4 REITS Debt Capital Markets Offerings for Real Estate
5 Issuers IntermediariesInvestors Facilitate the pricing and placement of securities Monitor counterparty risk Global measure of credit risk Benchmark for risk premium Portfolio monitoring Enlarge the universe of potential investors More favorable credit terms The Value of Credit Ratings
7 Case Study: US Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) in the United States: –Created in 1960 to enable small investors to invest in real estate. –Slow start but picked up in the 1990s after tax reforms and property downturn (companies saw them as an efficient way to access capital). –There are currently 300 REITs operating in the United States. –Total assets under management currently over US$300 billion. –Approximately two-thirds are trade on the national stock exchange.
8 Case Study: Australia Listed Property Trusts (LPT) in Australia: –Launched in the early 1980s –The LPT sector has been one of the strongest performing sectors of the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX). –The capitalisation of Australia's listed property trusts represents seven percent of the ASX. –There are presently more than 38 listed property trusts on the ASX and these are capitalised at more than A$50 billion. –REITs own around 50% of an estimated A$120 billion of institutional quality property in Australia
9 Case Study: Asia Japan –J-REITs were launched in Japan in 2000 –Real estate to account for more than 50% of total assets. –There are currently six registered J-REITs in the market. Korea –Property trusts were launched in Korea in 2001. –There are two types of trust: K-REITs and CR-REITs. –K-REITs are not preferred by investors because dividend income is taxable (there are some exemptions). Singapore –S-REITs were launched in 2002. –Three S-REITs in the market CapitaMall (retail) and Ascendas (industrial) and Fortune Reits (retail). Hong Kong –Enabling legislation launched in 2003
11 Case Study: Attractive Yield Notes: (1) Domestic interbank overnight interest rate as at December 27, 2002. (2) Based on interest paid on CPF Ordinary Account from Oct 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002. (3) Straits Times Index. 0 2 4 6 (%) 8 8.0% A-REIT Yield at IPO UOB Sub Notes due 2016 (3) (4.95% -A-) 4.44% OCBC Sub due 2011 (3) (5%-BBB+) 4.01% 10 Year Government Bond (3) 3.16% 2.83% SESPROP Dividend Yield (3) CPF (Ordinary Account) (2) 2.50% 12 Month Deposit Rate (1) 0.50% STI Equity Index (3) 3.19% CapitaMall 7.06%
14 CMBS Market In Japan Growth Factors: Corporate restructuringdivesting owned real estate Establishment of JREIT market Efforts of the RCC to securitise non-performing pools Liquidations of real estate portfolios by failed companies Emergence of some performing loan conduitsstill sporadic Challenges: Securitization continues to be lender of last resort Still faces competition from direct lending market
15 CMBS Market In Korea Growth Factors: Corporate restructuringdivesting owned real estate Establishment of REITS enabling legislation Securitization of non-performing NPL loans held by private equity firms Challenges: Tenant Rights and Tenant Senior Liens (Chonsae) Still faces competition from direct lending market
16 CMBS Market In Hong Kong & Singapore Growth Factors: Corporate restructuringdivesting owned real estate Establishment of REITS Challenges: Valuation Gap Still faces competition from direct lending market
17 What is a REIT? Equity - The shares or unit trusts are usually traded on the stock exchange. Most REITs remit at least 90% of their income to shareholders. REITs are usually not required to pay income tax. A REIT is a company that owns and, in most cases, operates income producing real estate. Laws differ across geographic locations, but broad parameters are similar.
19 The REITS Ratings Approach Industry Characteristics Trust Operational Risk Financial Risk/Flexibility Degree of Operating Risk The companys business risk profile determines the level of financial risk appropriate for a rating category. Specific trust risk factors.. Financial risk is portrayed largely through quantitative ratios.
21 What is a CMBS Debt -- Fixed Income Securities backed by real estate Issuer contracts to pay a stated coupon to investor Issuer contracts to repay principal to investor over the tenor of the bond Issuer is typically tax neutral Issuer is a SPV company that either owns operates income producing real estate or owns a secured loan backed by real estate.
23 The CMBS Rating Approach Transaction enquiry Desk top review of collateral, indicative ranges provided Staged engagement entered into Detailed review of collateral, site visits, underwriting S&P assessed collateral values, stabilised cash flows, loan- to-value and debt-service-coverage-ratios assigned Proceed onto second stage – YES/NO?? Review of building condition, environmental and general due diligence information (including requirements for reserves) Transaction documents Ratings assigned
24 Major Issues to Examine Property industry characteristics:Structural Considerations: Cyclical trendsInterest rate risks, F/X risk CompetitionInsurance requirements Economic outlookLiquidity Lines, Reserves Collections Management/Commingling Risks Refinancing Risk Amortizing Debt or Bullet Debt Asset Quality and Stability of Cash Flow:Asset Valuation Consideration DiversificationStabilized cashflows & yields Rent review detailsDetermine valuation Tenant qualityIs loan to value appropriate for the target rating Lease maturity profile Vacancy & Re-letting reservesCash Flow Consideration Capital expenditures Determine refinancing constant Is the debt service coverage ratio appropriate for the target rating Management evaluations:Legal Considerations: Property Managers ExpertiseCreditors rights on real estate security Rental Managers ExpertiseLiquidation process and timeframe Credit control and administrationBankruptcy remoteness of the Issuer (SPV)
25 Issuer rating vs. issue rating Corporate approach incorporates REITs business strategy and asset profile for a rolling five year period. It is our opinion of an issuers capacity to pay its financial obligations CMBS seeks to protect the bondholder from the REITs insolvency risk. CMBS rates to the bond documents underpinned by income from the rental property. The rating takes into account recovery prospects Default rating vs. ultimate recovery Distinction with a CMBS Rating
26 CMBS Rating vs. REIT/Real Estate Issuer Rating CMBSIssuer/CCR First registered mortgagesSecurity not required Detailed analysis of security value and cashflowsPortfolio-wide analysis of assets Explicit LTV and DSCR thresholdsNo LTV and DSCR controls Finite tenor of bondsReasonable term (ie open duration) Liquidity facility (may be required)No liquidity facility required Bankruptcy remote SPV issuerCorporate risk considered Dealing with assets – prescribed limits and controlsDealing with assets – corporate strategy related Predetermined limitations regarding additional debtCorporate strategy regarding debt considered Provisioning for potential liabilities (capex and relet)No cashflow provisioning for potential liabilities Cashflow and waterfall controlsNo cashflow controls required Rating reflects probability of default (inc. recovery)Rating reflects probability of default
28 Case Study: CapitaMall Trust Trust: CapitaMall Country: Singapore Type: Shopping malls Lettable area:813,352 sq. ft Management: CapitaMall Trust Management Sponsor: Subsidiary of CapitaLand Listed: July 2002 S&P rating: A-/stable Placement:60-70% institutional Listed yield:7.2%
29 Case Study: Silver Maple Investment Corp. Ltd. Issuer: Silver Maple Investment Corp. Ltd. Country: Singapore Sponsor: CapitaMall Trust Closed: February 2002 (class A-1) June 2003 (class A-2) S&P rating: class A-1 Sing $ 172MM AAA class A-2 US$ 73MM AAA class B Sing $ 52MM A Placement:private, single investor Coupon:floating rate Maturity:December, 2011
30 Diversification in portfolio Can offer high income and stable yields (example: REITS) Can offer bond backed by real estate security which are immune to event risks (example: CMBS) Demands of investor base (pension funds, insurance companies, banks) Demographics (aging population seeks income, preservation of capital) Outlook for Real Estate Backed Securities in Asia
31 Implications for Taiwan? Lessons From Global Trends: Capital markets can allocate funds efficiently for real estate assets – RMBS, CMBS and REITS vs. corporate bond vs. equity Real estate backed securities provide high quality investments for investors New source of funding for real estate would alleviate the concentrated risk of Taiwan bank to real estate New source of stable revenue (property management fees) is beneficial to developers Setting clear legal, security, accounting and tax legislations are critical to establishing REIT and CMBS markets in Taiwan Capital market transaction propels the industry to higher levels of standard and accountability (valuation, management and reporting) Capital market is efficient in pricing risk and return (and will differentiate high quality assets from poor quality assets) Cultivate and educate the investors
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.