Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Lake Mathews Airport Study

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Lake Mathews Airport Study"— Presentation transcript:

1 Lake Mathews Airport Study
Created By: Beshay, John Chow, Denise Difilippo, Sean Hoss, Sean Medina, Marlon Olson, Christina Panek, Greg Ramos, Ryan Taylor, Kristin

2 Design Video Satellite background image of site
All images are from design Video flight path is design flight path

3 Insert Video

4 Objectives & Master Plan
Greg Panek

5 What is General Aviation?
Definition All Non-Military & Non-Airline Flights Benefits 1% US GDP 1.3 Million Jobs

6 Project Objectives Initial Planning Master Plan Demand for Facility
Location of Facility Master Plan Airport Layout Plan Environmental Assessment Cost Analysis

7 Demand Estimation Greg Panek

8 Area of Focus

9 Area of Focus

10 Inland Empire Airports System
16 Existing Airports Most Airports Constructed Prior to 1950 Most Recent Construction in 1989

11 Lake Mathews Service Area

12 Airport Personnel Airport Operations Population

13 Population Increase 60 million Californians by mid-century
Riverside will become the second most populous county behind Los Angeles Los Angeles Times: July 10, 2007

14 Population Increase Riverside County 4.7 million by 2050 203% increase
CA Dept. of Finance

15 Population Forecast 30 cities in proposed service area
Census data: 1990, 2000 & 2005 Each city had a population trend line Population forecasts to 2028

16 Population Forecast

17 Airport Personnel Airport Operations Population

18 Types of Airport Personnel
Pilot Certified Flying Instructor Control Tower Operator Flight Engineer Ground Instructor Mechanic Rigger Repairman

19 Current Airport Personnel

20 Airport Personnel Forecast
Current records from FAA Population increase=Airport personnel increase

21 Airport Personnel Airport Operations Population

22 Present Day Operations in Region
Airport Operations Corona Municipal 186 Riverside Municipal 285 Flabob 110 Perris Valley 94 Chino 436 Hemet-Ryan 207 French Valley 269 Total: 1582

23 General Aviation Demand
Airport Operations Lake Mathews 32 Corona Municipal 184 Riverside Municipal 278 Flabob 108 Perris Valley 92 Chino 421 Hemet-Ryan 202 French Valley 266 Total: 1582

24 General Aviation Demand
1700 Total Operations 1969 Total Operations

25 20 Year Demand Projection
Lake Mathews Airport 2028 % Ops/Day/Airport 13.0% Operations per Day 271 Aircraft Based 435 Single Engine 336 Multi Engine 46

26 Site Selection Christina Olson

27 10 Selection Factors Convenience to Users Availability of Land
Design and Layout of the Airport Airspace Obstructions Engineering Factors Social and Environmental Factors Availability of Utilities Atmospheric Conditions Hazards Due to Birds Coordination with other Airports

28 Three Proposed Sites Site 2 Site 3 Site 1

29 Proposed Site 1

30 Proposed Site 1

31 Proposed Site 2

32 Proposed Site 2

33 Proposed Site 3

34 Proposed Site 3


36 Methodology

37 Airport Layout Plan Sean Di Filippo

38 Airport Layout Plan Runway Placement, Orientation, and Length
Taxiway Layout Airport Marking, Lighting, and Signage

39 Runway Dimensions Design Aircraft Airport Elevation Temperature
Adjacent Land

40 Wind Analysis Historical Wind Data Collected From Weather Stations Surrounding Site Data Compiled Into Single Wind Rose

41 Wind Rose Analysis Wind Coverage Greater Than 95%

42 Terrain Analysis Best Terrain Alignment and Runway Placement

43 Runway Profile

44 Final Wind Rose Wind Coverage 10.5 Knot Crosswind 9 27 Runway 9 84.06%
Combined % Preferred Runway ________________ Runway % Runway % 9 27

45 Runway Overview 4000 Feet Long Runway Runway 27 Runway 9 Apron

46 Runway Summary Layout Distance (ft) Runway Length 4000 Runway Width 75
Runway Shoulder Width 10 Runway Blast Pad Width 95 Runway Blast Pad Length 150 Runway Safety Area Width Runway Safety Area Length 300 Runway Object Free Area Width 500 Runway Object Free Area Length

47 Taxiway Layout 90° Exits Acute Angled Exits
Parallel Taxiway South of Runway Single Holding Bay

48 Taxiway Summary Layout Distance (ft) Taxiway Width 35
Taxiway Shoulder Width 10 Taxiway Safety Area Width 79 Taxiway Edge Safety Margin 7.5

49 Airport Markings Runway Designator Blast Pad Centerline Runway Edge

50 Airport Markings Aim Point Taxiway Centerline Movement Area Boundary
Hold Marking

51 Airport Lighting Visual Approach Slope Threshold Lights
Runway Edge Lights Taxiway Edge Lights

52 Airport Signage 3 FBO 9-27 Runway S Taxiway D D Taxiway S Apron

53 Airport Layout Plan Marlon Medina

54 Facility Layout Plan Facility includes Hangers Tiedowns
Transient aprons Proposed Facilities 50 transient aprons 176 based airplanes 2028 future facilities 243 based airplanes

55 Airport Layout Plan Landside Terminal area plan Structures Parking
Signing and striping Access roads Perimeter road

56 Terminal Area Plan Structures 12,000 sq. ft. terminal building
4,200 sq. ft. F.B.O building Parking 173 total parking 6 disabled parking Geometric design AASHTO Geometric Design of Highways and Streets Signing and striping California MUTCD Caltrans 2006 Standard Plans

57 Access Road Signing and Striping California MUTCD 2006
Caltrans 2006 Standard Plans Geometric Design AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

58 Perimeter Road Fire and maintenance access
Based on Caltrans Highway Design Manual Design speed Width

59 Pavement Kristin Taylor

60 Pavement Design Overview
Soil classification within the Lake Mathews project area Flexible pavement design Rigid pavement design Final selection for pavement design

61 Soil Types within project area Engineering properties
Soil Classification Soil Types within project area Engineering properties Map Unit Depth (inch) USDA Texture Unified Class. CBR Value Assigned CaD2 0-13 Fine sandy loam SM 13-22 Loam, clay loam CL 5 -15 22-62 Weathered bedrock --- LaC 0-12 Loam CL, CL-ML 5-15 12-32 Clay loam, clay CH, CL 3-5 32-54 ChD2 20-40 Bfc 0-23 Clay 20-45 32-36 20-47 USDA classification of soils was found using Web Soil Survey v2.0. CBR value was found using FAA standards. A CBR value of four was selected.

62 Flexible Pavement Design
Due to the gross weight of our service aircraft (Less than12,500 pounds) our design was based on light weight aircraft criteria. FAA specifies that no reduction in thickness should be made for “noncritical” areas of pavement (i.e. Apron).

63 Results of Flexible Pavement Design
Hot Mix Asphalt Surface: Four inches Structural Base: Three inches Subbase: Nine inches Subgrade Compaction: 90% for Four to Eight inches References: Federal Aviation Administration: AC D, Chapter 5 Pavements for light aircraft.

64 Flexible Pavement Detail

65 Rigid Pavement Design Subbase: Is required due to the soil type CH located within our runway. Subgrade: 90% compaction required for soil types found within our project site. Jointing: Not to exceed maximum spacing.

66 Results for Rigid Pavement Design
Portland Cement Concrete: 5 inches Subbase: Subgrade: 90 % compaction Joint spacing: See Detail

67 Rigid Pavement Detail

68 Selection of Pavement Flexible pavement was selected for the Lake Mathews Municipal Airport due to construction costs and timeline.

69 Grading Kristin Taylor

70 Grading Plan Overview Grading of runway and taxiway
Grading of non-critical areas Final grading plan Earthwork

71 Runway & Taxiway Specifications

72 Runway Cross Section

73 Grading of Non-Critical Areas
Access Road – 2% from the center line to the gutters on either side. Perimeter Road – 2% away from runway and taxiway. Apron – Design to allow surface flow of 1% away from the taxiway to the south edge of the apron area, where the water is treated. Structures – For buildings and other structures a 2% grade for a minimum of 10 feet was used.

74 Final Grading Plan Existing and proposed surfaces showing the grading needed for site

75 Earthwork Quantities Cut: Cubic Yards Fill: Net Earthwork: 54,245
29,280 Cut 24,965 Summary: Based on the designed grading plan a net cut of 24,965 cubic yards will need to be removed from the project site.

76 Airport Drainage Sean Hoss

77 Drainage Promotes safe and efficient operations
Handles airport surface runoff Diverts runoff away from Lake Mathews Two drainage areas Runway handled by Volume Based drainage Ramp area handled by Flow Based drainage Based on Riverside County Flood Control District BMP Handbook

78 Runway Runoff Corrugated steel pipe Ponding Outfall Slope = 0.005
Di = 15”, Df = 24” Inlets at 400 feet or less Water quality inlet Ponding Rainfall > 0.85 in/hr 10 acre-ft storage Outfall Extended detention basin

79 Ramp Runoff Filter strip (turf grass) Infiltration trench 15’ depth
Wide as the ramp Removes pollutants and sediment Infiltration trench Aggregate 1-3” 48 hr drawdown Overflow pipe to detention basin Source: RCFCD BMP Handbook

80 Environmental Impact Assessment
Denise Chow

81 Environmental Noise Impact
Environmental Concerns With restrictions in time, we will concentrate on noise impact INM: Integrated Noise Model FAA approved Airport Noise Exposure Map Noise contours generated with real-time values and coordinates General allowable threshold FAA (Advisory Circular) 65 dB 7 different thresholds of noise level

82 Noise Assessment Data Airport Location Runway Position Aircraft Models
Lat: Length 4000 ft Group A-II Long: Width 75 ft DHC6 Dash 6 Elevation 2080 Runway 9 Group B-II Annual Operations 97000 FAL20 Falcon20 Daily Operations 271 Runway 27 Helicopter B206L Bell 206L Long Ranger

83 Importing Supplemental Data
CAD graphics Airport runway layout AutoCAD DXF file for graphic enhancement Terrain data Topographic map overlay Signify elevation affecting noise propagation Street census Streets, highways, hydrographic features, civil boundaries Overlays street map data Population census Population points Enables visual inspection of sound impact on neighboring residents

84 Integrated Noise Model

85 Integrated Noise Model

86 Integrated Noise Model

87 Integrated Noise Model

88 Integrated Noise Model

89 Outcome Viable source for current and future noise predictions generated by Lake Matthews Airport (LMA) and its components Ensure LMA from causing unwanted noise around neighboring communities Homes, schools, businesses Easement required dB Level Population Acres 55.0 894 4113.5 60.0 529 2158.3 65.0 194 913.9 70.0 15 155.4 75.0 40.1 80.0 10.5 85.0 3.1

90 Sound Decibel Threshold
65 dB Threshold Not designated under Federal, State, or local law Responsibility for permissible land use remains with local authorities Sound proofing packages

91 Cost Estimate Ryan Ramos

92 Cost Estimate 2006 RSMeans Building Construction Cost Data
Discrepancy in price values between 2006 and present

93 Airport Cost Pavement $10,155,726 Earthwork $2,349,183 Striping
$207,224 Airport Structures $7,652,721 Landscape $68,079 Airport Signage $41,500 Airport Fencing $835,380 Drainage $952,992 Sound wall $582,977 Total $ 23,568,125

94 Airport Contingency Plan
20% Conceptual Stage 5% Economic Factors 4% Utilities 1% Permits Total Cost + 30% Contingency ∑= $ 23,568,125 + $7,070,437 = $30,638,562

95 Lake Mathews Airport Aviation demand levels deemed an additional airport necessary Selection of an appropriate site location Successful completion of the Master Plan Design and layout Environmental noise impact Cost analysis

96 Questions?

Download ppt "Lake Mathews Airport Study"

Similar presentations

Ads by Google