Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Federal Aviation Administration Visual Guidance Research and Development Presented to: 33rd Annual Eastern Region Airport Conference By: Donald Gallagher,

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Federal Aviation Administration Visual Guidance Research and Development Presented to: 33rd Annual Eastern Region Airport Conference By: Donald Gallagher,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Federal Aviation Administration Visual Guidance Research and Development Presented to: 33rd Annual Eastern Region Airport Conference By: Donald Gallagher, Program Manager Date: March 2010

2 Federal Aviation Administration 2 Airport Safety Technology R&D Wildlife Hazard Mitigation Program Hazards Management, Bird Detection Radar Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Program (ARFF) Agents, Vehicles New Large Aircraft Program (NLA) Airport Issues Concerning NLA Airport Design Program Airport Design Airport Planning Program Terminal Design Guidelines, Multimodal Access Airport Surface Operations Program Runway Friction, Soft Ground Arrestor System, Runway Deicing Visual Guidance Program Lighting, Marking, Signing

3 Federal Aviation Administration 3 Phasing out Incandescent Lamps The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 –Begins to phases out incandescent and halogen incandescent lamps in 2012 –Department of Energy (DOE) within five years is mandated to create an LED replacement for the PAR Type 38 halogen light –Probably will not be compatible with MALSR voltage levels The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 is available at:

4 Federal Aviation Administration 4 FAA LED Working Group Lighting Systems Group, AJW-46 Approach Lighting Systems Airport Engineering Division, AAS-100 Airport Lighting Airport Safety Technology, AJP-6311 Visual Guidance, R&D

5 Federal Aviation Administration 5 Issues with Implementing LED Technology Claim: LEDs can not be seen as well as Incandescent lights in low visibility? True or False? FALSE! Any source with the same Candela value can be seen the same in a given visibility. Except…

6 Federal Aviation Administration 6 Perceived Brightness There is a quantifiable Brightness/Luminance (B/L) conversion factor with LEDs. Conversion to Incandescent: –Blue B/L = 1.4 –White B/L = 1.6 –Green B/L = 1.4 However, light scattered by Fog can desaturate LED signal colors reducing or eliminating the brightness advantage.

7 Federal Aviation Administration 7 Issues with Implementing LED Technology Incandescent & LED Lights at same intensity observed from 100 feet. Observers noted that the Incandescent lost the GREEN appearance early.

8 Federal Aviation Administration 8 Issues with Implementing LED Technology Incandescent & LED Lights at same intensity observed from 100 feet. LED light still has GREEN appearance.

9 Federal Aviation Administration 9 LED Applications Issues Chromaticity Boundary for Aviation White –Preliminary results for Aviation White Chromaticity Boundary Changes: Yellow boundary could be moved from x=.540 to.440 which will help limit confusion between white and yellow signal colors. Blue boundary could be moved from x=.350 to.320 which will allow a more bluish white (CCT up to 6000 Kelvin) while not contributing to confusion between white and blue signal colors. To match CIE S004 for LED binning: Green boundary y=0.150 +.640x to 0.150 +.643x. Purple boundary y=0.150 +.750x to 0.150 +.757x..

10 Federal Aviation Administration 10 Shift

11 Federal Aviation Administration 11 LED Applications Issues Does the narrow spectral band of LED impact pilots with certain types of color deficient vision? CIVIL AEROSPACE MEDICAL INSTITUTE (CAMI) and Airport Safety Technology R&D (AJP-6311) are currently conducting an evaluation on this issue sponsored by the Lighting Systems Office, AJW-46 and Office of Airport Safety and Standards, AAS-1

12 Federal Aviation Administration 12 Electrical Infrastructure Research Team (EIRT) A team of FAA and Industry experts formed to design an Airport Lighting Infrastructure to take full advantage of new lighting technologies.

13 Federal Aviation Administration 13 Electrical Infrastructure Research Team (EIRT) Goals A system that promotes interoperability. Reduced life cycle cost without dependence upon a single source. A standards-based, robust architecture airfield lighting system.

14 Federal Aviation Administration 14 Electrical Infrastructure Research Team (EIRT) Held 4TH meeting in Atlantic City Nov. 2008. Circuits considered so far: –450 V, AC Parallel Circuit –1.4 Amp, DC Series Circuit –2.8 Amp, AC Series Circuit –PWM, DC Series Circuit

15 Federal Aviation Administration Elevated Runway Guard Lights

16 Federal Aviation Administration 16 Minimum intensity for Incandescent Runway Guard Lights (RGL) Prior to 1996, the minimum luminous intensity requirement was 600 cd –Increased to 3000 cd based on results from 1996 study Flash rate was also increased from 30 cycles per minute to 45-50 cycles per minute –Study looked at 30, 48 & 60 flashes per minute

17 Federal Aviation Administration 17 Elevated Runway Guard Light Evaluation (ERGL) Laboratory study completed 6/08. –Scope: Min. intensity for Incandescent Lamps and LEDs Recommendations for flash frequency for LED system Recommendations for duty cycle for LED system Impact of waveform profile shape for LED system

18 Federal Aviation Administration 18 Findings It is not recommended that the current incandescent- based ERGL specification be changed. LED ERGL intensities could be reduced.

19 Federal Aviation Administration 19 Recommendations These values can be obtained by a combination of a selecting a square wave signal, flash rate, and on-time percentage. The best flash rates & on-time percentages were: 1.25 Hz @ 70% or 2.50 Hz @ 30% LED ERGL Step Current Standard Recommended Value Step 3 (100%)3000 cd451-1128 cd Step 1 (10%)300 cd68-113 cd

20 Federal Aviation Administration 20 Moving Forward Prototype units are be built for field testing with the following features: 1.A square wave signal. 2.Selectable flash rates & on-time percentages of 1.25 Hz @ 70% and 2.50 Hz @ 30%. 3.1,000 candela. Field testing to begin Spring 2010.

21 Federal Aviation Administration Markings

22 Federal Aviation Administration 22 Retro-reflective Media for Marking Materials 3 Tasks 1.Ground based testing of Type I, III, IV approved beads and 2 new beads: A.Bead with dry-performing (1.7 IOR) and wet performing (2.3 IOR) microcrystalline ceramic beads embedded on a center core. B.Bead with Premium (1.9 IOR) glass beads and a solid glass bead core. 2.Completed 12/09.

23 Federal Aviation Administration 23 Retro-reflective Media for Marking Materials 3 Tasks (cont) 2.Airborne test to determine the relative conspicuity of Type I and Type III retro- reflective beads. - Completed 12/09. 3.Airborne test of Type I and Type III beads installed side by side for direct comparison of conspicuity. Completed 12/09.

24 Federal Aviation Administration 24 Retro-reflective Media for Marking Materials Findings – Ground Based 1.All retro reflective beads tested proved suitable for use on aged Hot Mix Asphalt and aged Portland Cement Concrete. 2.Proposed new beads A and B proved suitable on aged Hot Mix Asphalt and aged Portland Cement Concrete. 3.Paint marking materials and included beads do not perform well on new Hot Mix Asphalt as airports typically can not afford to wait the appropriate curing time.

25 Federal Aviation Administration 25 Retro-reflective Media for Marking Materials Findings – Airborne 1.The majority of subjects involved in the tests at both ACY and SAV stated they do not use runway markings as a visual cue on approach to the runway at night. 2.The predominate visual cues they focus on during the approach to a runway are the runway lights. 3.All but one of the subjects reported no difference in ease of detection between Type I and Type III beaded markings.

26 Federal Aviation Administration 26 Automatic Switching technologies for Rwy Centerline Lights in a Displaced Threshold The FAA Advisory Circular AC 150/5340-30D Design and Installation details for Airport Visual Aids states: –For displaced threshold areas over 700 feet (100m) in length and used for takeoffs, the centerline lights in the displaced area are circuited separately from the centerline lights in the non-displaced runway area to permit turning off the centerline lights in the displaced area during landing operations. Teterboro Airport has this issue on both ends of runway 1/19. Air Traffic Control are indisposed to operating the interlock switch that manually controls the centerline lights.

27 Federal Aviation Administration 27 Project Objectives Evaluate and determine the feasibility of using varied surveillance technologies and safety logic to automate the activation/deactivation of Runway Centerline Lighting in a displaced threshold to support takeoff/landing operations. Install and optimize the preferred technology at Teterboro Airport (TEB)

28 Federal Aviation Administration 28 Proposed Solution Architecture State Machine Light Activation Logic Surveillance Device Evaluatio n Display Field Lighting System Surveillance of the area of interest is derived from a surveillance device. Operational state of the traffic is estimated by the state machine. Light activation logic determines if centerline lights should be activated. Traffic and light states are shown on evaluation display. Light commands are sent to field lighting system.

29 Federal Aviation Administration 29 General Aviation For non-part 139 airports Lighting small airports that do not qualify for AIP funds. –COMMUNITY SERVICE AIRPORT LIGHTING HANDBOOK posted on Illuminating Engineering Societies Aviation Lighting Committee's (IESALC) web site.

30 Federal Aviation Administration Signs

31 Federal Aviation Administration 31 Holding Position Signs for Runway Approach Areas ATO is in the process of revising their current procedure, which does not require pilots to obtain a specific clearance to cross these holding positions. In the revised procedures Pilots will now be required to obtain specific clearance to pass any holding position.

32 Federal Aviation Administration 32 Holding Position Signs for Runway Approach Areas The RSO has identified a potential risk of runway incursions due to pilot confusion at the holding position marking and signs for a runway approach. ATO would like to retain their current practice - therefore a different signage and/or marking may be required.

33 Federal Aviation Administration 33 Holding Position Signs for Runway Approach Areas

34 Federal Aviation Administration 34 15 - APCH Standard Mandatory Sign When Hold is Required

35 Federal Aviation Administration 35 15 - APCH Sign changes Color When Hold is Not Required

36 Federal Aviation Administration 36 Non-Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) Components on Performance of Certified OEM Lighting Systems Scope of Work: Purchase certified OEM lighting devices and non- OEM replacement components and subject the devices to certification tests. Phase I: Individual components replaced. – Completion 3/10. Phase II: Components replaced in combination. – Completion 7/10.

37 Federal Aviation Administration 37 Low-Cost Ground Surveillance Specification Development

38 Federal Aviation Administration 38 The LCGS Project Scope Develop FAA functional and operational standards for LCGS implementation that would support AIP eligibility for this system. Provide the foundational capability to support other runway safety improvements (e.g. RWSL, dynamic stop bar automation, …). Develop a cost-benefits case for the use of Low Cost Ground Surveillance Systems for airport operations. Mission To enhance airport operations by improving safety, shared situational awareness & environmental impact, reducing airport operating costs and improving capacity and resource utilization

39 Federal Aviation Administration 39 LCGS Challenge Of over 460 towered airports in the NAS only 35 of the larger airports have or are slated to receive comprehensive surface surveillance systems (i.e. ASDE-X). Many of the excluded small to mid-sized airports have considerable surveillance needs that are not being met. –Surveillance capacity is limited to voice reporting and field of view Many of todays airports struggle with the challenge of improving operational efficiency and maximizing revenue growth opportunities.

40 Federal Aviation Administration 40 LCGS High Level Concept The currently developed LCGS solution is centered on the use of a Surface Movement Radar (SMR) to monitor ground traffic movements. SMR inherently presents some deficiencies (loss of target due to masking, plot clutter due to rain or grass reflection, flight label overlap, etc.) which renders the surveillance function less effective and could result in a lack of confidence in the system. SMR technology is characterized by high maintenance and lifecycle costs.

41 Federal Aviation Administration 41 LCGS High Level Concept Researching existing technology the framework recommended for an LCGS system is the coupling of a network of non-cooperative (i.e. optical and thermal devices) sensors and a Mode S multilateration system. This will provide the most flexible and modular framework for the smaller airports as multilateration systems can be easily adapted to smaller coverage areas with complex layouts and no vertical extension. This network design would provide several levels of redundancy which would translate into continuous operational availability and coverage.

42 Federal Aviation Administration 42 Status Concluded final preliminary study on strengths, limitations and cost effectiveness of prospective systems. Conducting site visits to deployment locations of prospective systems. Work in concert with the Advanced Technologies Development & Prototyping Group (AJP-67) at the three approved test sites of San Jose Airport (SJC), Long Beach Airport (LGB) and Manchester-Boston Regional Airport (MHT). - Test candidate systems against predefined functional requirements. - Evaluate operational feasibility of candidate systems.

43 Federal Aviation Administration 43 Ground Vehicle Navigation System Specification Development

44 Federal Aviation Administration 44 Background Scope –Evaluate current technology, including by not necessarily limited to, GPS navigation devices for use in preventing runway incursions.

45 Federal Aviation Administration 45 Objectives Provide recommendations for criteria for the design and operation of airport vehicle navigation systems defining both mandatory and optional features. Provide cost estimates for the procurement of equipment.

46 Federal Aviation Administration 46

47 Federal Aviation Administration 47 Visual Display – Brick

48 Federal Aviation Administration 48 Visual Display - Laptop

49 Federal Aviation Administration 49 Group Brainstorm Session System CAN NOT… Give directions ATC Personal Airport Familiarization Situational Awareness Tool

50 Federal Aviation Administration 50 Vertical Flight Touchdown & Lift Off (TLOF) area Final Approach & TakeOff (FATO) area Heliport Approach Lighting System (HALS) for IMC Heliport Instrument Landing System (HILS) for IMC Heliport Approach Path Indicator (CHAPI) Current Facility

51 Federal Aviation Administration 51 Vertical Flight Conducting photometric tests on products being sold as heliport perimeter lights. –Intensity –Beam spread –Chromaticity Currently conducting flight test To determine if a suitable candidate exists.

52 Federal Aviation Administration 52 Site Selected Cape May County Airport( KWWD) Cape May County Airport Delaware River Bay Authority

53 Federal Aviation Administration 53 Site Selected Cape May County Airport( KWWD) Runway 10/28 - 4,998 x 150 ft. Runway 1/19 - 4,998 x 150 ft.

54 Federal Aviation Administration 54 New Visual Guidance Technology Test Bed Will be conducted in three phases funded over a three year period. Phase 1: –To be Completed: Layout plan. Schedule of installation. Begin refurbishment of unused runway pavement. Begin electrical infrastructure installation. – Currently developing an MOA with the Delaware River and Bay Authority (DRBA) for the use of Cape May Airport.

55 Federal Aviation Administration 55 Questions or Comments? - Program Manager - Project Manager - Project Manager - Project Manager FAA Technical Center Airport Safety Technology R&D Section AJP-6311, AAR-411, Building 296 Atlantic City International Airport, NJ 08405

Download ppt "Federal Aviation Administration Visual Guidance Research and Development Presented to: 33rd Annual Eastern Region Airport Conference By: Donald Gallagher,"

Similar presentations

Ads by Google