Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

 Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration, OER National Institutes of Health, DHHS NIH Regional.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: " Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration, OER National Institutes of Health, DHHS NIH Regional."— Presentation transcript:

1  Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration, OER National Institutes of Health, DHHS NIH Regional Seminar – Indianapolis, IN – April Diane Dean, Director Kathy Hancock, Assistant Grants Compliance Officer Joel Snyderman, Assistant Grants Compliance Officer

2 Cost Principles Administrative Standards Audit Requirements Grant Award Basics Award Restrictions Responsibilities Accounting Basics Monitoring Basics Subrecipient Monitoring Other Cost Considerations NIH Financial Reporting Basics Closeout 2

3

4 OMB Circular A-21 (2 CFR Part 220) - Educational Institutions OMB Circular A-122 (2 CFR Part 230) – Non-Profits OMB Circular A-87 (2 CFR Part 225) – State/Local Governments 45 CFR Part 74, Appendix E - Hospitals 48 CFR Subpart 31.2 (FAR) – For-profits Foreign institutions comply with the applicable cost principles depending on the type of organization 4

5 Establishes principles for determining costs applicable to grants, contracts, and other agreements Direct costs F&A/indirect costs Selected items of cost o allowable/unallowable costs o time and effort reporting 5

6 OMB Circular A-110 – relocated to 2 CFR Part Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Universities, Hospitals and Other Non-Profit Organizations (domestic and foreign) 6

7 Prescribes: Preaward requirements Postaward requirements Also includes requirements for: o Payment o Matching or Cost sharing o Accounting for program income o Revision of budget and program plans o Non-Federal audits o Allowable costs Financial management systems standards Property standards Procurement standards Reports and records 7

8 In general, OMB Circular A-133 requires a State government, local government, or non-profit organization (including institutions of higher education) that expends $500,000 or more per year under Federal grants, cooperative agreements, and/or procurement contracts to have an annual audit by a public accountant or a Federal, State, or local government audit organization. Foreign and Commercial (for-profit) organizations are subject to audit provisions contained in 45 CFR 74.26(d) and the NIH Grants Policy Statement (GPS). 8

9 Summary of Applicable Regulations Grantee TypeAdministrative Requirements Cost PrinciplesAudit Requirements State & Local Governments A-102 (45 CFR Part 92) A-87 (2 CFR Part 225) A-133 _________________ 45 CFR Part 74.26(d) Colleges & Universities A-110 (2 CFR Part 215) A-21 (2 CFR Part 220) Non-ProfitsA-122 (2 CFR Part 230) Hospitals45 CFR Part 74, Appendix E For-ProfitsFAR 31.2 (48 CFR Subpart 31.2) ForeignAs stated above for the grantee type NIH GPS, uses 45 CFR Part 74.26(d) 9

10 **************** NOTICE OF AWARD******************* CENTER GRANT Issue Date:06/24/2010 Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes Of Health **************** NOTICE OF AWARD******************* CENTER GRANT Issue Date:06/24/2010 Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes Of Health 10

11 Terms of Award – Section III o 45 CFR Part 74 or 92 - HHS rules and requirements that govern the administration of grants o NIH Grants Policy Statement (GPS) – policy requirements that serve as the terms and conditions of NIH awards (latest version 10/01/11) o Program legislation o Appropriation acts o Program regulations 42 CFR Part 52 - Grants for Research Projects Special Terms and Conditions – Section IV 11

12 Only applied to a particular grant for cause Shown on the Notice of Award (NoA) after Section III – Institute and/or Center specific terms of award Funds usually are not restricted in the Payment Management System Restricted funds must be tracked by grantee to ensure compliance o EXAMPLE of Award Restriction: Funds may not be used to purchase equipment without the written prior approval of the NIH awarding component. 12

13 A. The Principal Investigator B. The Departmental Administrator C. The Department Chair D. The Institution 13

14 14

15 Requires that: o Separate account is established for each project o Program Income is identified and accounted for by project o Program Income is used in accordance with the appropriate alternative, i.e.,  Additive  Deductive  Combination  Matching 15

16 Requires that: o Expenses are charged in accordance with  NoA Terms and Conditions  NIH Grants Policy Statement  Salary Cap / Rate Limitation  Cost Accounting Standards  OMB Circulars o ALL expenses are appropriately documented 16

17 17

18 Requires that: o Actual expenses are periodically compared with budget o Actual expenses are accurate, i.e., reasonable, allocable, allowable and consistently charged o Mischarges are corrected in a timely manner (cost transfers) o Prior approvals are obtained when required o Subrecipient expenses are monitored – (Grantee’s responsibility to monitor expenses) 18

19 Actual expenses should be compared at least monthly to the budget to ensure: o Total funds on the grant have not been exceeded o Total funds are used appropriately o Total funds for any cost category have not been exceeded if restricted on the NoA 19

20 Actual expenses should be reviewed to ensure they are accurate and allowable o Reasonable (including necessary) o Allocable o Consistently applied o Conforms to any limitations or exclusions 20

21 A cost may be considered reasonable if the nature of the goods or services acquired or applied reflect the action that a prudent person would have taken under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision to incur the cost was made. 21

22 Dr. Grant needed a specialized microscope for his research supported by an NIH grant from the National Cancer Institute. When deciding on the model that would best suit his needs, he received several price quotes on various models that were all within the same general price range. However, one microscope in particular appealed to him – it met all of the necessary specifications plus many additional features. Although it was about $8,500 more than the others, he ordered it. 22

23 A cost is allocable to a specific grant if it is incurred solely in order to advance work under the grant and is deemed assignable, at least in part, to the grant. 23

24 When Dr. Grant’s microscope finally arrived, he found that equipment funds for his National Cancer Institute grant were fully expended. Since the microscope was for use on an NIH grant, he decided to charge the cost to another one of his NIH grants that was funded by the National Eye Institute. 24

25 Grantees must be consistent in assigning costs to cost objectives. Costs may be charged as either direct costs or F&A costs, depending on their identifiable benefit to a particular project or program. All costs must be treated consistently for all work of the organization under similar circumstances, regardless of the source of funding. 25

26 Dr. Grant’s lab was running low on office supplies and postage stamps. Since he couldn’t wait any longer for his institution to provide the supplies, he purchased them and charged them to his NIH grant account. 26

27 A cost is allowable if it is reasonable, allocable and conforms to the cost principles and the sponsored agreement AND is not prohibited by law, regulation or term of award. This type of allowability -- conformance with limitations and exclusions as contained in the terms and conditions of award including those in the cost principles—varies by type of activity, type of recipient, and other characteristics of individual awards. 27

28 Dr. Grant decided to host a very important Departmental meeting at his home and serve beer and pizza hoping that everyone would attend. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss changes in NIH grants policy, which affected the work of the entire Department. Therefore, he decided to charge the cost of the beer and pizza to his grant, especially since he was providing the use of his home. 28

29 Used to correct: o Erroneous charges o Unreasonable charges o Unallocable charges o Inconsistently applied charges o Unallowable charges Must be well documented Must be made within 90 days from the time error was discovered 29

30 Other Cost Considerations 30

31 NIH Grants Policy Statement defines actions requiring NIH prior approval. Some prior approval actions affecting cost include the following: o Carryover of funds (if required-see Section III of NoA) o Incurrence of preaward costs greater than 90 days o Deviation from award terms and conditions o Activities disapproved or restricted as a condition of award For a complete listing of prior approval requirements see: _ch8.htm#prior_approval_requirements _ch8.htm#prior_approval_requirements 31

32 Requests for carryover of funds should be signed by Authorized Representative. Request must be sent to GMO and include: o Detailed budget by direct cost category with F&A cost information (base and rate). If personnel costs are requested, include  a detailed breakdown of personnel costs  base salary  salary requested  effort to be spent on the project o A scientific justification for the use of funds o The reason for the unobligated balance 32

33 33

34 Federal Financial Report (FFR)(SF-425) Expenditure Data Timely - Must adhere to submission deadlines: o Annual – (Non-SNAP Awards)  FFR submitted for each budget period no later than 90 days after the end of the calendar quarter (CQ) in which the budget period ended.  Budget period ends 1/31/2011 – FFR due 6/30/11 (90 days after the end of the CQ of 3/31/11) o Final (End of Competitive Segment) – (SNAP and Non-SNAP Awards)  FFR submitted within 90 days following the end of the project period (SNAP – Streamlined Non-competing Award Process) 34

35 FFRs should be submitted accurately Reported expenses and program income must agree with institutional accounting records Routine Revisions to correct FFRs are not appropriate Any revisions must be submitted in the same format as the original submission. For example: If the original report was submitted as a Financial Status Report (FSR)(SF-269), the revised report must be submitted as an FSR. 35

36 Information and NIH Guide Notices related to Financial Reporting: See FFR (SF425) Instructions for NIH Grantees available at See NIH Guide, January 4, 2011, Implementation of Federal Financial Report – Upcoming Mandatory Use of the Federal Financial Report System in the eRA Commons beginning February 1, 2011 (NOT-OD ) See NIH Guide, July 27, 2007, NIH Requiring Mandatory Use of the Electronic Financial Status Report System in the eRA Commons Beginning October 1, See NIH Guide, February 22, 2001, FINANCIAL STATUS REPORTS: REMINDER AND INFORMATION ON TIMELINESS AND ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS 36

37 Failure to submit timely final reports may affect future funding to the organization o Final Federal Financial Report (FFR) SF-425 Expenditure Data o Final Invention Statement and Certification o Final Progress Report Final Reports are due within 90 days of the end of grant support. Grantee must ensure there are no discrepancies between final FFR expenditure data (in eRA Commons) and FFR cash disbursement data in the Payment Management System. April 2, 2008, NIH Announces New Centralized Processing Center for Receipt of Grant Closeout Documents and Reminds Grantees of Required Closeout Reports for NIH Assistance Awards June 17,2005, NIH Announces New Closeout Feature in the eRA Commons and Reminds Grantees of Required Closeout Reports for NIH Assistance Awards Reminder 37

38 in advance Whenever you are contemplating a significant postaward change, and you are uncertain about the need for prior approval, consult in advance with: The Notice of Award (terms and conditions) Your Office for Sponsored Research/Projects NIH awarding component Grants Management Officer/Specialist 38

39 Diane Dean, Director, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight Kathy Hancock, Assistant Grants Compliance Officer Joel Snyderman, Assistant Grants Compliance Officer


Download ppt " Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight Office of Policy for Extramural Research Administration, OER National Institutes of Health, DHHS NIH Regional."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google