Presentation on theme: "Daniel L. Schacter Harvard University Episodic Simulation of Future Events and the Medial Temporal Lobe Banbury Center, April 13, 2009."— Presentation transcript:
Daniel L. Schacter Harvard University Episodic Simulation of Future Events and the Medial Temporal Lobe Banbury Center, April 13, 2009
Amnesic Patient KC: No Past, No Future Tulving, Canadian Psychology (1985)
* Amnesic patients: Difficulties imagining personal futures/novel scenes (Tulving, 1985; Klein, Loftus, & Kihlstrom, 2002; Hassabis et al., 2007) * Depressed patients/older adlts: Reduction in episodic specificity of past events and future events significantly correlated (Williams et al., 1996; Addis, Wong, & Schacter, 2008) * Cognitive studies: Manipulations/individual differences similarly influence past and future events (DArgembeau & van der Linden, 2004; 2006; Spreng & Levine, 2006) Neuroimaging: Similar areas active when remembering past and imagining future (Addis, Wong, & Schacter, 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007; Okuda et al., 2003; Szpunar, Watson, & McDermott, 2007) Commonalities between Past and Future Events Reviewed by Schacter, Addis, & Buckner, Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2007); Year in Cognitive Neuroscience, Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences (2008)
Core Network of Regions Involved in Remembering the Past, Imagining the Future, & Related Forms of Mental Simulation Schacter, Addis, & Buckner, Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2007)
–Episodic memory involves constructive processes: *Details are stored as fragments in cortical regions; during retrieval they are reactivated by these cortices and reintegrated by hippocampus into a coherent event. –The constructive nature of episodic memory makes it well-suited to building simulations of possible future events: *Enables one to extract details from past events *Enables the flexible recombination of details from past events into coherent future scenarios – which likely relies heavily on relational processing capacities supported by the hippocampal region. –Though well-suited to simulating future events, constructive nature of episodic memory has a cost: *Miscombination of details can result in memory errors such as false recognition. Constructive Episodic Simulation Hypothesis (Schacter & Addis, 2007, Nature; Phil.Trans. Royal Society B)
We used event-related fMRI to examine the neural substrates of past and future event construction and elaboration; focus on everyday autobiographical events Instructions (14 young adult participants): –Cued to recall past event or imagine future event –Future events should be novel and plausible –Three time periods for both past and future: last/next week, last/next year, last/next 5-20 yrs. Subjects describe events in post-scan interview Addis, Wong, & Schacter (Neuropsychologia, 2007) Past & Future: A Neuroimaging Approach
Past and Future: Common Neural Substrates? CUE CONSTRUCTIONELABORATION PAST event Last 5-20 yrs CAR FUTURE event Next year DRESS time-period task cue 0 Event cue screen presented for 20 s Button press made when event in mind – signifies end of construction & beginning of elaboration 24 past and 24 future event task trials 20 time OR 2RT RATINGS 3 scales, shown consecutively each for 5 s 35 Detail 1 2 3 4 5 Emotion 1 2 3 4 5 Perspective field/observer
CUE CONSTRUCTIONELABORATION items to generate task cue 0 Event cue screen presented for 20 s Button press made when event in mind – signifies end of construction & beginning of elaboration 24 semantic and 24 visuospatial task trials 20 time OR 2RT RATINGS 3 scales, shown consecutively each for 5 s 35 Detail 1 2 3 4 5 Relatedness 1 2 3 4 5 Difficulty easy / difficult WORDS-sentence 2 related words CABLE OBJECTS- triangle bigger / smaller LEAF Past and Future: Control Tasks
CUE CONSTRUCTIONELABORATION FUSIFORM & R. MIDDLE OCCIPITALL. HIPPOCAMPUS Cue processing / object recognitionInitial retrieval past eventsfuture eventscontrol tasks OVERLAP: Past and Future Events: Common Neural Substrates?
Construction: Neural differentiation CUE CONSTRUCTIONELABORATION future > past R. FRONTAL POLE (BA 10) Novelty / Recombining details R. HIPPOCAMPUS Novelty encoding? Recombining details to form specific episodes ? past eventsfuture eventscontrol tasks
CUE CONSTRUCTIONELABORATION L. FRONTAL POLE L. HIPPOCAMPUS Self referential processingReintegrate/recombine event details L. TEMPORAL POLEMEDIAL PARIETAL / PARAHIPPOCAMPUS Conceptual detailsImagery / context past eventsfuture eventscontrol tasks OVERLAP: Past and Future Events: Common Neural Substrates?
Are hippocampal responses to detail similar for past and future events? Constructive Episodic Simulation Hypothesis: –Past events: reintegration of relevant event details –Future events: recombination of various details into novel event Past and Future Detail Background
RECALL PAST Last 5-20 yrs CAR IMAGINE FUTURE Next year DRESS 02 20 time RT 25 RATE DETAIL 1 2 3 4 5 RATE DETAIL 1 2 3 4 5 –Past & future detail did not differ on average –Parametric modulation: what regions vary with amount of detail? Past and Future Detail Method CUE CONSTRUCTIONELABORATION RATE DETAIL
Posterior HC activity correlates with past AND future detail: -Retrieval of details from past events? More anterior HC activity correlates with future detail -Flexible recombination of details from past events? Cf. Preston et al. (2004) Past and Future Detail Addis and Schacter (2008, Hippocampus)
Hippocampal Response to Recombined Details Preston et al. (2004): Recombined details engage anterior hippocampus
Constructive Episodic Simulation: Two Conceptual Issues 1. Comparison has focused on remembering the past vs. imagining the future, but past/future confounded with remembering/imagining: Are observed patterns specific to imagining future events or associated with more general imagination/simulation? According to constructive episodic simulation hypothesis, critical process of recombining event details should occur regardless of whether individuals imagine an event as occurring in the future, present, or past.
Constructive Episodic Simulation: Two Conceptual Issues 2. Constructive episodic simulation hypothesis emphasizes recombining of details across events, but it is possible that subjects simply remember entire events and recast them in the future. In previous studies, future simulations could be based on recasting, recombining, or some combination of the two. Are main effects still observed when individuals are required to recombine elements of different episodes?
fMRI Paradigm: Experimental Recombination of Details Fall outside library PERSON: Katie LOCATION: Widener OBJECT: Hat Graduation Day PERSON: Mom LOCATION: Harvard Yard OBJECT: Gown Meeting Cathy PERSON: Cathy LOCATION: Filipes OBJECT: Fajita MEMORY POOL Imagine PAST event: Mom: Graduation Day Filipes: Meeting Cathy Gown: Graduation Day IMAGINE PAST RECALL TASK RECALL memories: Cathy: Meeting Cathy Widener: Fall outside library Hat: Fall outside library Imagine FUTURE event: Katie: Fall outside library Harvard Yard: Graduation Day Fajita: Meeting Cathy IMAGINE FUTURE CONTROL TASK CREATE SENTENCE Start with smallest: Cat: Include cat in sentence Bulb: Include bulb in sentence Tree: Include tree in sentence
fMRI Paradigm: CUE CONSTRUCTIONELABORATION Imagine FUTURE event : Katie: Fall outside library Harvard Yard: Graduation Fajita: Meeting Cathy Button press when event is in mind 02 24 time RT 25 RATE DETAIL 1 2 3 4 5 RATE DETAIL 1 2 3 4 5 Imagine PAST event : Mom: Graduation Day Filipes: Meeting Cathy Gown: Graduation Day Recall MEMORIES: Cathy: Meeting Cathy Widener: Fall outside library Hat: Fall outside library RATE DETAIL 1 2 3 4 5
Constructive nature of the episodic memory system: during retrieval, various elements of past experiences are reintegrated and recombined, allowing us to draw on the past to imagine the future. Imaging data support the constructive episodic simulation hypothesis - and the possibility that simulation of future events is a primary function of a constructive episodic memory. The hippocampus plays an important role in recombining and encoding details from past episodes into simulations of the future. Converging evidence from work on prospective coding/preplay of event sequences. Conclusions (see Schacter & Addis, 2009, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc.)
Acknowledgements Memory Lab, HarvardCollaborators Brendan Gaesser Donna Addis Kathy Gerlach Randy Buckner Adrian Gilmore Theresa Cheng Yoko OkadoElizabeth Chua Ling Pan Noa Laiser Jessica Payne Ling Pan Nathan SprengAlana Wong Dale Stevens Gagan Wig Supported by NIMH & NIA