Presentation on theme: "Schedule Tuesday 19th & 26th October 2010"— Presentation transcript:
1EU TAX LAW COURSE by Dr. Ivan Sammut from Faculty of Laws University of Malta
2Schedule Tuesday 19th & 26th October 2010 Introduction – Is there EU Tax Law?Introduction to the EU Legal orderEU InstitutionsDirect EffectPreliminary referenceEnforcement ActionsLocus StandiFour FreedomsFree Movement of GoodsOther Freedoms (very brief)Other Articles relevant to TaxationHistory of EU Tax Law
3THEORIES OF ECONOMIC INTGRATION Free-trade area (FTA)- where the member partners remove all trade impediments among themselves, but each country can apply its own customs tariff with respect to third countries.Customs Union (CU)- same as in FTAs, all obstacles to free movement of goods among partner countries are removed. Moreover, they must pursue common external commercial relations – for instance, they must adopt common external tariffs (CETs) on imports from non-participants.
5THEORIES OF ECONOMIC INTGRATION Common Market (CM)- which are customs unions that allow free movement of production factors such as labour and capital across national member frontiers. It leaves various options as to the relation with third countries.Economic Union (EcU)- implies a common market with a high degree of coordination or even unification of the most important areas of economic policy, market regulation, as well as macro-economic and monetary policies. A common trade policy is pursued towards third countries.
6THEORIES OF ECONOMIC INTGRATION Monetary Union (MU)- cooperation on top of a common market which creates either irrevocably fixed exchange rates and full convertibility of the currencies of the member states, or one common currency in all member states.Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)- which combines the characteristics of the monetary union and the economic union.
7Theories of Economic Integration Full Economic Union (FEU)- implies the complete unification of the economies involved, and a common policy for many important matters. The situation is similar as that within one nation, and political integration is often implied.
9FOUR FREEDOMSGOODSPERSONSSERVICESCAPITALRight for free Enterprise
10Article 28 TFEU ex 23 EC Article 28 TFEU 1. The Union shall be based upon a customs union which shall cover all trade in goods and which shall involve the prohibition between Member States of customs duties on imports and exports and of all charges having equivalent effect, and the adoption of a common customs tariff in their relations with third countries.2. The provisions of Article 30 shall apply to products originating in Member States and to products coming from third countries which are in free
11Amsterdam/Lisbon Treaty Renumbering of Treaty ArticlesPre Amsterdam pre 1999Between Amsterdam and LisbonPost Lisbon 2009-
12Article 29 TFEU ex Article24 EC Products coming from a third country shall be considered to be in free circulation in a Member State if the import formalities have been complied with and any customs duties or charges having equivalent effect which are payable have been levied in that Member State, and if they have not benefited from a total or partial drawback of such duties or charges.
13Article 30 TFEU ex 25 EC Article 30 Customs duties on imports and exports and charges having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States. This prohibition shall also apply to customs duties of a fiscal nature.Article 31 TFEUCommon Customs Tariff duties shall be fixed by the Council acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission
14DUTIES AND CHARGES THE EFFECT AND NOT THE PURPOSE Case 7/68 Commission v ItalyDiamantarbeiders v SA Ch Brachfeld & Sons Cases 2/3 of 69
15CHARGES HAVING EQUIVALENT EFFECT Case 24/68 Commission v Italy
16CHARGES HAVING EQUIVALENT EFFECT: INSPECTIONS AND THE ‘EXCHANGE EXCEPTION’ Bresiani v Amministrazione Italiane delle Finance - Case 87/75Cadeskry v ICE – Case 63/74Commission v Belgium - Case 132/82
17CHARGES HAVING AN EQUIVALENT EFFECT INSPECTIONS AND FULFILLMENT OF MANDATORY LEGAL REQUIREMENTSBauhuis vs NL – Case 46/77Following conditionsnot exceeding the actual cost of the inspections in connection with which they are charged;the inspections in question are obligatory and uniform for all the products concerned in the communitythey are prescribed by community law in the general interest of the communitythey promote the free movement of goods, in particular by neutralizing obstacles which could arise from unilateral measures of inspection adopted in accordance with Article 36 of the Treaty
18Internal Taxation Article 110 TFEU ex 90 EC No Member State shall impose, directly or indirectly, on the products of other Member States any internal taxation of any kind in excess of that imposed directly or indirectly on similar domestic products.Furthermore, no Member State shall impose on the products of other Member States any internal taxation of such a nature as to afford indirect protection to other products.
19Internal Taxation Direct discrimination i) Direct Discrimination Lutteck Case 57/65Drexl Case 299/86Commission v Italy Case 21/79Hansen Case 148/77
20Internal Taxation Commission v France C 265/99 Humblot v Directeur des Services Fiscaux Case 112/84Feldian Case 433/85Chemical Farmaceutici v DAF SpA Case 140/79Commission v France Case 196/85Outokompu Oy Case C- 213/96Commission v Greece Case C-132/88
21Internal Taxation Relationship between Article 110(1) & 110(2) Commission v France Case 168/78Firma Fink-Frucht Case 27/77Johnny Walker v Ministeriet for Skatter Case 243/84Commission v Italy Case 184/85
22Internal Taxation The determination of Protective Effect Vinal - Case 46/80 v Regenerated oil / spirits casesDanish Fruit Wines v John WalkerHumblot Feldain / Italian DieselMarsala /WineUK british beer
23Internal Taxation Boundary Between Articles 23-25 / 90-93 Lutticke case 105/76Cooperattive co-Frutta SRL v Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato Case 193/85Scharbatke Case C-72/92
24Quantitative Restrictions Article 34 TFEU ex Article 28 ECQuantitative restrictions on imports and all measures having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States.Article 35 TFEU ex 29 ECQuantitative restrictions on exports, and all measures having equivalent effect, shall be prohibited between Member States
25Quantitative Restrictions Directive 70/50EECProcureur du Roi v Dassonville -- Case 8/74ALL TRADING RULES ENACTED BY MS WHICH ARE CAPABLE OF HINDERING, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ACTUALLY OR POTENTIALLY, INTRA-COMMUNITY TRADE ARE TO BE CONSIDERED AS MEASURES HAVING AN EFFECT EQUILAVELENT TO QUANTITATIVE RESTRICTIONS
26Quantitative Restrictions Discriminatory Barriers to TradeImport & Export RestrictionsCommission v Italy Case 154/85Promotion of Favouring of Domestic ProductsCommission v Ireland Case 249/81Commission v UK Case 207/83DU Pont Case C-21/88Commission v Ireland Case 45/87Commission v France 21/84
27Quantitative Restrictions Price-fixingRoussel Case 181/82Openbaar Ministerie v Van Tiggele Case 82/77Measures which Make Imports more Difficult or CostlySchloh case v Auto Control TechniqueNational Measures versus Private ActionApple & Pear Development Council Case 222/82R v The Pharmaceutical SocietyCommission v France C-265/95
28Quantitative Restrictions Indistinctly Applicable rules: Cassis de DijonCasis de Dijon Rewe-Zentrale AG v Bundesmonopolverwaltung fur Branntwein Case 120/78
29Quantitative Restrictions Cassis de DijonIN EFFECT THE PRINCIPLE EFFECT OF REQUIRMENTS OF THIS NATURE IS TO PROMOTE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES HAVING A HIGH ALCOHOLIC CONTENT FO THE PURPOSE OF THE SALE OF ALCOHOL BEVERAGES CONSTITUTES AN OBSTACLE TO TRADE WHICH IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 30SO THERE IS NO VALID REASON WHY THEY HAVE BEEN LAWFULLY PRODUCED AND MARKETED ON ONE OF THE MEMBER STATES – ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES SHOULD NOT BE INTRODUCED IN ANY OTHER MEMBER STATE - SALE OF SUCH PRODUCTS MAY NOT BE THE SUBJECT TO A LEGAL PROHIBITION ON THE MARKETING OF BEVERAGES WITH AN ALCOHOL CONTENT LOWER THE LIMITS SET BY NATIONAL RULES
30Quantitative Restrictions INDISTINCTLY APPLICABLE RULES – POST CASSIS JURISPRUDENCE:Deserbais - Case 286/86Gili and Andes Case 788/79Commission v Germany Case C-317/92Piageme Case C -369/89Groenveld Case 15/79
31Quantitative Restrictions Indistinctly Applicable rules: The Limits of Article 28Cinetheque Cases 60 and 61/84Torfaen v BQ Case145/88Stoke v City Council CMLR 31BQ v Shresbery CMLR 535Union Department des Sydicates v SIDEF Conforma Case C- 322/89Minister public v Marchandise Case C-306/88Semeraro Casa Uno Srl v Sindaco del Comune di Erbusco 1996
32Quantitative Restrictions The Judgement in KeckKech & Mithourd Case C /91Selling arrangement is not as such as to HINDER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ACTUALLY OR POTENTIALLY, TRADE BETWEEN MS within the meaning of the Dassonville formula provided that they apply to all and provide they affect in the same manner in law and in fact
33Quantitative Restrictions Static and Dynamic Selling ArrangementsTWO JUDICAL QUALIFICATIONS1. IS OPEN TO THE ECJ TO CHARACTERISE CERTAIN RULES WHICH AFECT SELLING IN SOME MANNER AS PART OF THE NATURE OF THE PRODUCT ITSELF, AND HENCE WITHIN THE AMBIT OF ARTICLE 28?FAMILIAPRESS C 368/95
34Quantitative Restrictions 2. EVEN IF A RULE IS CATHEGORIZED AS BEING ABOUT A SELLING ARRANGEMENT, IT WILL STILL BE WITHIN ART 28 IF THE RULE HAS A DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT IN LAW OR FACT FOR DOMESTIC TRADERS AND IMPORTERS
35Quantitative Restrictions Article 36 TFEU ex Article30 ECThe provisions of Articles 34 and 35 shall not preclude prohibitions or restrictions on imports, exports or goods in transit justified on grounds of public morality, public policy or public security; the protection of health and life of humans, animals or plants; the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value; or the protection of industrial and commercial property. Such prohibitions or restrictions shall not, however, constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.
36Free Movement of Persons Article 45 TFEU ex 39 EC1. Freedom of movement for workers shall be secured within the Union.2. Such freedom of movement shall entail the abolition of any discrimination based on nationality between workers of the Member States as regards employment, remuneration and other conditions of work and employment.3. It shall entail the right, subject to limitations justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health:(a) to accept offers of employment actually made;(b) to move freely within the territory of Member States for this purpose;(c) to stay in a Member State for the purpose of employment in accordance with the provisions governing the employment of nationals of that State laid down by law, regulation or administrative action;(d) to remain in the territory of a Member State after having been employed in that State, subject to conditions which shall be embodied in implementing regulations to be drawn up by the Commission.
37Free Movement of Persons Bosman ruling case C- 415/93European Parliament and Council Directive 2004/38/EC of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC , 68/360/EEC , 72/194/EEC , 73/148/EEC , 75/34/EEC , 75/35/EEC , 90/364/EEC , 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC .
38Free Movement of Services Article 49 ECWithin the framework of the provisions set out below, restrictions on freedom to provide services within the Community shall be prohibited in respect of nationals of Member States who are established in a State of the Community other than that of the person for whom the services are intended.The Council may, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, extend the provisions of the Chapter to nationals of a third country who provide services and who are established within the Community.
39Right to establishment Article 49 TFEU ex 43 ECWithin the framework of the provisions set out below, restrictions on the freedom of establishment of nationals of a Member State in the territory of another Member State shall be prohibited. Such prohibition shall also apply to restrictions on the setting-up of agencies, branches or subsidiaries by nationals of any Member State established in the territory of any Member State.Freedom of establishment shall include the right to take up and pursue activities as self-employed persons and to set up and manage undertakings, in particular companies or firms within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 39, under the conditions laid down for its own nationals by the law of the country where such establishment is effected, subject to the provisions of the Chapter relating to capital.
40Free movement of capital Article 59 TFEU ex 52 EC1. In order to achieve the liberalisation of a specific service, the Council shall, on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the European Parliament, issue directives acting by a qualified majority.2. As regards the directives referred to in paragraph 1, priority shall as a general rule be given to those services which directly affect production costs or the liberalisation of which helps to promote trade in goods.
41History of EU tax Law Article 113 TFEU ex 93 EC The Council shall, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes, excise duties and other forms of indirect taxation to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and the functioning of the internal market
42Indirect Taxation1960 Commission 3 working groups (experts from Commission & MS)A – removal of tax frontiers & border inspectionB- single stage – general sales taxC- common single stages tax at production & at retail levels
431960 Fiscal & financial Committee to study tax system of the MS which conflicted with the Internal MarketNeumark Report abolish a cascade tax and opt for VAT because of market distortionEC agreed with reportFirst draft directive of VAT
44VAT First Vat Directive 67/227/EECof 11 April 1967 Preamble The main objective of the Treaty , within the framework of an economic union, a common market within which there is a healthy competition & whose characteristics are similar to those of a domestic market
45First Directive to be transposed by 1 January 1970 DefinitionsTerritory of the countryPlace of supplyTaxable personsProvision of services
46First Directive to replace their present turnover taxes by a VAT system 1/1/70 Second Directive 67/228/EEC of 11/4/67VAT to be applied to:The supply of goods and the provisions of services within the territory of a country by a taxable person against payment;The importation of goods
47No major problems in the implementation except some fears of budgetary repercussions 3rd VAT Directive extended the deadline until 19724th & 5th VAT Directive extended further time for Italy 1973By 1973 the 3 new MS were already in place (DK 1967) (Eire 1972) UK 1973
48Sixth VAT Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 Most comprehensive DirectiveIn force today with amendments
491985 white PaperRemoval of physical bordersRemoval of technical bordersRemoval of tax barriers
50Approximation of VAT Common base Number of rates Level of the rates (particularly of the standard rate)1989 proposals COM(89) 260VAT & excise duty rates should be approximatedTax frontiers are incompatible with genuine market
51Common system of VAT COM 328(96) final A definitive system of VAT Easing of the administrative obligations incumbent on enterprises and administrations and a significant simplification of taxation;No reduction in MS’s revenueNo increase in the risk of tax evasionMaintenance of tax neutrality in terms of competitiveness
52The Concepts behind a Future Definitive Regime of VAT a) The Destination Principleb) The Origin Principlec) The Place of Establishmentd) A Federal Tax
53The new VAT system will have to satisfy the following criteria: It must abandon the segmentation of the internal market into individual tax areas;It must be simple and modern so as to rise to the challenges of this new century;It must guarantee equal treatment of all transactions carried out in the Community; andIt must ensure effective taxation and guarantee proper monitoring, thereby maintaining the level of VAT revenues.
55Future Options for EC VAT The first is to revert back to the destination principle. The current system is mostly based on the destination principle, and therefore one could argue that if the feeling is that none of the theories proposed are considered to be superior, then one could revert back to such a system.The second option is to finally move towards the origin principle with or without a clearing-house mechanismThe third option could be to introduce a totally new system. What form could this new system take place is still debatable.
56Community Customs Code Article 28 TFEU ex 23EC1. The Community shall be based upon a customs union which shall cover all trade in goods and which shall involve the prohibition between Member States of customs duties on imports and exports and of all charges having equivalent effect, and the adoption of a common customs tariff in their relations with third countries.
57Direct Taxes Legal basis – not very broad APPROXIMATION OF LAWS Article 115 TFEU
58EU Direct Tax Harmonisation aims at: Curbing the alarming tendency in national tax policies of shifting the tax burden from the more mobile capital factor to the less mobile labour factor;Alignment of corporate taxes;Co-ordination of tax treatment of distributed company profits;Elimination of obstacles such as withholding taxes to cross-border flow of dividends, interests and royalties;Facilitating the cross-border grouping of companies;Elimination of international double taxation;Non-discriminatory tax treatment of non-residents taxpayer, especially frontier workers;Creating a favourable tax environment for SME’s;Harmonisation of tax savings while avoiding a possible flight from the Union to third countries;
59Parent Subsidiary Directive 90/435/EEC of 23 July 1990 Merger Directive 90/434/EEC of 23 July 1990Arbitration Convention 90/463/EEC of 23 July under Article 293EC(then 220EEC)
60Tax aspects of European Economic Interest Grouping (EEIG) and the European Company (SE) Interest & Royalty Directive 2003/49/EC of 26 June 2003Savings Interest Directive (initially withdrawn a draft) 2003/48/EC of 26 June 2003 came into force 1/7/2005(initially planed for 1/1/2005)