Presentation on theme: "Econ 141 Fall 2013 Slide Set 4 Simple and general models of the monetary approach to the exchange rate."— Presentation transcript:
Econ 141 Fall 2013 Slide Set 4 Simple and general models of the monetary approach to the exchange rate.
Money and Exchange Rates – Simple Model We first use a simple theory of household money demand that assumes that the transactions demand for money is proportional to an households income. Summing up, aggregate money demand is proportional to national nominal income. A rise in national nominal income leads to a proportional increase in transactions and, hence, in aggregate money demand. This is the quantity theory of money:
Demand for money Dividing the previous equation by P, the price level, we derive the demand for real money balances: Real money balances measure of the purchasing power of the stock of money in terms of goods and services. The demand for real money balances is strictly proportional to real income.
Money Market Equilibrium Just set the demand for money equal to the supply of money, M (assumed determined by the central bank). Nominal money supply equals nominal money demand: or, equivalently, the real money supply equals real money demand:
A Simple Monetary Model of Prices We use money market equilibrium to write expressions for the price levels in the U.S. and Europe as: These equations exemplify the monetary model of the price level. In the long run, we assume nominal prices are flexible and adjust to maintain money market equilibrium.
A Simple Monetary Model of the Exchange Rate We substitute the two price equations into the absolute PPP equation to get an expression for the exchange rate: This is the fundamental equation of the monetary approach to exchange rates.
Implications of this equation Suppose the U.S. money supply increases, all else equal. The right-hand side increases (the U.S. nominal money supply increases relative to Europe), causing the exchange rate to increase (the U.S. dollar depreciates against the euro). Now suppose the U.S. real income level increases, all else equal. Then the right-hand side decreases (the U.S. real money demand increases relative to Europe), causing the exchange rate to decrease (the U.S. dollar appreciates against the euro).
Money Growth, Inflation, and Depreciation The growth rate of the U.S. money supply is M US, is μ US The growth rate of real income in the U.S. is g US :
The growth rate of P US =M US /L US Y US equals the money supply growth rate μ US minus the real income growth rate g US. The growth rate of P US is the inflation rate π US. The quantity theory of money in terms of rates is European inflation is calculated similarly: When money growth is higher than income growth, we have more money chasing fewer goods and this leads to inflation. Money Growth, Inflation, and Depreciation
We can rewrite the fundamental equation of the monetary approach to exchange rates, in rates of change and then use our equations for inflation to substitute and get Money Growth, Inflation, and Depreciation
Intuition behind the fundamental equation, If the United States runs a looser monetary policy in the long run (measured by a faster money growth rate), the dollar will depreciate more rapidly, all else equal. If the U.S. economy grows faster in the long run, the dollar will appreciate more rapidly, all else equal (because inflation will be lower for any given money growth rate). Money Growth, Inflation, and Depreciation
Applying the Simple Monetary Model The monetary model assumes that all prices are flexible and purchasing power parity holds. It gives us a theory of how exchange rates behave in the long run. The exchange rate is a nominal concept. If all prices are flexible and goods markets are integrated (no trade frictions), the exchange will be determined by relative money supplies. The fundamental equation of the monetary model tells us that the rate of depreciation equals relative inflation. If we use the model to predict future exchange rates then we assume that all prices are flexible and relative PPP holds.
Simple monetary approach: example 1 Suppose that U.S. and European real income growth rates both equal zero (g US = g EUR = 0), and that the European price level is constant, so that European inflation is zero. Example 1: Consider a one-time 10% increase in the U.S. money supply. 1. Because prices are flexible and GDP, Y US, is constant, the price level rises by 10% and real money balances M US /P US are constant. 2. PPP implies that the exchange rate E rises by 10% because the price level for the U.S. rises relative to the price level for Europe. The dollar depreciates by 10%.
Example 2: Assume the U.S. money supply grows at a fixed rate μ. 1. GDP growth is zero, so the growth rate of real balances M/P is zero. 2. The price level P and money supply M must grow at the same rate, μ. Inflation in the U.S. equals μ. 3. The rate of depreciation of the exchange rate is determined by relative PPP as 4. If the European inflation rate is zero, the dollar depreciates at a rate of μ against the euro: Simple monetary approach: example 2
At time T, the United States will raise the rate of money supply growth to a higher rate, μ + Δμ At T, real balances must continue to stay constant (U.S. and European GDP growth rates are zero). U.S. inflation rises at time T from to The rate of depreciation of the dollar against the euro also rises from to Example 2 continued
The monetary approach: example 2
Evidence for the Monetary Approach The monetary approach to prices and exchange rates suggests that, all else equal: Increases in the relative rate of inflation should correspond to equal increases in the rate of depreciation for the home currency, Increases in the relative money supply growth rates should correspond to equal increases in relative inflation and, hence, the rate of exchange rate depreciation for the home country.
Evidence for the Monetary Approach
Hyperinflations of the Twentieth Century
Hyperinflation and redenomination In hyperinflations, currency lose value rapidly and are often replaced by foreign currency (usually, US$). Ecuador is a recent example. A central bank may redenominate by introducing a new currency unit equal to 10 N old units. In the 1980s, Argentina suffered hyperinflation. On June 1, 1983, the peso argentino replaced the peso at a rate of 1 new per 10,000 old. On June 14, 1985, the austral replaced the peso argentino again at a rate of 1 per 1,000 old. On January 1, 1992, the convertible peso replaced the austral at 1 peso per 10,000 austral (this was equivalent to 10,000,000,000 of the 1982 pesos).
Redenomination in Brazil 1942: The cruzeiro replaced the reis at a rate of 1 per : The cruzeiro novo replaced the cruzeiro at 1 per (March 1): The cruzado replaced the cruzeiro novo at 1 per 1000 In 1990, it was renamed the cruzeiro again, at par (August 1): The cruzeiro real replaced the cruzeiro at 1 per (June 30): The real was introduced at 1 real per 2750 cruzeiro reals.
In Zimbabwe In 1980, the ZW$ replaced the Rhodesian$ at par On August 1, 2006, a new dollar was introduced at 1 per 1000 old. In September 2007, the official exchange rate was ZW$30,000 per 1 US$, but the black market rate was ZW$600,000 per 1 US$. On August 1, 2008, another new dollar was introduced at 1 per 10 billion old. On February 2, 2009, a new ZW$ was introduced for 1 trillion old, but Zimbabwe legalized foreign currency use and dollarized.
Next, we consider a more general model of exchange rates in the long run that allows for money demand to vary with the nominal interest rate. The quantity theory of money assumes that the demand for money is stable: L (velocity) was constant. A more general theory (Keynesian) allows money demand to depend on the opportunity cost of holding money, the nominal interest rate. We first consider the links between inflation and the nominal interest rates in an open economy, and then apply this to how exchange rates are determined in the long run. The Monetary Approach: Money, Interest Rates and Prices in the Long Run
The Demand for Money: The General Model All else equal, a rise in national dollar income (nominal income) will cause a proportional increase in transactions and, hence, in aggregate money demand. All else equal, a rise in the nominal interest rate will cause the aggregate demand for money to fall. Dividing by P, we can derive the demand for real money balances
The Demand for Money: The General Model
Long-Run Equilibrium in the Money Market We already derived two relationships for the exchange rate. The first is relative PPP which holds if all prices are flexible and goods markets are integrated. The second is uncovered interest parity (UIP) which holds if there are no unexploited arbitrage opportunities. In terms of the rate of depreciation of the home currency, these are
The Fisher Effect Putting PPP and UIP together, we get That is, the nominal interest differential equals the expected inflation differential: This says that, all else equal, a rise in the expected inflation rate in a country will lead to an equal rise in its nominal interest rate. This is the Fisher effect. The Fisher effect predicts that the change in the opportunity cost of money is equal to the change in the nominal interest rate and to the change in the inflation rate.
Real Interest Parity Rearranging the last equation, the Fisher effect is rewritten The difference between the nominal interest rate (i) and the expected inflation rate (π e ) is the real interest rate (r e ) (the inflation-adjusted return on an interest-bearing asset). We have found that PPP and UIP together imply that This result states that if both PPP and UIP hold, then the expected real interest rates are equalized across countries. This is called real interest parity.
This result can be stated as: Arbitrage in goods and financial markets alone is sufficient to cause the equalization of real interest rates across countries in the long run. This implies that, in the long run, all countries will have the same expected real interest rate. This is the long-run expected world real interest rate denoted r*, and We treat r* as a given, exogenous variable, something outside the control of a policy maker in any particular country. The Fisher effect tells us that Real Interest Parity
Evidence on the Fisher effect
Evidence for Real Interest Parity This graph shows the differences between the real interest rate and the U.S. real interest rate using monthly data for 1970 through These are calculated by subtracting average core CPI inflation for the past year from the current 3-month nominal rate.
Real interest rate convergence These are the real interest rates for the U.S., U.K. and Germany used in the previous graph. (The differences between U.S. and U.K. rates reflects differences in inflation rates.)
The Fundamental Equation under the General Model This model differs from the simple model (the quantity theory) only by allowing L to vary as a function of the nominal interest rate i. Only when nominal interest rates change does the general model have different implications than the simple model.
Implications of the general model Reconsider what happens when the U.S. money supply growth increases from μ to a higher rate μ + Δμ. For constant GDP growth rates, money supply growth and inflation are related by The Fisher effect tells us that When the U.S. money growth rises, the U.S. inflation rate rises by Δμ and the U.S. nominal interest rate rises by Δμ.
Real money demand declines when the nominal interest rate rises by Δμ: vs When the money growth rate rises, real money balances must fall even though the money stock changes continuously. The price level must immediately jump up because at the instant this happens, M is given and M/P falls. Implications of the general model
An increase in the money supply growth rate for the general model of money demand Implications of the general model
After the growth rate of money supply rises by Δμ at time T, the inflation rate is higher by Δμ. Relative PPP tells us that the rate of depreciation of the dollar also rises by Δμ. The equation for the exchange rate shows that E $/ depreciates suddenly at T. Implications of the general model
In this example, the growth rate of the U.S. money is raised from μ to μ+Δμ The General Monetary Approach: Example 2 again
Exchange Rates and Monetary Policy Regimes The nominal anchor The central bank needs a long-run monetary policy objective. In the long run, real interest rates, real GDP growth rates and real exchange rates are independent of monetary policy. The long-run relationship between the rate of depreciation of nominal exchange rates, inflation rates and money supply growth rates is given by two equations: The exchange rate target, money supply target, and Inflation target are the three primary choices for a nominal target.
Relative PPP says that home inflation equals the rate of depreciation plus foreign inflation. A simple exchange rate rule is to set the rate of depreciation equal to a constant. Choosing the desired long-run rate of depreciation implies that foreign (US) inflation rate anchors home (Brazilian) monetary policy. Exchange rate target
Money supply target A simple money supply rule is for the central bank to set the growth rate of the money supply equal to a constant, for example, 2% per year. The inflation rate will be given by A drawback of a money growth rate target is that real income growth fluctuates over the adjustment to the long run. With a fixed money supply growth rate, inflation and the rate of nominal exchange rate depreciation fluctuate with real income growth.
Inflation target under interest rate policy Choosing a target rate of inflation sets the desired rate of depreciation given foreign (U.S.) inflation. It allows the money supply growth rate to vary with real income growth. The Fisher effect tells us how inflation depends on the international real rate of interest.
Exchange rate regimes and nominal anchors Countries without a currency of their own Fixed or Crawling Pegs or Bands Managed Floating Freely Floating Freely falling (rapid depreciation) Exchange Rate Target XXX Money Supply Target XX Inflation Target XX No anchor XX
Nominal Anchors from Theory to Policy In the 1970s, inflation rates were high in most countries of the world. Inflations continued in the 1980s, even as the U.S. undertook aggressive disinflationary policies. In the 1990s, central banks paid attention to the need to establish working nominal anchors and designed policies to achieve more stable inflation. Most, but not all, of those policies have turned out to be credible. Some of this success is due to political acceptance of central-bank independence.
Monetary policy reform and outcomes This chart shows the global disinflation