registration Tracking System o Detailed registration form and document upload o Reduce process cycle time o Eliminate repetitive data entry o Provide automated communications to registrants helping to improve customer service Registration Tracking System
36 Types of Registration Requests submitted through the new Registration Form o New Registrations o Functional Change Registrations o Transfer of Assets o Foot Print Changes o Deactivations o Legal Name Changes Types of Registration Requests
37 Where is the WECC Registration Web Page?
38 Where is the New Form Located?
39 Registration Request Web Page
40 You will Need a WECC Website Account to Access the Registration Form
41 Registration Tracking System Implementation Timeline DateDescriptionLocation October 23, 2013Registration Tool Overview CUG October 29, :00 PM (MDT) Registration User Training Webinar November 1, 2013All Registration Requests are required to be submitted via the new form N/A
Taylor Allred Associate Compliance Process Analyst Questions?
Kim Israelsson Lead Compliance Data Analyst 2014 Actively Monitored List September 19, 2013
Laura Scholl Managing Director of Stakeholder Outreach Questions?