Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDana Saylors Modified over 9 years ago
1
Past, present and future of Gravitational Wave detection Science J. Alberto Lobo, Bellaterra, 13-October-2004
2
Presentation summary 1.Current GW detection research status: Acoustic detectors Interferometers LISA 2.LPF and the LTP 3.The Diagnostics and DMU subsystems 4.Future prospects
3
Earth based GW detectors There are two detection concepts at present Acoustic detection: Interferometric detection: Based on resonant amplification of GW induced tidal effects. Based on GW induced phase shifts on e.m. waves. VIRGO, LIGO, GEO-600, TAMA EXPLORER, NAUTILUS, AURIGA, ALLEGRO, NIOBE
4
Bar concept Idea of an acoustic detector (bar) is to link masses with a spring: so that and GW signal gets selectively amplified around frequency . Strong directionality
5
Real bar detectors J. Weber Two well separated aluminum bars (~1000 km) Resonance at ~1 kHz Piezoelectric non-resonant transducers Impulse sensitivity: h~10 -16 Coincidence analysis Tens of sightings claimed in one year Claims questioned and eventually disproved Hawking and Gibbons: energy innovation theory Giffard: bar quantum limit New generation cryogenic and ultra-cryogenic bars
6
EXPLORER detector at CERN (ROG)
7
NAUTILUS, Frascati Dilution refrigerator: 50 mK Resonant transducer h ~ 5x10 -19
8
Resonant motion sensor Principle: Resonant energy transfer to & fro Mecahnical amplification Beat spectrum:
9
Bar detector sensitivity Maximum bandwidth: NAUTILUS, 1999
10
IGEC IGEC (International Gravitational Event Collaboration) Essential resultsEssential results: No impulse signals above 4x10 -18 Negligible false alarm when n>3 (<1/10 4 years) Various controversial, single detector claims available… Remarkable… but insufficient
11
MiniGrail, Leiden
12
Interferometric detector working principle Resonance condition :
13
Interferometric detector design Fabry-Pérot arms: Photodiode: dark fringe: Photon flux waste Shot noise important Light recycling technique: Power recycling Signal recycling Delay lines
14
Details of VIRGO Cascina site, near Pisa
15
Details of VIRGO Vacuum pipe Highly reflecting mirror
16
Summary status of LIGO Nov. 1999: Official inauguration Feb. 2002: Engineering run E7, 6 months Sep. 2002: Science run S1, 17 days, + TAMA + GEO-600 Feb. 2003: Science run S2, 59 days, Nov. 2003: Science run S3, 70 days, + TAMA + GEO-600 End of 2004: Science run S4: ~4 weeks Spring 2005: Commissioning, ~6 months Autumn 2005: Science run S5, ~6 months After: Full observatory operation
17
LIGO Science run S3, and GEO-600
19
there are many GW sources at low frequencies Earth-based detectors are seismic noise limited If… but… then… the solution is to go out to space
20
LISA
21
Brief chronology: 1993.Europe/US team submits LISA proposal as M3 project of ESA’s Horizon-2000 Science Programme. 1994. LISA is changed to cornerstone mission in ESA’s Horizon-2000 Plus, and approved as ESA alone. 1997. New studies to reduce cost: LISA is redefined as a three S/C Constellation, 1.4 ton payload. NASA joins in (50% + 50%), launch advanced to ~2010. 1998. ESA’s FPAG recommends industrial study phase. 1999. System & Technology Study begins. Prime is Dornier Satellitensysteme, LIST strongly involved. 2000. Final Report delivered to ESA. 2003. TRIP Review panel considers LISA medium risk. 2003. ESA’s 4 th Nov SPC approves LISA, and LPF. 2004. NASA’s new exploration programme defers LISA to 2013.
22
LISA concept Test masses 5 million km, 30 mHz Transponder scheme
23
LISA sensitivity
24
Comparison with Earth detectors
25
LISA’s assured sources
26
Cumulative Weekly S/N Ratios during Last Year Before MBH-MBH Coalescence
28
LISA orbit
29
Orbit dynamics 1 o inclination 0.01 eccentricity
32
The three spacecraft Thermal shield Downlink antennas FEEP Baffle Solar panels Support structures Science module Star tracker
33
The science module
34
LISA mission summary Detection of GWs, sensitivity: 4x10 -21 at 1 mHz Payload: Objective: Six capacitive inertial sensors Six set of four FEEP per S/C Two lasers per S/C: ND-YAG, 1064 nm, 1 W Six test masses of Au-Pt alloy, 40 mm a side, in three S/C Fabry-Perot cavities, stability 30 Hz/sqrt(Hz), transponders Quadrant photodiode detectors, fringe resol: 30 cm Cassegrain telescopes Orbit:1 AU, 0.01 ecc, 1 deg ecliptic inclin, 20 deg behind Earth Launcher:NASA’s Delta, launch date: 2013 Spacecraft:Total mass: 1380 kg Total power: 940 W/composite Pointing performance: few n-rad/sqrt(Hz) in band Science data rate: 672 bps each S/C Telemetry:7 kps, 9 hour/2 days; Deep Space Network
35
LISA PathFinder (formerly SMART-2) LISA’s requirements are extremely demanding. Drag free subsystem can not be fully tested on Earth. A previous, smaller technology mission, will assess feasibility: LPF It will carry on board the LTP. However it will be in a smaller scale, both in size and sensitivity. Essentially, LTP will check: drag free technology picometre interferometry other important subsystems and software
36
LPF
37
LPF Funding Agencies and countries Mission: DLR SSO Payload: Prime contractor: – Platform: Astrium UK – Payload: Astrium Friedrichshafen
38
LTP concept 1. One LISA arm is squeezed to 30 centimetres: 2. Relax sensitivity by one order of magnitude, also in band: 30 cm LTP Objectives : Drag-free Interferometry Other…
39
LTP functional architecture Ground Support Equipment (GSE) LTP flight dynamics simulator Integration GSE IS GSE Optical metrology GSE
40
LPF orbit Lagrange L1 Launch: Sep-2008 Travel time: Mission lifetime: Launch vehicle: Rockot from Plesetsk
41
LTP functional architecture Inertial sensors (IS) Charge management system IS core Caging Mechanism IS Front End Electronics
42
Drag-free subsystem For LISA to work test masses must be (nominally) in free fall. But there are perturbations which tend to spoil this: External agents, e.g., solar pressure, magnetic fields… Internal disturbances, caused by instrumentation itself To compensate for these, a drag-free system is implemented. It has two fundamental components: A position sensor An actuation system
43
Drag-free working concept Courtesy of S. Vitale
44
Drag-free working concept Courtesy of S. Vitale
45
Drag-free working concept Courtesy of S. Vitale
46
Drag-free working concept Courtesy of S. Vitale
47
Drag-free working concept Courtesy of S. Vitale
48
Drag-free working concept Courtesy of S. Vitale
49
Drag-free working concept Courtesy of S. Vitale
50
Drag-free working concept Courtesy of S. Vitale
51
Drag-free working concept Courtesy of S. Vitale
52
Capacitive position sensing principle Bias: few volts at 100 kHz Nanometre precision comfortably attained
53
Rotational and translational control example
54
Inertial sensor structure
55
LTP functional architecture Optical Metrology Unit (OMU) Optical Metrology Front End Electronics Laser Unit Optical Bench Acousto-optic modulator Laser
56
LTP optical metrology To interferometer: Mach-Zender heterodyne Power = 1 mW = 1.064 m Signal:
57
LTP interferometer Reference x1-x2x1 Frequency Readout: quadrant InGaAs photodiodes A CD B
58
The LTP EM optical bench
59
The LTP EM OB: after-shake tests: phase
60
LTP functional architecture LTP structure (LTPS) Structure Gravitational balance system Thermal Shield
61
The LTP structure ASD, courtesy of S. Vitale
62
The LTP structure ASD, courtesy of S. Vitale
63
The LTP structure ASD, courtesy of S. Vitale
64
The LTP structure ASD, courtesy of S. Vitale
65
The LTP structure ASD, courtesy of S. Vitale
66
The LTP structure ASD, courtesy of S. Vitale
67
The science spacecraft The science spacecraft carries the the LTP and DRS, the micro-propulsion systems and the drag free control system. Total mass about 470kg Inertial sensor core assemblies mounted in a dedicated compartment within the central cylinder. DRS Colloid thrusters mounted on opposing outer panels. Payload electronics and spacecraft units accommodated as far away as possible from the sensors to minimise gravitational, thermal and magnetic disturbances. FEEP and cold-gas micro-propulsion assemblies arranged to provide full control in all axes. Courtesy of G. Racca
68
LTP functional architecture Diagnostics and Data Management Unit (DMU) Diagnostics end items DMU and diagnostics box
69
DDS: Data Management & Diagnostics Subsystem Diagnostics items: Purpose: – Noise split up Sensors for: – Temperature – Magnetic fields – Charged particles Calibration: – Heaters – Induction coils DMU: Purpose: – LTP computer Hardware: – Data Processing Unit (DPU) – Power Distribution Unit (PDU) – Data Acquisition Unit (DAU) Software: – Process phase-meter readout – Charge management control – UV light control – Caging mechanism drive (TBC) – DFACS split (?)
70
Noise analysis concept Test mass equation of motion (1 dimension): In frequency domain: Thus spurious forces fake GW signals, with spectral density: LTP top level science requirement rephrased:
71
Noise apportioning Direct forces on test mass: Thermal gradients Magnetic forces Fake interferometer noise Coupling to S/C: Test mass position fluctuations Drag free response delay Charged particle showers Diagnostics items
72
Noise reduction philosophy Problem: to assess the contribution of a given perturbation to the noise force f int. Approach: 1) Apply controlled perturbation to the system 2) Measure “feed-through” coefficient between force and perturbation: 3) Measure actual with suitable sensors 4) Estimate contribution of by linear interpolation: 5) Substract out from total detected noise: 6) Iterate process for all identified perturbations
73
Example Courtesy of S. Vitale
74
Various diagnostics items Temperature and temperature gradients: – Sensors: thermometers at suitable locations – Control: heaters at suitable locations Magnetic fields and magnetic field gradients: – Sensors: magnetometers at suitable locations – Control: induction coils at suitable locations Charged particle showers (protons): – Sensors: radiation monitor (Mona Lisa) – Control: non-existent Direct forces Coupled to S/C Specifications follow from mission top level requirements
75
Diagnostics science requirements Ref. num LISALTP Req. 107Temperature PSD (optical bench) 10 -4 K/ Hz Req. 108Temperature difference PSD (IS) 10 -5 K/ Hz10 -4 K/ Hz Value Magnetic Field T T/m Magnetic Field Fluctuation PSD 650 nT/ Hz 25 (nT/m)/ Hz Magnetic Field Gradient PSD Magnetic Field Gradient Magnitude Overflow for 10 8 p/cm 2 Solar Energetic Proton (SEP, >100 MeV) at peak flux B RM
76
DDS current development status Thermal: NTC and RTD devices identified and procured (EM) FEE designed and built (EM) First round of tests and data analysis complete New tests underway Magnetic: Some preliminary studies and surveys New team has recently assumed responsibility Radiation monitor: Full conceptual design ready Front-end Electronics Designed Rest of components selected from ESA/NASA qualified parts Some other parts to be defined DMU: In situ design and manufacture (price) Advanced state of development, redundancy requested Software writing in progress
77
Long term: – LISA is fully endorsed by FPAG and SSAC – Full, first class participation in LISA: Technology developments Science yield – LISA PathFinder: Fulfill accepted LTP/DDS commitments MEC funds until 2007, 3.9 MEU New projects needed until LPF launch in 2008 Create qualified Science and Technology teams Can Science already be done with LPF? Short-medium term: Conclusion and future prospects
79
End of presentation
80
IGEC
82
Garching delay line prototype
83
Delta launcher
84
LPF operation orbit and injection
86
FEEP (Field Emission Electric Propulsion) Cs or In ions Range: 0.1 N < F < 100 N Resolution: 0.1 N Power: 50 mW/ N Negligible sloshing Long life: 9 gr/thruster.2 yr Low noise, no mechanical parts LISA needs six sets of four thrusters per S/C for full drag free control
87
The entire payload
88
Various launcher alternatives RockotDneprAriane 5
89
The LTP optical bench
90
Thermal diagnostics: current status Sensor choice: NTC & RTD to be tested
91
PIC C HP 3440 2A IEEE-488 USB RS232 USB FEE Al block FOAM CH0 CH1 CH2 CH3 CH4 CH5 CH6 CH7 MUX, GAIN control 16 bit data NTC type sensor RTD type sensor Reference resistor. Vishay S102J 10k Test setup only. Not part of DMU-LTP LabVIEW NTC2 NTC1 NTC2 NTC3 NTC2 RTD1 RTD2 NTC3 NTC2 RTD2 Test Philosophy Thermal diagnostics: current status
92
Thermal diagnostics: clean room at NTE
93
Thermal diagnostics: foaming process
94
Thermal diagnostics: sensor inserts
95
Thermal diagnostics: first NTC results
96
Magnetometer top level requirements from LTP magnetic requirements (TBC). Magnetic Field10 μT Magnetic Field Gradient 5 μT Magnetic Field PSD650 nT Magnetic Field Gradient PSD 25 nT Sample rate: 0.33 sample/second (x 3 components) Bits/sample: 16 Range: variable (± 10 μT, ± 30 μT ± 100 μT) Resolution (FS/2 16 ) variable (0.305 nT, 0.91 nT, 3.05 nT) Noise (for SNR=10 dB in ± 10 μT range) 40 pt / sqrt Hz @ 0.15Hz Mass, power, drift. Survey of suitable magnetometer technologies. Candidate: Fluxgate Magnetometer. TechnologyFGMAMRMGMRMHEM MeasurementVectorial Range1 pT – 1 T100 pT- 1 T 1uT- 100 T Precision(noise)5-10 pT/√Hz @ 1 Hz3-10 nT/√Hz @ 1 Hz20 pT/√Hz @ 100 Hz10 nT/√Hz @ 1Hz Drift 0.2 nT/yr 30-50 ppm/ºC (temp) 600 ppm/ºC (temp) 600 ppm/ºC (temp) 600 ppm/ºC Power Consumption<0.5W Magnetic diagnostics
97
Helmholtz coil configurations analysed: Preliminary magnetometer survey: flux-gate, Hall effect,…
98
Radiation monitor 18 x 18 mm 2 10 x 10 mm 2 10 mm Telescopic Configuration reduces the Angular acceptance on particles and gives a better spectral resolution.
99
Radiation Monitor Data Control & Analysis
100
DMU Block Diagram
102
DMU mechanical design
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.