Presentation on theme: "Are Peripheral IVs an Overlooked Source of Infection?"— Presentation transcript:
1 Are Peripheral IVs an Overlooked Source of Infection? Michelle DeVries MPH, CIC Senior Infection Control Officer Methodist Hospitals Gary, Indiana1
2 Michelle DeVries is a paid consultant of Ethicon, Inc. This promotional educational activity is brought to you by Ethicon, Inc. and is not certified for continuing medical education.2
3 Explore the infection risk of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters Discuss the impact of PIV infectionsObjectives3
4 Let’s Start with a Definition… Primary bloodstream infections (BSI)Laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infections (LCBI) that are not secondary to a community-acquired infection or an HAI meeting CDC/NHSN criteria at another body siteReport BSIs that are central line associated (i.e., a central line or umbilical catheter was in place at the time of, or within 48 hours before, onset of the event)NOTE: There is no minimum period of time that the central line must be in place in order for the BSI to be considered central line associatedBut please note this changes 1/1/2013Accessed October 19, 20124
5 LCBI – Criterion 1Patient has a recognized pathogen cultured from one or more blood culturesAndOrganism cultured from blood is not related to an infection at another siteAccessed October 19, 20125
6 LCBI – Criterion 2Patient has at least one of the following signs or symptoms: fever (>38⁰C), chills or hypotensionAndSigns and symptoms and positive laboratory results are not related to an infection at another siteCommon commensal (i.e. diptheroids [Corynebacterium spp.], Bacillus [not B. antrhacis] spp., Propionibacterium spp., coagulase-negative staphylococci [including S.epidermidis], viridans group sterptococci, Aerococcus spp., Micrococcus spp.) is cultured from two or more blood cultures drawn on separate occasions.Accessed October 19, 20126
7 CLABSI New clarification in CDC definition: CLABSI is an LCBI where a central line or umbilical catheter was in place for >2 calendar days, with day or device placement being Day 1AndA central or umbilical catheter was in place on date of event or day before. If admitted or transferred into facility with central line in place (eg, tunneled or implanted central line), day of first access is considered Day 1.Accessed October 19, 20127
8 A Few More Points… Phlebitis Infection Inflammation of the walls of a veinCan be chemical, mechanical or infection- relatedFocus today is only on infectious complicationsFocus on surveillance definitions because that is what current reporting requirements address8
9 Why Should You Care About Complications Associated With Non-central Lines? In 2008 the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) began its program of disallowing reimbursement for vascular catheter-associated infections (note there is no modification for type or location of the catheter or the type--local or bloodstream [BSI]--of infection)Vascular catheter-related infections would encompass all devices used to access the vasculature without regard to the specific tip location or limiting only to BSIs9
10 Why Doesn’t Anyone Talk About This? General belief is that the risk is minimal or non-existentBut almost no one is looking!Body of research is starting to grow and dispel this myth
11 Maki DG et al., Mayo Clinic Proc 2006;81:1159-1171.
12 Peripheral Venous Catheters (PVCs) PVCs are most frequently used invasive device in hospitalsUp to 70% of patients require a PVC during their hospital stayEstimated that PVCs are in place for 15%-20% of total patient-daysNo consensus on optimal time point for PVC change, or whether PVC replacement is required at allCurrent estimates are that PVC-bloodstream infection incidence density rates are per 1,000 device-daysZingg W. et al., Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009;34 Suppl4:S38-42.
13 12% of all device related S. aureus bacteremias were caused by PVCs Recently Published Article On: Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia24 S. aureus bacteremiasA rate of 0.07/1000 line days12% of all device related S. aureus bacteremias were caused by PVCsAverage treatment in this study was 19 daysSome serious complications including two patient deaths and one transfer to hospiceTrinh, et al. Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32(6):13
14 Risk Factors1 Antecubital fossa (67%) Placement outside of the hospital (16%)Placement in Emergency Room (67%)Longer duration of catheterization46% had duration greater than 3 daysA national survey showed that >90% of PIV infections take place with catheters left in more than 3 daysRisk Factors11. Trinh, et al. Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32(6):14
15 Catheter-Related Intravascular Infections in Critical Care Units1 Baleva, et al6-month prospective study on prevalence of catheter-related infections in their CCU and ICU1983 patients, all of whom had a peripheral line in place5/1983 developed bacteremia (0.3%)One patient died1. Baleva MEA, et al Catheter-related infections in critical care unit. Phil J Microbiol Infect Dis 1997; 26(2):51-54.15
16 Strategies for Preventing Intravenous Cannula Infection Wendy Morris – North Bristol NHS TrustThe Nosocomial Infection National Surveillance Service suggests that “6.2% of hospital-acquired bacteremias may be directly attributable to peripheral IV cannulation.”Developed a Peripheral Venous Cannulation Policy and Peripheral Cannula Care PlanAudit using tools including the Saving Lives PIV Cannula Care BundleMorris, W et al, Strategies for preventing peripheral intravenous cannula infection. British Journal of Nursing, 2008 (IV THERAPY SUPPLEMENT), Vol 17, No 1916
17 Pujol: A Comparison of Bloodstream Infections in Central and Peripheral Venous Catheters Study DesignProspective study of bloodstream infections (BSIs) in short and mid- line peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) vs central venous catheters (CVCs) among a group of non-intensive care unit patients from October 2001 to March 2003 in a hospital in Spain.Results150 vascular catheter-related BSIs in 147 patients: 77 were PVC-BSIs (0.19 per 1,000 patient-days) vs 73 CVC-BSIs (0.18 per 1, 000 patient-days). Patients with PVC-BSIs more often had the catheter placed in the emergency department (42% vs 0 ), had a shorter duration from catheter insertion to BSI (4.9 vs days) and S. aureus as the pathogen (53% vs 33%).Pujol M et al., J Hosp Infect 2007;67:22-917
18 Pujol (continued)Rates of infection very similar between peripheral and central venous cathetersDifference in onset between lines placed in ER versus inpatient unitsEmergency Room: 3.7 daysNursing units: 5.7 daysS. aureus was more prevalent in peripheral lines, but MRSA was about the samePatients with S. aureus had more complications than from other organismsThis is significant not only for the patients but for mandatory reporting beginning in two months in the United StatesPujol M et al., J Hosp Infect 2007;67:22-918
19 Prevalence of Bloodstream Infections (BSIs) in Central and Peripheral Vascular Catheters Study DesignPrevalence survey at 72 hospitals in GermanyResultsA total of 14,966 patients were surveyed. Of these 23.9% patients had a non-central catheter and 5.1% had a central catheter. Device utilization was 27.3% for peripheral and 6.1% for central. BSI prevalence was 0.3% for non-central catheters and 0.8% for central catheters.ConclusionPeripheral catheters are very prevalent and associated with moderate BSI riskWischnewski N. et al., Zentralbl Bakteriol 1998;287:19
20 Not Without Risk Ritchie 2007 (New Zealand)1 Hong 2008 (Korea)2 Looked at 345 PIVs22/345 had signs of infections6/44 in greater than 72 hours16/301 in less than 72 hoursHong 2008 (Korea)2Purulent thrombophlebitis from IV. Positive for C. albicansDeveloped fungal spondylitis in vertebraePatient died1. Ritchie, et al. The Auckland City Hospital device Point Prevalence Survey 2005: utilisation and inectius complications of intrasvasular and urinary devices. N Z Med J. 2007; 120:U2683.2. Hong, et al. Fatal peripheral candidal suppurative thromophlebitis in a postoperative patinet. J Korean Med Sci. 2008; 23:1094.20
21 Not Without Risk Easterlow 2010 (England)1 Lee 2010 (Taiwan)2 Pre-intervention: 30 MRSA bacteremias – 9 catheter-relatedPost-intervention: 14 MRSA bacteremias – 4 definite, 2 possibly catheter-relatedLee 2010 (Taiwan)246 cases of soft tissue infections from peripheral lines (over 3-year period)6 with bacteremia (also with local inflammation)6 needing surgical debridement for abscess8 with purulent drainage or cellulitis at insertion site1 with bacteremia with same pathogen26 with inflammation (persisting more than 3 days after catheter removal1. Easterlow, et al. Implementing and standardising the use of peripheral vascular access devices. J Clin Nurs. 2010; 19(5-6):2. Lee, et al. Risk Factors for peripheral venous catheter infection in hospitalized patients: a prospective study of 3165 patients. Am J Infect Control. 2009; 37(8):21
22 One More Hospital’s Experience Period of 6 Years All LCBI CountedLine types associated with each infection were recordedOver that time period between 11 and 21% of LCBI had only peripheral access (total of 74 patients)30 to 47% of patients had multiple lines in placeMajority of those had peripheral as well as central linesClassified (based on NHSN definition) as CLABSI(But no proof of which line was truly responsible)With These Infections, Can’t Reach ZeroHouse-wide in reduction of CLABSIPIV-only infections: not yet observed same reductionM. DeVries, P. Mancos abstract ICAAC 2012. Non-central line related laboratory confirmed bloodstream infections22
23 Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Assessed impact of removing peripheral catheters when clinically indicated versus removing and re-siting routinelyFound no conclusive benefit in changing PIV every 72 hours to 96 hoursLooked at phlebitis as well as bacteremiaAlso looked at costs associated with routine changesResults:Changing for clinical need rather than on routine schedule reduced the rate of bacteremia 44%OR = P= 0.3724% increase in phlebitis in the clinical change groupOR= 1.24 P=0.09Webster, J., Osborne, S., Rickard, C., Hall, J. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. (2010) Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online), 3, pp. CD 23
24 CDC Recommendation“ There is no need to replace peripheral catheters more frequently than every hours to reduce risk of infection and phlebitis in adults [36, 140, 141]. Category 1B”“No recommendation is made regarding replacement of peripheral catheters in adults only when clinically indicated [142–144]. Unresolved issue”“Replace peripheral catheters in children only when clinically indicated [32, 33]. Category 1B”“Some studies have suggested that planned removal at 72 hours vs. removing as needed resulted in similar rates of phlebitis and catheter failure [142–144]. However, these studies did not address the issue of CRBSI, and the risk of CRBSIs with this strategy is not well studied.”Accessed October 19, 2012.24
25 INS Standards“Routine site care and dressing changes are not performed on short peripheral catheters unless the dressing is soiled or not longer intact.”“The nurse should consider replacement of the short peripheral catheter when clinically indicated and when infusion treatment does not include peripheral parenteral nutrition.”“The nurse should not routinely replace short peripheral catheter in pediatric patients.”“If a catheter related bloodstream is suspected, consideration should be given to culturing the catheter after removal.”Infusion Nursing Standard of Practice, Journal of Infusion Nursing ; (34) 1S25
26 What Could Be Causing These Infections? Back To Basics
27 The Origin of Microrganisms Causing CRBSI1 YOUR FLORA OR MINE2Contaminated Infusate<1%3SkinOrganisms60%1Contaminate d Catheter Hub12%Unknown = 28%Fibrin Sheath,ThrombusSkinVeinSafdar N, Maki DG. The pathogenesis of catheter-related bloodstream infection with nuncuffed short-term central venous catheters. Int Care Med. 2004; 30:62-67.
29 Technology’s RoleWhat are you doing for the PIVs that are staying in longer then 72 hours to reduce skin colonization?There are products out there that can help reduce the skin flora if you are leaving your catheters in for long periods of time, i.e.Biopatch® Protective Disk with CHG is the only product indicated to reduce CRBSIIndicated to use on IV catheters (Proper Size 4151 for ≤6 Fr catheter)Its up to you to decided what fits best in your hospital’s protocolLook at the evidenceLook at product indications29
30 Reporting…NHSN/CMS/JC/Health departments, etc only require reporting central line associated bloodstream infectionsJust need to meet the definition PLUS have a central line in placeNo requirement for “proof” that the central line was the source or for any evidence of local site infectionYou can still meet the definition for a LCBI and not have a central line in place, but it is not analyzed and no benchmarks are available within NHSNThese are what can be referred to as non-central line associated, laboratory confirmed bloodstream infections30
31 CDC RecommendationPeriodically assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines for all personnel involved in the insertion and maintenance of intravascular catheters. Category IAIdeally, this involves auditing actual careMorris, et al describe using audit results as educational material and making them widely availableEasterlow (2010. Journal of Clinical Nursing), et al demonstrated poor baseline compliance with care of peripheral linesThe author’s institution periodically conducts audits of peripheral maintenance bundle as well as the more standard central line maintenance bundleThis data can have large impact on identifying areas needing further review or educationAccessed October 19, 2012.31
32 CMS and Peripheral Lines Starting January 1, 2013 all MRSA blood isolates are reportable via NHSN to CMSBoth community onset and healthcare associated must be reportedHouse-wide (not just ICU) isolates must be reported from all inpatient locationsNot just CLABSIs are counted, so any infections associated with peripheral vascular access will also be reportedStarting back in 2008, non-payment also includes vascular catheter related infections; CLABSIs reported through NHSN are only part of this data setAny coded vascular access related infections are also included in this categoryNot limited to only central linesAccessed October 19, 2012.32
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.