Download presentation

1
**Minimizing Chance of Type I and Type II Errors**

2
**O.J. Simpson trial: the situation**

O.J. is assumed innocent. Evidence collected

3
**O.J. Simpson trial: jury decisions**

In criminal trial: The evidence does not warrant rejecting the assumption of innocence. Behave as if O.J. is innocent. In civil trial: The evidence does warrant rejecting the assumption of innocence. Behave as if O.J. is guilty. Was an error made in either trial?

4
Errors in Trials If O.J. is innocent, then an error was made in the civil trial. If O.J. is guilty, then an error was made in the criminal trial.

5
**Errors in Hypothesis Testing**

6
**Definitions: Types of Errors**

Type I error: The null hypothesis is rejected when it is true. Type II error: The null hypothesis is not rejected when it is false. There is always a chance of making one of these errors. We’ll want to minimize the chance of doing so!

7
**Example: Grade inflation?**

H0: μ = 2.7 HA: μ > 2.7 n = 36 s = 0.6 and Data Random sample of students Decision Rule Set significance level α = 0.05. If p-value < 0.05, reject null hypothesis.

8
If X-bar is … Reject null since p-value is (just barely!) smaller then 0.05.

9
If X-bar is 2.95 … Reject null since p-value is smaller then 0.05.

10
If X-bar is 3.00 … Reject null since p-value is smaller then 0.05.

11
**Alternative Decision Rule**

“Reject if p-value 0.05” is equivalent to “reject if the sample average, X-bar, is larger than 2.865” X-bar > is called “rejection region.”

12
Type I Error

13
**Minimize chance of Type I error...**

… by making significance level small. Common values are = 0.01, 0.05, or 0.10. “How small” depends on seriousness of Type I error. Decision is up to researcher.

14
**P(Type I Error) in trials**

Criminal trials: “Beyond a reasonable doubt”. Jurors must unanimously vote guilty. Significance level set at 0.001, say. Very small chance of Type I error. Civil trials: “Preponderance of evidence.” 9 out of 12 jurors must vote guilty. Significance level set at 0.10, say. Larger chance of a Type I error.

15
**Example: Serious Type I Error**

New Drug A is supposed to reduce blood pressure by more than 15 mm Hg. H0: μ = 15 versus HA: μ > 15 Drug A can have serious side effects, so don’t want patients on it unless μ > 15. Implication of Type I error: Expose patients to serious side effects without other benefit. Set = P(Type I error) to be small 0.01

16
**Example: Not so serious Type I Error**

Grade inflation? H0: μ = 2.7 vs. HA: μ > 2.7 Type I error: claim average GPA is more than 2.7 when it really isn’t. Implication: Instructors grade harder. Students get unhappy. Set = P(Type I error) at, say, 0.10.

17
Type II Error Type II Error is made when we fail to reject the null when the alternative is true. When Type I error is made smaller, Type II error is made larger. When Type II error is made smaller, Type I error is made larger. Inverse relationship

Similar presentations

OK

A review of key statistical concepts. An overview of the review Populations and parameters Samples and statistics Confidence intervals Hypothesis testing.

A review of key statistical concepts. An overview of the review Populations and parameters Samples and statistics Confidence intervals Hypothesis testing.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To ensure the functioning of the site, we use **cookies**. We share information about your activities on the site with our partners and Google partners: social networks and companies engaged in advertising and web analytics. For more information, see the Privacy Policy and Google Privacy & Terms.
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.

Ads by Google

Ppt on international business environment Ppt on bolivian water wars Ppt on barack obama leadership qualities Download ppt on phase controlled rectifiers Ppt on aryabhatta in sanskrit Ppt on market friendly state for retirees Ppt on do's and don'ts of group discussion topic Ppt on software configuration management by pressman Ppt on horizontal axis windmill Ppt on stages of group development