Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1
LARGE EDDY SIMULATION Chin-Hoh Moeng NCAR

2
OUTLINE WHAT IS LES? APPLICATIONS TO PBL FUTURE DIRECTION

3
WHAT IS LES? A NUMERICAL TOOL FOR TURBULENT FLOWS

4
**Turbulent Flows governing equations, known**

nonlinear term >> dissipation term no analytical solution highly diffusive smallest eddies ~ mm largest eddies --- depend on Re- number (U; L; )

5
**Numerical methods of studying turbulence**

Reynolds-averaged modeling (RAN) model just ensemble statistics Direct numerical simulation (DNS) resolve for all eddies Large eddy simulation (LES) intermediate approach

6
**LES turbulent flow Resolved large eddies Subfilter scale, small**

(important eddies) Subfilter scale, small (not so important)

7
**FIRST NEED TO SEPARATE THE FLOW FIELD**

Select a filter function G Define the resolved-scale (large-eddy): Find the unresolved-scale (SGS or SFS):

8
**Examples of filter functions**

Top-hat Gaussian

9
**Example: An 1-D flow field**

Apply filter large eddies

10
**Reynolds averaged model (RAN)**

f Apply ensemble avg non-turbulent

11
LES EQUATIONS Apply filter G SFS

12
**Different Reynolds number turbulent flows**

Small Re flows: laboratory (tea cup) turbulence; largest eddies ~ O(m); RAN or DNS Medium Re flows: engineering flows; largest eddies ~ O(10 m); RAN or DNS or LES Large Re flows: geophysical turbulence; largest eddies > km; RAN or LES

13
**Geophysical turbulence**

PBL (pollution layer) boundary layer in the ocean turbulence inside forest deep convection convection in the Sun …..

14
**LES of PBL inertial range, km m mm resolved eddies SFS eddies L**

energy input dissipation

15
**Major difference between engineer and geophysical flows: near the wall**

Engineering flow: viscous layer Geophysical flow: inertial-subrange layer; need to use surface-layer theory

16
The premise of LES Large eddies, most energy and fluxes, explicitly calculated Small eddies, little energy and fluxes, parameterized, SFS model

17
The premise of LES Large eddies, most energy and fluxes, explicitly calculated Small eddies, little energy and fluxes, parameterized, SFS model LES solution is supposed to be insensitive to SFS model

18
**Caution near walls, eddies small, unresolved**

very stable region, eddies intermittent cloud physics, chemical reaction… more uncertainties

19
**A typical setup of PBL-LES**

100 x 100 x 100 points grid sizes < tens of meters time step < seconds higher-order schemes, not too diffusive spin-up time ~ 30 min, no use simulation time ~ hours massive parallel computers

20
**Different PBL Flow Regimes**

numerical setup large-scale forcing flow characteristics

21
**Clear-air convective PBL**

Convective updrafts ~ 2 km

22
**Horizontal homogeneous CBL**

23
LIDAR Observation Local Time

24
**Oceanic boundary layer**

Add vortex force for Langmuir flows McWilliam et al 1997

25
**Oceanic boundary layer**

Add vortex force for Langmuir flows McWilliams et al 1997

26
**Add drag force---leaf area index**

Canopy turbulence < 100 m Add drag force---leaf area index Patton et al 1997

27
**Comparison with observation**

LES

28
**Shallow cumulus clouds**

~ 12 hr ~3 km ~ 6 km Add phase change---condensation/evaporation

29
**COUPLED with SURFACE turbulence heterogeneous land**

turbulence ocean surface wave

30
**Coupled with heterogeneous soil**

Surface model Wet soil LES model Dry soil the ground Land model

31
**Coupled with heterogeneous soil**

wet soil dry soil (Patton et al 2003)

32
**Coupled with wavy surface**

stably stratified

33
U-field flat surface stationary wave moving wave

34
So far, idealized PBLs Flat surface Periodic in x & y Shallow clouds

35
**Future Direction of LES for PBL Research**

Realistic surface complex terrain, land use, waves PBL under severe weather

37
**mesoscale model domain**

500 km 50 km LES domain

38
**Computational challenge**

Resolve turbulent motion in Taipei basin ~ 1000 x 1000 x 100 grid points Massive parallel machines

39
**Technical issues Inflow boundary condition**

SFS effect near irregular surfaces Proper scaling; representations of ensemble mean

40
**How to describe a turbulent inflow?**

41
**What do we do with LES solutions?**

Understand turbulence behavior & diffusion property Develop/calibrate PBL models i.e. Reynolds average models

42
CLASSIC EXAMPLES Deardorff (1972; JAS) - mixed layer scaling Lamb (1978; atmos env) - plume dispersion

43
**FUTURE GOAL Understand PBL in complex environment**

and improve its parameterization for regional and climate models turbulent fluxes air quality cloud chemical transport/reaction

Similar presentations

OK

A Thermal Plume Model for the Boundary Layer Convection: Representation of Cumulus Clouds C. RIO, F. HOURDIN Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, CNRS,

A Thermal Plume Model for the Boundary Layer Convection: Representation of Cumulus Clouds C. RIO, F. HOURDIN Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, CNRS,

© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

Ads by Google