Presentation on theme: "Contingency Tables Chapters Seven, Sixteen, and Eighteen Chapter Seven –Definition of Contingency Tables –Basic Statistics –SPSS program (Crosstabulation)"— Presentation transcript:
Contingency Tables Chapters Seven, Sixteen, and Eighteen Chapter Seven –Definition of Contingency Tables –Basic Statistics –SPSS program (Crosstabulation) Chapter Sixteen –Basic Probability Theory Concepts –Test of Hypothesis of Independence
Basic Empirical Situation Unit of data. Two nominal scales measured for each unit. –Example: interview study, sex of respondent, variable such as whether or not subject has a cellular telephone. –Objective is to compare males and females with respect to what fraction have cellular telephones.
Contingency Table One column for each value of the column variable; C is the number of columns. One row for each value of the row variable; R is the number of rows. R x C contingency table.
Contingency Table Each entry is the OBSERVED COUNT O(i,j) of the number of units having the (i,j) contingency. Column of marginal totals. Row of marginal totals.
Basic Hypothesis ASSUME column variable is the independent variable. Hypothesis is independence. That is, the conditional distribution in any column is the same as the conditional distribution in any other column.
Expected Count Basic idea is proportional allocation of observations in a column based on column total. Expected count in (i, j ) contingency = E(i,j)= total number in column j *total number in row i/total number in table. Expected count need not be an integer; one expected count for each contingency.
Residual Residual in (i,j) contingency = observed count in (i,j) contingency - expected count in (i,j) contingency. That is, R(i,j)= O(i,j)-E(i,j) One residual for each contingency.
Pearson Chi-squared Component Chi-squared component for (i, j) contingency =C(i,j)= (Residual in (i, j) contingency) 2 /expected count in (i, j) contingency. C(i,j)=(R(i,j)) 2 / E(i,j)
Assessing Pearson Component Rough guides on whether the (i, j) contingency has an excessively large chi- squared component C(i,j): –the observed significance level of 3.84 is about 0.05. –Of 6.63 is about 0.01. –Of 10.83 is 0.001.
Pearson Chi-Squared Test Sum C(i,j) over all contingencies. Pearson chi-squared test has (R-1)(C-1) degrees of freedom. Under null hypothesis –Expected value of chi-square equals its degrees of freedom. –Variance is twice its degrees of freedom
Marijuana Use at Time 4 by Marijuana Use at Time 3
Contingency Tables Chapter Eighteen –Measures of Association –For nominal variables –For ordinal variables
Measures of Association Measures strength of an association –usually, a dimensionless number between 0 and 1 in absolute value. –Values near 0 indicate no association, near 1 mean strong association. Correlation coefficient is a measure of association Chi-square test is not –depends on the number of observations.
Measures of Association for Nominal Scale Variables Chi-square based –Phi coefficient –Coefficient of contingency –Cramers V Proportional reduction in error –Lambda, symmetric –Lambda, not symmetric
Chi-squared Measure: Phi Coefficient Definition of the Phi Coefficient
Phi Coefficient Can be greater than one. N is the total number of the table. For marijuana at time 3 and 4 data, phi coefficient is (96.595/366) 0.5 =0.51.
Coefficient of Contingency Definition of coefficient of contingency
Coefficient of Contingency Can never get as large as one. Largest value depends on number in table. For example given, c=0.46.
Cramérs V Definition of statistic; k is smaller of number of rows and columns.
Interpretation of Chi-squared measures of association An approximate observed level of significance is given for each measure. Use this in the usual way.
Proportional Reduction in Error (PRE) Measures Prediction is the modal category. Predict overall –Predict used marijuana at time 4; correct for 237 and wrong for 129. Number of misclassified is 129.
Proportional Reduction in Error (PRE) Measures Predict for each condition of the independent variable. –Predict not use at time 4 for those not using at time 3 correct 120 of 215 times misclassify 95 times –Predict use at time 4 for those using at time correct 142 of 151 times misclassify 9 times.
Proportional Reduction in Error (PRE) Measures Using only totals, number of misclassified is 129. Using marijuana at time 3, number misclassified is 104. The lambda measure is λ= (129-104) /129=0.19
Lambda PRE Measures There is a lambda measure using marijuana use at time 4 as the independent variable. –Total: predict no usage at time 3: 151 errors. –Conditional no usage at Time 4: predict none at 3 with 9 errors usage at time 4: predict use at 3 with 95 errors 104 total errors. –Lambda measure is (151-104)/151=0.31
Lambda PRE Measures There is a symmetric lambda measure. [(129-104)+(151-104)]/(129+151)=0.26
Comparing Pairs of Cases Concordant pair of cases: sign of difference on variable 1 is the same as the sign of the difference on variable 2. –Case 1 and Case 2: concordant. –Case 2 and Case 3: discordant –Case 1 and Case 3: tied Let P be number of concordant pairs and Q be the number of discordant pairs.
Measures Based on Concordant and Discordant Pairs Goodman and Kruskals Gamma –(P-Q)/(P+Q) Kendalls Tau-b Kendalls Tau-c Somers d
Choosing a measure Choose a measure interpretable for the purpose in hand! Avoid data dredging (taking the measure that is largest for the data set that you have).
Other measures Correlation based –Pearsons correlation –Spearman correlation: replace values by ranks. Measures of agreement –Cohens kappa.
Summary Contingency table methods crucial to the analysis of market research and social science data. Hypothesis of independence Measures of association describe the strength of the dependence between two variables.