Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

MÁV PLC Transport Safety projects (finansed fromTransport OP ) Rehabilitation of rail-road crossings László Pál Deputy Director General.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "MÁV PLC Transport Safety projects (finansed fromTransport OP ) Rehabilitation of rail-road crossings László Pál Deputy Director General."— Presentation transcript:

1 MÁV PLC Transport Safety projects (finansed fromTransport OP ) Rehabilitation of rail-road crossings László Pál Deputy Director General

2 Institutional framework Transport Op – 2.5.0.-09-2011-0006 MÁV PLC Transport safety project Improving the safety of road-railway crossings, Vehicle diagnostics, track inspection system Intermediary Body: KIKSZ Zrt Beneficiary: MÁV ZRt. Project Management: MÁV Zrt Project Management office Total budget :EUR 43,7 million Contracted on 18.06.2012. Planned execution on 31.08.2015.

3 Institutional framework Transport Op – 2.5.0.-09-2011-0007 MÁV PLC Transport safety project Rehabilitation of rail-road crossings Intermediary Body: KIKSZ Zrt Beneficiary: MÁV ZRt. Project Management: MÁV Zrt Project Management office Technical Planning: MÁV ZRt. Total budget :EUR 0,2 million Contracted on 05.06.2012. Project started on 201.07.2012. Planned execution on 30.06.2013.

4 The Project Plots KÖZOP – 2.5.0.-09-2011-0007 MÁV PLC Transport safety project Rehabilitation of rail-road level crossings Feasibility study Approval plan Environmental Study Other activities needing experts from outside of MÁV PLC (culture and heritage study, geotechnical excavations; etc)

5 Facts: 5649 pc. Rail-road level crossings Road crossing in every 1,3 km Dangerous geometrical layouts: 1) „Bug shaped” crossing, small vertical curves 2) Small horizontal curves with superelevation on the track 3) Other defaults: Connection without transition curves, Lack of sufficient straight section, Lack of visibility, Different rail-track levels. Feasibility Study

6 The Scope of the Project Monitoring of the level crossings with inapropiate geometrical layout. Improving possibilities:  Rail / road track long-section correction in place  Rebuilding of the level crossing with the necessary correction of the long section of the rail/road  Favorable crossing angular  Visibility  Relocation of the level crossing    Elimination the level crossing

7 The Project Area 6 Regions 12 Counties

8 The feasibility study Monitoring of 20 level crossing chosen by MÁV PLC Infrastructure Unit:  Traffic situation, traffic technology, capacity  Existing infrastructure, technical characters  Traffic forecast  Personal and freight transport  Analysis of the planned variations  Technical variations  Multicriterian Analysis

9 Traffic of the level crossings

10 Multicriterial Analysis (MCA) According to the proposal of NFÜ

11 Multicriterial Analysis (MCA) According to the proposal of NFÜ Helyszín Azonosító Investmen cost[Ft] Accidental risk Traffic volume Road maintenance Rail maintenance Land [m2] Local government Environmental effect Bódvaszilas 1.1.400 500 00023443240000322 Eger-Felnémet 2.0.137 600 000434641340000311 Eger-Felnémet 2.1.559 048 411434643240000321 Tápiószentmárton 4.1.779 154 226199341228000212 Farmos 5.1.791 480 000199342252000413 Farmos 5.2.1 234 100 000199341262000413 Farmos 5.3.4 382 800 0001993411240000434 Ceglédbercel 6.0.174 000 00032 0012130111 Ceglédbercel 6.1.3 460 300 00032 00123118800321 Nyíregyháza - Sóstóhegy 7.1.3 360 000 00043 05812117000211 Rakamaz 8.1.2 360 000 00031 51933130000311 Nyíradony 9.1.529 200 000148841240000323 Szeghalom 10.1.1 368 000 000231941220000221 Kiskőrös 11.0.18 990 000404220111 Kiskőrös 11.1.156 400 000404122000121 Sásd 12.0.34 080 00031 0613130111 Sárbogárd 13.0.90 000 00037034330121 Sárbogárd 13.1.962 800 000370341233580313 Mórágy 14.1.709 600 00028342234500333 Mórágy 14.2.844 080 000183411282000413 Isaszeg 15.1.3 000 000 00012 60622135000314 Gyömrő 16.0.68 800 00034 0891330111 Gyömrő 16.1.251 500 00034 08912224000222 Gyömrő 16.2.2 713 200 00034 08911124000223 Soltvadkert 17.1.927 500 000199841274400412 Apátfalva 18.0.37 300 00045054120111 Nyíradony-Aradványpuszta 19.1.905 000 000148841218100222 Nyírgelse 20.1.1 908 530 000135241180000413

12 Multicriterial Analysis (MCA) According to the proposal of NFÜ

13 Multicriterial Analysis (MCA) According to the proposal of NFÜ Helyszín Azonosító Beruházási költség [Ft] I.II.III.IV.V. Bódvaszilas 1.1.400 500 0000 nem 0 1 400 500 000 0 nem 1 400 500 000 Eger-Felnémet 2.0.137 600 0001 0 nem 0 1 137 600 000 1 Eger-Felnémet 2.1.559 048 4110 nem 0 0 0 0 Tápiószentmárton 4.1.779 154 2261 1 1 1 1 Farmos 5.1.791 480 0000 nem 0 0 0 0 Farmos 5.2.1 234 100 0001 0 nem 0 0 Farmos 5.3.4 382 800 0000 nem 0 0 0 0 Ceglédbercel 6.0.174 000 0001 1 1 1 1 Ceglédbercel 6.1.3 460 300 0000 nem 0 0 0 0 Nyíregyháza - Sóstóhegy 7.1.3 360 000 0000 nem 1 3 360 000 000 0 nem 0 0 Rakamaz 8.1.2 360 000 0000 nem 0 0 0 0 Nyíradony 9.1.529 200 0001 1 1 1 1 Szeghalom 10.1.1 368 000 0000 nem 1 1 368 000 000 0 nem 1 1 368 000 000 1 Kiskőrös 11.0.18 990 0000 nem 1 18 990 000 1 1 1 Kiskőrös 11.1.156 400 0000 Nem nem Sásd 12.0.34 080 0001 1 1 1 1 Sárbogárd 13.0.90 000 0001 0 nem 1 90 000 000 1 1 Sárbogárd 13.1.962 800 0000 nem 0 0 0 0 Mórágy 14.1.709 600 0000 nem 0 0 0 0 Mórágy 14.2.844 080 0001 1 1 1 0 nem Isaszeg 15.1.3 000 000 000 nem 0 0 0 0 Gyömrő 16.0.68 800 000 nem Gyömrő 16.1.251 500 0001 1 1 1 1 Gyömrő 16.2.2 713 200 0000 nem 0 0 0 0 Soltvadkert 17.1.927 500 0001 1 1 1 1 Apátfalva 18.0.37 300 0001 1 1 1 1 Nyíradony-Aradványpuszta 19.1.905 000 0001 1 1 0 nem 0 Nyírgelse 20.1.1 908 530 0000 nem 0 0 0 0 Kiválasztott változatok összköltsége: 5 943 514 226 9 228 804 226 4 991 304 226 5 191 404 226 4 747 824 226 Total sum of the investments chosen in the most cases: 5 985,8MFt Total sum of the investments chosen in the most cases: 5 985,8MFt

14 Multicriterial Analysis (MCA) According to the proposal of NFÜ and finally another case: In the case we would like to choose according to the less investment cost the minimal cost of the reconstruction of 12 level crossing would be 3 953 MFt

15 Cost – Benefit Analysis (CBA)

16  Time savings  Accidental savings

17 Let’s do as much as we can to avoid these… Nyíregyháza Bük Mátészalka

18 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION !


Download ppt "MÁV PLC Transport Safety projects (finansed fromTransport OP ) Rehabilitation of rail-road crossings László Pál Deputy Director General."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google