1. An aerodrome operator’s experience Jan Smeitink, Chairman RST Amsterdam Schiphol Airport ERRSS Amsterdam, March 8, 2012

2. 2 Key element: multi sectorial team composition Amsterdam Airport Schiphol Chairman Secretary Dutch ATC Major carriers operating to and from Schiphol Ground handlers Representatives from Dutch ALPA & Dutch ATC Guild CAA delegates (with observer status)

3. 3 Schiphol: Complex layout Specific vulnerabilities More prone to incursions than excursions

5. 5 Role and achievements of RST Schiphol Newly defined runway incursion definition paper  Guidelines with regard to risk category rating  In line with EAPPRI 2.0  Available for all to share Runway Incursion Alerting System Schiphol  Continuously active on all runways

6. RIASS continuously monitors all runways

7. landing scenario

8. A B

9. A B

10. A B

11. A A claims first part of the runway B

12. landing scenario A A claims first part of the runway B

13. landing scenario A A claims first part of the runway B

14. landing scenario A A claims first part of the runway B

15. landing scenario A A claims first part of the runway B

16. landing scenario A A claims additional part of the runway B

17. landing scenario A A claims additional part of the runway B

18. landing scenario A A claims additional part of the runway B

19. landing scenario A A claims additional part of the runway B

20. landing scenario A A claims additional part of the runway B

21. landing scenario A A claims additional part of the runway B

22. landing scenario A B

23. A B

24. A B

25. A B

26. A B

27. A B

28. A B

29. A B

30. A B

31. A B

32. A Behind landing traffic, claim is withdrawn B

33. landing scenario A Behind landing traffic, claim is withdrawn B

34. landing scenario A Behind landing traffic, claim is withdrawn B

35. landing scenario A Behind landing traffic, claim is withdrawn B

36. landing scenario A Behind landing traffic, claim is withdrawn B

37. landing scenario A B

38. A B

39. All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed A B

40. landing scenario All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed A B

41. landing scenario All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed A B

42. landing scenario All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed A B

43. landing scenario A All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed B

44. landing scenario A All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed B

45. landing scenario A All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed B

46. landing scenario A All claims are cancelled upon reaching taxi speed B

47. landing scenario A B

48. A B

49. A B

50. Landing scenario with incursion

51. A B B initiates crossing, while A is about to land (also applicable when B is a vehicle)

52. A B initiates crossing, while A is about to land (also applicable when B is a vehicle) B

53. A B B initiates crossing, while A is about to land (also applicable when B is a vehicle)

54. A B

55. A B

56. A B

57. A B

58. A B

59. landing scenario with incursion A B Conflict !!

60. landing scenario with incursion A B Conflict !!

61. landing scenario with incursion A B Conflict !!

62. landing scenario with incursion A B Conflict !!

63. landing scenario with incursion A B Conflict !!

64. 64 Methods & best Practices Schiphol RST founded in March 2004 Careful analysis of all runway safety related events Discussion of significant events on other airports Proposals and recommendations based on trend analysis Contact and dialogue with Dutch Safety Board Management commitment, incl. funding & budget Efforts to initiate joint AAS/ATC investigations Issuing of joint AAS/ATC yearly surveys

65. 65 Wave project on runway incursions Aiming for tangible results within three months Focussing on  Adaptation of communication procedures in line with EAPPRI recommendations  Mitigating adverse effects of Schiphol typical frequent changes in active runway combinations  Infrastructural modifications to eliminate hotspots.

66. Time for questions