Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Capacity Planning in Distributed Environments Dr Bernie Domanski The Information Systems Manager, Inc. (ISM) & City University of New York/CSI Performance.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Capacity Planning in Distributed Environments Dr Bernie Domanski The Information Systems Manager, Inc. (ISM) & City University of New York/CSI Performance."— Presentation transcript:

1 Capacity Planning in Distributed Environments Dr Bernie Domanski The Information Systems Manager, Inc. (ISM) & City University of New York/CSI Performance Analysis & Prediction -- Made Easy

2 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 2 Should Capacity Planning Be Treated With the Same Reverence As in the Past? Lets all sing the hymn - But Thats How Weve Always Done It.

3 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 3 Objectives & Agenda View IT as a Service Provider; focus on service delivery for the survival of the company; Does doing CP the same old way make sense because Thats How Weve Always Done It? Does the mainframe costing model make sense today? When does make sense to do CP ? There are alternatives to complex tools that model down to the disk revolution.

4 The Key Message CP in a distributed environment should allow IT to make intelligent, cost-effective decisions regarding the resources required that will rapidly enhance the service given to its customers.

5 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 5 Moores Law - Capacity Doubles Every 18 Months

6 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 6 Service Delivery Timely delivery of services to customers Global view of resource use Cost mainaining a CP staff - what is the ROI? Cost of studying vs. just buying! The difference for making mistakes is orders of magnitude different in price.

7 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 7 Whats the Real Reason to Do Capacity Planning? If mission-critical business applications become overloaded, Then poor performance could have a very serious consequence: Revenue can be lost if dissatisfied customers move to the competition. If you can't do it right yourself, pay someone else to do it for you!

8 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 8 Providing too much capacity? Ties up $$$ When is CP done? If that new appl could negatively impact customers Why is CP done? To be competitive; new features/functions implies sizing the underlying architecture correctly What about business vs. technical requirements? Needs are ASAP and cheap => use modeling for broad evaluations Key Questions

9 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 9 Success is a lousy teacher - Bill Gates Out-of-date? 8-track tape player, vacuum tube television, or the monolithic mainframe computer. The key to understanding mistakes is the need to initiate rather than to follow trends. Lets look at some actual history: Scaleability and Compatibility

10 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 10 History 50s / 60s: Different machines/op. Systems for different computing purposes 65: IBM/Tom Watson => scaleable 360 architecture; you could move your work up DEC/Ken Olsen => PDP alternative; VAX in 77 offered scaleability too

11 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 11 Whats the Lesson Here? IBM & DEC saw a need that business had … –to fill incremental computing needs in different ways... – … without having to waste prior IT investments This same need is still with us today! Need more computing power? Get it for the mission-critical application software

12 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 12 Market-driven Compatibility Originally is was difficult and expensive tochange brands Amdahl, HDS, StorageTek, EMC => where would we be today? Proliferation of UNIX IBM PC clones - Look at Apple! Internet acceptance: Netscape, IE cross platforms JAVA allows dynamic distributed systems

13 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 13 CP is Driven by New Business What Drives CP for Distributed Systems? –Scaleable architectures –Market-driven compatibility The key: the network - its the glue! CP becomes less about counting MIPS, & … becomes more about being driven by anticipated new business that has to be processed

14 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 14 WhadaWeWant? we want to scale our applications up to process more work; we want them to run on the new hardware we acquire; we need to connect applications (i.e. data) that currently exist on different platforms; and we dont want to re-invent or convert anything, if we can help it, to keep our costs down and our productivity up.

15 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 15 Bill Gates - Its a little hard to appreciate how far weve come from the good old days where just to get the sales report formatted in a nice way, you might wait nine months! … weve really gone way beyond anything that ever happened on the mainframe. … you really will be able to do simple, multiserver applications. Just sit down, write a few lines of business logic, and boom - connect all that up.

16 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 16 Sam Greenblatt - CAs Senior VP of Advanced Technology Integrating application, system and network management is helpful only if it yields useful business information. Nobody cares whether or not a system is down if it doesnt impact their business.

17 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 17 Is Capacity Planning a Checkoff Item? Rather than burden the planner with commodity shopping, users took on that responsibility. Do we even need CP any more? –it might be easier to just buy new gear when you need it, period, and not do any Capacity Planning at all! –Consider, too, the cost of doing a CP study

18 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 18 More Important Questions Is the network yielding adequate performance? What should we get/do if it isnt? How are scaleable distributed appls built? How many more users can be added while preserving response time? We seek a new perspective that is more closely tied with application-specific measurement.

19 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 19 Key to CP Success Delivery of IT services, where... Scaleability and compatibility are key. Deploying new applications on a specific architecture may be wonderful today, but … may become disastrous tomorrow if that architecture becomes a dinosaur and new/faster/cheaper gear is available.

20 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 20 YOU MUST... become application savvy understand the network. focus attention identifying the parts of an application that wont scale up well offer alternative solutions. keep compatibility across platforms at the forefront of your thinking. be able to anticipate bottlenecks and propose alternative components

21 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 21 Tools to Help Find How Much Capacity is Needed Cottage industry originated for the mainframe Costs: $20K = $120K (*MXG) Not meant for distributed applications No end-to-end response time measurement Queuing models ignored the network No standout predictor of workload growth

22 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 22 Needed Measurement Tools Populate a PDB with data from distributed applications Display status of every resource in the distributed environment + drill-down Need summarized data across systems for trending Need simulation models along with queuing

23 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 23 Just-in-Time Capacity Use the tools … –monitors –collections of performance data –models … to find when to add more resources Adding at the right time implies: –no interruption in service quality –no paying for services before they are needed

24 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 24 Costing for Distributed Systems A great advantage is being able to buy needed capacity in small increments. Scaleability is key for capacity planning You buy enough capacity to do your processing now... –if additional capacity is required in the future, –then it is acquired at a reduced unit-cost –because of the constant improvement in price/performance ratios.

25 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 25 Is Costing That Simple? Incur both acquisition and installation costs. Over time, you incur operational costs (licensing fees, support personnel, and maintenance).

26 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 26 What Happens When Additional Capacity Is Needed? Yes, you acquire a bigger server, but Most companies would rollover the server Causes a cascading effect, … costs that have to be incurred when installing each old machine in a new place, e.g. installing new software, testing, support personnel costs, etc.

27 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 27 Leilani Allen By the year 2000, it will cost more to keep old technology than to upgrade. Bottom Line: change the focus of financial mgmt strategies from acquisition. The realities of the life-cycle of equipment dictate that ongoing operational costs demand more attention (consider rollover)

28 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 28 Service Levels Service level measures should be reported by business unit and application - –availability, –response times and –workload volumes Obstacles: –client instrumentation –different communication paths/protocols

29 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 29ARM Transaction instrumentation becomes the applications responsibility ARM SDK addresses appls written in –C/C++, - Visual Basic, –MicroFocus COBOL,- Delphi Approach systems management from the end-to-end appl. workload perspective, rather than as a collection of physical components.

30 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 30 Summary & Thoughts The critical questions we must face -- –Is CP helping IT deliver the best service possible to its customers? –Are you building scaleable architectures that have market- driven compatibility?

31 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 31 More Key Questions to Ask Yourself ! Perhaps a checkoff item CP philosophy may prove to be a real cost saver Include the true costs associated with adding incremental capacity. Without application-level instrumentation across platforms, service-level management across the enterprise may not be possible

32 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 32 More of What We Need Reporting software must manage the volume of customer data across platforms, It must address the network, the client and the server. We need graphical modeling tools to make it easier to define the network Modeling tools must be able to model any combination of hardware & software Need predictions of IT service and usage from a global perspective as well as a detailed focused perspective

33 ©B. Domanski,1997. All Rights Reserved 33 Thats It For Now! Thanks for listening Any questions??? Dr Bernie Domanski Phone: Fax:


Download ppt "Capacity Planning in Distributed Environments Dr Bernie Domanski The Information Systems Manager, Inc. (ISM) & City University of New York/CSI Performance."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google