3PCT Applications- Nationalization Routes PCT Applications that designate the US are considered US applications, so...Can Nationalize under 35 USC 371- traditional nationalization- a 371 nationalization is technically the same application as the PCT applicationCan file a “Bypass CON”- a continuation application that claims priority under 35 USC 120 to the PCT application as a continuation application of the PCT application35 U.S.C. 363 provides that "[a]n international application designating the United States shall have the effect, from its international filing date under article 11 of the treaty, of a national application for patent regularly filed in the Patent and Trademark Office....“ --See, MPEP 1895
4PCT Applications- 371 Nationalization Route International PhaseTransmittalNational PhasePCT ApplicationUS National Stage-Same Int'l App. No.-Assigned New US App. No. (for tracking)-Claims & Spec. amendments are based on those during international phase.-Generally, do not need a new IDS for Refs. cited in Search Report/Written Opinion (as long as transmitted to USPTO).-Generally, do not need to resubmit certified copies of foreign priority documents as long as transmitted to the USPTO (but may need to submit verified translation).Treated as if the Same Application
5PCT Applications- Bypass Continuation Route International PhasePCT Application“This application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/...CON.ContinuationApplicationTreated as a New Application-New US App. No.-Claims & Spec. amendments are based on what is filed- amendments during international phase do not count.-Need a new IDS for Refs. cited in Search Report/Written Opinion.-Need to resubmit certified copies of foreign priority documents and may need to submit verified translation.
11PCT Applications- Practical Issues Filing Bypass CONStandard practiceAllows addition of new matter (CIP) –see, MPEP 1895371 NationalizationSometimes, not sure which claims are pending due to amendments during the international phaseHave to deal with multiple dependenciesNot familiar with transmittalDo not need to submit copy of the application and other paper work- just makes USPTO file messyNo new matter allowed (i.e., no CIP’s)
13Certified Foreign Priority Documents Easily missed- need to check PAIRIf Examiner comes across intervening reference, they may request foreign priority documents (to show entitled to earlier date)Otherwise, no notice!To Perfect a Foreign Priority ClaimUSPTO Needs a Certified Copy1. Paper Certified Copy, OR2. Patent Document Exchange (PDX) Request- Electronic Transfer to USPTO (automatic now)- but some countries not yet participating.Verified English Translation- for non-English foreign priority documents
14PCT Applications- Foreign Certified Copies 371 NationalizationCertified copies of foreign priority applications are not required so long as the International Bureau transmits the copies to the USPTO.If priority application is not in English, you will still need to transmit a verified translation.Bypass CONYou will need to submit a certified copy of foreign priority applicationBUT now have Patent Document Exchange (PDX) program with a majority of countriesUSPTO will now automatically requestIf priority application is not in English, you will still need to transmit a verified translation.
16PCT Applications- After Filing Formalities 371 NationalizationFiling Receipt takes a long time to receiveSigned Declaration- will not receive a filing date until a signed declaration is filed (hurts patent term as well)Bypass CONFiling Receipt- processed relatively fastSigned Declaration- filing date is not based on when declaration is filedFiling Fees- can file later
17PCT Applications- After Filing Formalities 371 NationalizationPublicationClaim amendments made at the time of nationalization via a Preliminary Amendment might be published (or not) at the discretion of the USPTO.Normally, the application is published without the amended claims from the Preliminary Amendment.This is a BIG problem because you might time from your damages calculation for provisional rights.Bypass CONPublicationAs long as the amended claims are incorporated into the body of the application (i.e., not via a Preliminary Amendment), they will be published.-Any new matter questions-you can submit remarks.Eliminates the problem with damages calculations.
19PCT Applications- IDS Comparison 371 NationalizationDo not need to submit IDS for references cited during international phase (e.g., in the search report) so long as USPTO Form PCT/DO/EO/903 indicates search results transmitted to national file.Still probably good practice to submit IDS because references will not be listed on the face of the patent unless cited on IDS. --see, MPEPWill need to submit IDS for new referencesBypass CONNeed to submit an IDS“When filing a continuing application that claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. 120 to an international application that designated the U.S. (see MPEP § 1895), it will be necessary for the applicant to submit an information disclosure statement complying with 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98 in the continuing application listing the documents cited in the international search report and/or the international preliminary examination report of the international application if applicant wishes to ensure that the information be considered by the examiner in the continuing application.<“ MPEPWill need to submit IDS for new references
21PCT Applications- Restriction 371 NationalizationRelies on PCT unity of invention standardUsually results in less independent claimsThis can cause problems because US examiners may not be familiar with the standard and incorrectly use US standard restriction practiceBypass CONUses US standard restriction practice (independent & distinct)On average, more independent claims- more permissiveUS Examiners are familiar with the standard
23PCT Applications- Prosecution & Fees 371 NationalizationTotally clean search report/opinion (i.e., all claims are patentable)- very unlikelyMay receive marginal filing fee discount if have clean Search Report/Written Opinion by US as ISA$320 Savings US/ISA$650 Savings other normal ISA’sNew- May use PCT-PPH to speed up examination when originating application is filed in certain countries (JPO, EPO, etc.)No fee now requiredBypass CONBypass route is the only way to use traditional accelerated examination (371 will not work) --See, USPTO’s Accelerated Examination FAQsClean written opinion- still pay the same fees (Rare)PCT-PPH available for bypass applications as well
25PCT Applications- Patent Term Adjustment 371 NationalizationWill lose patent term if:Do not request expedited examination (check the right box on transmittal).File signed declaration after nationalization date.Bypass CONWill only lose patent term if file signed declaration more than 3 months after mail date of missing parts.
26Quick Patent Term Adjustment Refresher 35 USC §154(b)(1) Periods(A) Guarantee of prompt USPTO responses- 14 months for USPTO to send an Office Action or Notice of Allowance (plus various 4 month periods)- Examination Delays(B) Guarantee of no more than 3-year application pendency- USPTO fails to issue patent 3 years after actual filing dateNo Double Counting When Periods Overlap§ 154(b)(2)(A) "[t]o the extent that periods of delay attributable to grounds specified in paragraph (1) overlap, the period of any adjustment granted under this subsection shall not exceed the actual number of days the issuance of the patent was delayed."
27Wyeth v. Kappos (Fed. Cir. 2009) Issue: When does the overlap occur?USPTO37 CFR § 1.703(f)- B guarantee period starts at the time of the filing of the application, not 3 years after the filing date.You only get the greater of the A or B periodsUSPTO – 3 Years PTAOverlap HereOverlapHereB DelayA DelayA DelayFiling date14 mo. dateOffice Action issued3 year dateIssue fee paid4 mos. from issue fee payment, patent should issueIssue date
28Wyeth v. Kappos (Fed. Cir. 2009) Federal CircuitA & B overlap only occurs after 3 years from the filing date. (A+B Formula)1 YearUSPTO – 3 Years PTAOverlapHereB DelayA DelayA DelayFiling date14 mo. date26 mo. Office Action issued3 year dateIssue fee paid4 mos. from issue fee payment, patent should issue6 years issue date
29Wyeth v. Kappos (Fed. Cir. 2009) USPTO ResponseUSPTO will be processing recalculation requests under an interim procedure that is available to a patentee whose patent issues prior to March 2, 2010, and who requests it no later than 180 days after the issue date.This procedure is available only for alleged errors in calculation that are specifically identified in Wyeth.Information on requesting a recalculation of patent term is on the USPTO Web site at
30Wyeth v. Kappos (Fed. Cir. 2009) USPTO Wyeth PTA Form PTO/SB/131
31Novartis Challenges Interim Procedure "[t]hese interim procedures included an expedited, informal procedure for seeking recalculation of PTA solely on the basis of Wyeth, but extended that remedy only to patents issued on or after September 2, 2009." … it would “deny as untimely any request for recalculation of patent term adjustment indicated on a patent that is not filed within 180 days of the day the patent was granted."
32Japan Tobacco Petition USPTO Miscalculating Period B for PCT 371 National Stage ApplicationsOriginally, USPTO considered the B Period filing date= when an international applications fulfilled the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 371 (e.g., filed signed Oath/Dec.).BUT, 37 C.F.R. § 1.702(b) states that "the term of an original patent shall be adjusted if the issuance of the patent was delayed due to the failure of the Office to issue a patent within three years after the date on which the application was filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) or the national stage commenced under 35 U.S.C. 371(b) or (f) in an international application.”Section 371(b) states that subject to § 371(f), "the national stage shall commence with the expiration of the applicable time limit under article 22 (1) or (2), or under article 39 (1)(a) of the [PCT].“ = 30 Month Chapter II DeadlineSo the B-Period filing date for 371 national stages should be the 30-Month Chapter II deadline (if filed under 371(b)-- more later)
33Japan Tobacco Petition USPTOUSPTO relents- B-delay should be calculated based on the date on which the national stage commenced, not the date on which the requirements of § 371(c) were fulfilled.3-Year B-PeriodChap II Deadline (30 Months)File Signed Declaration- satisfy 371(c)
34Japan Tobacco Petition PCT Patent Term LandminesB-Period Delay Landmine- Early 371 NationalizationIf Nationalize under 371 before 30-month chapter II deadline and satisfy 371(c) requirements (e.g., pay fees, signed Declaration, etc.), you still need to expressly request early processing under 371(f) to get the nationalization date for B-Delay filing date.If not, B-Delay filing date will be based on the Chapter II (30-month) deadline & not the earlier nationalization date.Contrast regular utility or bypass CON- B-Period filing date is the actual filing date of the application.
35Japan Tobacco Petition B-Delay Period LandmineNationalize PCT Application before the Chapter II DeadlineSatisfy 371(c)- file signed declaration, etc.Expressly request early processing (check the box on form)3-Year B-PeriodB-Delay filing date starts before Chapter II DeadlineNationalizeChap II Deadline (30 Months)
36Japan Tobacco Petition B-Delay Period LandmineNationalize PCT Application before the Chapter II Deadline BUTFail to satisfy 371(c) ORFail to expressly request early examination3-Year B-PeriodB-Delay filing date starts on Chapter II DeadlineNationalizeChap II Deadline (30 Months)File Signed Declaration- satisfy 371(c)
37Japan Tobacco Petition B-Delay Period Landmine- COMPAREInstead file via the bypass CON route BUTFail to file signed declaration ORFail to expressly request early examinationB-Delay filing date starts before Chapter II Deadline3-Year B-PeriodBypass CON Filing DateChap II Deadline (30 Months)File Signed Declaration
38PCT- Patent Term Adjustment PCT Patent Term A-Delay LandminesA-Delay Date is still based on fulfillment of national requirements under 371(c).For example, if you do not file a signed declaration when the PCT application is nationalized, you lose A-term until you file the signed declaration.Contrast to a regular utility or bypass CON- where you do not lose A-term so long as you file the signed declaration within 3-months of Notice to File Missing Parts
39PCT- Patent Term Adjustment A-Delay Period LandmineNationalize PCT application under 371Fail to file signed declaration with nationalizationA-PeriodA-Delay- lose term- until file signed DeclarationLose TermNationalizeChap II Deadline (30 Months)File Signed Declaration
40PCT- Patent Term Adjustment A-Delay Period Landmine- COMPAREInstead file via the bypass CON routeFail to file signed declaration when application filedFile signed declaration 1-month after missing parts deadlineA-Period2 Month Deadline For Missing PartsDO NOT LOSE ANY A-TERM!Bypass CON Filing DateChap II Deadline (30 Months)File Signed Declaration w/ 1-Month EOT + surcharge