Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byTyler Balding Modified over 4 years ago

1
Warranty and Maintenance Decision Making for Gas Turbines Susan Y. Chao*, Zu-Hsu Lee, and Alice M. Agogino n University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720 *chao@garcia.me.berkeley.eduleez@ieor.berkeley.eduaagogino@euler.me.berkeley.edu

2
Acknowledgments n Many thanks to General Electric Corporate Research and Development and the University of California MICRO Program. n Special thanks to Louis Schick and Mahesh Morjaria of General Electric Corporate Research and Development for their guidance and intellectual input.

3
Gas Turbine Basics n Complex system: large number of parts subject to performance degradation, malfunction, or failure. n Turbine, combustion system, hot-gas path equipment, control devices, fuel metering, etc. n Condition information available from operators, sensors, inspections.

4
Gas Turbine Maintenance n Enormous number of candidates for maintenance, so ideally focus on most cost-effective items. n Maintenance planning (optimized, heuristic, ad hoc) determines: u Inspection activities u Maintenance activities u Intervals between inspection and maintenance activities.

5
On-line Statistical Analysis Expert Subjective Probabilities On-line Machine Learning Knowledge Extraction Diagnosis Maintenance Planning Sensor Fusion Sensor Validation Maintenance Planning Repair or Replace Parts Order Inspections Sensor Readings Inspection Results

6
Gas Turbine Warranty n Warranty/service contract for gas turbine would transfer all necessary maintenance and repair responsibilities to the manufacturer for the life of the warranty. n Fixed warranty period determined by manufacturer. n Gas turbine customer pays fixed price for warranty.

7
4 Key Issues n Types of maintenance and sensing activities (current focus) n Price of a gas turbine and service contract n Length of service contract period n Number of gas turbines for consumer

8
Consumer Profit Maximization How many gas turbines should the customer purchase, if any? Maximize R j (n j,w)–(p 1 + p 2 ) *n j * - n(w/ * shutdown loss

9
Producer Profit Maximization How much should the manufacturer charge for a gas turbine engine and warranty? How long should the warranty period be? Maximize (p 1 + p 2 - m) * n j * p 1,p 2,w Subject Tom=F 0 (x t, s, t s ).

10
Optimal Maintenance What types of maintenance and sensing activities should the manufacturer pursue? How often? n Derive an optimal maintenance policy via stochastic dynamic programming to minimize maintenance costs, given a fixed warranty period. n Solve for F 0 (x t, s, t s ).

11
Gas Turbine Water Wash Maintenance n Focus on a specific area of gas turbine maintenance: compressor water washing. n Compressor degradation results from contaminants (moisture, oil, dirt, etc.), erosion, and blade damage. n Maintenance activities scheduled to minimize expected maintenance cost while incurring minimum profit loss caused by efficiency degradation.

12
Compressor Efficiency Motivation: if fuel is 3¢/KWHr, then 1% loss of efficiency on a 100MW turbine = $30/hr or $263K/yr. n On-line washing with or without detergents (previously nutshells) relatively inexpensive; can improve efficiency ~1%. n Off-line washing more expensive, time consuming; can improve efficiency ~2-3%.

13
Decision Alternatives Blade replacement Major scouring Do nothing On-line wash Do nothing Off-line wash Major inspection

14
Influence Diagram Current Engine State, s´ Average Efficiency, x t Decision, d Total Maintenance Cost, v Last Measured Engine State, s

15
Stochastic Dynamic Programming n Computes minimum expected costs backwards, period by period. n Final solution gives expected minimum maintenance cost, which can be used to determine appropriate warranty price. n Given engine status information for any period, model chooses optimal decision for that period.

16
Stochastic Dynamic Programming Assumptions n Problem divided into periods, each ending with a decision. n Finite number of possible states associated with each period. n Decision and engine state for any period determine likelihood of transition to next state. n Given current state, optimal decision for subsequent states does not depend on previous decisions or states.

17
Other Assumptions n Compressor working performance is main determinant of engine efficiency level. n Working efficiency and engine state can be represented as discrete variables. n Current efficiency can be derived from temperature and pressure statistics. n Intra-period efficiency transition probability depends on maintenance decision and engine state.

18
Dynamic Program Constraints

20
F t (x t, s, t s ) = min [ c1, c2, c3, c7 ]

21
Dynamic Program Simulation User/Other Inputs n Service Contract period n Cost of each decision n Losses incurred at each efficiency level n Transition probabilities for state and efficiency changes Program Outputs n Expected minimum maintenance cost n Optimal action for any period

22
Turbine Performance Degradation Curves* *Source: GE

23
Turbine Performance Degradation Curves* *Source: GE

24
Online Water Wash Effects* *Source: GE

25
Online Water Wash Effects* *Source: GE

26
Efficiency Transition Probabilities

27
Conclusions n Analyzed maintenance and warranty decision making for gas turbines used in power plants. n Described and modeled economic issues related to warranty. n Developed a dynamic programming approach to optimize maintenance activities and warranty period length suited in particular to compressor maintenance.

28
Future Research n Sensitivity analysis of all user-input costs. n Sensitivity analysis of the efficiency and state transition probabilities.

Similar presentations

OK

BY DR LOIZOS CHRISTOU OPTIMIZATION. Optimization Techniques.

BY DR LOIZOS CHRISTOU OPTIMIZATION. Optimization Techniques.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google