Presentation on theme: "PROF. SHLOMO GROSSMAN COUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (CHE) CHAIRMAN OF PLANNING AND BUDGETING COMMITTEE (PBC) THE ISRAELI SYSTEM, PLANS AND PERSPECTIVES."— Presentation transcript:
PROF. SHLOMO GROSSMAN COUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (CHE) CHAIRMAN OF PLANNING AND BUDGETING COMMITTEE (PBC) THE ISRAELI SYSTEM, PLANS AND PERSPECTIVES
The Structure of the Higher Education System in Israel: * The Council for Higher Education (CHE) * The Planning and Budgeting Committee (PBC) * Universities * Institutions for Higher Education
The Council for Higher Education The framework of the system of higher education in Israel is defined in the Law from 1958, with 11 amendments enacted over a period of 40 years.
* To grant a permit for the opening and maintenance of an institution of higher education; * To accredit an institution as an institution of higher education; * To revoke the accreditation of an accredited institution. The Councils Responsibilities Accreditation
Approval of new degree and programs To authorize an accredited institution to confer an academic degree in a specific program of study.
To permit an institution to use designations (such as university, academy, etc.) for which approval is required according to the Council for Higher Education Law; Institutional Designations
To license the branches and extensions of foreign institutions of higher education which operate in Israel. Licensing Foreign Institutions
Quality assurance and assessment To plan, organize and carry out quality reviews in the Israeli higher education system on two levels: 1. At the level of the individual program of study. 2. At the institutional level.
The Council delegated to the Planning and Budgeting Committee (PBC) its responsibilities of planning and budgeting. The PBC is therefore the executive arm of the Council. The PBC
Terms of references of the PBC as defined by government decision in 1977
To be an independent body between the Government and the Institutions of higher education, in all matters relating to allocations for higher education; The PBC as a Buffer
To exclusively allocate the budget to the institutions of higher education, taking into account the needs of society and the state, while safe-guarding academic freedom and assuring the advancement of research and teaching; Allocation of Funds
To ensure that institutional budgets are balanced and executed according to plan; Accountability
To draw up plans for the coordinated and efficient development of higher education on the national level; Planning and Coordination
To submit its recommendations to the Council for Higher Education concerning requests to open new institutions or new units in existing institutions, after examination of the planning and budgetary points of view. Recommendations to the Council
Membership of the PBC The PBC is composed of seven members: four university professors, one of whom serves as the Chairman of the PBC, one college professor and two representatives of the public from the economic, business or industrial sectors of the economy.
The PBC Budget Institutions of Higher Education Research & other Bodies Student aid
Budgeting of Universities The main objective is to enable the universities to plan and budget their teaching & research activities in a way that maintains the academic and administrative autonomy of each institution.
Principles of the Model: 1. The model is comprised of two separate components: Teaching Research
Budgeting for teaching is based on an absolute model whereas research is based on a competitive model.
Research Component The research component is divided according to the following four indicators, based on competition: 1. Income from competitive research funds 35% 2. Income from non-competitive research funds 20% 3. Scientific publications 15% Weight 4. Doctoral students 30%
Diversification of the Higher Education The expansion and diversification of the higher education system resulted in the emergence of different types of institutions to provide alternative solutions for the growing demand for higher education all over the country. The institutions of higher education in 2004, divided into eight categories, are:
A. Universities B. The Open University C. Arts Academies D. Comprehensive Academic Colleges E. Academic Colleges of Engineering F. Academic Programs under University Auspices in Regional Colleges G. Academic Colleges for the Training of Teachers H. Non – Budgeted Colleges.
The Growth in the Number of Institutions of Higher Education in the 1990s
Students in Institutions of Higher Education
Proportion of Entering Students in Higher Education in the Average Age Cohort
Bachelors Degree Students by Type of Institution 1989/ / ,230 66,260 81,180 92, , , , ,150 58,310 73,430 86, , , , ,500
Factors that Made the Growth in Student Numbers Possible:
Students in Institutions of Higher Education
1. More young men and women recognize the importance of higher education for social and economic progress.
2. The growth and diversification of institutions of higher education.
3. Development in various spheres of life, as well as demand, caused the institutions of higher education, new and old alike, to develop programs of study and to offer academic degrees in a wide variety of subjects, some of which were not previously offered in Israel.
4. The success of Israeli industry, particularly in the fields of hi-tech, has brought the fruits of higher education to the attention of young men and women.
Strategy & Targets The Five-Year Plan Higher education In Israel operates within a series of five-year plans. Each plan is backed up by a five-year agreement between the PBC and the Ministry of Finance. Higher education is the only public sector that has multi-year agreements with the treasury.
The new five-years plan ( ) has few major targets: 1. Enhancing scientific excellence. 2. Establishing quality assurance in teaching and research. 3. Stabilizing the finance condition of the universities. 4. Expanding access to higher education.
Excellence in Israel Scientific Research The following are some indicators of Israels strength in science:
1. Israeli scientists produce about 1% of the world output of articles in international scientific journals.
Scientific Publications of Israel and neighboring countries As Percentage of World Publications Source: Science & Engineering Indicators 2004, US NSF Israel Middle East & North African Countries (Exc. Israel)
2. In relative terms, Israel ranks third in the world, behind Switzerland and Sweden, in the number of scientific articles per capita and fourth in the world, behind Switzerland, Sweden and the United States, in citations per capita.
Scientific Publications – and Number of Citations in Scientific Literature – 2001 per Million Population (us=1.00) Source: Science & Engineering Indicators 2004, US NSF
3. Israel excels in the field of computer science both in terms of research output and of the impact of the research.
4. Israel also ranks highly in the impact of its scientific articles in the fields of biomedical research, chemistry and physics.
Israels place in the world rank of relative impact of scientific literature in selected fields – 1994, All Fields 1819 Medicine 35 Bio-Medical research 168 Biology 57 Chemistry 89 Physics 614 Earth & Space Sciences 13 Engineering & Technology 16 Mathematics Note: Relative impact is calculated as follows: the countrys share of total citations in a certain year divided by its share of all world scientific publications in that year Source: Science & Engineering Indicators 2004, US NSF
5. A major feature of Israels scientific research is its international character. 96% of Israeli authored scientific articles in the natural sciences and technology are published in foreign journals.
6. A high and rising share of Israel s scientific publications are written in collaboration with foreign scientists.
Scientific excellence and universal access to higher education: contradictory?
Selective access is changing and progressing toward universal access and the monolithic system is being replaced by a differential system, made up of institutions with different missions to respond to the changing needs of the economy and to the different aspirations of the students.
Israels system of higher education has two sectors, with different tasks and missions: a. Universities that combine research and teaching. b. Institutions of higher education whose mission is to provide academic teaching at the highest possible level.
The two sectors operate within one system with one funding agency (The PBC) and one accrediting council ( The CHE). All academic degrees of universities and other institutions are equal by law.
ROLE OF UNIVERSITIES * Research universities compete for scientific excellence at world level. * They have to prepare the next generation of scientists and the future academic staff.
The Role Of Colleges UNIVERSAL ACCESS: *.The colleges should provide a place to anyone who can benefit from academic education. *. Colleges must promote diversity in institutions of higher education.
EXPANDING HIGHER EDUCATION * The colleges reach new groups in the population that were under- represented in academic institutions. * The colleges are oriented to the labor market and teach employable skills.
2003/041994/951989/90 150,15086,32055,250 Grand total Percent Jerusalem District Northern District Haifa District Central District Tel Aviv District Southern District Bachelors Degree Students by District of Study
The balance between UNIVERSITIES and COLLEGES * The practical disciplines- such as engineering, health professions, management, communication – have a lower research output and are mainly taught in colleges, compared to the non- practical fields: Philosophy, history, physics and chemistry Taught primarily at research universities.
Quality Assurance The recent decision of the CHE to establish a national mechanism of quality assurance and assessment in higher education, will serve as a mechanism for following achievements in the higher education.