Presentation on theme: "Models of Economic Growth A"— Presentation transcript:
1Models of Economic Growth A Outline:Because this area is complex and mathematical there are two files of slides for this topicLecture AIntroduction – trends in growthNeoclassical growth modelsLecture BEndogenous growth modelsThe convergence debateBelow are slides for lecture ASee next file for lecture B
2IntroductionNeed to define ‘economic growth’ (in book this is growth in GDP per capita, not GDP growth).Some background on history of economic growth – including own country dataAlso, worthwhile to stress importance of small differences in growth rates e.g.2% growth per year GDP p.c. increases 7.4 fold in 100 years0.6% GDP per capita increase 1.8 times in 100/ growth rate = no. of years to double, hence China’s 10% p.a. implies 7.2 years
3The very long run 1500-1820 1820-1900 1900-2000 OECD 1.2 2.0 Non-OECD Growth of GDP per capita (average annual percentage changes)OECD1.22.0Non-OECD0.40.6World0.040.81.9Source: Boltho and Toniolo (1999, Table 1) OECD refers to North America, Western Europe, Japan, Australia and New Zealand.
4USA, UK and EIREGrowth of GDP p.c: USA=2.2%, GBR=2.0%, Ireland=3.7% (but post-93, 8.5%)GDP per capita is US$ 1996 constant prices. Source: Penn World Table 6.1
5China and IndiaGrowth: pre-90 China 3.7%, India 4.4% : China 7.0%, India 4.4%Source: Penn World Table 6.1
6Brazil, S. Korea, Philippines Source: Penn World Table 6.1 (http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu/aboutpwt.html)
7Other data Above are from Penn World Table 6.1, now 6.3 is available Some further links at:
8GDP per capita growth not everything Focusing on ‘economic growth’ does neglect health, the environment, education, etcUN’s Human Development Index (HDI) gives equal weight to life expectancy, education and GDP per capita (http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2004/)Ultimate interest ‘well-being’ or ‘happiness’. Layard, R. (2003). "Happiness: Has Social Science a Clue?"GDP measures aggregate value added – whether coal power station or wind farmFriedman, Ben (2005) The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth argues growth is important for ‘stable’ societies
9Neoclassical modelThere are many ways to teach this. Book tends to use equations, but can do a great deal with intuition and few diagrams.This model most often attributed to Robert Solow (1956) – US Nobel prize winner …. but Trevor Swan (1956) (a less well known Australian economist) published (independently) a very similar paper in the same year – hence refer to Solow-Swan model
10Neoclassical growth model Model growth of GDP per worker via capital accumulationKey elements:Production function (GDP depends on technology, labour and physical capital)Capital accumulation equation (change in net capital stock equals gross investment [=savings] less depreciation).Questions:how does capital accumulation (net investment) affect growth?what is role of savings, depreciation and population growth?what is role of technology?
11Solow-Swan equationsSolow-Swan analyse how these two equations interact.Y and K are endogenous variables; s, d and growth rate of L and/or A are exogenous (parameters).Outcome depends on the exact functional form of production function and parameter values.
12Neoclassical production functions Solow-Swan assume:diminishing returns to capital or labour (the ‘law’ of diminishing returns), andconstant returns to scale (e.g. doubling K and L, doubles Y).For example, the Cobb-Douglas production functionHence, now have y = output (GDP) per worker as function of capital to labour ratio (k)
13GDP per worker and kAssume A and L constant (no technology growth or labour force growth)
14Accumulation equation If A and L constant, can show*This is a differential equation. In words, the change in capital to labour ratio over time = investment (saving) per worker minus depreciation per worker.Any positive change in k will increase y and generate economic growth. Growth will stop if dk/dt=0.
16Solow-Swan equilibrium GDP p.w. converges to y* =A(k*)a. If A (technology) and L constant, y* is also constant: no long run growth.
17What happens if savings increased? raising saving increases k* and y*, but long run growth still zero (e.g. s1>s0 below)call this a “levels effect”growth increases in short run (as economy moves to new steady state), but no permanent ‘growth effect’.
18What if labour force grows? Accumulation eqn nowPopulation growth reduces equilibrium level of GDP per worker (but long run growth still zero) if technology static
19Analysis in growth rates Can illustrate above with graph of gk and kDistance between lines represents growth in capital per worker (gk)
20Rise in savings rate (s0 to s1) NB: This graph of how growth rates change over time
21Golden ruleThe ‘golden rule’ is the ‘optimal’ saving rate (sG) that maximises consumption per head.Assume A is constant, but population growth is n.Can show that this occurs where the marginal product of capital equals (d + n)
22Graphically find the maximal distance between two lines
23… over savingEconomies can over save. Higher saving does increase GDP per worker, but real objective is consumption per worker.
24Golden rule for Cobb Douglas case Y=KaL1-a or y = kaGolden rule states: MPk = a(k*)a-1 =(n + d)Steady state is where: sy* = (d +n)k*Hence, sy* = [a(k*)a-1]k*or s = a(k*)a / y* = aGolden rule saving ratio = a for Y=KaL1-a caseAssuming perfect competition, and factors are paid marginal products, a is share of GDP paid to capital (see C&S, p.481). Expect this to be 0.1 to 0.3.
25Solow’s surprise*Solow’s model states that investment in capital cannot drive long run growth in GDP per workerNeed technological change (growth in A) to avoid diminishing returns to capitalEasterly (2001) argues that “capital fundamentalism” view widely held in World Bank/IMF from 60s to 90s, despite lessons of Solow modelPolicy lesson: don’t advise poor countries to invest without due regard for technology and incentives* This is title of Chapter 3 in Easterly (2001), which is worth a quick read for controversy surrounding growth models and development issues
26What if technology (A) grows? Consider y=Aka, and sy=sAka, these imply that output can go on increasing.Consider marginal product of capital (MPk)MPk=dy/dk =aAka-1,if A increases then MPk can keep increasing (no ‘diminishing returns’ to capital)implies positive long run growth
27…. graphically, the production function simply shifts up
29Output (capital) per effective worker diagram If Y/AL is a constant, the growth of Y must equal the growth rate of L plus growth rate of A (i.e. n+a)And, growth in GDP per worker must equal growth in A.
30Summary of Solow-SwanSolow-Swan, or neoclassical, growth model, implies countries converge to steady state GDP per worker (if no growth in technology)if countries have same steady states, poorer countries grow faster and ‘converge’call this classical convergence or ‘convergence to steady state in Solow model’changes in savings ratio causes “level effect”, but no long run growth effecthigher labour force growth, ceteris paribus, implies lower GDP per workerGolden rule: economies can over- or under-save (note: can model savings as endogenous)
31Technicalities of Solow-Swan Textbooks (Jones 1998, and Carlin and Soskice 2006) give full treatment, in short:Inada conditions needed ( “growth will start, growth will stop”)It is possible to have production function where dY/dK declines to positive constant (so growth declines but never reaches zero)Exact outcome of Solow model does depend on precise functional forms and parameter valuesBUT, with standard production function (Cobb-Douglas) Solow model predicts economy moves to steady state because of diminishing returns to capital (assuming no growth in technology A)
33Questions for discussion What is the importance of diminishing marginal returns in the neoclassical model? How do other models deal with the possibility of diminishing returns?Explain the effect of (i) an increase in savings ratio (ii) a rise in population growth and (iii) an increase in exogenous technology growth in the neoclassical model.What is the golden rule? Can you think of any countries that have broken the golden rule?
34ReferencesBoltho, A. and G. Toniolo (1999). "The Assessment: The Twentieth Century-Achievements, Failures, Lessons." Oxford Review of Economic Policy 15(4): 1-18.Easterly, W. (2001). The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics. Boston, MIT Press.Swan, T. (1956). "Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation." Economic Record 32:Jones, C. (1998) Introduction to Economic Growth, (W.W. Norton, 1998 First Edition, 2002 Second Edition).Carlin, W. and D. Soskice (2006) Macroeconomics: Imperfections, Institutions and Policies, Oxford University Press.