Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Imaging the pregnant patient with right lower quadrant pain Julia R. Fielding, M.D. RSNA 2010.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Imaging the pregnant patient with right lower quadrant pain Julia R. Fielding, M.D. RSNA 2010."— Presentation transcript:

1 Imaging the pregnant patient with right lower quadrant pain Julia R. Fielding, M.D. RSNA 2010

2 Ultrasound is test of choice First trimester –With bleeding exclude ectopic pregnancy renal stones -Without bleeding ovarian pathology

3 Ectopic Pregnancy No IUP and positive pregnancy test 1/3 of those with ectopic pregnancy will have a normal US exam Those with a simple adnexal cyst have a 10% likelihood of ectopic pregnancy A complex non-ovarian mass has a sensitivity of 84%, specificity 99% and positive predictive value of 96% for ectopic pregnancy Complex fluid/blood is often present Dighe M et al, J Clin Ultrasound 2008;36:

4 ECTOPIC PREGNANCY Courtesy Dr. D. Brown, Mayo Clinic

5 Renal stones Incidence of 1/1500 pregnancies Stones that are >5mm, located in the proximal ureter and of irregular shape usually will require treatment US will identify hydronephrosis Ureteral jets indicate an incompletely obstructed ureter and may spare the patient a stent

6 HYDRONEPHROSIS BLADDER STONE

7 SCOUT 10 MINUTE Right mid ureteral stone

8 Differential diagnosis ovarian pathology Corpus luteum cyst –Usually 2-5cm, can be up to 10cm in size –Regresses week as placenta develops Simple cyst/hemorrhagic cyst/endometrioma/dermoid Torsion – 70% cases with abnormal adnexa Cancer very rare

9 Simple Cyst Courtesy Dr. D. Brown, Mayo Clinic

10 Ovarian torsion

11

12 Use of CT increasing N Engl J Med 2007;357:

13 What are the numbers? 62 million CT scans annually, 4 million in children University of North Carolina ER data: , pediatric admissions increased 2%, chest CT increased by 435%, abdominal CT by 49% (Emerg Radiol 2007;14:227-32) Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital data: Number of pregnant women scanned increased 89% in 10 years with only a 7% increase in admissions (RSNA 2007)

14 Why do we worry? In general, fetal absorption is 40% that of maternal abdomen Ex: Maternal pelvic CT dose is 4cSv, fetal dose is cSv (1cSv =1 rem) This is well below the 10cSv level for teratogenic effects However…. Invest Radiol 2000;35:

15 Why do we worry? Young children (and presumably those in utero) are most susceptible to radiation damage and therefore at higher risk for development of cancers later in life Organs involved are brain, digestive tract, bone marrow (leukemia)

16 N Engl J Med 2007;357:

17

18 What can we do? Have a plan! 1.Balance risks/benefits – talk over the procedure with the referring physician and make sure CT is needed and is the test of choice. 2. Let the referring physician discuss and document the need for the CT scan in the medical record

19 What can we do? 3.Get written and oral informed consent for use of radiation (see new ACR guidelines) 4.Avoid multiple CT scans – radiation effects are cumulative 5.Use best scanning techniques – automatic dose reduction is useful, beware dropping the maS so low that the scan is not diagnostic

20 What are the indications for CT scan in pregnancy? 1. Renal stones when US is indeterminate particularly in 2 nd /3 rd trimester 2. Appendicitis – MR is now test of choice, CT appropriate for IBD, obstruction 3. Cancer staging – substitute MR if possible 4. Lung disease – PE studies and V/Q scans yield similar radiation doses 5. Trauma – use your routine protocol, most common cause of fetal death is maternal death 6. Intracranial hemorrhage

21 What is the radiation dose to the fetus? For CT examination of head, extremities and chest, minimal <10 mSv For CT of the abdomen/pelvis, moderate cSv

22 Is there a risk to the use of IV contrast agent? Very minimal risk of depression of fetal thyroid function by free iodide Water-soluble contrast agents (100cc) contain 5 micrograms of free iodide, less than 1/10 th the level known to cause thyroid dysfunction in neonates Exception would be maternal renal failure when free iodide not excreted back across placenta Eur Radiol 2005;15: Radiology 2010;256:

23 Flank pain/obstructing ureteral stone Choice 1: Ultrasound with hydronephrosis, severe pain, stent placed prophylactically under ultrasound guidance Choice 2: <24 weeks, limited IVU Choice 3: >24 weeks, helical CT

24 HYDRONEPHROSIS SINGLE LEFT JET

25 RIGHT HYDRONEPHROSIS

26 DIILATED URETER

27 COMPRESSED URETER

28 Lower abdominal pain with suspicion of appendicitis Ultrasound, followed by Choice 1: MRI of the abdomen and pelvis Choice 2: Contrast-enhanced helical CT

29 27 year old woman, 33 weeks pregnant with negative ultrasound Courtesy Dr. E. Lazarus, Rhode Island Hospital

30

31

32 Cancer staging of the abdomen and pelvis Choice 1: MRI of the abdomen and pelvis, judicious use of Gd-DTPA Choice 2: Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen/pelvis

33 I+ CT Jejunal adenoCA with SBO

34

35 Recurrent gastric cancer

36

37 TRAUMA Use your routine protocol Intravenous contrast agent always necessary, oral contrast agent varies by institution

38 Ruptured splenic artery aneurysm

39

40 When do we use MRI in pregnancy? 1. The information requested from the MR study cannot be acquired using US 2. The data are needed to affect the care of the patient or fetus during the pregnancy 3. The referring physician does not feel is is prudent to wait until the patient is no longer pregnant to obtain these data.

41 When do we use MRI during pregnancy? In general, when the information to be obtained is absolutely essential to the well being of the mother or child Specifically, –RLQ pain, suspicion of appendicitis/bowel disease –Characterization of an adnexal mass –Cancer staging –Choledocholithiasis –Head and back injuries –Fetal/placental abnormalities

42 Safety issues Present data have not conclusively documented any deleterious effects of MR imaging exposure on the developing fetus All pregnant women should understand and sign a consent for the performance of MRI

43 What about Gd chelates and fetal renal development? Gd chelates do pass through the placenta and remain in the amniotic fluid Because of our lack of knowledge regarding contrast/fetal kidneys, avoid Gd chelates in pregnant women unless absolutely necessary - cancer staging/vascular issues such as aneurysm, AVM

44 Basic protocol for maternal abd/pelvis Sagittal/axial/coronal ultrafast T2 weighted images (HASTE/SSFSE) using large FOV and torso coil if possible. Axial T2W series performed with fat saturation. Ax T1 weighted image with fat sat through pelvis (to locate blood) Patient supine or in left lateral decubitus position

45 Appendicitis Incidence 1:1500 pregnancies Graded compression US is impractical after the first trimester MRI is test of choice – excellent NPV for appendicitis in those patients with a normal US (94%) Alternative is CT (fetal dose 1.8cGy) Appearance on T2WI: Tube >6mm, often vertical, just below TI with adjacent high signal edema

46 Case 1

47

48

49 Case 2

50

51 TERMINAL ILEUM

52 APPENDIX

53 Acute appendicitis with perforation Low signal appendicolith adjacent to appendix Case 3

54

55

56 Bowel inflammation/obstruction Incidence SBO in pregnancy is 1 in 1500 to 1 in 66,500. Majority due to adhesions, volvulus, internal hernias and inflammatory bowel disease MRI has a 95% sensitivity for obstruction, while location of transition point can be identified in 70-90%

57 Small bowel adhesions Third trimester pregnancy s/p total colectomy for UC with formation of J pouch Small bowel obstruction to right of uterus

58 POINT OF TRANSITION

59

60 Uterine leiomyomata Leiomyoma is the most common adnexal mass with an prevalence of 40% These masses grow during pregnancy May torse, bleed or interfere with fetal development or delivery (LUS fibroid) Bridging vessels from the uterus and/or continuirity of the serosa are diagnostic of a fibroid

61 Uterine leiomyomata Round, well-demarcated Variable T2 signal intensity High T1 signal intensity indicated bleeding, red degeneration

62 Fibroid in patient with lupus

63 First trimester pregnancy

64 Pancreatitis Pregnant female, 2 nd trimester with abdominal pain and elevated amylase Diagnosis – pancreatitis Are there stones involved?

65 YES!

66 T2-weighted/fat sat images - PANCREATITIS

67 CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS

68 Renal mass identified on US

69 Placenta previa

70 Does this work with AIP? Usually not Percreta may sometimes be identified if there is extension of placenta into bladder or when the placenta is posterior Accreta and increta can rarely be identified

71 References Pedrosa I, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of right lower quadrant pain in pregnant and non- pregnant patients. Radiographics 2007; 27: Fielding JR, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal pain during pregnancy. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2006;17:

72 References Wieseler KM, Imaging in pregnant patients: Examination appropriateness. Radiographics 2010; 30:

73 Thank you


Download ppt "Imaging the pregnant patient with right lower quadrant pain Julia R. Fielding, M.D. RSNA 2010."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google