Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The NEW Administrative Review This institution is an equal opportunity provider.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "The NEW Administrative Review This institution is an equal opportunity provider."— Presentation transcript:

1 The NEW Administrative Review This institution is an equal opportunity provider

2 It takes a lot of courage to release the familiar and seemingly secure, to embrace the new. But there is no real security in what is no longer meaningful. There is more security in the adventurous and exciting, for in movement there is life, and in change there is power - Alan Cohen

3  The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 calls for a more effective and efficient review process:  Consolidate the Administrative Review Processes  Incorporate school breakfast, the new meal pattern and dietary specification, and the 6-cent performance based reimbursement  Implement a 3-year review cycle  Provide for offsite monitoring approaches  Provide effective training and ongoing technical assistance Administrative Review Goals

4  New processes uses tools and forms designed to be:  Modular  Efficient  Flexible  Effective  Collaborative Revamped Resources

5  Includes questions on a number of monitoring areas and is intended for completion prior to the on-site visit  Additional Off-Site Monitoring Tools Include:  Meal Compliance Risk Assessment Tool  Dietary Specifications Assessment Tool  Resource Management Risk Indicator Tool Off Site Assessment Tools

6 Maximizing Resources

7  Review Period  Most recent month claim submitted, Must include 10 or more operating days  2013 Reviews  Postponed Reviews from 2012  Those schools not 6 Cents Certified  Special circumstances  Reviews early in school year  Year round, multi-track, and Provision schools 3 Year Review Cycle

8 Just because everything is different doesn’t mean that everything has changed. -Irene Peter

9 New Administrative Review Areas

10  Notify Superintendent and Food Service Director  Initiate Off-site Assessment Tools  Review SFA Documentation  Obtain pre-visit information  Select NSLP sites for review Pre-Visit Procedures

11  Entrance Conference  On-Site Review  Exit Conference On-Site Review Procedures

12  Certification  Household Applications and Direct Certification  7 CFR 245.6 for process  Benefit Issuance  Roster and Medium of Exchange  7 CFR 210.7 (c)(1)(ii); 245.6 (a)(4); 245.6 (c)(3)(iii); 245.6 (c)(6)(iii)  Verification  Meal Counting and Claiming  School level review Entire School Food Authority

13  Complete Off-Site Assessment Tool  Step 1: Obtain Benefit Issuance Document  Must always use the list used by the Point of Service  Must be a day during the review period  Step 2: Select Student Certifications for Review  Step 3: Obtain Certification Documents Off-Site Review Phase

14 Step 2: Selecting Student Certifications for Review

15  Step 1: Validate SFA’s procedures as described on the Off-Site Assessment Tool  Step 2: Validate Student Certifications  Examine Household Application OR find student on DC List  Step 3: Validate Benefit Issuance Document  Make sure no Overt Identification  Validate POS  Step 4: Review Denied Applications  Reviewed at least 10 denied applications On-Site Assessment Phase

16 If you have always done it that way, it is probably wrong. -Charles Kettering

17  Accuracy of Verification  Applications Verified correctly  Sample Size determined correctly  Confirmation reviews done as necessary  Direct Verification done properly  Letter sent to household met FNS requirements  Correct documentation received from family and determined correctly  Notice of adverse action met FNS requirements Verification

18 Review scheduled for:Validation Review Prior to completion of Verification Summary Report (FNS742) *Previous year Verification Summary Report *Previous year’s verified applications Timeframe that falls BEFORE the Verification Summary Report for the current school year has been submitted BUT after the SFA completed Verification *Previous Year’s FNS742 *Validate the number of applications from the previous school year *Review current year’s verified applications for accuracy After the Verification Summary Report is completed *Use current year’s applications and FNS742 Verification Review Documents

19 Verification Review

20  Validate Off-Site Assessment Tool  Validate the Counting and Claiming Process  Electronic versus Manual  Prevention of Overt Identification  Point of Service  Alternative Points of Service  Back-up System  Training  Consolidation and Reimbursement  Record Errors Meal Counting and Claiming

21  Reviewer will assess whether the school:  Offers students the required meal components in the required quantities  Gives students access to select required meal components on all reimbursable meal service lines; and  Records for reimbursement only meals that contain required components in required quantities Meal Components and Quantities


23  At Least two varieties of fluid milk at breakfast and lunch  Fat Free, Flavored or unflavored  Low fat, unflavored Milk Requirements

24  Schools must offer vegetables from five vegetable subgroups over the course of a week:  Dark Green  Red/Orange  Beans/peas  Starchy  Other Vegetable Subgroup Requirements

25  Starting July 1, 2013 in NSLP and SBP  ½ grains offered over the week must be whole grain-rich  Starting July 1, 2014  All grains offered over the week must be whole grain- rich Whole Grain-Rich Requirements

26  Review breakfast and lunch documentation to assess meal pattern compliance  Menus/production records  6 Cents reimbursement documentation  Week must be 3-7 consecutive days  Missing meal components/insufficient quantities: expand documentation review to (at least) entire review period Documentation Review

27  Production Records  By meal service line and age/grade group served  Support claims  Document what was served and leftovers  Food is creditable for portions served  Document that daily and weekly meal component requirements are met  Identify if seconds are offered regularly Pre-Visit Documentation Review

28  Ensure all reimbursable meal lines offer all required components  Make sure standardized recipes are used and followed  Ensure students have access to, and know how to select a reimbursable meal  Ensure there is a milk variety available to all students  “Like” substitutions strongly encouraged On-Site Review

29  The State agency will monitor whether:  School is offering enough food on all reimbursable meal service lines;  Signage is posted on the service line;  Students are selecting enough components/items to make a reimbursable meal;  Food service staff are accurately judging quantities on self-serve bars; and  Food service staff at the POS are trained and can recognize a reimbursable meal  If they make a child go back for more food when the child has a reimbursable meal, that is now a OVS violation Offer Versus Serve

30  Lunch  Must take 3 of 5 components  Fruits and Vegetables are 2 separate food components  Must take at least ½ cup serving of fruit or vegetable component  Food Component is one of the five food groups for a reimbursable meal  Breakfast  4 food items for OVS versus 3 items for non-OVS  Must include the three breakfast components (Fruit (or vegetable substitute), Grain, and Milk)  Food Item is a specific food offered within the five food components  After School Snack Offer versus Serve

31 School Breakfast OVS Must Offer 4 Breakfast Items that include the 3 Breakfast Components: Fruit (or Vegetable Substitute Grain Milk Student may decline: 1 Item Student Must Take: At Least 3 items One component must be fruit or vegetable (SY 2014-15) School Lunch OVS Must offer 5 Lunch Components: Fruit Vegetable Grain Meat/Meat Alternate Milk Student may decline: 2 Items Student Must Take At Least 3 components One component must be fruit or vegetable OVS: Breakfast and Lunch

32  We will be asking you 26 questions to assess your practices and determine if you are a Low Risk or High Risk  We will request and review a weeks worth of menu documentation from the targeted menu review site prior to coming on-site  Breakfast & Lunch Menu  Corresponding Production Records  Corresponding Standardized Recipes  If High Risk will have to complete on-site Dietary specifications Assessment tool and a Nutrient Analysis  Nutrition Facts Labels and Manufacturer Specification Sheets will be requested for all food to complete a nutrient analysis Dietary Specifications

33  Possible Findings:  Missing Meal Components  Insufficient quantities of Fruits/Vegetables  Implementation  Staff Training  Signage Technical Assistance & Corrective Action

34  Must review at least 1 school  0-5 schools selected that operate FFVP – Review 1  6-10 schools selected that operate the FFVP – Review 2  11-20 schools selected that operate the FFVP – Review 3  Must review the invoices, timesheets, purchase orders, etc. submitted for the FFVP claim  FFVP Meal Service observation Review FFVP

35  Reviewer will determine if SFA retains final administrative and management responsibility for meeting all afterschool snack requirements  Assess compliance in the following areas:  Eligibility  Accountability/Meal Counting and Claiming  Meal Pattern/Production Records  Monitoring  General Areas Review Afterschool Snack Program

36  General Areas of Review  Written Food Safety (HACCP) plan  Food Safety Inspections posted in a publicly visible location  Temperatures Monitored  Request for two inspections  Recordkeeping  Storage Food Safety

37  Have an “…And Justice for All” poster displayed in a prominent location  Program materials have the correct statement included  Civil Rights policy and procedure  Documentation for staff training Civil Rights

38  FNS Memo SP42-2011  Copy of the Local School Wellness Policy  How does the public know about the Local School Wellness Policy?  Periodic review and update  How are stakeholders made aware of their ability to participate  Goals for Nutrition Education, physical activity, school based activities  Nutrition promotion goals  Designated LWP oversight official  Nutrition guidelines  Plan for Measuring implementation  How does the public know about the results of the most recent assessment on implementation of LWP? Local School Wellness Policy

39  Maintenance of the Nonprofit School Food Service Account  Indirect Costs  Paid Lunch Equity  Revenue from Non-Program Foods  USDA Foods Resource Management

40  Nonprofit School Food Service Account  Did you conduct a year-end review of revenues and expenses?  Did you have expenses in excess of revenues?  If you had a surplus – was this amount moved out of your account?  Net Cash Resources  Less than 3 month operating balance  Allowable Costs  Restrict the use of program funds to expenses that meet the requirements of 2 CFR 225 and are reasonable, necessary, and otherwise allowable. Maintenance of the Nonprofit School Food Service Account

41  Review the SFA’s most recent full year statement of revenues and expenses  Determine whether selected expenses are allowable  Ensure accurate and sufficient support documents are maintained for allowable costs  Select a sample of at least 10% of the SFA’s expenses to test compliance and allowability Review

42  WE will check your PLE calculations and amount you determined to increase prices to make sure prices were increased, and if not, make sure that there is a corresponding move of money from non Federal sources (i.e. the General Fund) to Food Service to make up for not increasing prices. PLE

43  Non-Program foods – Foods and beverages sold in a participating school that are purchased using funds from the nonprofit food service account  Includes:  A la carte items  Adult meals  Vending machine food purchased with food service funds  Fundraisers  Catered and vended meals Non-Program Foods Revenue

44  Does the SFA use the USDA Revenue from Non- program Foods Tool to calculate its non-program food costs and non-program food revenue? Non-Program Foods Revenue

45  FNS Instruction 782-5 Rev. 1  Adult meal prices should include the value of any USDA entitlement and bonus donated foods used to prepare the meal  Lunch Reimbursement Rate $2.88  Commodity Rate $.2275  Tax at 6%  Total Lunch Adult Price $3.27-$3.29 depending on lunch rate  Total Breakfast Adult Rate $1.60-$1.91 Adult Meal Prices

46  Ensure SFAs are correctly determining if their costs are allowable, allocable and appropriately charged as a direct or indirect cost.  Indirect costs are determined on an annual basis at the Department Of Education and are valid for one year.  Direct costs – incurred specifically for a program or other cost objective; clearly identifiable  Indirect Costs – Incurred for the benefit of multiple programs, functions, or other cost objectives; not readily identifiable Indirect Costs

47  The reviewer should determine if the SFA is conducting an annual reconciliation to ensure that a purchasing agent of FSMC has credited the SFA for the value of all USDA foods received.  Must also review invoices to make sure all rebates, discounts and credits are properly given back to the SFA Food Service Management Company

48  Have at most 30 days to correct.  Some corrective action must occur immediately Corrective Action

49  Regulatory Authority  Authority for Withholding Payments as a result of Administrative Review (7 CFR 210.18 (l))  Authority for Withholding payments (7 CFR 210.24) Withholding Payments

50  SFA has failed to submit documented Corrective Action by the specified due date  SA finds Corrective Action was not completed  SFA continues to have the same problems with the same cause  Payments are withheld until the SA determines that Corrective Action was properly implemented by the SFA When???

51  Applications missing information  Miscategorization of Certification  Benefit Issuance Errors  Failure to update verified applications Fiscal Action

52  Missing Meal Components  Immediate fiscal action required  Vegetable Subgroup & Milk Type  Fiscal Action required for repeat violations  Quantities & Whole Grain Rich  Fiscal action discretionary for repeat violations Fiscal Action

53 2013-14 SFA’s to be reviewed Sugar Salem SD

54 Never doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. - Margaret Mead Thank you

Download ppt "The NEW Administrative Review This institution is an equal opportunity provider."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google