1. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond New Design for the REMBRANDTPARK Amsterdam Yves Martens Buiting Bosontwikkeling In cooperation with

2. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond BACKGROUND New design Rembrandtpark Construction of a new road Wet ecological corridor Re-design of the park

3. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond LOCATION REMBRANDTPARK

4. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond IMPRESSION WITH PICTURES

5. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond BACKGROUND Three themes: 1. Trees 2. Routing and safety 3. Design and use 2nd evening in september: theme Trees Two other themes to be discussed in November during 3rd evening

6. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond WORKSHOP 1. Presentation 2nd evening 2. Two other themes used to discuss for this workshop Main questions: 1. How can GIS be used in preperation for the 3rd meeting?

7. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond AGENDA 2nd evening TREE SURVEY FRAMEWORK DESIGN MODEL STUDY DISCUSSION

8. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond TREE SURVEY NUMBER246 bomen PURPOSEmonitor present qualities MEASURMENTS AND CHARACTERISTCS tree species diameter breast height tree height vitality crown projection and shape damage and/or faults

9. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond TREE SPECIES

10. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond VITALITY

11. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond CROWN PROJECTION

12. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond SHAPE OF THE CROWN / DIRECTION SHAPE OF TREE WITH LIVING CROWN < 2 METER SHAPE OF TREE WITH LIVING CROWN 2 TO 4 METER OTHER TREES

13. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond DAMAGE AND/OR FAULTS NO DAMAGE MECHANICAL DAMAGE

14. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond FRAMEWORK DESIGN ECOLOGICAL CORRIDOR CLOSED AND GREEN BORDER STARTING POINT WATERWAY SAFETY SPONTANEOUS PROCESSES BEAUTIFUL TREES

15. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond ECOLOGICAL CORRIDOR connection between “Schipluidensingel” and the Rembrandtpark

16. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond CLOSED BORDER green screen between park en Lelylaan (=road)

17. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond STARTING POINT WATERWAY connection on “ Schipluidensingel” is fixed

18. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond SAFETY gentle slope (minimum 1:3)

19. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond BEAUTIFUL TREES & SPONTANEOUS PROCESSES remain as many beautiful trees as possible

20. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond

21. MODEL STUDY 4 alternatives CONNECTION CULVERT QUAY or DAM-WALL GENTLE SLOPE, 1:3 DUBBLE SLOPE WITH TERRACES

22. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond Alternative 1: CONNECTION CULVERT Alternative 1: CONNECTION CULVERT

23. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond CONNECTION CULVERT does not suffice to the ecological corridor CONNECTION CULVERT does not suffice to the ecological corridor

24. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond Alternative 2: QUAY OR DAM-WALL Alternative 2: QUAY OR DAM-WALL

25. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond

27. QUAY OR DAM-WALL QUAY OR DAM-WALL

28. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond QUAY OR DAM-WALL QUAY OR DAM-WALL

29. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond QUAY OR DAM-WALL Only suffice to the demands for ecology and safety when using a very special and expensive construction. QUAY OR DAM-WALL Only suffice to the demands for ecology and safety when using a very special and expensive construction.

30. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond Alternative 3: SLOPE 1 : 3 Alternative 3: SLOPE 1 : 3

31. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond

32. GENTLE SLOPE 1 : 3 GENTLE SLOPE 1 : 3

33. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond GENTLE SLOPE 1 : 3 Better alternative from ecological point of view, but it gives little possibilities for further design of the park. GENTLE SLOPE 1 : 3 Better alternative from ecological point of view, but it gives little possibilities for further design of the park.

34. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond Alternative 4: DUBBLE SLOPE 1 : 3 WITH TERRACES Alternative 4: DUBBLE SLOPE 1 : 3 WITH TERRACES

35. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond

36. DUBBLE SLOPE 1 : 3 WITH TERRACES DUBBLE SLOPE 1 : 3 WITH TERRACES

37. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond DUBBLE SLOPE 1 : 3 WITH TERRACES wide slope with groups of trees on the slopes and terraces DUBBLE SLOPE 1 : 3 WITH TERRACES wide slope with groups of trees on the slopes and terraces

38. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond DISCUSSION

39. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond In cooperation with

40. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond Workshop What we learned: 1. Among some people trust is lost, which causes problems 2. Certain information on maps can trigger emotion and anger 3. There is a difference between public participation and public decision 4. Visualization techniques are unlimited but information on the map should be accurate and complete 5. Well defined plan eases the acceptance

41. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond Task for the workshop We are going to prepare 2 themes for the 3rd evening! Theme routing and safety Theme further design and use

42. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond Theme routing and safety What is the best routing? (Cyclist vs joggers) How can we make a safe design? (Streetlights vs dark spots)

43. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond Theme further design and use 1. Interaction between park and surroundings? (how is the park experienced from the inside) 2. Zoning? (division recreational areas vs nature)

44. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond TASK Every group gives (3) recommendations on how to use GIS in this project. Material: paper pen maps of the park

45. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond REMEMBER Trust among citizens is slowly regained Technically everything is possible, but (financial) resources are limited

46. BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond Results of the workshop Your ideas will be integrated in the CoPack! Your ideas will be used in preparation of the 3rd public meeting in November in Amsterdam!