Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

MÁV PLC Transport Safety projects (finansed fromTransport OP ) Rehabilitation of rail-road crossings László Pál Deputy Director General.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "MÁV PLC Transport Safety projects (finansed fromTransport OP ) Rehabilitation of rail-road crossings László Pál Deputy Director General."— Presentation transcript:

1 MÁV PLC Transport Safety projects (finansed fromTransport OP ) Rehabilitation of rail-road crossings László Pál Deputy Director General

2 Institutional framework Transport Op – MÁV PLC Transport safety project Improving the safety of road-railway crossings, Vehicle diagnostics, track inspection system Intermediary Body: KIKSZ Zrt Beneficiary: MÁV ZRt. Project Management: MÁV Zrt Project Management office Total budget :EUR 43,7 million Contracted on Planned execution on

3 Institutional framework Transport Op – MÁV PLC Transport safety project Rehabilitation of rail-road crossings Intermediary Body: KIKSZ Zrt Beneficiary: MÁV ZRt. Project Management: MÁV Zrt Project Management office Technical Planning: MÁV ZRt. Total budget :EUR 0,2 million Contracted on Project started on Planned execution on

4 The Project Plots KÖZOP – MÁV PLC Transport safety project Rehabilitation of rail-road level crossings Feasibility study Approval plan Environmental Study Other activities needing experts from outside of MÁV PLC (culture and heritage study, geotechnical excavations; etc)

5 Facts: 5649 pc. Rail-road level crossings Road crossing in every 1,3 km Dangerous geometrical layouts: 1) „Bug shaped” crossing, small vertical curves 2) Small horizontal curves with superelevation on the track 3) Other defaults: Connection without transition curves, Lack of sufficient straight section, Lack of visibility, Different rail-track levels. Feasibility Study

6 The Scope of the Project Monitoring of the level crossings with inapropiate geometrical layout. Improving possibilities:  Rail / road track long-section correction in place  Rebuilding of the level crossing with the necessary correction of the long section of the rail/road  Favorable crossing angular  Visibility  Relocation of the level crossing    Elimination the level crossing

7 The Project Area 6 Regions 12 Counties

8 The feasibility study Monitoring of 20 level crossing chosen by MÁV PLC Infrastructure Unit:  Traffic situation, traffic technology, capacity  Existing infrastructure, technical characters  Traffic forecast  Personal and freight transport  Analysis of the planned variations  Technical variations  Multicriterian Analysis

9 Traffic of the level crossings

10 Multicriterial Analysis (MCA) According to the proposal of NFÜ

11 Multicriterial Analysis (MCA) According to the proposal of NFÜ Helyszín Azonosító Investmen cost[Ft] Accidental risk Traffic volume Road maintenance Rail maintenance Land [m2] Local government Environmental effect Bódvaszilas Eger-Felnémet Eger-Felnémet Tápiószentmárton Farmos Farmos Farmos Ceglédbercel Ceglédbercel Nyíregyháza - Sóstóhegy Rakamaz Nyíradony Szeghalom Kiskőrös Kiskőrös Sásd Sárbogárd Sárbogárd Mórágy Mórágy Isaszeg Gyömrő Gyömrő Gyömrő Soltvadkert Apátfalva Nyíradony-Aradványpuszta Nyírgelse

12 Multicriterial Analysis (MCA) According to the proposal of NFÜ

13 Multicriterial Analysis (MCA) According to the proposal of NFÜ Helyszín Azonosító Beruházási költség [Ft] I.II.III.IV.V. Bódvaszilas nem nem Eger-Felnémet nem Eger-Felnémet nem Tápiószentmárton Farmos nem Farmos nem 0 0 Farmos nem Ceglédbercel Ceglédbercel nem Nyíregyháza - Sóstóhegy nem nem 0 0 Rakamaz nem Nyíradony Szeghalom nem nem Kiskőrös nem Kiskőrös Nem nem Sásd Sárbogárd nem Sárbogárd nem Mórágy nem Mórágy nem Isaszeg nem Gyömrő nem Gyömrő Gyömrő nem Soltvadkert Apátfalva Nyíradony-Aradványpuszta nem 0 Nyírgelse nem Kiválasztott változatok összköltsége: Total sum of the investments chosen in the most cases: 5 985,8MFt Total sum of the investments chosen in the most cases: 5 985,8MFt

14 Multicriterial Analysis (MCA) According to the proposal of NFÜ and finally another case: In the case we would like to choose according to the less investment cost the minimal cost of the reconstruction of 12 level crossing would be MFt

15 Cost – Benefit Analysis (CBA)

16  Time savings  Accidental savings

17 Let’s do as much as we can to avoid these… Nyíregyháza Bük Mátészalka

18 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION !


Download ppt "MÁV PLC Transport Safety projects (finansed fromTransport OP ) Rehabilitation of rail-road crossings László Pál Deputy Director General."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google