Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ESOPHAGEAL FUNCTION TESTING IN 2011

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ESOPHAGEAL FUNCTION TESTING IN 2011"— Presentation transcript:

1 ESOPHAGEAL FUNCTION TESTING IN 2011
Donald O. Castell M.D. Professor of Medicine Director, Esophageal Disorders Program Medical University of South Carolina

2

3 ABNORMAL ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY
Data obtained from 95 healthy volunteers: age 22-74 “Abnormal” defined 1)Exceeding 2 SD from mean Hypertensive LES > 45 mmHg Hypotensive LES < 10 mmHg Incomplete LES relaxation (RP > 8 mmHg) Nutcracker esophagus > 180 mmHg

4 ABNORMAL ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY
2)Exceeding # found in any subject from 10 liquid swallows Diffuse spasm > 20% simultaneous contractions Ineffective motility > 30% with amplitude <30 mmHg Richter J et al: Dig Dis Sci 33:583, 1987

5 ESOPHAGEAL FUNCTION TESTING IN 2011: The New Toys
Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH: MII-pH Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and manometry: MII-EM High Resolution Manometry: HRM High Resolution Impedance Manometry: HRIM

6 GERD DIAGNOSIS History: Not specific (i.e. functional heartburn) Trial of PPI Rx: standard of care Endoscopy Erosive esophagitis: Not sensitive (modified by PPI) Biopsy: on again; off again Dilated Intracellular Spaces: Specific Manometry: neither sensitive nor specific Prolonged pH metry: Gold standard for years Neither sensitive nor specific Combined impedance-pH: “The most sensitive test for reflux” (Sifrim et al: GUT, 2004; 53: 1024)

7 EVALUATING ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY WITH THE NEW TOYS EM, MII-EM, HRM AND HRIM
Devils and dinosaurs!

8

9 THE PRIMARY PERISTALTIC WAVE TRANSPORTS FOOD THROUGH THE ESOPHAGUS
(Kahrilas: Gastroenterology 1988)

10 COMBINED MII-EM CATHETER
Esophagus Body LES Circumferential Sensors 20 cm 15 cm 10 cm 5 cm LES HPZ

11 NORMAL IMPEDANCE-MANOMETRY (MII-EM) WITH COMPLETE BOLUS TRANSIT

12 INCOMPLETE BOLUS TRANSIT

13 COMBINED MII-EM IN 350 PATIENTS Percent patients with normal bolus transit (liquid)
(Tutuian & Castell: Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1011)

14 ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY ABNORMALITIES
Abnormal Transit Achalasia Scleroderma Ineffective esophageal motility Distal esophageal spasm Abnormal Pressure Only Nutcracker esophagus Hypertensive LES Hypotensive LES Incomplete LES relaxation

15 MANOMETRY VS BOLUS TRANSIT(MII) AFTER FUNDOPLICATION (80 PATIENTS; 33 MONTHS)
p=ns p=0.01 p=ns p<0.05 Post-fundoplication MII may detect abnormalities in esophageal motility not detected by manometry. Yigit et al. Dis Esophagus 2006; 19:382-8

16 IMPEDANCE TESTING INCREASES SENSITIVITY FOR DETECTING MOTILITY ABNORMALITIES (589 patients with normal manometry) (Koya et al: Dis Esophagus 2008; 21: 563)

17 HIGH RESOLUTION IMPEDANCE MANOMETRY CATHETER
8 9 10 5 3 2 11 12 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 7 1 0 cm (HPZ) 24 25 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 6 4 26 27 28 29 35 cm pressure sensor span HIGH RESOLUTION IMPEDANCE MANOMETRY CATHETER

18 HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY
UES UES relaxation Distance from nares (mm) Esophageal body Pressure scale LES LES relaxation

19 Transition Zone

20 HIGH RESOLUTION IMPEDANCE MANOMETRY

21 BOLUS TRANSIT DATA FROM MII
PRESSURE DATA FROM EM

22 HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY Clinical perspective
Motility diagnoses similar to conventional classification “Segmental nutcracker” and “spastic nutcracker” defined May detect abnormalities of the length of the “transition zone” Nuances in analysis of pressure topographic plot “eSleeve” measurement of LES relaxation: multiple (3-4) adjacent sites: Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP) “Contractile front velocity” (CFV): isobaric pressure-time relationship of peristaltic movement “Distal contractile integral” (DCI): pressure/time/distance integrated measure of peristaltic amplitude Whether this tool will be “valuable in the clinical management of esophageal motility disorders” remains to be established (Pandolfino et al: Am J Gastroenterol 2008, 103:27-37)

23

24 DIAGNOSIS OF ACHALASIA
This patient is a 35 year old male who has been having progressive dysphagia to solids and liquids. A barium swallow was consistent with achalasia. However, esophageal manometry was somewhat incongruent. His mean LES pressure was 24 mmHg and relaxation was achieved most of the time. Interestingly, the body of the esophagus demonstrated no progression of peristaltic waves. From a referring physician

25 MANOMETRY FINDINGS IN ACHALASIA
73 consecutive patients 38 female; age years Absent peristalsis %(required) Incomplete LES relaxation % Elevated LES pressure % All 3 of above % Increased esophageal pressure % All 4 of above % (Agrawal et al: J Clin Gastro 2008; 42: 266)

26 HRiM

27 SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS

28 SCLERODERMA Esophageal involvement
Muscle replaced by connective tissue Occurs in >75% of cases Preferentially affects smooth muscle

29 SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS Esophageal endoscopic ultrasound

30

31

32

33 MANOMETRIC DIAGNOSIS OF HIATAL HERNIA
Features Double high pressure zone (“double hump”) PIP at distal HPZ Seen best with HH >5cm (Klaus) 153 patients having both EM & endoscopy Manometry: 11/153 (7%). (10 seen on endo) Endoscopy: 51/153 (33%) Manometry has low sensitivity (20%) but high specificity (99%) for hiatal hernia detected by endoscopy (Agrawal A et al: Dis Esoph 2005, 18:316) (Klaus A et al: Dig Dis 18: 172, 2000)

34

35

36

37 EFT TESTING OF DES PATIENTS Demographics
71 patients with DES Females 43 (60%), males 28 (40%) Age: mean 57 years, range years Presenting symptom Dysphagia (32; 45%) Chest pain (16; 22%) GERD symptoms (23; 33%) Over a nine-month period we studied 350 patients and identified 70 patient with manometric patterns of IEM, 35 females and 35 males with a mean age of 54 years ranging from Each patient had 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows providing a total of 700 liquid and 700 viscous swallows for analysis. Given the limited time I’m going to present primarily the results from the liquid swallows.

38 DISTAL ESOPHAGEAL SPASM
Definition: 2 or more liquid swallows with simultaneous onset What is simultaneous? Truly simultaneous Retrograde Fast antegrade(>8 cm/sec) Over a nine-month period we studied 350 patients and identified 70 patient with manometric patterns of IEM, 35 females and 35 males with a mean age of 54 years ranging from Each patient had 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows providing a total of 700 liquid and 700 viscous swallows for analysis. Given the limited time I’m going to present primarily the results from the liquid swallows.

39 SALINE SWALLOWS (N=710) Normal Simultaneous (N=303) Ineffective (N=51)
Retrograde (N=49) Simultaneous (N=22) Antegrade (N=232) Complete BT Incomplete BT

40 SIMULTANEOUS SWALLOWS IN DES PATIENTS

41 DISTAL ESOPHAGEAL AMPLITUDE IN DES

42 COMPLETE BOLUS TRANSIT IN DES PATIENTS

43 RESULTS OF COMBINED MII-EM IN DES
MII provides additional information on the functional defect in DES Patients with a manometric diagnosis of DES are a heterogeneous group Combined MII-EM testing may help direct appropriate therapy for patients in different groups: Chest pain, high pressure, normal transit Dysphagia, low amplitude, abnormal transit (Tutuian R et al: Am J Gastro 2006; 101: 464)

44

45 “INEFFECTIVE” PERISTALSIS
Defect in esophageal peristalsis Non-transmitted Hypotensive (< 30mmHg)* Based on study of 95 normal subjects: > 3 (30%) wet swallows showing ineffective peristalsis at either distal site Kahrilas et al: Gastroenterology 1988; 94:73-80 Richter et al: Dig Dis Sci 1987; 33: 583

46 INEFFECTIVE ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY (IEM) IS A SPECIFIC MOTILITY ABNORMALITY
# of NEMD Patients Leite, L. et al: Dig Dis Sci 42:1853, 1997

47

48 MII-EM IN PATIENTS WITH IEM (LIQUID) (N=70)
26/31 normal 9/39 normal

49 EVALUATION OF IEM Combined MII-EM assesses function of motility abnormalities not shown by EM alone Factors determining complete/incomplete bolus transit Amplitude of esophageal contractions (DEA <25 mmHg) Number of swallows with low amplitudes (>5) (Tutuian R, Castell D: Clin Gastro Hepatol 2: 2004)

50 ADVANTAGES OF COMBINED HRIM
UES activity is easily seen Also excellent swallow marker Identify potential transition zone abnormalities Identify achalasia types Better recognition of LES dynamics Particularly relaxation residual pressure Intrabolus pressure easier to identify Better placement of reflux probe (HH seen) Disadvantage: will it violate rule #1?

51 ENTHUSIASM TIME

52 TRUTH The mind is like an umbrella: It works best when it is open!

53 TRUTH “You should be less threatened by what you don’t know,
Than by what you believe you know that really ain’t so” Mark Twain


Download ppt "ESOPHAGEAL FUNCTION TESTING IN 2011"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google