Presentation on theme: "Transportation Past, Present and Future Public Transportation Symposium August 27, 2013."— Presentation transcript:
Transportation Past, Present and Future Public Transportation Symposium August 27, 2013
18,046 miles of city streets 39,748 miles of county roads and four county ferries Over 7,000 miles of state highways and 22 ferries 465 miles of Columbia-Snake river barge transport Reservation roads and Forest Service roads 39 transit agencies 75 port districts in 33 of 39 counties Sidewalks and bike paths Over 5.5 million licensed passenger vehicles, trucks and motorcycles Amtrak, Sounder, Link light rail, streetcars Freight trains and trucking companies Airlines and maritime shipping lines Bicycles 2 What is the statewide transportation system?
Federal 90% of the Interstate System was built with federal gas tax money. Congress increased the federal gas tax to 18.4 cents per gallon in Washington State Tacoma Narrows Bridge, the two Lake Washington floating bridges, the I-5 bridge between Vancouver and Portland, all were toll bridges. State gas tax increases in 2003 and 2005 were bonded to build capital projects. State gas tax as a percent of retail price of gas has steadily declined from about 25% in the 40s, 50s and 60s to 10% today Local Sales tax revenue is the primary fund source for city streets and transit systems. Property tax revenue is the primary fund source for county roads. 3 The Past
WA State Gas Tax Rate Adjusted for Inflation Since the 1930s, the real gas tax rate has declined steeply from its high point of nearly $.90 cents per gallon. The largest real value contribution from tax payers was during the 1930s. 4
The Present: Federal Transportation Funding 5 No federal gas tax increase since Since 2008, over $53 billion transferred from General Fund to Highway Trust Fund and Mass Transit Fund. Highway Trust Fund projected to be in deficit by 2015.
How much is invested in transportation today? Washington State Transportation Budget: $8.956 billion for the biennium Annual county, city and transit investment statewide from local sources: over $3 billion 6 The Present: State and Local Transportation Funding
Transportation Infrastructure is Less Than 11% of the State Budget* State Budget -- $81.9 Billion *Not all of the Transportation Budget builds infrastructure or moves people and goods. It also includes funding for the Washington State Patrol, the Department of Licensing and other transportation agencies. 7
Where Does State Transportation Revenue Come From? 8 Federal gas tax =18.4¢ per gallon State gas tax = 37.5¢/gallon State car and truck weight fees Ferry fares generate $328 million and pay for 65% to 70% of operating costs Enacted Transportation Budget = $8.956 billion
9 Debt Service is Growing Debt service is a large and growing share of the transportation budget.
Population, Vehicle Miles, and Motor Fuel Consumption Trends and Forecast (1990 – 2027) Miles, and Motor Fuel Consumption Trends and Forecast ( ) 10 The Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax is Not Sustainable The gas tax is levied as a fixed amount per gallon, so it: Does not rise and fall with the price of fuel; Does not keep pace with inflation; and Declines on a per-mile basis as vehicles become more fuel-efficient. Better fuel economy in light-duty vehicles will be the primary cause of lower fuel consumption over the next 15 years. Population and vehicle miles will continue to increase but will consume less fuel – this translates into less revenue to fund transportation.
Challenges of preserving and maintaining the system: Transportation infrastructure is aging and $175 - $200 billion in transportation system investments are needed statewide in the next 20 years. Long-term needs vs. short-term revenue solutions. Population to grow by 28% in the next decade. Elimination of MVET in 2000 cut transportation revenue by $750M annually. Fuel tax, primary source of transportation revenue, is not sustainable long-term. Revenue sources dont keep pace with needs. The motor fuel tax represents the largest share of state transportation funding, supporting 76 percent of all state transportation investments. What does the Future Bring? Washington State is at a transportation funding crossroads 11
Six transportation policy goals: ECONOMIC VITALITY PRESERVATION SAFETY MOBILITY ENVIRONMENT STEWARDSHIP RCW Blueprint for the Future: the Washington Transportation Plan
The Future: More Tolling Likely Tolling can be used to : Build a project Manage traffic Build a project and manage traffic Manage a transportation corridor 13
Tolling in the Future 14 Two additional toll facilities authorized SR 99 AWV Replacement Tunnel I-5 Columbia River Crossing (not funded) Four other toll projects under consideration & review: I-405/SR 167 Express Toll Lanes SR 509 Extension to I-5 SR 167 Extension to Port of Tacoma I-90 from I-5 to I-405
Tolling and congestion pricing in use: o Tacoma Narrows Bridge Tolls increased by $0.25 to keep pace with growing debt payments. o SR 520 Bridge Tolls increased by 2.5% as planned to generate required revenue and effectively manage demand. Ferry Fares adjusted to meet required revenue target of $328 million for the 13/15 biennium o About a 4% increase for passengers and about 5.5% for vehicles. o Reduced youth fares to 50% of full fare. The update of the Washington Transportation Plan (WTP) and federally compliant plan underway. Evaluation of the business case for a future Road Usage Charge system underway. The Future Meets the Present: Commission Work in
2013 Toll Rate Setting 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge Toll Setting Examined traffic and revenue data. Received toll rate recommendation from Citizen Advisory Committee in February. Formally proposed new tolls in March. Held public input meeting in April. Held public hearing and adopted $0.25 toll rate increase effective July 1, 2013 and July 1, SR 520 Toll Setting Examined traffic and revenue data. Formally proposed FY 2014 tolls in March. Held public hearing and adopted 2.5% toll rate increase in May, effective July 1, 2013.
2013 Ferry Fare Setting 17 Ferry Fare Setting Worked with Washington State Ferries and the Ferry Advisory Committees to identify needed fare policy and rare adjustments to meet the required revenue target. Commission accepted WSF/ FAC recommendations and issued fare change proposal for public review. Held meetings in ferry-served communities in July. Held final hearing in Seattle and adopted changes, including across the board fare increases of about 4% for passengers and about 5.5% for vehicles. Changes take effect on October 1, 2013 and May 1, 2014.
The Next WTP 18 A comprehensive and balanced statewide transportation plan. Build on WTP 2030 and the current federally compliant state transportation plan. Build the Next WTP in two phases: Phase I – Update Statewide Policy Plan and deliver to Governor and Legislature by December 2014 Phase 2 – Adopt new federally compliant state plan that meets MAP-21 requirements and includes performance targets.
WTP Organization 19
Road Usage Charge Assessment 20 The Legislature directed and the Commission established a 20 member Road Usage Charge (RUC) Steering Committee, including eight legislators. The Steering Committee met four times in 2012 and determined, among other things, that a Road Usage Charge is feasible in Washington. Recommended Goal: Identify and develop a sustainable, long-term revenue source for Washington States transportation system to transition from the current motor fuel tax system.
What is a Road Usage Charge? With road usage charging, drivers would pay for roads as they do for other utilitiesbased on how much they use. This study is focused on general road usage charging, NOT: »Tolls »HOT or Express Toll Lanes »Cordon or area charges Two basic forms of road usage charging: Time Vignettes – Prepaid stickers & electronic Distance Prepaid stickers Odometer reading GPS / e-hubodometer 21
Steering Committee Findings & Feasibility Recommendations 22 Successful international examples show that there are numerous viable operational concepts and technologies. There are many ways road usage charging could work. Some as simple as buying one-year permit or annual odometer readings. Others more technologically involved. However implemented, road usage charging will not be perfect. All taxing polices involve tradeoffs between ideal policy objectives and how these objectives can be implemented in the real world. Offering choices to users may solve many of the issues such as privacy and acceptance. Steering Committee members unanimously agreed that road usage charging is feasible in Washington and recommended to the 2013 Legislature further assessment and advancement is needed. The work continues.
Develop preliminary road usage charge policies that are necessary to develop the business case, as well as supporting research…. Develop the preferred operational concept(s) that reflect the preliminary policies Evaluate the business case….must assess likely financial outcomes Identify and document policy and other issues that are deemed important to further refine….to gain public acceptance. Should form the basis for continued work… 23 Road Usage Charge Assessment: 2013 Legislative Directives
The Road Usage Charge Steering Committee developed these guiding principles: Transparency. A road usage charge system should provide transparency in how the transportation system is paid for. Complementary policy objectives. A road usage charge system should, to the extent possible, be aligned with Washingtons energy, environmental, and congestion management goals. Cost-effectiveness. The administration of a road usage charge system should be cost effective and cost efficient. Equity. All road users should pay a fair share with a road usage charge. Privacy. A road usage charge system should respect an individuals right to privacy. Recommended Guiding Principles to Develop and Evaluate Options 24
Data Security. A road usage charge system should meet applicable standards for data security and access to data should be restricted to authorized people. Simplicity. A road usage charge system should be simple, convenient, transparent to the user, and compliance should not create an undue burden. Accountability. A system should have clear assignment of responsibility and oversight, and provide accurate reporting of usage and distribution of revenue collected. Enforcement. A road usage charge system should be costly to evade and easy to enforce. System Flexibility. A road usage charge system should be adaptive, open to competing vendors, and able to evolve over time. Recommended Guiding Principles (continued) 25
User Options. Consumer choice should be considered wherever possible. Interoperability and Cooperation. A Washington road usage charge system should strive for interoperability with systems in other states, nationally, and internationally, as well as with other systems in Washington. Washington should proactively cooperate and collaborate with other entities that are also investigating road usage charges. Phasing. Phasing should be considered in the deployment of a road usage charge system. Recommended Guiding Principles (continued) 26
Difficult Policy Issues and Tradeoffs Remain Relationship to the gas tax Social objectives Reduce energy use, greenhouse gas emissions and congestion; encourage transit use? Use of revenues Just roads, or broader? Interpretation of Washingtons 18 th Amendment Equity among user groups Urban/rural; income. Privacy Rate-setting How important is it for a road usage charge to reflect actual miles traveled? Tradeoffs? Out-of-state issues Capture revenue from all out- of-state motorists? Exclude out-of-state travel? 27
Five Meetings in Washington Communities: May 22Port Townsend June 19Walla Walla July 30-31Seattle September 16-17Spokane and Colville November 19Bothell New Ferry Riders Opinion Group surveys coming New statewide Voice of Washington State surveys coming this fall and into 2014 – join now! 2013 Commission Outreach 28
Tell Us What You Think: 29
Thank you! Commissioner Joe Tortorelli -- Paul Parker -- 30