Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Requirements Executive Overview Workshop Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Defense Systems Management College Defense Acquisition.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Requirements Executive Overview Workshop Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Defense Systems Management College Defense Acquisition."— Presentation transcript:

1 Requirements Executive Overview Workshop Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Defense Systems Management College Defense Acquisition University Fort Belvoir, Virginia 14 November 2012

2 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Developing Requirements The Requirements Environment Evolution of Capabilities Based Planning Sequence of events –Analysis –Initial Documentation –Transitions to actions that provide solutions Non-Materiel solutions JCIDS interactions with developing materiel solutions Requirements Approval structure Recent Changes to the Process Rapid Response Lanes for JCIDS JCIDS Review 2

3 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response The Requirements Environment Finding the balance between: CCMD near-term requirements to support CONPLANs and current missions and Services’ long range vision & investment plans Versatile, joint systemsand Systems optimized for service missions Growing demandsandFiscal & political constraints Geographic specificityandWorldwide applicability Ambitious requirementsandAchievable acquisition strategy Quantity mattersandHigh-end capabilities 3

4 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Requirements Generation System (RGS) ~30 years of experience Threat vs Capabilities-Based Planning 4 Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) ~ Since 2003 Late Integration Joint Capabilities Strategic Direction Joint Warfighting Concept Development Joint Experimentation, Assessment & Analysis, Validation, Selection of Solutions Services Build Systems Service Unique Strategic Visions and Requirements Service Experimentation, Assessment & Analysis, Validation, Selection of Solutions CCMDs, Services’ Unique Strategic Visions

5 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response 5 Force Management Adaptive Planning JCIDS (J8) Common Lexicon – Joint Capability Areas Joint Concepts (J7) CJCSI C Joint Concepts Joint Concept Development & Experimentation Process Guide JCDE Campaign Plan CJCSI /JCIDS Manual JROC Validation and Approval of JCIDS Documents Joint Capabilities Board Functional Capabilities Boards Evaluation of CCMD Needs (lessons learned, joint urgent needs, CGA/IPL, etc.) Strategic Guidance (OSD (P)) National Security Strategy National Defense Strategy National Military Strategy QDR Report GEF DPPG/DPG **New strategic guidance for DOD (Jan 2012) Spt for Strategic Analysis (OSD (P)/J-8) Defense Planning Scenarios Integrated Security Constructs Multi-Service Force Deployment Operational Availability Studies Global Force Management DoD 5000 (OSD AT&L) Defense Acquisition Boards Materiel Development Decision Milestone Decisions Acquisition Decision Memos Root Cause Analysis Selected Acquisition Reports/ Defense Acquisition Executive Summaries Program Objective Memorandum/ Budget Estimate Submission Program and Budget Review Resource Management Decisions President’s Budget CBP Strategic Guidance And Desired Effects Delivered Capability to the Joint Warfighter PPBE (OSD (C/CAPE)) Capabilities-Based Planning (CBP)

6 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response JCIDS is… 6 A key supporting process for DoD acquisition and PPBE processes –That supports “the statutory responsibility of the JROC to validate joint warfighting requirements” –And supports the CJCS advising the Secretary of Defense in identifying, assessing and prioritizing joint military requirements –A Staffing method enabling the Joint Staff to ensure Sponsors’ needs meet the Chairman’s intent (Joint force needs) JCIDS is not… the entire “Integrated Defense Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Life Cycle Management System” “Requirements” (JCIDS) Acquisition PPB&E

7 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response LRIP FOT&E Technology Demonstrated Initial Key Performance Parameters/Key System Attributes (KPPs/KSAs) Acquisition Strategy T&E Master Plan (TEMP) SEP MS “B” Final Design Developmental T&E (DT&E) Operational Assessments Revise KPPs/KSAs Acquisition Strategy Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) TEMP SEP MS “C” Develop, Test, Produce & Field MS “A” Evolutionary Acquisition Materiel Solution Analysis Technology Development Engineering & Manufacturing Development Production & Deployment CDD CPD SECDEF Select Joint Concept Activity Capabilities-Based Assessment / Other Policy Identify Capability Requirements Develop CONOPS Select Materiel Solution Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) Initial Operational T&E (IOT&E) Acquisition Strategy APB TEMP SEP Military Services OSD/Joint Staff Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Technology Development Strategy (TDS) Test & Evaluation (T&E) Strategy (TES) System Engineering Plan (SEP) OSD (AT&L, CAPE), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Competitive Prototyping Joint Staff / Joint Requirements Oversight Council / OSD Getting The Front End Right is Key JCIDS and Acquisition 7 SSA Products Integrated Security Constructs Joint Concepts ICD Materiel Development Decision Sponsor- Approved CDD Identification of Capability Requirements CCMD Operational Planning CBAs & Other Studies Exercises/Lessons Learned Outputs Mission & Problem Capability Gaps Tasks Performance Conditions Operational Risk Non-Materiel Approaches Materiel Approaches Recommendations President, SECDEF & Chairman: Strategic Guidance JCTDs/JUON/JEON/ Experiments JIEDDO Initiatives Defense Business Sys Validates ICD Reviews AoA Results Validates CDD Validates CPD JROC action for JROC Interest programs (ACAT I & IA)

8 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Capabilities-Based Assessment (CBA) 8 NEEDS GAPS SOLUTIONS Existing Guidance The problems and the risks What we need for the mission What should we do about it? Where does this need rank? How soon do we need it?

9 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Identifying Needs and Potential Solutions CBA Recommendations: –Transformational solutions –Evolution of existing capabilities –Information technology solutions Information for an Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Managers must communicate to avoid disconnects over seams between JCIDS, DAS, and PPBE CBA Documentation: –Initial Capabilities Document –DOTmLPF-P Change Recommendation 9

10 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response CBA Output Documents Joint DCR – DOTmLPF-P Change Recommendation –When DoD decides a Joint Non-Materiel Solution is appropriate –Non-Materiel Solutions Change doctrine Reorganize Train DOD personnel differently Acquire commercial or non-developmental items, or additional quantities of existing items Adjust the professional development of the joint leader Add or reassign personnel Move or realign facilities Change policy 10

11 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response CBA Output Documents Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) (MS A) –Documents Capabilities-Based Assessment (CBA) Results – specifically Capability Gaps –Identifies relevant operational performance attributes –Documents the recommendation on the need for a materiel solution and potential non-material solutions –Predecessor for the Capabilities Development Document 11

12 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Operational Performance Attributes Attributes Necessary to Design a Proposed System Establish a Performance Baseline Guide Development and Demonstration Guide Development of Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) for Inclusion in Capabilities Development Document 12

13 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Key JCIDS Development Documents Capability Development Document (MS B) –Defines Performance Requirements to Achieve the Capability Identifies KPPs, KSAs, and additional attributes Attributes should be Authoritative, Measurable and Testable –Describes DOTmLPF-P constraints associated with the solution –May describe multiple increments –Provides operational capabilities for the acquisition strategy and the Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) –Insert all CDD KPPs and Sustainment KSAs verbatim into the APB 13

14 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Key Performance Parameters (KPPs) Performance Attributes of a System Critical To Develop an Effective Military Capability KPPs Must be Measurable, Testable, and Quantifiable in a Practical and Timely Manner –Enable feedback from T&E; support decision making Mandatory KPPs –Force Protection, Survivability, Sustainment, Net Ready, Training, Energy Validated by the JROC for JROC Interest Documents Failure to Meet a KPP Results in Reevaluation or Reassessment of the Program 14

15 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Key System Attributes (KSAs) Attributes or Characteristics Considered Essential to Achieving a Balanced Solution Not Critical Enough to be Selected as a KPP Also Measurable, Testable, and Quantifiable Identified by the Sponsor; Should be Kept to a Minimum Sponsor Senior Leadership can Change a KSA 15

16 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Key JCIDS Development Documents Capability Production Document (CPD) (MS C) –Supports Production and Development of one increment –Documents Authoritative, Testable Capabilities –Support Production, Testing, and Deployment May describe Incremental Production and Deployment –No New Requirements –Must meet Operational Performance Attributes 16

17 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Differences Between the CDD and the CPD CDDCPD Focus on DesignFocus on Production All IncrementsA Specific Increment KPPs to Help Evaluate Alternative Designs KPPs Refined and Tailored to the Proposed System 17

18 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response JCIDS Document Tracks 18 JROC Interest Joint Integration Joint Information JCB Interest KM/DS staffing & comment FCB review & prioritization Independent KM/DS staffing & comment FCB review & prioritization KM/DS staffing & comment FCB review & prioritization KM/DS staffing & comment FCB review & prioritization FCB prioritization JCB Review Validation Authority Validation Authority JCB Sponsor Joint Staffing Designator (JSD) ACAT I/IA programs & Joint DCRs ACAT II & below with impact on interoperability ACAT II & below that require endorsements & certifications ACAT II & below that do not require endorsements & certifications All others KM/DS: Knowledge Management/Decision Support tool

19 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response A Streamlined Process (Deliberate) 19 ) Sponsor Gatekeeper Functional Capability Board SME inputs from DoD Prep for JCB/JROC Termination Joint Requirements Oversight Council Acquisition (and/or DCRs) Joint Capabilities Board Phase 1 Staffing O-6 level coord from across DoD Phase 2 Staffing GO/FO lvl coord from multiple agencies Sponsor Gatekeeper FCB Chair: Phase 2? 21 days4 days Variable Total: 95 – 160+ days 45+ days days FCB Draft Prep for mtg 15 days26 – 35 days DJ8 Prep Brief Est. 21 days Commenting/30 days Adjudication/7 days to FCB Chair 4 daysEst. 7 days to JCB/14 days to JROC Total: 83 days Sponsor Gatekeeper Functional Capability Board SME inputs from DoD Prioritization within this portfolio CCMD Inputs Allied/Partner Nation equity Non-material recommendations FCB Chair: Ready Validation Discussion? Termination JROC JCB Acquisition (and/or DCRs) Combined “Staffing”

20 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Requirements Decision Chain 20 JCB JROC VCJCS FCB WG FCB JROC DECISION CHAIN JROC: Joint Requirements Oversight Council JCB: Joint Capability Board FCB: Functional Capability Board FCB WG: Functional Capability Board Working Group JROC MEMBERSHIP Chair: VCJCS Council Members: Vice Chief of Staff, Army Vice Chief of Naval Operations Vice Chief of Staff, Air Force Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps Combatant Commands* (Commander or Deputy Commander) *Unless otherwise directed to participate by the JROC Chairman, CCMD representatives are highly encouraged to participate as voting members of the JROC when matters related to the area of responsibility or functions of that command will be under consideration by the JROC. USD(AT&L), Dir, CAPE, USD(Comptroller), DOT&E, and USD(Policy) attend as JROC advisors Owns JCIDS; Validates JROC Interest documents; final authority Validates JCB Interest documents; assists JROC Reviews documents & prioritizes prior to FCB review Reviews documents; prioritizes within portfolio; makes validation recommendation to JCB/JROC JROC Chairman; Advises the CJCS

21 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Functional Capability Boards & Sponsoring Organizations Logistics Battlespace Awareness Mr. Gareau JS J-2 Mr. Hawkins JS J-4 Force Application BGen O’Donohue JS J-8 Force Support Protection BG Polakowski JS J-8 DOD CIOOSD(Comptroller) D/CAPE DIA Rep (Threat) ODNI/IRB Other DoD Agencies as necessary FCB Membership: (O-6 level) Services Combatant Command Reps OSD (AT&L) OSD (I) USecAF (Space) BGen O’Donohue JS J-8 Additional JCAs: Building Partnerships Corporate Management & Support C4/Cyber Includes NC and C2 JCAs Brig Gen Weggeman JS J-6

22 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Capability Development Tracking and Management (CDTM) 22 IT system that transforms JCIDS capability tracking from document-centric to data-centric process –Developed and deployed on NIPRNet and SIPRNet –30 June 2011 mandated CDTM use for all JCIDS documents (ICD, CDD, CPD, DCR) has been relaxed until post JCIDS Manual re- write Capability gap traceability Process metrics Ease of use enhancements –Improved search capability –Improved document creation –Input standardization Ability to data share with other DoD applications

23 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Summary of the Deliberate JCIDS Process Materiel Solutions –Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) –Capability Development Document (CDD) –Capability Production Document (CPD) Non-Materiel Solutions – Joint DOTmLPF-P Change Recommendation (DCR) Operational Requirements Development is a Team Effort; All Stakeholders Should be Involved; Involve the User in Technical Requirements Development Implementing Major Changes to Improve the Process… 23

24 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Rapid Response 24

25 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Rapid Response Situations Urgent and Compelling Needs During Crisis and Conflict Each Service has Policies and Procedures, but … Service-Unique Approaches do not Address Theater- Wide Joint Urgent and Emergent Operational Needs Requirements Managers Need to Stay Engaged in the Process 25

26 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Deliberate Requirements –Service, CCMD or Agency Driven –Traditional route for capabilities that require significant tech development and/or are not urgent or compelling in nature Emergent Requirements –CCMD Driven –Supports accelerated acquisition of capabilities needed for an anticipated or pending contingency operation –VCJCS verifies, JCB or JROC validates Urgent Requirements –CCMD Driven –Urgent and compelling to prevent loss of life and/or mission failure during current operations –Require little tech development and can be resolved in less than two years –DDR validates “Keep right, except to pass” DELIBERATEDELIBERATE EMERGENTEMERGENT URGENTURGENT 0 – 2 YRS 0+ to 5 YRS CONFLICT LANE ONLY POTENTIAL CONFLICT LANE 2-6+ YRS Three Requirements “Lanes” 26

27 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Joint Urgent & Emergent Operational Needs Every Service has a Rapid Response Procedure The Joint Rapid Response Lanes are the Joint Urgent Operational Needs (JUON) and Joint Emergent Operational Needs (JEON) JUON/JEON Validation and Resourcing Involves –VCJCS/JCB/JROC –The Gatekeeper (J8 Deputy Director for Requirements (DDR)) –The Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell (JRAC) –Functional Capabilities Boards (FCBs) and Working Groups –The Military Services, Defense Agencies, ISR TF and Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO) 27

28 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Who Initiates an Urgent/Emergent Need? An Urgent/Emergent Request Must Come from: –A Joint Force Commander –A Service Component Commander –A commander’s delegated representative Service or Services Must Validate Service-Unique Urgent/Emergent Need JUONs/JEONs are Endorsed by the Combatant Commanders and Validated by the Joint Staff 28

29 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Urgent/Emergent Staffing 29

30 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response JUON / JEON Process Flow From Generation to Delivery to Assessment Warfighter Originates Joint Rapid Acquisition Cell (JRAC) Determines Resourcing Strategy Assigns to JIEDDO or Service/Agency for sponsorship Services/Agencies Non C-IED Solutions Joint IED Defeat Office C-IED Solutions FCB Triages JS J-8/RMD Receives JS J-8 DDR or JCB/JROC Validates Senior Integration Group (SIG): Oversight Body for DoD Urgent Needs Solution Delivery CCMD CoS Certifies Assessment of Operational Utility 30

31 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response The Sponsor Service or Agency Recommended by the Gatekeeper and Named by the JRAC The Sponsor Develops an Initial Course of Action –Implementation recommendation –Funding strategy recommendation The Sponsor Manages the Approved JUON / JEON Effort 31

32 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Challenge of Rapid Acquisition 32  Future Focused  Very Structured Process  Evolved Requirements  Analysis of Alternatives  Lengthy Development  High Visibility on Program  Large Investment immediate  Now-focused  More ad hoc process  Broad requirement  Quick assessment of alternatives  Limited development  High visibility on results  Limited investment  Very Limited Feedback  Transition to PoR

33 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response JCIDS Review 33

34 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Law and Policy Title 10 Responsibilities (as modified by 2009 Weapon System Acquisition Reform Act and 2011 National Defense Authorization Act) –The JROC shall assist the VCJCS… In making cost, schedule, and performance trades In prioritizing joint military requirements –The JROC must… Consider input from Combatant Commanders on joint requirements Consider cost, schedule and performance tradeoffs in establishing requirements Set an Initial Operational Capability (IOC) schedule objective for each requirement All the above further emphasized in the JROC Charter (CJCSI 5123 series) More than any other body, …. the JROC is charged with shaping the force 34

35 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response What Has Happened in the Past Current construct ineffective; does not encourage/promote incisive questions/discussions –Little consideration of cost/schedule/performance tradeoffs –No prioritization within and across portfolios…little to no risk analysis –Document and process intensive -- bureaucratic and time consuming –Little impact on shaping the force Congressional Question for the Record (GEN Dempsey Confirmation Hearing) –“General Dempsey, what’s the remedy for Admiral Mullen’s belief that DoD has ‘lost the ability to prioritize, to make hard decisions, to do tough analysis, to make trades’?” JROC Criticisms (Defense Science Board, Defense Business Board, Government Accountability Office,…) –Not making the hard decision regarding cost/schedule/performance –Perceived as not timely and too document centric 35

36 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Where are We Going Take the Lead in Shaping the Force: –Debate the difficult issues and make difficult choices earlier –Better upfront fidelity on cost/schedule/performance tradeoffs –More analytic rigor and risk/portfolio analysis –Stronger emphasis on prioritizing requirements/capabilities –More dynamic/iterative process throughout a program’s lifecycle. (Revisit as necessary…strategy shifts, threat changes, etc.) Create a more dynamic and iterative process…Make difficult choices throughout the requirements process continuum!!! 36

37 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response How We are Getting There Limit the audience so determinative discussion/ decisions can be made –More Tank-like –JROC Principals+1, CCMD Principals+1 –Statutory Advisors or their Deputy (AT&L, CAPE, OT&E, OSD(P), OSD (C)) –JS J7 –FCB Chair –Minimal others by invitation only… Cost vs. Capability vs. Risk – better upfront analysis of alternatives –Review of Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) prior to Milestone A –Highlight non-materiel approaches as alternative or in conjunction with materiel solutions –Tee up the appropriate debate Tougher decisions on the 80% solution (i.e. knee in the curve) More portfolio analysis to determine risk Include Special Access Programs in the portfolio review; established JRAD Solution centric vice document/process centric – faster timelines 37

38 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Changes to JCIDS 38 Consolidated Four Instructions Into Two and JCIDS Manual –CJCSI 5123 (JROC Charter) and CJCSI 3170 (JCIDS), 10 Jan 2012 –JCIDS Manual, 19 Jan 2012 –Cancelled: CJCSI 3137 (FCBs) and CJCSI 3470 (JUONs) Adjusted JROC Venue to be More Tank-like with FCBs Briefing Issue and Providing Portfolio-Level Assessment –Incorporated SAP aspects into the discussion Require FCB Joint Prioritization of Capability Requirements Within Their Portfolio Stand Up the SAP Integration Group to Comprehensively Integrate Requirements/Capabilities and Provide Recommendations for JCB/JROC Consideration

39 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Changes to JCIDS (con’t) 39 Validation Decision Considers Cost, Schedule, Performance and Quantity Targets in JROCMs as Appropriate with Expanded Tripwire Process Clarified the Ability of the JROC to Call for a Review of Previously Validated Requirements/Programs Mandated Shorter Document Lengths Applied “IT Box” Construct to ICDs (IS ICD) to Allow Greater Flexibility and Response to Evolving Technologies Require Studies Notification and Repository Capability Development Tracking & Management (CDTM) Tool Available for Document Generation; Will be Mandated Again When Updates Completed (exceptions: Urgent/Emergent Operational Needs documents, and above SECRET documents) Formalized Capability Gap Assessment (CGA) Process – Review and Assessment of CCMD IPLs by FCBs/JCB for JROC Decisions

40 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Changes to JCIDS (con’t) 40 Incorporate Pre-Milestone A review of AoA Results in Support of Providing Cost/Schedule/Performance Recommendations to the MDA Require Draft CDD (Component-Level; Not Submitted to Joint Staff) to Support Technology Development Phase Greater J-7 Role to Emphasize Non-Materiel Solutions and Considerations to Capability Gaps Streamlined Joint Staff Procedures and Timelines by 50% to Increase Effectiveness and Responsiveness of the Requirements Development Process Established Three Lanes to Requirements Development to Respond to Capability Gaps within Acceptable Timeframes and Risks…Deliberate, Urgent, and Emergent

41 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response New IT Box 41 No return to the JROC unless new core capabilities added to the ICD Further definition of capabilities through Requirements Definition Packages/Capability Drops Applications & System Software Development & Acquisition Desired Investment level Hardware Refresh & System Enhancements & Integration Desired Investment level $ $ Requirements Organization & Oversight Capabilities Required Capability statements and required performance from ICD JROC Approved IS ICD Proposed GO/FO-level Body or Component Requirements Oversight Council (AFROC, AROC, R3B, MROC, etc.) with authority to further delegate

42 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response 42 Backup Slides

43 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) Fielded Capabilities Warfighter Feedback Acquisition CBA Analysis Set the Strategic Stage Set Priorities Identify Needs Materiel Solutions Non-Materiel Solutions Capabilities-Based Planning 43 Take risk Do Nothing

44 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Urgent Situations Urgent Situations (Current Guidance) –Ongoing conflict or crisis –Unforeseen military requirements –Must resolve as soon as possible These Situations Must Result in: –Direct enemy-action related loss of life and/or –Critical mission failure 44

45 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Emergent Situations Emergent Situation –Supports accelerated acquisition of capabilities needed for an anticipated or pending contingency operation –Variation of the JUONs process –Driven by “pending” or “imminent” operations and require capability in short timeframes to avoid loss of life an/or mission failure when operations commence –Verification by VCJCS is required prior to staffing as an emergent candidate Validation at the JCB or JROC Staffing goal of 31 days 45

46 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Rapid Response Framework 46 The JUON / JEON Process Consists of Four Phases: GENERATION PHASE VETTING PHASE EQUIPPING PHASE OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT PHASE Force Commander Identifies Urgent /Emergent Need CCMD Staff determines the most suitable process CCMD CoS certifies and submits to Joint Staff (J-8 RMD) J-8 RMD Receives and verifies that JUON / JEON meets submission criteria Joint staff reviews and validates JUON or JEON Identify solutions JRAC determines a resourcing Strategy and assigns Sponsor Sponsor creates a Simplified Acquisition Plan Procures and delivers solution to the Warfighter Provide Progress Reports On Performance, Cost, and Schedule Sponsor sustains solution and monitors performance for twenty- four months Sponsor, CCMD, and FCB prepare Capability Review to address final disposition of fielded system SPEED IS LIFE

47 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Rapid Response Summary An Urgent / Emergent Situation that Results in –Direct enemy-action related loss of life and/or –Critical mission failure Each Service has Its Own Approach to Urgent Needs JUONs / JEONs Support Joint Urgent / Emergent Needs Initiating JUONs / JEONs is a Requirements Process Requirements Managers will Need to be Involved with Follow-On Activities 47

48 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response 48 Addressing JCIDS Criticism Major criticism of the JCIDS process: –Solution development and delivery are not timely –Decisions are made late to need or with poorly scoped information –Process is complex, cumbersome and too document-centric –Lacks mechanisms to focus review across portfolios –Does not control “requirements creep” –Does not include key customers (CCMDs) in the decision process –Does not have tracking mechanisms to trace developments from gap identification through solution fielding 48

49 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Overview of Updated JCIDS Manual 49

50 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Key Points: Describe the overall bounds of an IS program in order to reduce return trips to the JROC for approval of improved capabilities. Provide to FCB/JCB/JROC as part of the approval process for an IS program’s ICD. The “IT Box” 50 Only applies to programs who do not need to develop hardware systems (leveraging COTS/GOTS hardware). Once ICD is approved, no need to return to the JROC with a CDD or CPD, unless the IS ICD results in a MDAP. Applications & System Software Development & Acquisition Hardware Refresh & System Enhancements & Integration Requirements Organization & Oversight Capabilities Required JROC Approved IS ICD $ $

51 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Discussion Questions What Urgent Situations Call for a Joint Response and Which Situations Call for Individual Service Responses? What Sort of Funding for Urgent Situations Would be Most Responsive and Effective? Can you share some of your experiences with urgent situations and solutions? 51

52 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Discussion Questions What analysis is going to work best to deliver effective solutions to warfighters? How can we be sure non-materiel solutions are going to be effective? What subsequent analysis is going to help deliver effective materiel solutions? What is your experience with analysis and the results of analysis? 52

53 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response The Acronym 53 D – Doctrine O – Organization T – Training m – Materiel L – Leadership and education P – Personnel F – Facilities - P – Policy DOTmLPF - P

54 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Sustainment Systems Acquisition Pre-Systems Acquisition IOC Technology Development Engineering and Manufacturing Development Production & Deployment Operations & Support FRP Decision Review FOC Post-CDR Assessment Materiel Solution Analysis Materiel Development Decision B A C Program Initiation Relationship to JCIDS Initial Capabilities Document Capability Development Document Capability Production Document The Materiel Development Decision Precedes Entry Into Any Phase of the Acquisition Management System Entrance Criteria Met Before Entering Phase Evolutionary Acquisition or Single Step to Full Capability IOC: Initial Operational Capability FOC: Full Operational Capability CDR: Critical Design Review FRP: Full Rate Production LRIP/IOT&E Technology Opportunities & Resources User Needs The Defense Acquisition Management System 54

55 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response JROC Approve Capability Based Process and Acquisition JIC CBA CBA Plan ICD JCD Capability Gap Validation Technical Approach Refine & Produce System JCB Review JCB Approval JROC Approve ICD JCD Change DOTmLPF Risk OK Gap Validated Done Additional Analysis JROC Approval CDD KPPs KSAs Cost Schedule Risk Affordability Technical & Programmatic Analysis JROC Approval CPD CDD Production Weapon System Performance System Development & Demonstration Produce & Deploy MilestoneB MilestoneC JCB Review JCB Review MilestoneA Technology Development JCB Review LRIPFRP OSD Services Decision Meetings JS/CCMDS CBA ICD JCD 55

56 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response JCIDS Gatekeeper Perform an initial review of all JCIDS proposals The Gatekeeper will determine: – Joint Staffing Designator JROC Interest JCB Interest Joint Integration Joint Information Independent – Lead and supporting Functional Capabilities Boards Formal Staffing begins after Gatekeeper decisions 56

57 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Focus of The CBA What does the CBA identify? The mission Concept of Operations Assumptions Timeframe Capability definition Use SWarF identified attributes Gaps Operational risk Priorities Desired solution type Breakout – 5x improvement over current, fundamental change Incremental – modify an existing system IT system Non-materiel Recommendations Sets the conditions for the ICD and AoA 57 ICD

58 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response What is JCIDS? What is a JCIDS responsibility… Ensures the joint force has the capabilities to perform across the range of operations Is a primary interface to the DoD acquisition system Implements an integrated process to guide new capabilities development A key linkage on how the future joint force will fight Provides the analytic baselines to support studies to inform capability development Leverages expertise to identify improvements to existing capabilities and to develop new warfighting capabilities What is NOT a JCIDS responsibility … Is not capabilities-based planning Is not DoD 5000 The JROC is not JCIDS Joint Concepts are not JCIDS The Analytic Agenda is not JCIDS Is not designed to obtain or address near-term funding or urgent warfighting needs (JRAC) but some changes are being considered to make more agile 58

59 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Waivers Deviations from the process are approved by DDR Waivers have been used for: –Request to develop a CDD without an ICD (ACAT II and below) –Request to use an ORD for an upcoming MS C rather than submitting a new CPD Approval process –Requests are submitted by Services/Agencies –CAD/AO coordinates through Lead FCB RMD Div Chief 59

60 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response CDTM Wizard and Automated Document Creation 60 Document is created with data filled in from wizard entries

61 Tab 2 – JCIDS including Rapid Response Capability Development Tracking and Management (CDTM) 61 Current ProcessCDTM Traceability of Capability Gaps Gaps buried in documents; no way to track or report status of individual gaps Ability to track and report individual gaps from entry to fielded capability Process metrics No measurement of length of time to complete documents Benchmark data and workflow tracked to identify time to complete documents Search capability Limited keyword search capability (full text search) which may not return relevant results Ability to search specific areas and specific data categories in a document to get relevant results Ease of use Can only search higher-tier JCAs at the document level Search for relevant gaps at all JCA tier levels Document creation and standardization Manually create word document; leads to verbosity and no limit to document length; required sections often missing or incomplete “Turbo-tax” wizard interface prompts for inputs; automatically creates and formats document; standardization of JCIDS document formatting & length Interoperability Requires input in multiple stove-piped systems to navigate JCIDS process; results in duplication of effort Ability to share common data with other DoD applications Transforms JCIDS from document-centric to data-centric process –Developed and deployed on NIPRNet and SIPRNet in August 2010 –First enhancements Nov 2010, additional enhancements in Feb, May, Aug, Nov 2011


Download ppt "Requirements Executive Overview Workshop Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) Defense Systems Management College Defense Acquisition."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google