Presentation on theme: "Medical Malpractice and Licensure"— Presentation transcript:
1Medical Malpractice and Licensure Sheldon F. Kurtz
2The Nature and Extent of Medical Error How rampant is medical error?The Harvard Study (180,000 per year)The 1999 Institute of Medicine Study (100,000 per year)Three jumbo jets going down every 2 daysDoes the data make your nervous about your doctor?Is there too much medical litigation?Does the data suggest reasons for physicians to be frustrated over malpractice litigation?Harvard found too many of the wrong persons recoverPersons with most severe injury undercompensates
3Saks StudyA negligent doctor who causes injury has a probability of sued sued of 3 out of 100.A non-negligent doctor has a probability of being sued for a nonnegligent injury of 13 out of 10,000.Thus, for every malpractice claim in response to a negligent injury there are malpractice victims who bring no suit but there are 4-5 claims brought by non-negligently injured patients.
4How the Law Effects Quality of Care Medical malpracticeLicensureCertification
5The Donabedian Model To Access Quality Care StructureFocus on underlying capacity to deliver care (licensure, brick and mortar)ProcessStudies process through which care delivered (focus on procedure by which health care delivered)OutcomeDid patient get better when patient should have gotten betterMalpractice begins with outcome but largely looks to Process to find negligence
6Elements of a Medical Malpractice Case The Applicable Standard of CareOrdinary and Prudent Physician would have done under the same or similar circumstancesBreach of the standard of careInjury andProximate Cause between the breach and the injury
7McCourt v. Abernathy What are the facts of this case? Failure to properly diagnosis septicemiaFailure to timely order diagnostic testsFailure to realize seriousness of deteriorating conditionFailure to timely seek appropriate consultationPatient diedExpert testified that defendant’s conduct was below the standard of careWhat does the court hold?Charge (on page 316) was correct
8Locke v. Pachtman What are the facts of this case? Broken needle case Why is expert testimony necessary?Ordinary juror not equipped by common knowledge or experience to judge skill and competence of a medical serviceFact that defendant’s statement may have suggested defendant erred not controlling because statement not related to the standard of careHow does court distinguish the Orozco case on page 321Jury’s common knowledge satisfies requirement of breach by doctors who states he cut in the wrong place.Doctor’s statement about needle not of same effectSome contrary authority, see note 2, page 326Liability of resident vs. attending physicianNegligent supervision
9The Custom-Based Standard of Care What is the medical custom standard and how does it differ from ordinary negligence law?Why does the law defer more strongly to professional standards here than elsewhere?Is the custom standard meaningful or coherent?
10Summary of Notes—Page 326-332 Error in judgment ruleStandard of care for residents, specialists and consulting and supervising physiciansAvailability of punitive damagesVariations in the verbal formulationOrdinary careful and prudent physicianReasonably prudent, minimally competent physicianGood medical careAbsence of data to support conclusion of what average or prudent physician would do
11Variations in the Standard of Care—Jones v. Chidester Two schools of thoughtWhat constitutes a school?A “considerable number”Respected, reputable and reasonableWhat factors affect variation in practice?
12Locality vs National Rule-Chapel v. Allison What is the locality rule (page 337, 1st paragraph)National standardWhy have courts abandoned the locality standard—at least for specialists?Should a specialist in Iowa City and Dubuque be held to the same standard?Economic constraintsWhat is the practical effect of one standard over another?
13Economic Malpractice—Page 349 Does the standard of care fall for municipal hospitals?Does the standard of care allow for different approaches to the practice of medicine based on paying status?How does the standard of care fit in with the need for research and experimentation?Does it penalize the innovator or researcher?Relationship to informed consent law?How does the standard of care react to specialization?Is the standard affected by cost-cutting mechanisms of HMOs
14Locke v. Pachtman-A Reprise Plaintiff’s attempt to use res ipsa failsTo succeed, plaintiff must establish thatThe event was of a kind that ordinarily would not have occurred absent negligenceThe injury must have been caused by an agency with the defendant’s exclusive controlInjury must not have been due to voluntary act or contribution of plaintiff andEvidence of the true explanation of event must be more readily accessible to defendant than to plaintiff.
15Notes 371-374-Avoiding Experts Common knowledgeJury makes finding based on its own experience and knowledge- Some expert testimony required but jury can fill in gaps from its common knowledgeRes ipsa loquiturNo expert testimony requiredNegligence per seCan actually result in a directed verdictAll of these shift focus from “prudent physician” to what jury thinks is reasonable.
16Notes 371-374-Avoiding Experts Res ipsa and multiple defendantsWhere there were multiple defendants who were all present in operating room when injury occurred, court shifts burden to defendants to come forward with evidence as to who or who was not responsible
17Notes 371-374-Avoiding Experts Legal effect:Res ipsa case still goes to jury for ultimate decisionCourt must instruct jury to find liability against at least one defendantCreates rebuttable presumption or shifts burden to defendant
18Helling v. Carey What are the facts of this case Given that the medical experts agree defendant complied with the standard of care, how can the plaintiff prevail?What is the potential effect of the holding on the practice of medicine?
19Sullivan v. O’Connor What are the facts of this case? Why are courts skeptical about contract claims?What evidentiary benefits flow to a patient claiming a breach of contract?How does a contract claim impact on the measure of damages?How might the contract approach impact on HMOs?
20Franklin v. Gupta What are the facts of this case? Was the surgeon personally negligent?What theories are there to hold surgeon liable for the negligent acts of others?“Captain of the ship doctrine”Borrowed servant doctrine (also excuses hospital and shifts liability to surgeon)Professional corporations
21Strict LiabilityShould there be strict liability in medicine?
22Institutional Liability Recall structure of hospital and its relationship to its medical staffIf doctors are uniformly insured, why is there such a desire to sue hospitals?
23Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital What are the facts of this case?What defenses are offered by the hospital?Charitable immunity doctrineHospital not responsible for acts of physicians who are not employees of the hospitalNurse is agent of doctor not hospitals as her services are for docs.Even if nurse was agent of hospital, she acted reasonablyNurses don’t question doctors
24Adamski v. Tacoma General Hospital What are the fact of this case?Accepting that the doctor was an independent contractor, what theories does the court suggest for holding the hospital liable?Nondelegable duty ruleInherent functions doctrineOstensible or apparent agencyDo these theories apply to office-based doctors such as surgeons, internists, etc.
25Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital What are the facts of this case?What did the court hold?How does Johnson fit?
26Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital What are the facts of the case?Negligent selection vs. Negligent supervision
27Summary of Notes, PgsDirect vs. vicarious liability results in holding that hospital had a duty of care to its patients independent of the duty owed to patients through members of its medical staff.Direct liability unlike vicarious liability does not require a showing that independent-contractor doctor had either actual or apparent authority
28Summary of Notes, PgsWith direct liability comes a new rationale for hospitals to assert more control over their medical staffs
29Summary of Notes, PgsDarling and its progeny identify two types of negligence with respect to which hospital can be held liable for acts of independent-contractor physicians:Negligent selectionSee Johnson caseNegligent retentionAssumes contemporaneous supervision of daily treatment decisions as they are madeHospital risk management programs are an offshoot of this liability
30Boyd v. Albert Einstein Medical Center What are the facts of this case?What does the court hold?Facts to establish ostensible agencyPatient paid fees to HMO not doctorPatient selected doctors from list provided by HMOHMO screened the primary care providersHMO providers required to comply with list of rules in HMO contractHMO primary doctors had a gatekeeping function
31Wickline v. State What are the facts of this case? While the court ultimately concluded that the managed care organization did not corrupt the medical judgment, what is the important message of Wickline?
32Summary of Notes, PgsThe particular components of a MCO may affect how courts look at them in determining whether to impose liability.Vicarious liabilityDirect liabilityIn some states HMOs are immune from liability by statuteIn Wilson v. Blue Cross of Southern California finding insurer could be liable stated “civil liability for a discharge decision rests solely within the responsibility of a treating physician in all contexts is dicta.”
34Dukes v. US Healthcare, Inc. What are the facts of this case?What is ERISA?What is the significance of preemption?What issue underlies the question of whether this case can appropriately be removed to a federal court?What is the issue in this case?
36Professional Licensing What function does licensing serves?StatusMarket exclusionState sanctioned monopoliesQuality controlProtection of public healthIncrease cost of entry
37Physician Licensure MD DO Board Certification, not required Distinguish from credentialing
38State v. Miller What are the facts of this case? Charged with practicing medicine without a licenseDefendant claims he never held himself out as a doctorHe did, however, let customers believe he could diagnose and cure ailmentsRoutinely prescribed and furnished medicines
39Unlicensed Practice of Medicine CriminalDefining Medical PracticeIf you tell me you have a headache and I tell you to take 2 aspirins, am I engaged in the unauthorized practice of medicine?
40Iowa Code 148.1For the purpose of this subtitle the following classes of persons shall be deemed to be engaged in the practice of medicine and surgery: 1. Persons who publicly profess to be physicians or surgeons or who publicly profess to assume the duties incident to the practice of medicine or surgery. 2. Persons who prescribe, or prescribe and furnish medicine for human ailments or treat the same by surgery. 3. Persons who act as representatives of any person in doing any of the things mentioned in this section.
41Unlicensed Practice of Medicine Is their a constitutional right to provide care?Are patient’s constitutionally permitted to obtain medical care from anyone, even non-licensed persons?
42Other Health Care Professionals MidwiferyNursesPhysician AssistantsTelemedicine
43Modi v. West Virginia Board of Medicine What are the facts of this case?What issues are raised by the doctor in this appeal of the Board’s action?What does the court hold?