Presentation on theme: "Section 3: Some Basics, Econometrics, & Discounting Jisung Park: February 22 2013 (Based in part on slides by Liz Walker and."— Presentation transcript:
Section 3: Some Basics, Econometrics, & Discounting Jisung Park: February (Based in part on slides by Liz Walker and Rich Sweeney)
Outline Some Important Preambles The Bigger Picture Basic Econometric Techniques and Intuition Methods Used in Environmental Economics Hedonic Pricing example Review of Discounting Questions
Some Important Preambles This Course in the context of Environmental Economics and Sustainability Stavins and Weitzman Real-world policy relevance
Some Important Preambles Math and Economics Math just isnt my thing, but I think I like economics. Welcome to the Club! MATH IS JUST A LANGUAGE Ϛ -σ = τλβη … Voulez-vous coucher avec moi, ce soir?
Some Important Preambles Policy Applications as the End-Goal Most of you, I would imagine, are taking this course because you actually care about or are interested in environmental policy and big-picture problems like Climate Change or Sustainable Development. These models and methods are so unrealistic True, but they can help us clarify our thinking about complex issues.
Why do we need to learn Econometrics? The Bigger Picture Policy Analysis Empirics/ Economet- rics Economic Theory POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
Some Basic Statistics Econometrics ~ Statistics Mean Mean = X i /n Mean takes all data points into account Mean is sensitive to outliers. Outliers have a lot of weight on mean (e.g. mean income and Bill Gates) Measures of Dispersion Variance = (X i – mean) 2 /N Standard Deviation =[(X i – m) 2 /N] 1/2 = (Variance) 1/2 More dispersed data have higher variance Like mean, standard deviation is also sensitive to outliers
Data sets can vary in their means and distributions…
We often look at how two variables relate to each other.. 9 Y (wateruse) = *income This red line comes from Ordinary Least Square Regression (OLS), which shows the impact of income on water use
Bi-variate Regression (Y on one X) 10 Y i = β 0 + β 1 X i + ε i i = each observation Y = Dependent Variable (water use) X = Independent Variable (income) ε i = Error term β 0 = intercept. It tells us the predicted value of Y when X = 0. β 1 = The coefficient that tells us how Y changes for unit change in X. What sources of error can you imagine?
Y i = β 0 + β 1 X i 1 + β 2 X i 2 + β 3 X i 3 + ε i More than one independent variables Now, β 1 is the change in value of Y for a unit change in X 1 while holding constant (or controlling for) X 2 and X 3 (the marginal interpretation) Recall Hedonic example in class 11 Multiple Regression (Y on many Xs)
Functional Form F(x, z, e) Just a general way of representing the relationship between variables. (As opposed to a specific functional form.) Some examples of functional forms: Linear: F(x, z,e) = ax + bz - ce Quadratic: F(x, z, e) = ax + bz^2 -ce Cubic, Exponential, Power, etc…
Vectors F(X, Z, e) X is a vector of housing unit variables: X = (x1, x2, x3 … xn) x1 = # of bedrooms x2 = size of kitchen … Z is a vector of neighborhood characteristics: Z = (z1, z2, z3… zm)
Benefit Estimation Methods: Big Picture Policy Analysis Empirics/ Econometrics Economic Theory e.g. Cost- Benefit Analysis e.g. Hedonic Regression, Travel Cost e.g. Micro- Theory of the Firm
Benefit Estimation Methods How would you estimate the benefits from proposed Chinese air pollution control legislation? Think it through from what weve learned
Stated Preference Techniques The short definition: Think surveys Pros: Can design surveys to target the good in question directly E.g. How much do you value the existence of Polar Bears? Cons: Incentive Compatibility Purely hypothetical: seldom actually asked to pay Information Problems Do respondents really know the science behind ecosystem services, air pollutions impact on health, biodiversity conservation? Framing and other biases (Prospect Theory) Scale Issues Loss Aversion
Revealed Preference Techniques The short definition: Backing out implied valuation using observed behavior. E.g. Back out value of better air quality through differences in home prices. Pros: Suffers fewer problems of incentive compatibility, framing bias Cons: Sensitive to study design and key assumptions (more overleaf)
Key Assumptions for Revealed Preference Methods Prices are good indicators of true value E.g. Few behavioral biases like hyperbolic discounting Markets are operating well Usual market failures arent in effect Information Problems are minimal Consumers know the true health impacts of air pollution All Relevant market participants are included E.g. What of future generations? All attributes and demands properly measured E.g. Recall potential issues with travel cost and available substitutes
Example of Revealed Preference: Hedonic Pricing These models use attributes of market products, including environmental attributes to explain variation in product prices P = F(x, z, e) P: price of market product (e.g., house) x: vector of non-env. product attributes (e.g., lot size, bedrooms) z: vector of non-env. local attributes (e.g., crime rate) e: environmental attribute (e.g., local air pollution) Marginal implicit price of environmental attribute or marginal willingness to pay for environmental attribute: 21
Hedonic Pricing example Suppose we wanted to study the variation in housing prices due to proximity to an airport (which generates noise, a negative environmental externality) Price = β 0 + β 1 *Bedrooms + β 2 *Bathrooms + β 3 *Airport + β 4 *Crime + β 5 *Scores + β 6 *Sold error Price: Sale price of house in dollars Number of Bedrooms Number of Bathrooms Near Airport: Dummy variable equal to 1 if the house is near the airport and 0 otherwise (so coefficient is not a slope in this case) Crime Rate: Annual number of incidents per 10,000 population Test Scores: Average test scores at public high school (out of 100) Sold in 2008: Dummy variable equal to 1 if the house sold this year Running this regression, we are interested in β 3 Other applications: estimate how much people value air quality, visibility 22
Results of multiple regression On average, a house near the airport sells for $49,198 less than a house not near the airport, all else equal 23 Fictional data Hedonic Pricing Example
Issues and problems Simultaneity: Prices are determined by both supply and demand, but these models treat supply as exogenous (i.e., unaffected by environmental attributes) Selection: Individuals differ in their tolerance of negative environmental attributes Information: Individuals perceptions of environmental attributes may differ from measurements Omitted variable bias: Coefficients are too large or small if an explanatory variable associated with the dependent variable and correlated with other explanatory variables is left out Scope: Relatively narrow range of applications 24 Hedonic Pricing Model Issues and Problems
OMB Guidelines on Cost Benefit Analysis For transparencys sake, you should state in your report what assumptions were used, such as the time horizon for the analysis and the discount rates applied to future benefits and costs. It is usually necessary to provide a sensitivity analysis to reveal whether, and to what extent, the results of the analysis are sensitive to plausible changes in the main assumptions and numeric inputs. 26
Why do we need discounting? Comparing apples to apples U = r = ρ + η g r : discount rate ρ : pure rate of time preference (felicity discounting, or impatience) η : elasticity of marginal utility g: future consumption growth rate 27
Why do we need discounting? Benefits or costs that occur sooner are often (though not necessarily) more valuable Resources invested earn a positive return, so current consumption is more expensive than future consumption, since you are giving up that expected return on investment when you consume today. (Opportunity Cost). Postponed benefits also have a cost because people generally prefer present to future consumption. (Positive time preference). Also, if consumption continues to increase over time, as it has for most of U.S. history, an increment of consumption will be less valuable in the future than it would be today (Principle of diminishing marginal utility).
What is the correct discount rate? Big Debate, with philosophical dimensions Especially in the context of long-T problems like Climate Change (stay tuned!) (Weitzman, Nordhaus, Stern, Goulder, Stavins…) The problem of discounting for projects with payoffs in the far future is largely ethical. - Kenneth Arrow Discounting later enjoyments versus earlier ones is simply a practice that is ethically indefensible. - Frank P. Ramsey Descriptive Reality Normative Desirability People tend to be impatient and value present goodies over future goodies is not the same statement as Societies should value present generations over future generations Philosopher Bryan Norton (2009): Levels of analysis matter An active area of research
What is the appropriate discount rate in practice? a real discount rate of 7 percent should be used as a base-case for regulatory analysis (OMB) Why? The 7 percent rate is an estimate of the average before-tax rate of return to private capital in the U.S. economy. the returns to real estate and small business capital as well as corporate capital. It approximates the opportunity cost of capital it is the appropriate discount rate whenever the main effect of a regulation is to displace or alter the use of capital in the private sector. 30