Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published bySean Schwartz Modified over 2 years ago

1
A Tutorial on Inference and Learning in Bayesian Networks Irina Rish Moninder Singh IBM T.J.Watson Research Center

2
Road map Introduction: Bayesian networks What are BNs: representation, types, etc Why use BNs: Applications (classes) of BNs Information sources, software, etc Probabilistic inference Exact inference Approximate inference Learning Bayesian Networks Learning parameters Learning graph structure Summary

3
Bayesian Networks = P(A) P(S) P(T|A) P(L|S) P(B|S) P(C|T,L) P(D|T,L,B) P(A, S, T, L, B, C, D) Conditional IndependenciesEfficient Representation CPD: T L B D=0 D= Lung Cancer Smoking Chest X-ray Bronchitis Dyspnoea Tuberculosis Visit to Asia P(D|T,L,B) P(B|S) P(S) P(C|T,L) P(L|S) P(A) P(T|A) [Lauritzen & Spiegelhalter, 95]

4
Bayesian Networks Structured, graphical representation of probabilistic relationships between several random variables Explicit representation of conditional independencies Missing arcs encode conditional independence Efficient representation of joint pdf Allows arbitrary queries to be answered P (lung cancer=yes | smoking=no, dyspnoea=yes ) = ?

5
Example: Printer Troubleshooting (Microsoft Windows 95) Print Output OK Correct Driver Uncorrupted Driver Correct Printer Path Net Cable Connected Net/Local Printing Printer On and Online Correct Local Port Correct Printer Selected Local Cable Connected Application Output OK Print Spooling On Correct Driver Settings Printer Memory Adequate Network Up Spooled Data OK GDI Data Input OK GDI Data Output OK Print Data OK PC to Printer Transport OK Printer Data OK Spool Process OK Net Path OK Local Path OK Paper Loaded Local Disk Space Adequate [Heckerman, 95]

6
Example: Microsoft Pregnancy and Child Care)

7
[Heckerman, 95] Example: Microsoft Pregnancy and Child Care)

8
Independence Assumptions Tuberculosis Visit to Asia Chest X-ray Head-to-tail Lung Cancer Smoking Bronchitis tail-to-tail Dyspnoea Lung Cancer Bronchitis Head-to-head

9
Independence Assumptions Nodes X and Y are d-connected by nodes in Z along a trail from X to Y if every head-to-head node along the trail is in Z or has a descendant in Z every other node along the trail is not in Z Nodes X and Y are d-separated by nodes in Z if they are not d-connected by Z along any trail from X to Y Nodes X and Y are d-separated by Z implies X and Y are conditionally independent given Z

10
Independence Assumptions A variable (node) is conditionally independent of its non-descendants given its parents Lung Cancer Smoking Bronchitis Dyspnoea Tuberculosis Visit to Asia Chest X-ray

11
Independence Assumptions Cancer Smoking Lung Tumor Diet Serum Calcium AgeGender Exposure to Toxins Cancer is independent of Diet given Exposure to Toxins and Smoking [Breese & Koller, 97]

12
Independence Assumptions What this means is that joint pdf can be represented as product of local distributions P(A,S,T,L,B,C,D) = P(A). P(S|A). P(T|A,S). P(L|A,S,T). P(B|A,S,T,L). P(C|A,S,T,L,B). P(D|A,S,T,L,B,C) = P(A). P(S). P(T|A). P(L|S).P(B|S). P(C|T,L). P(D|T,L,B) Lung Cancer Smoking Bronchitis Dyspnoea Tuberculosis Visit to Asia Chest X-ray

13
Thus, the General Product rule for Bayesian Networks is P(X 1,X 2,…,X n ) = P(X i | Pa(X i )) where Pa(X i ) is the set of parents of X i Independence Assumptions i=1 n

14
The Knowledge Acquisition Task Variables: collectively exhaustive, mutually exclusive values clarity test: value should be knowable in principle Structure if data available, can be learned constructed by hand (using expert knowledge) variable ordering matters: causal knowledge usually simplifies Probabilities can be learned from data second decimal usually does not matter; relative probs sensitivity analysis

15
The Knowledge Acquisition Task Fuel GaugeStart Battery TurnOver Variable Order is Important Battery TurnOver Start Fuel Gauge Fuel Gauge Start Battery TurnOver Causal Knowledge Simplifies Construction

16
Naive Baysian Classifiers [Duda&Hart; Langley 92] Selective Naive Bayesian Classifiers [Langley & Sage 94] Conditional Trees [Geiger 92; Friedman et al 97] The Knowledge Acquisition Task

17
Selective Bayesian Networks [Singh & Provan, 95;96]

18
Diagnosis: P(cause|symptom)=? Medicine Bio- informatics Computer troubleshooting Stock market Text Classification Speech recognition Prediction: P(symptom|cause)=? Classification: P(class|data) Decision-making (given a cost function) Data mining: induce best model from data What are BNs useful for?

19
Cause Effect Predictive Inference Cause Effect Diagnostic Reasoning Unknown but important Imperfect Observations Value Decision Known Predisposing Factors Decision Making - Max. Expected Utility

20
What are BNs useful for? Salient Observations Fault 1 Fault 2 Fault 3. Assignment of Belief Act Now!Halt?Yes No Next Best Observation (Value of Information) New Obs. Probability of fault i Expected Utility Do nothing Action 2 Action 1 Value of Information

21
Why use BNs? Explicit management of uncertainty Modularity implies maintainability Better, flexible and robust decision making - MEU, VOI Can be used to answer arbitrary queries - multiple fault problems Easy to incorporate prior knowledge Easy to understand

22
Application Examples Intellipath commercial version of Pathfinder lymph-node diseases (60), 100 findings APRI system developed at AT&T Bell Labs learns & uses Bayesian networks from data to identify customers liable to default on bill payments NASA Vista system predict failures in propulsion systems considers time criticality & suggests highest utility action dynamically decide what information to show

23
Application Examples Answer Wizard in MS Office 95/ MS Project Bayesian network based free-text help facility uses naive Bayesian classifiers Office Assistant in MS Office 97 Extension of Answer wizard uses naïve Bayesian networks help based on past experience (keyboard/mouse use) and task user is doing currently This is the smiley face you get in your MS Office applications

24
Application Examples Microsoft Pregnancy and Child-Care Available on MSN in Health section Frequently occuring childrens symptoms are linked to expert modules that repeatedly ask parents relevant questions Asks next best question based on provided information Presents articles that are deemed relevant based on information provided

25
Application Examples Printer troubleshooting HP bought 40% stake in HUGIN. Developing printer troubleshooters for HP printers Microsoft has 70+ online troubleshooters on their web site use Bayesian networks - multiple faults models, incorporate utilities Fax machine troubleshooting Ricoh uses Bayesian network based troubleshooters at call centers Enabled Ricoh to answer twice the number of calls in half the time

26
Application Examples

27

28

29
Online/print resources on BNs Conferences & Journals UAI, ICML, AAAI, AISTAT, KDD MLJ, DM&KD, JAIR, IEEE KDD, IJAR, IEEE PAMI Books and Papers Bayesian Networks without Tears by Eugene Charniak. AI Magazine: Winter Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems by Judea Pearl. Morgan Kaufmann: Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems by Richard Neapolitan. Wiley: CACM special issue on Real-world applications of BNs, March 1995

30
Online/Print Resources on BNs Wealth of online information at Links to Electronic proceedings for UAI conferences Other sites with information on BNs and reasoning under uncertainty Several tutorials and important articles Research groups & companies working in this area Other societies, mailing lists and conferences

31
Publicly available s/w for BNs List of BN software maintained by Russell Almond at bayes.stat.washington.edu/almond/belief.html several free packages: generally research only commercial packages: most powerful (& expensive) is HUGIN; others include Netica and Dxpress we are working on developing a Java based BN toolkit here at Watson - will also work within ABLE

32
Road map Introduction: Bayesian networks What are BNs: representation, types, etc Why use BNs: Applications (classes) of BNs Information sources, software, etc Probabilistic inference Exact inference Approximate inference Learning Bayesian Networks Learning parameters Learning graph structure Summary

33
Probabilistic Inference Tasks Belief updating: Finding most probable explanation (MPE) Finding maximum a-posteriory hypothesis Finding maximum-expected-utility (MEU) decision

34
Belief Updating lung Cancer Smoking X-ray Bronchitis Dyspnoea P (lung cancer=yes | smoking=no, dyspnoea=yes ) = ?

35
Belief updating: P(X|evidence)=? Moral graph A D E C B P(a|e=0) P(a,e=0)= P(a)P(b|a)P(c|a)P(d|b,a)P(e|b,c)= P(a) P(b|a)P(d|b,a)P(e|b,c) BC ED Variable Elimination P(c|a)

36
Bucket elimination Algorithm elim-bel (Dechter 1996) Elimination operator P(a|e=0) W*=4 induced width (max clique size) bucket B: P(a) P(c|a) P(b|a) P(d|b,a) P(e|b,c) bucket C: bucket D: bucket E: bucket A: e=0 B C D E A

37
Elimination operator MPE W*=4 induced width (max clique size) bucket B: P(a) P(c|a) P(b|a) P(d|b,a) P(e|b,c) bucket C: bucket D: bucket E: bucket A: e=0 B C D E A Finding Algorithm elim-mpe (Dechter 1996)

38
Generating the MPE-tuple C: E: P(b|a) P(d|b,a) P(e|b,c)B: D: A: P(a) P(c|a) e=0

39
Complexity of inference The effect of the ordering: Moral graph A D E C B B C D E A E D C B A

40
Other tasks and algorithms MAP and MEU tasks: Similar bucket-elimination algorithms - elim-map, elim-meu (Dechter 1996) Elimination operation: either summation or maximization Restriction on variable ordering: summation must precede maximization (i.e. hypothesis or decision variables are eliminated last) Other inference algorithms: Join-tree clustering Pearls poly-tree propagation Conditioning, etc.

41
Relationship with join-tree clustering ABC BCE ADB A cluster is a set of buckets (a super-bucket)

42
Relationship with Pearls belief propagation in poly-trees Pearls belief propagation for single-root query elim-bel using topological ordering and super-buckets for families Elim-bel, elim-mpe, and elim-map are linear for poly-trees. Diagnostic support Causal support

43
Road map Introduction: Bayesian networks Probabilistic inference Exact inference Approximate inference Learning Bayesian Networks Learning parameters Learning graph structure Summary

44
Inference is NP-hard => approximations Approximations: Local inference Stochastic simulations Variational approximations etc. S X D B C CB DX

45
Local Inference Idea

46
Bucket-elimination approximation: mini-buckets Local inference idea: bound the size of recorded dependencies Computation in a bucket is time and space exponential in the number of variables involved Therefore, partition functions in a bucket into mini-buckets on smaller number of variables

47
Mini-bucket approximation: MPE task Split a bucket into mini-buckets =>bound complexity

48
Approx-mpe(i) Input: i – max number of variables allowed in a mini-bucket Output: [lower bound (P of a sub-optimal solution), upper bound] Example: approx-mpe(3) versus elim-mpe

49
Properties of approx-mpe(i) Complexity: O(exp(2i)) time and O(exp(i)) time. Accuracy: determined by upper/lower (U/L) bound. As i increases, both accuracy and complexity increase. Possible use of mini-bucket approximations: As anytime algorithms (Dechter and Rish, 1997) As heuristics in best-first search (Kask and Dechter, 1999) Other tasks: similar mini-bucket approximations for: belief updating, MAP and MEU (Dechter and Rish, 1997)

50
Anytime Approximation

51
Empirical Evaluation (Dechter and Rish, 1997; Rish, 1999) Randomly generated networks Uniform random probabilities Random noisy-OR CPCS networks Probabilistic decoding Comparing approx-mpe and anytime-mpe versus elim-mpe

52
Random networks Uniform random: 60 nodes, 90 edges (200 instances) In 80% of cases, times speed-up while U/L<2 Noisy-OR – even better results Exact elim-mpe was infeasible; appprox-mpe took 0.1 to 80 sec.

53
CPCS networks – medical diagnosis (noisy-OR model) Test case: no evidence anytime-mpe( ), anytime-mpe( ), elim-mpe cpcs422cpcs360 Algorithm Time (sec)

54
Effect of evidence More likely evidence=>higher MPE => higher accuracy (why?) Likely evidence versus random (unlikely) evidence

55
Probabilistic decoding Error-correcting linear block code State-of-the-art: approximate algorithm – iterative belief propagation (IBP) (Pearls poly-tree algorithm applied to loopy networks)

56
approx-mpe vs. IBP Bit error rate (BER) as a function of noise (sigma):

57
Mini-buckets: summary Mini-buckets – local inference approximation Idea: bound size of recorded functions Approx-mpe(i) - mini-bucket algorithm for MPE Better results for noisy-OR than for random problems Accuracy increases with decreasing noise in Accuracy increases for likely evidence Sparser graphs -> higher accuracy Coding networks: approx-mpe outperfroms IBP on low- induced width codes

58
Road map Introduction: Bayesian networks Probabilistic inference Exact inference Approximate inference Local inference Stochastic simulations Variational approximations Learning Bayesian Networks Summary

59
Approximation via Sampling

60
Forward Sampling (logic sampling (Henrion, 1988))

61
Forward sampling (example) Drawback: high rejection rate!

62
Likelihood Weighing (Fung and Chang, 1990; Shachter and Peot, 1990) Works well for likely evidence! Clamping evidence+forward sampling+ weighing samples by evidence likelihood

63
Gibbs Sampling (Geman and Geman, 1984) Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC): create a Markov chain of samples Advantage: guaranteed to converge to P(X) Disadvantage: convergence may be slow

64
Gibbs Sampling (contd) (Pearl, 1988) Markov blanket :

65
Road map Introduction: Bayesian networks Probabilistic inference Exact inference Approximate inference Local inference Stochastic simulations Variational approximations Learning Bayesian Networks Summary

66
Variational Approximations Idea: variational transformation of CPDs simplifies inference Advantages: Compute upper and lower bounds on P(Y) Usually faster than sampling techniques Disadvantages: More complex and less general: must be derived for each particular form of CPD functions

67
Variational bounds: example log (x) This approach can be generalized for any concave (convex) function in order to compute its upper (lower) bounds: convex duality (Jaakkola and Jordan, 1997)

68
Convex duality (Jaakkola and Jordan, 1997)

69
Example: QMR-DT network (Quick Medical Reference – Decision-Theoretic (Shwe et al., 1991)) Noisy-OR model: 600 diseases 4000 findings

70
Inference in QMR-DT Inference complexity: O(exp(min{p,k})) p = # of positive findings, k = max family size (Heckerman, 1989 (Quickscore), Rish and Dechter, 1998) Positive evidence couples the disease nodes factorized

71
Variational approach to QMR-DT (Jaakkola and Jordan, 1997) The effect of positive evidence is now factorized (diseases are decoupled)

72
Variational approximations Bounds on local CPDs yield a bound on posterior Two approaches: sequential and block Sequential: applies variational transformation to (a subset of) nodes sequentially during inference using a heuristic node ordering; then optimizes across variational parameters Block: selects in advance nodes to be transformed, then selects variational parameters minimizing the KL-distance between true and approximate posteriors

73
Block approach

74
Inference in BN: summary Exact inference is often intractable => need approximations Approximation principles: Approximating elimination – local inference, bounding size of dependencies among variables (cliques in a problems graph). Mini-buckets, IBP Other approximations: stochastic simulations, variational techniques, etc. Further research: Combining orthogonal approximation approaches Better understanding of what works well where: which approximation suits which problem structure Other approximation paradigms (e.g., other ways of approximating probabilities, constraints, cost functions)

75
Road map Introduction: Bayesian networks Probabilistic inference Exact inference Approximate inference Learning Bayesian Networks Learning parameters Learning graph structure Summary

76
Why learn Bayesian networks? Incremental learning: P(H) or SC Learning causal relationships: Efficient representation and inference Handling missing data: ………………. Combining domain expert knowledge with data

77
Learning Bayesian Networks Known graph C S B D X Complete data: parameter estimation (ML, MAP) Incomplete data: non-linear parametric optimization (gradient descent, EM) P(S) P(B|S) P(X|C,S) P(C|S) P(D|C,B) – learn parameters C S B D X C S B D X Unknown graph Complete data: optimization (search in space of graphs) Incomplete data: EM plus Multiple Imputation, structural EM, mixture models – learn graph and parameters

78
Learning Parameters: complete data ML-estimate:- decomposable! MAP-estimate ( Bayesian statistics) Conjugate priors - Dirichlet X CB Multinomial counts Equivalent sample size (prior knowledge)

79
Complete data – local computations Incomplete data (score non-decomposable):stochastic methods Learning graph structure NP-hard optimization Heuristic search: Find C S B C S B Add S->B C S B Delete S->B C S B Reverse S->B Constrained-based methods Data impose independence relations (constraints)

80
Learning BNs: incomplete data l Learning parameters EM algorithm [Lauritzen, 95] Gibbs Sampling [Heckerman, 96] Gradient Descent [Russell et al., 96] l Learning both structure and parameters Sum over missing values [Cooper & Herskovits, 92; Cooper, 95] Monte-Carlo approaches [Heckerman, 96] Gaussian approximation [Heckerman, 96] Structural EM [Friedman, 98] EM and Multiple Imputation [Singh 97,98,00]

81
Learning Parameters: incomplete data EM-algorithm: iterate until convergence Initial parameters Current model Non-decomposable marginal likelihood (hidden nodes) S X D C B ……… Data S X D C B ……….. Expected counts Expectation Inference: P(S|X=0,D=1,C=0,B=1) Update parameters (ML, MAP) Maximization

82
Learning Parameters: incomplete data Complete-data log-likelihood is E step Compute E( N ijk | Y obs, M step Compute E( N ijk | Y obs, E( N ij | Y obs, (Lauritzen, 95) N ijk log ijk

83
Learning structure: incomplete data Depends on the type of missing data - missing independent of anything else (MCAR) OR missing based on values of other variables (MAR) While MCAR can be resolved by decomposable scores, MAR cannot For likelihood-based methods, no need to explicitly model missing data mechanism Very few attempts at MAR: stochastic methods

84
Learning structure: incomplete data Approximate EM by using Multiple Imputation to yield efficient Monte-Carlo method [Singh 97, 98, 00] trade-off between performance & quality learned network almost optimal approximate complete-data log-likelihood function using Multiple Imputation yields decomposable score, dependent only on each node & its parents converges to local maxima of observed-data likelihood

85
Learning structure: incomplete data

86
Scoring functions: Minimum Description Length (MDL) Learning data compression Other: MDL = -BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion) Bayesian score (BDe) - asymptotically equivalent to MDL DL(Model)DL(Data|model) ……………….

87
Learning Structure plus Parameters No. of models is super exponential Alternatives: Model Selection or Model Averaging

88
Model Selection Generally, choose a single model M*. Equivalent to saying P(M*|D) = 1 Task is now to: 1) define a metric to decide which model is best 2) search for that model through the space of all models

89
One Reasonable Score: Posterior Probability of a Structure structure prior parameter prior likelihood

90
Global and Local Predictive Scores [Spiegelhalter et al 93] log(|) (|,,,) (|) (|,) (|,,) pDSpS pSpSpS h ll h l m hhh xxx xxxxxx Bayes factor Local is useful for diagnostic problems

91
Local Predictive Score Spiegelhalter et al. (1993) Y disease X1X1 X2X2 XnXn symptoms...

92
Exact computation of Exact computation of p(D|S h ) n No missing data n Cases are independent, given the model. n Uniform priors on parameters n discrete variables [Cooper & Herskovits, 92]

93
Bayesian Dirichlet Score Cooper and Herskovits (1991)

94
Learning BNs without specifying an ordering n! ordering; ordering greatly affects the quality of network learned. use conditional independence tests, and d- separation to get an ordering [Singh & Valtorta 95]

95
Learning BNs via the MDL principle Idea: best model is that which gives the most compact representation of the data Idea: best model is that which gives the most compact representation of the data So, encode the data using the model plus encode the model. Minimize this. So, encode the data using the model plus encode the model. Minimize this. [Lam & Bacchus, 93]

96
Learning BNs: summary Bayesian Networks – graphical probabilistic models Efficient representation and inference Expert knowledge + learning from data Learning: parameters (parameter estimation, EM) structure (optimization w/ score functions – e.g., MDL) Applications/systems: collaborative filtering (MSBN), fraud detection (AT&T), classification (AutoClass (NASA), TAN- BLT(SRI)) Future directions: causality, time, model evaluation criteria, approximate inference/learning, on-line learning, etc.

Similar presentations

© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google