We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCory Wotton
Modified over 2 years ago
© Crown copyright Met Office Some thoughts on s12 stratocumulus feedback Adrian Lock EUCLIPSE WP3 meeting, Toulouse, April 2012
© Crown copyright Met Office
Subsidence pdfs: HadGEM2 vs CGILS s11 s12 Mean w unchanged
© Crown copyright Met Office Why do the LES robustly show a significant positive feedback at s12 when subsidence unchanged?
© Crown copyright Met Office Why the positive feedback at s12 with subsidence kept constant? Robust changes with +2K: 1)Cloud is warmer greater upward LW flux at cloud top more cloud-top cooling more entrainment thinner cloud? Actually find downward LW flux increases too and balances almost exactly cloud-top cooling unchanged
© Crown copyright Met Office Why the positive feedback at s12 with subsidence kept constant? Robust changes with +2K: 1)Cloud is warmer greater upward LW flux at cloud top more cloud-top cooling? Actually find downward LW flux increases too and balances almost exactly cloud-top cooling unchanged 2)Surface LH flux increases (assuming unchanged RH, U, T 1 -T surf ): LHF = c h (q 1 -q sat (T surf )) ~ c h (RH 1 q sat (T 1 )-q sat (T surf )) 3)Δq more negative (larger RH in the PBL dominates larger dq sat /dT in warm free atmosphere): (2)+(3) if entrainment rate unchanged, expect stronger LH fluxes throughout PBL: LH flux
© Crown copyright Met Office Impact of enhanced LH fluxes Buoyancy flux = α wθ l + β wq T wq T term is most important in the cloud layer (where β is much larger) Larger wq T larger buoyancy flux more turbulent PBL more entrainment of dry air thinner cloud positive cloud feedback Do the steps of this argument hold up?
© Crown copyright Met Office LH flux – entrainment feedback? Larger wq T larger buoyancy flux more turbulent PBL more entrainment of dry air thinner cloud positive cloud feedback … more entrainment of dry air… should also deeper PBL (given identical subsidence) but cloud-top drops less entrainment!
© Crown copyright Met Office LH flux – entrainment feedback? MetO LEM fluxes after 3 days LH flux still larger throughout PBL, despite lower inversion (larger Δq must dominate reduced w e ) Buoyancy flux weaker (consistent with reduced w e ) But why reduced w e, to less than in the control?
© Crown copyright Met Office Initial adjustment Entrainment is larger initially (
"name": "© Crown copyright Met Office Initial adjustment Entrainment is larger initially (
© Crown copyright Met Office Balanced state So, despite enhanced LH fluxes at all levels, SH flux is reduced because of reduced LW cooling implying reduced buoyancy flux Total Turb Rad
© Crown copyright Met Office What if? …the initial s12 cloud layer were deeper? Same initial response (larger w e higher cloud-top and thinner cloud layer)? Noting that cloud depth has a strong control on the integrated buoyancy flux, thinner cloud layer still implies w e reduces but not now to less than control? So equilibrium state would still be a thinner cloud layer (ie positive feedback) but with a higher cloud-top? Chris Jones has tested this in a MLM…
© Crown copyright Met Office Initial conditions dont matter!
© Crown copyright Met Office What if? What if the circulation changes? Eg, the shape of the w pdf changes? HadGEM2 shows no change in the mean but less ascent and more weak subsidence If w>0 associated with small cloud fraction then this might suggest a negative cloud feedback (but this doesnt happen in HadGEM2) Something to try in time-varying CGILS… Eg, the wind speed changes? (See Webb and Lock, soon!) s12
© Crown copyright Met Office CFMIP-GCSS Intercomparison of SCM/LES (CGILS) Results for the HadGEM2 SCM Mark Webb and Adrian Lock (Met Office) EUCLIPSE/GCSS.
© Crown copyright Met Office Met Office SCM and CRM results Adrian Lock, Met Office, UK.
© Crown copyright Met Office CGILS: Met Office LES results Adrian Lock, Met Office, UK.
© Crown copyright 2006Page 1 CFMIP II sensitivity experiments Mark Webb (Met Office Hadley Centre) Johannes Quaas (MPI) Tomoo Ogura (NIES) With thanks.
Met Office GPCI simulations Adrian Lock. © Crown copyright UK Met Office simulations in GPCI HadGAM1 climate – for IPCC AR4 38 levels (~300m at 1km),
Xin Xi Feb. 28. Basics Convective entrainment : The buoyant thermals from the surface layer rise through the mixed layer, and penetrate (with enough.
Introduction to Cloud Dynamics We are now going to concentrate on clouds that form as a result of air flows that are tied to the clouds themselves, i.e.
© Crown copyright Met Office CFMIP-2 techniques for understanding cloud feedbacks in climate models. Mark Webb (Met Office Hadley Centre) CFMIP/GCSS BLWG.
Condensation in the Atmosphere The atmosphere contains a mixture of dry air and a variable amount of water vapor (0-4% or 0-30 g/kg) An air parcel is said.
Relationships between wind speed, humidity and precipitating shallow cumulus convection Louise Nuijens and Bjorn Stevens* UCLA - Department of Atmospheric.
Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 3PB United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0)
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 RF01/RF02: LES sensitivity studies Adrian Lock and Eoin Whelan.
Case Study Example 29 August 2008 From the Cloud Radar Perspective 1)Low-level mixed- phase stratocumulus (ice falling from liquid cloud layer) 2)Brief.
The scheme: A short intro Some relevant case results Why a negative feedback? EDMF-DualM results for the CFMIP-GCSS intercomparison case: Impacts of a.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006 Precipitating Shallow Cumulus Case Intercomparison For the 9th GCSS Boundary Layer Cloud Workshop, September 2006, GISS.
Lapse Rates and Stability of the Atmosphere. What is a lapse rate? A lapse rate is defined as the rate of change in temperature observed while moving.
The ASTEX Lagrangian model intercomparison case Stephan de Roode and Johan van der Dussen TU Delft, Netherlands.
THE INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED ON SHALLOW CUMULUS CONVECTION from LES and bulk theory Louise Nuijens and Bjorn Stevens University of California, Los Angeles.
Coupled vs. Decoupled Boundary Layers in VOCALS-REx Chris Jones and Chris Bretherton Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington Dave Leon.
Warning! In this unit, we switch from thinking in 1-D to 3-D on a rotating sphere Intuition from daily life doesn’t work nearly as well for this material!
A Case Study of Decoupling in Stratocumulus Xue Zheng MPO, RSMAS 03/26/2008.
Large Eddy Simulation of Low Cloud Feedback to a 2-K SST Increase Anning Cheng 1, and Kuan-Man Xu 2 1. AS&M, Inc., 2. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton,
Q* -positive in daytime -almost always negative at night Any Q* imbalance is accounted for by convective exchange or conduction Q* = Q H + Q E + Q G.
© Crown copyright Met Office Towards understanding the mechanisms responsible for different cloud-climate responses in GCMs. Mark Webb, Adrian Lock (Met.
Boundary Layer Clouds. Intertropiccal Convergence Zone (ITCZ) Trade cumulus Transition Stratus and stratocumulus subsidence Trade wind inversion St &
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 Damian Wilson, 12 th October 2005 Assessment of model performance and potential improvements using CloudNet data.
Page 1© Crown copyright Modelling the stable boundary layer and the role of land surface heterogeneity Anne McCabe, Bob Beare, Andy Brown EMS 2005.
AOS 100: Weather and Climate Instructor: Nick Bassill Class TA: Courtney Obergfell.
Cloud Feedbacks on Climate: A Challenging Scientific Problem Joel Norris Scripps Institution of Oceanography Fermilab Colloquium May 12, 2010.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology The Effect of Turbulence on Cloud Microstructure,
11.2 Properties of the atmosphere. Temperature A measure of the average kinetic energy of the particles in a material. A measure of the average kinetic.
Lecture 7-8: Energy balance and temperature (Ch 3) the diurnal cycle in net radiation, temperature and stratification the friction layer local microclimates.
Observed Structure of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Many thanks to: Nolan Atkins, Chris Bretherton, Robin Hogan.
THE HADLEY CIRCULATION (1735): global sea breeze HOT COLD Explains: Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) Wet tropics, dry poles Problem: does not account.
Key Terms and Concepts ELR--Environmental Lapse Rate 5°C- 6.5°C/1000 m – temperature of the STILL air as you ascend through the troposphere. ALR--Adiabatic.
The representation of stratocumulus with eddy diffusivity closure models Stephan de Roode KNMI.
Thermodynamics, Buoyancy, and Vertical Motion Temperature, Pressure, and Density Buoyancy and Static Stability Adiabatic “Lapse Rates” Convective Motions.
Review of the Boundary Layer Over land, in the vicinity of an area of high pressure, the boundary layer evolves in a well-defined manner What is the boundary.
Stratocumulus-topped Boundary Layer. Review of last lecture The turbulent closure problem: Number of unknowns > Number of equations The turbulent closure.
Exam 2 Review AOS 121 November Geostrophic Balance and Geostrophic Winds Balance between the pressure gradient force and Coriolis force Will.
Josette Marquardt Thishan Karandana Yunpeng Shan.
Lecture 6. EPS 5: 23 Sep Review the concept of the barometric law (hydrostatic balance: each layer of atmosphere must support the weight of the.
The simplifed momentum equations Height coordinatesPressure coordinates.
EUCLIPSE Toulouse meeting April 2012 Roel Neggers Process-level evaluation at selected grid-points: Constraining a system of interacting parameterizations.
Low clouds in the atmosphere: Never a dull moment Stephan de Roode (GRS) stratocumulus cumulus.
Large-Eddy Simulations of the Nocturnal Low-Level Jet M.A. Jiménez Universitat de les Illes Balears 4th Meso-NH user’s meeting, Toulouse April 2007.
Lecture 15, Slide 1 Physical processes affecting stratocumulus Siems et al
Cumulus Clouds. What goes on inside a cumulus cloud?
1) What does this tool measure?. 2) What does this tool measure?
© 2017 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.