Presentation on theme: "Love, sex, and Choices- Soap Opera Video Episodes Streamed to Smartphones in a Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce HIV Sex Risk in Young Urban African."— Presentation transcript:
1Love, sex, and Choices- Soap Opera Video Episodes Streamed to Smartphones in a Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce HIV Sex Risk in Young Urban African American/Black WomenRachel Jones, PhD, RN, FAAN, Northeastern UniversityDonald R Hoover, PhD, MPH, Rutgers, UniversityLorraine Lacroix, MPH, Northeastern University
2This research was supported by: National Institute of Nursing Research R01NR10860National Library of Medicine G08 LM008349Healthcare Foundation of New Jersey
4In 2009, the majority of diagnosed HIV infections among females aged 13 years or older were attributed to heterosexual contact for all age groups. However, the percentages attributed to heterosexual contact decreased as age group increased. An estimated 17.9% of diagnosed HIV infections among females aged 45 years and older were attributed to injection drug use, compared with 9.6% in females aged 13–19 years, 10.0% in females aged 20–24 years, 13.0% in women aged years, and 15.9% in women aged years. The following 40 states have had laws or regulations requiring confidential name-based HIV infection reporting since at least January 2006: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. The 5 U.S. dependent areas include American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.Data include persons with a diagnosis of HIV infection regardless of stage of disease at diagnosis. All displayed data have been estimated. Estimated numbers resulted from statistical adjustment that accounted for reporting delays and missing risk-factor information, but not for incomplete reporting.Heterosexual contact is with a person known to have, or to be at high risk for, HIV infection.
6Formative StudiesWomen had unprotected sex with partners they believed engaged in HIV risk behaviorsJones, 2006; Jones & Gulick, 2009Patterns of Unprotected Sex Among WomenImportance of unprotected sex to win and hold onto a man and to show trustJones & Oliver, 2007
7Theoretical Framework TO Soap Opera Development Sex Scripts Power as Knowing Participation in Change ®
8FrameworkSex scripts: socially shared meanings about sex behavior (Simon & Gagnon, 1989)Power as Knowing Participation in Change® (Barrett, 2010)being aware of what one is chooses to dofeeling the freedom to act intentionallybeing involved in creating the changes that one intendsPeople participate in change, but not always in a knowing mannerJones, 2006; Jones & Oliver, 2007
10Entertainment-Education Soap OperasSinghal, Cody, Rogers, Santelli, 2004Stories grounded in urban women’s own experiencesWomen identify with the heroines’ process of changeMessages to reduce HIV risk are designed to fulfill familiar relationship needs
11Pilot Study on Handheld Computers A Story about Toni, Mike, and Valerie43 minute pilot video available at:Jones, 2008; Jones & Oliver 2007
12The intervention: Love, Sex, and Choices (LS&C) Twelve, minute episodes; Written & scripted by study team, professional filmmaker(Alan Roth), and actors
13Study Design and Expected Outcome 1:1 randomized controlled trial (RCT)Comparing LS&C to 12-week HIV prevention intervention of text messagesBoth groups used study-provided smartphones Jones & Lacroix, 2012Expected OutcomeVideo intervention participants have less unprotected vaginal and anal sex with high risk partners at 3 months (T2) and at 6 months (T3) than the comparison text message group
14Sex Risk Measured by VEE Unprotected anal and vaginal sex using the vaginal episode equivalent (VEE)* with high risk partners∑ (#UV) i + 2 (#UA)i )= sex riskthe sum of the # of unprotected vaginal sex acts + 2 x the number of unprotected anal sex acts, where i is the # of high risk partners in the past 3 months*Susser, Desvarieux, & Wittkowski (1998), Reporting sexual risk behavior for HIV: A practical risk index and a method for improving indices. American Journal of Public Health, 88,
15Participants and Settings 18 to 29 year old womenInclusion criteria:Had unprotected vaginal / anal sex with men they believed had sex with other women/men, and/or injected drugs -past 3 monthsRecruited in Newark, Jersey City, East Orange, & Irvington, NJ from:Public housing, STD Clinics, Community Center, Storefront, Food PantryScreening, Baseline, and Post-Intervention Interviews conducted with Audio Computer Assisted Self-Interview (ACASI)
16Interventions Sent weekly for 12 wks √ Study provided smartphones Video LS&C(n=117)Written messages(n=121)Sent weekly for 12 wks√Study provided smartphonesSent weekly to phone with link to open interventionF/u contact if missed weekly sCan watch/read current & previous episodes /messages 24/7Track FrequencyTrack viewing timeResponds on the phone with reason for re-watchingResponds on the phone with answers about content
17Data AnalysisOutcome = VEE with high risk partners at T2 (3 mo), and T3 (6 mo)Due to skewness (VEE +0.5) was log transformedRepeated measures mixed linear models that adjusted for baseline behavior were fit
19Results: Participant Flow 505 screened-295 eligible, consented, randomized-57 lost to f/u, most due to lost cell phones238 completed T2 and T3 post-intervention interviews-117 in Video Group-121 in Text Group
20Table 1. Baseline Equality of Video and Text Arms VariableText (n=121)Video (n=117)Mean ± std-dev or %Age (years)22.0 ± 3.422.1 ± 3.6Age at first sexual intercourse (years)14.4 ± 1.814.5 ± 2.2Highest grade completed12.2 ± 1.712.22 ± 1.7African American/Black90.1%86.32%Employment outside home36.4%40.2%Study SiteCommunity centerPublic HousingFood PantryStorefrontSTD Clinics14.1%30.6%19.0%22.3%18.8%30.8%10.3%17.1%23.1%Used Alcohol before /during sex81.8%75.2%Injected drugs2.53.4Any unprotected vaginal sex with a high risk partner99.2%Any unprotected anal sex with a high risk partner40.5%47.9%Sexual Pressure Score25.5 ± 15.329.7 ± 16.3Sensation Seeking Score13.6 ± 6.915.1 ± 7.5High Risk Sex Scripts Score5.1± 5.96.6 ± 7.4Any Male partner had sex with other women100%Any Male partner had sex with men29.8%41.9%Any Male partner injected drugs25.6%31.6%* Note- The intervention groups did not differ on any of these variables at p < 0.05 by exact test or Wicoxon test
21Summary of Baseline Findings Almost half had unprotected anal sex in the prior 3 months with high risk partners.Half (n=121, 51%) had 3 or more partnersA surprising number knew/ suspected their partners had sex with men –42 % Video vs 30% of Text arm, P =0.06.Over half the sample (56.7%) had first coitus at ≤ 14 years old.
22Table 2. Pre and Post Intervention VEE Change Geometric MeanOf VEE ActsPoint Estimate ± Standard ErrorText ArmVideo ArmAt baseline121.32 ± 2.8322.20 ± 3.01Follow UpAt T2 (3 months)16.55 ± 1.025.70 ± 0.84At T3 (6 months) 15.93 ± 0.914.85 ± 0.73P > 0.20 from Wilcoxon test for difference in VEE between Video Arm and Text Arm at each of the three time pointsBUT NOTE THE DRAMATIC DECLINE IN VEE FOR BOTH GROUPS FROM BASELINE TO T2 and T3. ALL DECLINES AT P < 0.001
23Table 3 Associations of Variables with VEE behavior Change 1 Characteristic2Association With Ratio of the Post to Pre intervention VEE Behavior3Point Estimate( ±SE)PVideo (Vs Text).0.81±0.130.21Visit 3 (Vs Visit 2)0.88±0.080.17High Risk Sex Script/ Log Unit0.870.10Study Site4Community centerPublic HousingFood PantryStorefrontSTD clinics1.482.101.731.74Baseline±0.39±0.48±0.50±0.45NA.03 -OVERALL40.120.0020.060.031. From Mixed Model Linear Regression on log transformed VEE at T2 and T3 with log baseline VEE as a covariate. Video Vs. Text and time points T2 Vs. T3 are forced into the model, otherwise only variables with P < 0.20 in Adjusted Models are included. Pre-intervention baseline VEE is included in all models.2. NOTE – Age, Age at First Sex, Ethnicity, Work Outside of Home, Education, Sexual Pressure Score, Sensation Seeking Score, and Any Male Partner had sex with Men did not meet the P < 0.20 Selection criteria3. From exponentiation of parameter estimates from mixed linear regression models with Log transformed VEE at post intervention Visits 2 and 3 as outcomes.4. Overall P-value for study site association with post intervention behavior was 0.03 in the multivariate model
24Summary of Main Findings Sex risk behavior declined by 19% more in the soap opera video group than the HIV prevention text group. Difference was not statistically significant (p=0.21).VEE risk behavior was ~12% lower at T3 (6 Mo) than T2 (3 Mo) in both groups, this difference between time points was not statistically significant (p = 0.17)Greater risk post-baseline reduction of VEE at STD clinic sites than in storefront or public housing.
25Evaluation of Love, Sex, and Choices Videos By Participants Women were enthusiastic about the videos.All but 4 of 117 thought the stories were realisticAll but 8 could relate to the characters90 % thought their friends might like to watchAll but one wanted the stories to continue
26Evaluation of Smartphone by 117 Video Participants Using cell phone for the project was easy (n = 113, 96.6%)Using the cell phone maintained privacy (n =113, 96.6%)Wanted to continue watching with the phone (n =107, 91.4%)Jones & Lacroix (2012)
28High risk behavior at baseline Post-intervention sex risk VEE behavior was reduced (p < 0.001) in both groups.While reduction was 19% more in the video group, this difference was not statistically significant.Both groups received s, calls, smartphones, high level of involvement /attentionGreater VEE reduction at STD clinic sites than public housing or storefront: further study neededThe stories held participants’ attentionParticipants identified with characters & stories and wanted to continue watching
29ConclusionThis is the first study to evaluate streaming weekly videos to smartphones to promote health.We believe that Love, Sex, and Choices was highly effective in reducing HIV risk behavior and the comparison group also received a viable HIV prevention intervention.A streamed video interventioncan be widely distributed and accessed 24/7Allows usage to be tracked, providing measures of treatment fidelity
30Gratefully Acknowledge The National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) supported this work (RO1-NRO10864).Technical support at Rutgers Newark Computing ServicesAlan Roth, filmmaker, Martinique L. Moore, Assistant DirectorThe cast of Love, Sex and Choices; Starring: Toni:Yasmine Weaver, Diamond:Tationna Bosier,Valerie: Leeann Hellijas, Keyanna: Darnell Rhea Williams, Mike: Laurence Covington,Dante: Omar Golden, James: Jaylen SansomRutgers University College of Nursing and the Educational Opportunity Fund (EOF) research assistants whose dedication made this work possible: Yvesnallie Antoine, Magnolita Bonheur, Essence Burrows, Fernandine Charles, Lin Chen, Geraldine Dufort, Catherine Lora, Judeline Marcellus, Sandra Rios, Tatiana Saavedra, Griselda Sanchez, and Mireille Zuniga;Thank you to the site recruiters, and to: Carol Tyler, the late Kevin Burnett, Brenda Davis, MS, LCSW, and Grace Malley, at Jersey City Public Housing; Honorable Mayor Wayne Smith of Irvington Township; Dorothy Wojcik, Program Manager, Jersey City Preventive Medicine Clinic; Ms. Verna Sims, Director at Mary McLeod Bethune Life Center; Rochelle D. Williams-Evans, RN, MS, Director/Health Officer, East Orange Department of Health & Human Services;And with gratitude to the women who participated in this study.
31Jones, R. & Lacroix, L.J. (2012). Using Smartphones to View Weekly Soap Opera Videos in a Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce HIV Risk in Young Adult, Urban African American/Black Women. DOI /s AIDS & Behavior, 16, 1341–1358. Jones, R. (2012). Handheld computers to run ACASI to assess HIV risk and deliver tailored soap opera video feedback: Acceptability among young adult urban women. DOI: /j.jana Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 23 (3).Jones, R. & Gulick, E. (2009).The Sexual Pressure Scale for Women-Revised. Research in Nursing and Health. 32, 71–85Jones, R. (2008). Soap opera video on handheld computers to reduce urban women’s HIV risk. AIDS and Behavior, 12, 876–884Jones, R. & Oliver, M. J. (2007). Young urban women’s patterns of unprotected sex with men engaging in HIV risk behaviors. AIDS and Behavior, 11 (6),Jones, R. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Sexual Pressure Scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, Jones, R. (2006) Sex Scripts and power: A framework to explain urban women’s HIV sexual risk with male partners. Nursing Clinics of North America, 41, Jones, R. (2004). Relationships of sexual imposition, dyadic trust, and sensation seeking with sexual risk behaviors in young urban women. Research in Nursing and Health, 27,Jones, R. (2003). Survey data collection using Audio Computer Assisted Self-Interview. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25,
32Many Thanks to the XIX International AIDS Conference Rachel Jones, PhD, RN, FAAN