Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.


Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "WORLD POLITICS – Lecture 4. 1. THE REALIST STATE."— Presentation transcript:

1 WORLD POLITICS – Lecture 4


3 General Agreement Among Realists State-prime actor in International Relations The use of force to adjust relations Competitive and conflictual character of international relations War as the remaining option for the resolution of conflict Pessimism about peace

4 Context of Realism Cold war (East / West blocks) Arms race (nuclear weapons)

5 State centric International relations as inherently competitive Material factors as opposed to non-material factors State-egoistic actors Realism Neorealism Postclassical Realism Both

6 3 Assumptions Differentiating Neorealism and Postclassical Realism The most important assumption: Possibility of conflict (Neorealism) or probability of aggression (Postclassical Realism).

7 Neorealism 1)Possibility of conflict shapes the actions of States 2)Heavy discount rate. Short-term military preparedness over long term 3)Military vs. economy -- military preparedness Postclassical Realism 1)States actions are based on assessment of probabilities of threats 2)Long-term not subordinate to short term preparedness for military action 3)Military vs. economy – economic trade off if probability of war is low

8 Possibility vs. Probability Neorealism Imminent possibility of conflict International relations as brutal Anarchy-suspicious and hostile context With states deciding whether or not to use force, war may at any time break out in the absence of supreme authority Rational state never lets down its guard: states adopt worst- case perspective Postclassical Realism Probability of conflict rather than imminent possibility of conflict Lower security pressure

9 Neorealism 3 principles guiding the worst-case perspective: 1)Costs of war triggering possibility of conflict 2)Material capabilities signal potential for aggression 3)Defensive precautions are the only assurance against aggression

10 Short-term vs. Long-term Neorealism Maximize military security in short-term due to the potential of immediate aggression Maximize short-term security from potential rivals High-discount rate Postclassical Realism See the world under lower security pressure lower discount rate No possibility of imminent war but probability

11 Trade-off Between Military and Economic Security Military Economic 45° MRS

12 Military Security vs. Economic Capacity Neorealism Military security first before economic capacity (rationality) In case of conflict between military objectives and economic military objectives favored (trade- off) Postclassical Realism Power = military preparedness + economic capacity Wealth determines power Power is the ultimate goal of the state Seeking power conquest. Conquest can increase wealth, but one can also increase wealth by: 1)changing international trade patterns 2)having efficient institutions 3)using comparative advantage to secure raw materials from weaker states 4)reducing non-productive expenditure

Download ppt "WORLD POLITICS – Lecture 4. 1. THE REALIST STATE."

Similar presentations

Ads by Google