Presentation on theme: "S5 Extended Project. Aims Develops employability skills, including project management. Specifically designed to aid transition to higher education and."— Presentation transcript:
S5 Extended Project
Aims Develops employability skills, including project management. Specifically designed to aid transition to higher education and the world of work by stretching and challenging you. Also equips you with the research, reflection and independent study skills they will need to succeed at university.
Employability skills Students can also gain valuable project management skills that companies are really looking for when recruiting. Indeed the skills of planning, self management of learning, collecting and analysing data, reviewing and evaluating will enhance your personal aspirations and career development. Skills are what universities and employers are looking for and what some students lack. The emphasis is on skills should prepare you for a better future.
What are you required to do? Select a topic / area of interest Identify and draft aims of your project and justify their choices of project Plan, research and carry out your project Provide evidence of all stages of the project Deliver a presentation to a specified audience
What should the written report contain? The written report or record is likely to contain the following: sources of and range of information accessed. details of the range of skills used including, where appropriate, new technologies and/or access to e-learning materials. historical or other research. details of the design, knowledge, understanding and skills used to complete the tasks or activities of the project, eg an experiment, a construction, a performance or research interviews. a conclusion to include an evaluation of the outcomes of the project, an evaluation of own performance of learning and decision-making.
Can I include supporting material with my project? Depending on the subject area or topic chosen, a variety of evidence may be submitted for assessment. Evidence can be provided in any form appropriate to the type of project chosen, and may include: an artefact, model or construction a CD/video/DVD of performances or activities an audiotape/multimedia presentation a journal of activities or events a slide or PowerPoint presentation a photographic record of the project.
All students must submit a written report for assessment of between 1000 and 5000 words. The exact length of each written report will depend on the nature of the project, the subject area or topic chosen and the other evidence provided. A project which consists solely of written work should be approximately 5000 words, for example an investigation, exploration of a hypothesis or extended essay or academic report. Projects where the majority of the evidence is provided in other formats should include a report or record of work undertaken which is at least 1000 words.
What will you be assessed on? MANAGE -Identify, design, plan and complete the task -apply organisational skills and strategies USE RESOURCES -Obtain and select information -Use a range of sources -Analyse data -Demonstrate any connections
What will you be assessed on? DEVELOP AND REALISE -Use a range of skills including new technologies -Solve problems -Take decisions -Achieve planned outcomes REVIEW -Evaluate outcomes -Evaluate your own learning and performance -Use a range of communication skills and media to present outcomes and conclusions
A dissertation This should be about 5,000 words, but do not worry if it is slightly over or under this number. It may contain maps, diagrams, data and illustrations if necessary. You may have appendices if you wish, but they should be of real importance and should not form more than 20 per cent of the total. Do not use appendices to show off a list of facts you have discovered which do not add anything to the project in terms of your skills. A dissertation should contain: an introduction a table of contents with page references the main body of the dissertation any works cited listed in a bibliography (which may have comments on the value of the resources used. They need not necessarily only be written sources, as interviews could be an equally important resource).
Factors which lead to successful dissertations Do not treat the project as a conventional piece of coursework. Remember, content itself is not marked. The project will be judged on your ability to do the following successfully: Manage a project, thinking of a broad topic and a title (in that order), planning and preparing for the project, acquiring new skills (research, data use, etc.) (20 per cent of the marks). Use sensibly and think critically about a wide range of resources – not just a couple of text books and Wikipedia (20 per cent of the marks). Develop and realise: this means writing the dissertation after you have completed the research, checking it carefully and submitting it on time. You must give your school/college time to assess it properly (40 per cent of the marks). Review the whole project. Demonstrate clearly that you have continuously reflected on what you have done. Did you change title? Did you change format? Did you change the focus of the project? If so, why? On reflection was it a good idea? What would you do better next time? What have you learned to do or avoid doing? (20 per cent of the marks). You should keep good records of all aspects of the project, not just notes taken for the content part. Remember that the content itself is not the most important thing; marks are awarded for demonstrating skills.
Successful dissertations are based on something that interests you personally are based on a hypothesis or question, e.g. How successful was Winston Churchill as Chancellor of the Exchequer?, rather than The cause of 13 Project formats Moderators hint You may do a project on some aspect of Physics if you are doing Physics A Level, but it must clearly be an extension of your A Level studies. Moderators hint Moderators are looking for evidence of a wide range of resources. 14 the collapse of Northern Rock. The latter type can end up as tedious lists which do not demonstrate your skills are not done because they might be useful for your A Level/Diploma and were suggested by someone else. They are done because you want to work on that topic demonstrate your own enterprise and initiative, planning and project management skills, not just your willingness to sit in a library and read books. Less successful dissertations are weighed down in detail and focused on content – like coursework provide little evidence of the skills for which marks are awarded, such as planning are obviously reworked parts of the A Level course have a limited range of resources used: just a couple of textbooks and Wikipedia are done in the wrong format; a dissertation instead of a report have no review/evaluation.
With Dissertations, the best way of focusing the objective of the project is to put it in the form of a question. Learners are more likely to progress if they can identify a specific question within a broad field of learning. For example, if learners are interested in contemporary art, they might choose to focus on the work of a particular artist, such as Tracey Emin, and aska specific question (Does Tracey Emins work show that art is more about ideas than beauty?).
Artefacts might be produced in response to a design brief: a specification of the role or function the Artefact has to fulfil (eg Design and build a portable high chair for children, Produce a piece of graphic communication to support the aims of a charity or campaign) OR - a self-generated brief or a commission (eg Design a mural or piece of public sculpture to celebrate an event or achievement related to a specific site).
An artefact This could be something you have made or designed. The possible range is vast: it could be artwork, a costume for a play, a working model, an educational game. It could be a design or a series of designs; the whole idea is to give you the maximum scope possible. If in any doubt about the format, contact your awarding body about it. There have been cases where the student was discouraged from doing an artefact because their school or college was worried about the student going into areas beyond the experience/expertise of the supervisors and the college. Usually these worries were totally unnecessary.
Successful artefacts have included the following: a dress sculpture computer programs building designs steam engines. You will need to submit a written report with your artefact, at about 1,500 words. Some of those words may be in the form of a commentary on different parts of the designs. No one is going to count the words carefully if you are clearly meeting the assessment criteria. You can use this report to meet the AO1, AO2 and AO4 criteria, demonstrating the following skills: 1 Planning: for example, how you anticipated problems, obtained the right resources at the right time. 2 Critically using the wide range of resources. 3 Reviewing and evaluating.
AO3 should be covered by the artefact itself. Your artefact will be judged on your ability to do the following: Manage the whole project, from the initial idea stage through to completion. Strong evidence of your planning will be critical here. Use a wide range of resources critically. The resources could range from interviews through to the designs of other artefacts, or secondary and primary sources. The potential list is vast and the type of resources will depend very largely on the nature of the project. Complete the artefact in a specified time. There have been cases where the actual artefact has not been completed but there was enough evidence (such as photographic) of the process for marks to be gained. Review and evaluate the whole process. What worked? Why? What did not? Why not? What was learned? What would or would not be repeated next time?
Successful artefact-based projects: are well planned (good planning is perhaps more important and a greater challenge in this format than in the others) involve the anticipation and learning of necessary skills (for example, arc welding, reading French) demonstrate the individuality and enterprise of the student reach outside the conventional educational box have a high level of review and evaluation. Less successful artefact-based projects: have bright ideas but bad planning do not achieve the timescale discover too late that the acquisition of a certain skill is vital to complete the project do not think through the transition from the bright idea to actual artefact expect too much help from others.
Performances may also be produced in response to a stimulus question (eg How far can people with a mental illness be held responsible for their actions?), where the question focuses and guides the development of performer research, development of script ideas, selection of theatrical techniques and choice of stage setting and publicity materials.
A production As with the other formats, there is a huge range of possibilities here. It could be a play, a film, a concert, a DVD, an event. Again, if you are not sure, contact OCR for advice. Remember what it is being assessed: if your planning, researching, evaluation, etc. is perfect, but you forget your lines in the performance of a play which you have written and in which you have the lead role, marks will not necessarily be deducted (although you might want to reflect on your line-learning skills and how to deal with pressure for AO4!). This project format will be judged on your ability to do the following: Plan the production: did you allow sufficient time to rehearse? Use a wide range of resources critically. Deliver the production. Reflect and evaluate on the whole process. What went well, and why? What did not, and why? What would you do better next time?
Successful productions: manage to translate the bright idea into an actual production without harming the essential creativity behind it are realistic, downsizing as necessary remember the assessment criteria: a stunning piece of film-making or music-writing will not achieve an A grade without the production demonstrating your planning, investigation and evaluation skills take the written report seriously. It should not be a rushed afterthought which neglects evidence of your skills. The production itself does not always display the skills required, particularly to a lay audience. Less successful productions: do not actually happen: the idea simply does not translate into practice forget what is being assessed. You might be the next Steven Spielberg, but if there is no evidence of planning or no report you will not gain high marks lack evidence of planning and resource use. If you are writing a play then you must still demonstrate your research and evaluation skills become the vehicle for one persons ego, or disintegrate over personality clashes do not provide evidence of individual contributions and skills within a group production.
Section Number of words Total word count Dissertation Performance 3000 Artefact 1500/3000 Abstract/ summary /100 Introduction /400 Research Review /900 Discussion/ Development/Analysis /1350 Conclusion /250 Bibliography No recommendation No recommendation No recommendation No recommendation Appendices (PPF, activity records, raw data) No recommendation No recommendation No recommendation No recommendation
Case study of project dvlpmnt - KISS
Mentoring Can be held as regularly as necessary for the student Mentors do not have to be subject- specialists Mentors act as supervisors and guide students but do NOT spoon-feed them. Students need to take risks, make decisions and solve problems by themselves
Focused objectives Independent learning Research base Structured outcomes Thinking skills
What to do first? What areas are you interested in doing your Extended Project on? Can you put together a title that will allow you to investigate and to access the higher-level concepts and skills in the learning outcomes and assessment objectives, i.e. plan, research, analyse, evaluate and explain, rather than simply describe and narrate? Are the title and proposed action clear and focused on an issue which can be managed within the timescale, available resources and word total? Do the title and proposed action indicate that you will be capable of investigating and researching the topic or carrying out the activity or task independently? Is there a danger that you will be unable to approach the project impartially and in a balanced way?
What makes a good title? Personal Interest The choice of the title for an Extended Project is important as it sets the scene for everything that follows. The first thing to bear in mind is that the Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) is designed to provide students with an opportunity to select a project which genuinely interests them. It could be that the topic they want to work on has a link to their plans for future work or study, or it could be a personal interest or hobby that provides the rationale for the project. A good first question, for students who have no idea at all, is to ask them what they are thinking of doing after their project is complete, then suggest that they choose something which links to this. If, for example, they hope to go on to study a course in psychology at university, it would make sense for them to work on a research question which has a psychological aspect. Or if they hope to go on to train to be an engineer, an engineering artefact would be a sensible choice. This may seem obvious, but it isnt always clear to students that it is worth making a connection to their potential future areas of work or study.
Thinking about the Outcome In thinking about whether or not a title is a good one it is important to consider the sort of project which it is likely to lead to. Whatever the outcome, all projects have to involve a process of planning, researching, developing and reviewing. The emphasis in the assessment criteria is very much on the fact that a project is a process. That process, at Level 3, should occupy around 80 guided learning hours of time, and should include ideas, techniques, theories and vocabulary which are of Level 3 standard. There should be some sophistication to the work. So, some immediate questions to ask of a student when they first come up with an idea for a title are as follows:
Is this something which will lead to a project taking around 80 hours worth of work? Some projects are simply too ambitious; more commonly, students chose tasks which can be done in much less time. Is it something which will need to be carefully planned? Sometimes, students choose projects which are essentially nothing more than tasks (e.g. I want to find out what I need to do to become a nurse; I want to learn to play a new song on my guitar; I will make some posters for our school trip). The EPQ is designed to challenge students to develop their skills in managing time and resources. They should choose projects which require significant planning, leading to a process of research and development, rather than simply being tasks. Is the project something for which research is going to be necessary? In all units of the qualification, the research base is central. It is the platform from which successful project development work can be launched. As with the requirement for planning, if a student opts to do a straight-forward task, there will be nothing to research, and it will be hard to meet the requirement to use research resources. Suppose that a student decides that her project will be to record herself playing some rock music. This would be a poor choice of objective, since no research will be involved. Will the project involve substantial development work in order that the chosen objectives are met? AO3 (the development and realisation criterion) is worth 44% of the marks. In terms of time allocation, that corresponds to around 35 hours worth of work. If a student has chosen as their title a question which could be answered by writing a short essay, it will not constitute a worthwhile Extended Project.
Will the student be able to evaluate their project once complete? The evaluation, or review, involves asking how successful the project has been. One part of this involves discussing the extent to which the initial objectives have been met. This means that the objectives need to be clear and specific. If the chosen objectives are vague, it will not be possible at the end to enter into a meaningful discussion of the extent to which they have been met. Suppose a student chooses to design an advert. This objective is too vague; there is no specification of what is to be advertised, or where the advert will be used, or whom the target audience is. It will therefore be impossible to evaluate the success of the advert. By contrast, consider a student who chooses to design a series of short documentary-style advertisements to heighten awareness of the requirements that employers face under the Disability Discrimination Act. This is a highly specific, focused design brief containing within itself the criteria for evaluation (Were the advertisements made? Were they in an appropriate format? Were they suitable for the target audience? Did they have the desired effect when shown to a test audience? etc)
Sample project titles Is it ethical to genetically engineer babies for designer purposes? Can you believe in God and the Big Bang? What role does comedy have in serious culture? Is the only aim of business to make maximum profit? What are the long term health effects of binge drinking? Is wi-fi safe? How useful is Feminist interpretation of fairy tales? Is Marxism still relevant in this post-modern world? Have reality TV programmes spawned a generation obsessed with fame? Are soap operas an accurate reflection of the way we live? Would the vote be beneficial for year olds? Can music influence crime rates? How do role models influence out body image? Has globalisation led to an increase on the exploitation of female workers? Is censorship justified? Is Shakespeare still relevant? Is freedom of speech a fundamental human right? Does anyone have the right to have children? Is it ethical to have a child for the purpose of saving another childs life?
Project Proposal Form The students choice of question/hypothesis/commission or brief A rationale for the project Identification of skills Objectives Activities Resources
Once you have worked through the above stages, complete page 4 of you Production Log (copy on school website) and arrange a meeting with your supervisor to discuss it. After this meeting you will be able to complete pages 5 and 8 of the
Hints Keep you Extended Project under control – dont get sidetracked or think Ill put it off until next week. Keep your topic/ research question manageable – within the time available and your skills. Keep it in perspective – the Extended Project is worth the same UCAS point score as any AS Level – this can and will help your future education/career. It should be approximately 5000 words – this may seem long, but in fact is only about 12 sides A4. You are unlikely to change the world with your EP – you are not expected to write something totally original, just something new to you. It should be on a topic that interests you, and that you want to find out more about. Follow the guidelines in the learning Log – remember this forms part of the assessment. Keep checking the assessment criteria to make sure that your project will fulfil the requirements. Stick to deadlines – they are there to help you – promise!
Step one – Action plan Use the SMARTER code to help you: Specific -What exactly will you do? Measurable -how will you know youve succeeded? Achievable -is it realistic? Resourced -have you allocated enough time? Have you enough information? Timetabled -by when will you achieve each step? Evaluated -keep checking if you are on track Reviewed -sometimes changed circumstances mean a modification in the goal is necessary
Step two - Research Scan reading: First flick through a textbook/article – scanning Look at the index Look at the headlines Look at the pictures Look at any summaries at the beginning or end of chapters Stop and glance at anything that interests you Jot down anything you already know – key words. Produce a mind map to develop ideas further. Always make notes and ask yourself questions. Analysis -Interrogate the author – ask questions as you are reading: How do I know this is true? If it is true, what else follows? Is the conclusion justified? What assumptions are being made? Is this fact or opinion? Whats the evidence? If its fact, is it always true? If its opinion, can I trust the source? Can I think of any (better) examples to illustrate the argument? Is this logical? What personal opinion or conclusion can I draw from this? Is it justified? What are the unique and new points? What is essential to know and what is just padding?
Step three – Organising the Project The average professional writer spends 40% of his time on research and planning, only 20% on actual writing and 40% on revision and re-writing. Writing tips: 1. Keep to the topic – what exactly is the question or issue that you are addressing? 2. If its a topic or problem for which you are proposing an answer, define the issue in the first paragraph, and keep checking back to see if you are sticking to the point. 3. Gather together the information you need – notes from books, sources from the internet. When you have your notes together try mind mapping the key ideas. 4. Now start to add to the mind map – putting ideas together in groups 5. Check back – do the points answer the question or suggest a solution to the problem? 6. Decide what will be in the beginning, middle and end of the report. The middle develops your arguments and ideas with example, facts, quotations and evidence to back up the argument. The end – a clever summary answer to the origina lquestion, and ties up any loose ends.
Step four Step four – Draft it Start with the middle: Start to write with your organised plan in front of you. Start with the middle – where you will be developing your arguments. Once the middle is complete then you can finish off by writing a punchy opening and a clever summary ending. Decide what is the best order for your main points – remember to give each new idea its own paragraph. All work should be done on a computer so its easy to cut and paste and move text around if necessary. Write up each of the ideas from your mind map
Step four Writing the conclusion Look back at the draft of the middle. Jot down the 10 most important key words. Find the shortest way to link them together – thats your ending. Check that your ending sums up your answer to the question or the issue you are addressing. Remember this is the last thing to be read before deciding your grade! Writingthe beginning: Now draft the beginning – this will give the reader the big picture of what youre going to say. Remember the beginning is the first thing your reader (or examiner) will see. A punchy beginning will put them in a good mood expecting to agree with your argument. What next? Sleep on it. When you read it again you will see points you missed or things you could have explained better.
Step five -Edit it Is the meaning clear? Have you used the words that describe exactly what you mean? Read your report out loud. Does it sound good? Have you used sub-headings that make it easy to read? Have you used short paragraphs that the reader will want to read, rather than long boring ones? Have you given examples to bring your ideas to life? Pay attention to the beginning – does it start with a bang? Does it make the reader want to read more? Keep your sentences short – long sentences are difficult to understand
Referencing/ Bibliography It is crucial that as you are researching your project that you make a note of the following information for every source you use: Title or publication or address of the website Name of the author or editor Page number Publishers name Date or publication Place or publication This information will go into your bibliography, and will prevent you being accused on plagiarism. Footnotes – these are a way of allowing your reader to check your sources for themselves. They are notes that appear at the foot of the page. Footnotes should be used whenever you refer to the work of another person. Everything that is not your own work must be referenced. Endnotes have the same purpose as footnotes; they simply appear at the end of a document or at the end of a section of a document. Both footnotes and endnotes can be used in one of two ways, either: 1. Parenthetical in text system -in other words putting your source in brackets within the text. 2. Number system -simply using the insert tool on Word to insert a number which refers the reader to your footnote or endnote. Bibliography -the list of all sources that you have used, referred to or consulted during the course of compiling your Extended Essay. For example: Power, J. A History of the Extended Project at MTGS. Crosby, England: Whatever Books, 2010 When citing a website you must specify Site name, Homepage URL, date viewed -for example: The BBC Website January 2010 Useful Links: A very thorough and easy to understand webpage on bibliographies and referencing from the University of Dundee. A very thorough pdf on the Harvard style of referencing and bibliography from the library of The University of Queensland, Australia.
The Formal presentation The presentation should be for a non-specialist audience and use media appropriate to the type of project. The presentation could take the form of a verbal or written presentation or may involve the use of flipcharts, posters, OHP transparencies, PowerPoint or short excerpts of video material. This could take the form of a group presentation, in the case of a group project, or a one-to-one presentation to the supervisor. The presentation should be supported by answers to any questions from supervisors.
Questioning learners after the presentation is useful, partly as a way of authenticating the originality of their work and partly as a way of giving them a chance to demonstrate the extent of their understanding further. The question and answer session can provide evidence for AO4 (Review). Suitable questions include: which of the resources used proved to be the most useful to you and why? what factors influenced your choice of presentation style? looking back at your project, are there any processes you would change? If so, why? did you anticipate any particular difficulties when approaching this subject and how did you/would you have dealt with them? what areas of your subject do you think provide opportunities for further exploration and why? A check sheet for different aspects of the presentation is given in Annexe A. This may help in making decisions about the award of marks for the presentation in AO4 against the specification assessment criteria.