Presentation on theme: "Lean Six Sigma -- A Deeper Dive -- Tom Devane Nexus U 2008."— Presentation transcript:
1Lean Six Sigma-- A Deeper Dive --Tom DevaneNexus U2008
2Session Objectives In this session you will learn How to address organizational performance issues through Lean Six SigmaThe fundamentals of Lean Six Sigma and some key toolsWhat other organizations have learned through compiled lessons learned analysesHow to get started, even if you’re not the CEOSome Lean Six Sigma considerations for your upcoming Sunday Design Experience.
3Agenda Topics Introduction Lean Six Sigma Primer Case Study 1 Pre-thinking for Sunday’s Design ExperienceWrap-up
6Whaddaya Think?At this point it’s not expected that you know anything about disciplines of Lean, Six Sigma, or their combined method. But you must have heard something, so get with a partner and take a shot at the T/F questions below, and then we’ll discuss in a learning environment.T FThe Toyota Production System -- a formidable competitive weapon by Toyota -- consists of both Lean and Six Sigma principles and tools.Six Sigma tends to get faster business results than Lean.General Electric, well-known for its Six Sigma program, does not do any Lean.The “Just-In-Time” process improvement craze of the 1980s was actually a combination of Lean and Six Sigma.Lean and Six Sigma are used best in a manufacturing environment, not in a service environment.Lean and Six Sigma both share the common goal of improved operational performance, they merely go about it in different ways.Jack Welch of General Electric fame first improved processes with Six Sigma, then modified the corporate culture to make Six Sigma results sustainable.The average weight of a Lean practitioner is 22 pounds less then his Six Sigma counterpart.Purist Lean and purist Six Sigma practitioners are often at odds with each other in companies that have been doing serious process improvement for 10 years or so.The learning curve for Lean tends to be greater than the learning curve for Six Sigma.Both go after the same big goal, but in a different way.Great companies doing process improvement don’t distinguish; they do both.
8Advanced tools like FMEA, Discipline OverviewLeanEliminate waste.Simple tools like VSM, 5s.Quick results.Can be dramaticLean Six SigmaBenefits of Leanand Six Sigma.Audience participation: how many people ever been on a great team? What were charactersistics of, what feel like? Ever probls protecting from rest of org to do work? Well HPO is about not needing protectoin because all have team values, practices (not just sense of “teamwork” Dilbert cartoon)So, why fix something that isn’t broken by adding a component (in electrical products this is bad!) Success like GE, AlliedSignal, Honeywell (truth is, they DID) and this is the change management portion-often cited as the most problematic!Most leadership tips over next two days apply to LSS and LSS/HPOSix SigmaReduce variation.Advanced tools like FMEA,DOE, control charts.Dramatic results.
9Which steps are “waste” in a Lean environment? Move required production materials to the work station.Insert lenses into sunglasses frame.Move filled frames to next work station.Check lenses for proper alignment within frame.Paint frames.Scrape excess paint from lenses.Move sunglasses to warehouse staging area.When ready to ship, move sunglasses to packing area.Pack sunglasses in box.Perform final inspection on 1 of every 40 pairs of sunglasses.Ship sunglasses.Notify material planning personnel to order more frames and lenses.
10Value Stream MapsVisualize all actions required (both value added and non-value added) required to produce and distribute a product.Identify sources of “waste”.Entire process defined using a common language.Manage flow through the process.Show linkage between material and information flow.PhilDefine value added and non-value added. Give examples.Decreasing proportion of non-value added activity will improve efficiency.Give examples of waste (i.e. inventory stops, inefficiencies in material and information flow, etc.)Express inventory in common unit throughout. Unit should be meaningful to your customers.Try to maintain “pull” through system.Inefficiencies in information flow can be as critical as material inefficiencies.
15Key Six Sigma Tool Control Chart A Control Chart is a graphic that monitors an important characteristic of a process over time. A Control Chart is useful for:Answering the first of two key questions about your process:Is the process in control? That is, is it predictable and stable over time? (process control)If the process is in control, then, is it capable of meeting your customer’s requirements? (process capability, see Capability Analysis)The ability to distinguish between the two sources of variation as a guide to taking appropriate management actionCommon Cause Variation: the natural, inherent variability of the process due to people, methods, materials, equipment, machines, and environment that are used. Common cause variation is present in the system or process at all times; the people working in the system can do nothing about it. Therefore, it is the responsibility of management to change the system or process to improve it.Special Cause Variation: the variability which results from a unique, or special circumstance, usually attributed to one individual or piece of equipment. It is not a normal part of the process. It is the responsibility of the individual working at the point of the process where the special cause occurred to improve it.Upper and Lower Control Limits on a Control Chart, help in determining the source of variation and who has the responsibility for eliminating it.A Control Chart is also useful for:Documenting a team’s effort to effectively change a process. That is:Sets the baseline or current operating level.Show’s the change to the improved operating level.Helping the process perform consistently and predictably to allow the process to achieve higher quality, lower unit cost, and a higher effective capacity.Anatomy of a Control Chart
16Players Player Roles & Responsibilities Typical Training Six Sigma DedicationBlack BeltWorks with a team – usually of Green Belts and people with no LSS training -- assigned to a specific LSS improvement project. Black Belts help with both the technical aspects (e.g., statistical tools) and people issues (e.g., team dynamics and change management). Typically a Black Belt will deliver about $1 million to the bottom line annually.4 weeks of training spread over 4 monthsFull-time(18 to 24 mo)Master Black BeltActs as instructor, coach and mentor to several Black Belts. Frequently Master Black Belts (MBBs) become involved in large-scale organizational change efforts and promotion of LSS within the organization. In many organizations MBBs organize into a learning group in which they challenge, advise, and support each other and Black Belts. They also often formulate business strategies with top management. In addition they may also lead “super-projects” that are high impact staffed with multiple Black Belts.Usually on the jobGreen BeltParticipates in LSS by collecting data, providing process expertise, completing improvement tasks, and communicating changes to colleagues.3 sessions of 3-4 daysPart-time, as project needs dictateChampion (Executive)Provides business guidance to teams, assists in selecting projects, acts as an organizational “evangelist” for Six Sigma, allocates resources, questions the team, anticipates and prevents problems with the LSS before they occur, removes roadblocks if they do occur.5 daysPart-time,as active executive sponsorship needs dictateExecutiveSponsorActively supports and encourages project teams, participates in LSS meetings, demonstrations, and celebrations.1-2 daysas executive support needs dictateProcess OwnerEnsures high quality design and peak performance of business processes. Helps triage problems as those addressable by simple process improvement methods or problems requiring use of complex, lesser-known statistical tools.1 weekHalf-time to full-time, depending on process size
17Who you gonna call? Black Belt Master Black BeltGreen BeltChampionExecutive SponsorProcess ownerThe Purchasing analyst cannot spend as much time on the cross-departmental New Product Launch process because her functional manager has put her on a “crunch project” in Purchasing. This will likely cause a 4-week slip in the launch of the next product.Data needs to be collected on the number of failures of your company’s new electric razor once it gets into a customer’s hands.The process improvement project will now be delayed 5 months because the engineer on the project has been sent on an overseas assignment.Some heavy statistical analysis and design of experiments need to be done for the new bioreactor in the South building because its yields are erratic, and averaging only 35%.Several Black Belts are working on similar problems in different parts of the company, but they are not benefiting from each others’ experience like they could.Decide that it would be great if the CEO could mention Lean Six Sigma in each of her company-wide addresses over the next two months.Draw a line to connect the issue with the person you would most likely call to address it.
18A peek into the practical world of Black Belts Common BB Challenges by Category Change managementPost-launch discoveriesPoliticsTeam problemsTeam interfaces with othersResourcingissuesEntire targeted population for the improvements not on improvement team, and resistMotivating teamto perform and improveMiddle manager seeks to block project in his/herareaTeam wants to jump ahead to fixes w/o dataTeam won’t assume ownership quickly enough backsliding, etc.Poor team dynamicshinder progressBB stretchedtoo thinlyTeam members stretchedGeneral poor support from ChampionPressure for quickresults from topmanagementBlack Belts in different parts of the organization make the same mistakesPowerful execs in other areas block implementation and Champion wimps outPowerful functional manager attempts to influence solutionMiddle manager wants pet project fundedAssigned project will not support strategy wellAssigned project will have little return
19What’s the “Sigma Thing” anyway? Sigma levelPercentage of time customers’ requirements were metDefects per million opportunities168.27690,000295.45308,537399.7366,80746,210523363.4
20Key terms and concepts The voice of the customer and “CTQ” Operational definitionDMAICDOEFMEAValue Stream Mapping5sTamperingThe “DMAIC”Improvement ProcessDMAIC is the Six Sigma problem-solving process teams use. It stands for Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control. (It is pronounced duh-MAY-ick.) By methodically following this simple, but highly effective five step process, teams can make significant process improvements. DMAIC is useful for:Helping teams design solutions that are sustainable once implementedProviding a framework for when tools should be usedProviding a sequence of optimal tool usage and linkages among tools.Helping practitioners understand how the tools and improvement phases are related, and how the tools support each other to produce an output that can be acted upon.It is essential that leaders understand the high level steps of the DMAIC improvement process. In project status meetings leaders should require that teams state which DMAIC phase they are in to provide a context for productive discussion. This provides a common ground for discussion, a context for applying lessons learned from previous similar steps, and a useful context for applying step-specific questions to the discussion of process improvements.A Control Chart is a graphic that monitors an important characteristic of a process over time. A Control Chart is useful for:Answering the first of two key questions about your process:Is the process in control? That is, is it predictable and stable over time? (process control)If the process is in control, then, is it capable of meeting your customer’s requirements? (process capability, see Capability Analysis)The ability to distinguish between the two sources of variation as a guide to taking appropriate management actionCommon Cause Variation: the natural, inherent variability of the process due to people, methods, materials, equipment, machines, and environment that are used. Common cause variation is present in the system or process at all times; the people working in the system can do nothing about it. Therefore, it is the responsibility of management to change the system or process to improve it.Special Cause Variation: the variability which results from a unique, or special circumstance, usually attributed to one individual or piece of equipment. It is not a normal part of the process. It is the responsibility of the individual working at the point of the process where the special cause occurred to improve it.Upper and Lower Control Limits on a Control Chart, help in determining the source of variation and who has the responsibility for eliminating it.A Control Chart is also useful for:Documenting a team’s effort to effectively change a process. That is:Sets the baseline or current operating level.Show’s the change to the improved operating level.Helping the process perform consistently and predictably to allow the process to achieve higher quality, lower unit cost, and a higher effective capacity.
21What it’s notIn helping to define what Lean Six Sigma is, it is also helpful to consider what it is not:It is not just a collection of tools that people can be trained in and shortly thereafter deliver outstanding results. Successful LSS efforts require strong management support, training, and formal ties to the organization’s management system.It is not just a statistics program. It is a results program.It is not a recycled Total Quality Management program from the 1970s. While many tools and some methods from the quality movement are present in LSS, it distinguishes itself by having formal links to the compensation system, financial screening of potential projects, and a fanatical emphasis on the needs of the external customer.It is not a training program, as many Total Quality Management programs became. It is a system of tools, principles, and management practices that are applied to a improve processes.
22Case Study 1 Biopharmaceutical division of a global pharma company
24Hit performance issues on multiple fronts Lean training for all managers and supervisorsBasic Six Sigma training for all managers and supervisorsCenter of Excellence leaders – located in all departments -- trained in advanced Six Sigma methods and philosophyLeadership development occurred simultaneously to address critical change management issues within, and among departments
25Operating Results Representative issues addressed Batch review cycle time reduced by 60%Operational metrics track 12 parameters, improvements in 9 so farYields improved by 20% in one production area by using statistical toolsApproach to addressing the issues and resultsAll work was done via chartered, cross-functional teamsDMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control)Trina.Dashboard – 12 chartsSPC many moreCell culture --
26The 10 Big “pay attention to” elements for LSS leaders The use of data and facts – not just opinions -- to make decisions.Managing variation in processes, instead of just managing reject levels for a product.An awareness of, and management of business processes and value streams that cut across functional department boundaries.Opportunities to pull work through operations rather than push them.An emphasis on prevention, not reaction.Processes and culture that foster the continual search for ways to streamline and eliminate waste.Impacts of activities and solutions on customer requirements.Checks and balances to ensure that LSS experts do not become overloaded and leave.Workplace orderliness and cleanliness.Links between LSS improvement efforts and the organization’s reward and recognition system.
28Background Key challenges High rate of field failures needed to be addressed in order to compete and be profitableLack of consistency within our products as a whole based on different servicesDifferent processes created unnecessary confusion and significant difficulties when it was time to transfer products into large volume productionAbsence of motivation for continuous improvement outside the internal total quality groupGoals among different departments were not aligned and people were working on redundant, and in some cases counter-productive projectsMany of the employees had come up through the scientific ranks and were accustomed to working alone, not on teams.ResultsSuccessfully integrated Lean, Six Sigma, and High Performance Organization disciplinesOperating results:$400,000 repeating annual savings within 2 monthsProductivity increase of 2x within 7 monthsEstablished a culture that drove for execution and continual improvementIdentified key areas for upstream new product development that later saved the company over $1 million annuallyValue-Added Process Time/Total Process Time went from 8% to 60% for two key processes within the first 2 monthsExecutives played a key role in the initial successHard/soft integration principles deployed.Multi-billion dollar manufacturer of data storage equipmentDepartments involved: four knowledge work groupsManufacturing engineeringInformation systemsTest engineeringTotal quality groupTotal quality group had matured from old TQM days – ready to move from a central department to a situation in which quality professionals were members of operating departments
29Discipline Overview Lean Lean Six Sigma Six Sigma LSS/HPO Eliminate waste.Simple tools like VSM, 5s.Quick results.Reduce variation.Advanced tools like FMEA,DOE, control charts.Dramatic results.Benefits of Leanand Six Sigma.High-PerformanceOrganizationsLSS/HPOCulture of execution & improvement.Restructure into HPTs.Intrinsic motivation for short- and long-term sustainable gains.Benefits of Lean,Six Sigma, and High-Performance Organizations.Audience participation: how many people ever been on a great team? What were charactersistics of, what feel like? Ever probls protecting from rest of org to do work? Well HPO is about not needing protectoin because all have team values, practices (not just sense of “teamwork” Dilbert cartoon)So, why fix something that isn’t broken by adding a component (in electrical products this is bad!) Success like GE, AlliedSignal, Honeywell (truth is, they DID) and this is the change management portion-often cited as the most problematic!Most leadership tips over next two days apply to LSS and LSS/HPO
30Journey Challenges articulated Study group convenes Announcements Research resultsCustomer requirementsDevelop directionProcess mappingTeamstructuringworkshopNew leadershiptrainingProjectsRemedialcoachingContinuousimprovement
31Hallmarks of the discipline Statistical methodsAttention to workplace and tool organizationFanatical focus on the external customerAttention to processPre-screening, and ongoing screening of improvement projects to ensure fit with strategy and financial returnPeople strive for perfection, but noble mistakes are toleratedAn analysis-rich and measurement-rich environmentA classification and sorting process to determine the type of tools to applyCoordination and control of the work occurs at the lowest level possibleCollective accountabilityThere are seven hallmarks of the discipline of LSS:Statistical methods. Methods that collect and analyze data are an important part of reducing variation in processes.Attention to workplace and tool organization. A set of mindsets, practices, and discipline that keeps work areas clean and uncluttered with tools and materials, and instead sorts and neatly arranges these items for easy retrieval and use.Fanatical focus on the external customer. One key element that distinguishes LSS from earlier Total Quality efforts is the high amount of attention paid to meeting external customer requirements and expectations. Senior managers as well as team members alike constantly ask, “How will what we’re doing here affect the external customer?”Attention to process. A process is a set of activities and decisions that collectively produce an output for an internal or an external customer. Often these processes span departmental boundaries, and improving these tend to have the highest likelihood of producing significant financial gain. Processes are the heart of “where the action is” with LSS.Pre-screening, and ongoing screening of improvement projects to ensure fit with strategy and financial return. Another important departure from traditional quality efforts is LSS’s initial, and ongoing requirement that projects must support strategy and yield a targeted financial return. This hallmark is true at the start of, and throughout the project.People strive for perfection, but noble mistakes are tolerated. While 3.4 parts per million is near perfection, along the way people must feel safe to make a mistake. If they don’t, then it is unlikely they will try anything really different that could yield significant gains. Obviously, certain types of mistakes – e.g., repeated mistakes and lack of follow-through -- can not be tolerated, but other types of mistakes should be considered potential learning opportunities.An analysis-rich and measurement-rich environment. LSS environments collect lots of data and project participants perform numerous data analyses – far more than typical organizations without LSS. In addition, in LSS companies, measurement is something that happens everywhere.A classification and sorting process to determine the type of tools to apply. Some problems are simple, while others are complex. Organizations need to develop internal rules that specify when a problem would benefit from simple tools like process maps and the application of streamlining principles, and when a problem would require more extensive data collection and statistical analyses.
325. Pre-Thinking for your Sunday Design Experience
33Sunday pre-thoughtWhat would a Lean Six Sigma “foundation building block” look like? How would it be described?What other methods might enhance Lean Six Sigma?What other methods might Lean Six Sigma enhance?
35Lessons Learned Planning Being realistic is quite helpful Ensuring wide participation in the planning processesMissing the customer perspective early on will kill youNeed to document planning phase wellAssign responsibilities clearlyIntegration of hard and soft aspects is key – each covers inherent weaknesses of the otherNo organization-wide roll-outs of Six Sigma without training senior managers how to support it – top management dialogue can’t stop after the approval and initial re-organization into teams.Resist the temptation to use good -- not great -- performers as driving change agents, such as Black Belts.Go for lean manufacturing techniques before Six Sigma to demonstrate quick wins unless data for analysis already exists (as it did for a field service warranty process)Strive to “over-communicate” and request feedback on the content and quality of communication.Phil
36Lessons Learned Implementation Maintain flexibility in the planning that other options can be considered as you move forward.You can generally do more than most people think.Ensure responsibilities are clearly assigned.Ensure leaders of change are optimistic and will push project through to completion.Groom the subsequent leadersThe restructuring into teams -- this can not be a pilot.Executives need to agree on their individual and collective areas of responsibility for business processes.Design structures and processes that ensure control.Training for new leaders needs to mandatory, not optionalBring Finance and HR into the process soon.Executive efforts can decrease as the transformation progresses if the soft elements of HPO are successfully anchored.It is extremely important to provide frequent status reports for the improvement projects.Trina.
37Sounds great. But how do I get something going with Lean Six Sigma if I’m not the CEO?
38For Future ReferenceBreyfogle, Forrest. Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions Using Statistical Methods. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1999.Devane, T. Integrating Lean Six Sigma and High Performance Organizations: Leading the Charge Toward Rapid, Radical, Sustainable Improvement.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, (current working title, forthcoming in November, 2003).Holman, P., Devane, T., & Cady, S., The Change Handbook. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler,Macy, B.A., and Izumi, H.A. “Organizational Change, Design and Work Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of 131 North American Field Studies – ,” in Research in Organizational Change and Development. R. Woodman and W. Pasmore (eds). New York: JAI Press Inc, Vol 7.Nauman, E. & Hoisington S. Customer Centered Six Sigma: Linking Customers, Process Improvement, and Financial Results. Houston: American Society for Quality, 2001.Pande, Peter, et al. The Six Sigma Way. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000.Rother, M., and Shook, J. Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Create Value and Eliminate Muda. Brookline, MA: Lean Enterprise Institute, 1989.Womack, J. and Jones, T. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York: Simon & Schuster.-----Web resource: