Presentation on theme: "Drug Development and Assessment in Man Pharmaceutical Medicine Thursday 22 nd March 2007 Dr John Stinson."— Presentation transcript:
Drug Development and Assessment in Man Pharmaceutical Medicine Thursday 22 nd March 2007 Dr John Stinson
An expert is somebody who is more than 50 miles from home, has no responsibility for implementing the advice he gives, and shows slides. Edwin Meese
What do Doctors Do? Diagnose and treat Cost of diagnosing What do we cure? What do we alleviate? How do we achieve these effects? Who makes medicines? Future threats?
Antibiotic Resistance 1937 Sulphonamides 1944 Penicillin 1947 Cephalosporins 1947 Chloramphenicol 1947 Aminoglycosides 1952 Macrolides 1953 Tetracyclines 1956 Glycopeptides 1960 Flucloxacillin 1961 Rifampicin 1962 Fusidic Acid 1970 Trimethoprim 1975 Carbipenems 1982 Fluoroquinolones A new class of antibiotic every 3 years 18 year gap to 2000
Route of Synthesis? Economics (platinum) Which Salt? Hydrocortisone = mild steroid Hydrocortisone butyrate = potent Solubility Physicochemical properties Stability Compatibility with excipients
Clinical Pharmacology The Scientific basis of drug therapy, includes: Pharmacokinetics Pharmacodynamics Pharmaceutical development Pharmacovigilance Pharmacoeconomics Pharmacoepidemiology
Pharmaceutical Process Is the drug getting into the patient? Route? Formulation? Dissolution? Absorption?
Pharmacokinetic Process Is the drug getting to its site of action? Absorption? Distribution? Metabolism? Excretion?
Pharmacodynamic & Therapeutic Process Is the drug producing the required pharmacological effect? Is the pharmacological effect being translated into a therapeutic effect?
Phase 1 Trials Initial studies in man to determine tolerance and the safe dosage range and to give indication of metabolic handling. These studies are usually undertaken with healthy volunteers but may be extended to include patients. Pharmacokinetic (ADME) and pharmacodynamic activities are measured if possible. N= 30-80
Phase II Trials Early controlled trials in a limited number of patients (with the disease) under closely monitored conditions to show efficacy and short term safety. Humans exposed 250-500
Phase III Trials Extended large-scale trials to obtain additional evidence of efficacy and safety, and definition of most common adverse effects. Longer term trials possible Humans exposed 300 - 10,000+
Phase IV Trials These are performed after the medicine has been licensed and marketed. Post- marketing surveillance occurs after the clinical trials programme is complete. It is used to collect adverse event data from a large patient population. Humans exposed 10,000+
When Phase I to III Complete Apply for Product Licence or authorisation From FDA From EMEA From National authority (IMB etc) Decision based on Safety Data Efficacy Data Pharmaceutical Quality
Pharmacovigilance Sulfanilamide one of first antibiotics Effective against streptococcal infections Not under patent protection (1908) Many manufacturers marketed it A small company decided to produce a liquid formulation Found that diethylene glycol was a suitable solvent
Pharmacovigilance Raspberry tasting elixir of sulfanilamide 72% diethylene glycol, 16% water, 10% sulfanilamide Control laboratory found it suitable with regards to appearance, flavour and flagrance. There was no toxicity testing of the ingredients
Pharmacovigilance 105 patients died (out of 353 treated) A mass poisoning The only rule broken by the manufacturer, the Massengill Company, was that it called the product an elixir although it did not contain ethanol! The FDA changed the law: Manufacturers had to prove safety before marketing a medicine.
Toxicology Testing Thalidomide 1956 Germany Antiemetic in pregnancy 1961 Reports of Phocomelia no cases in 1949-1959 477 cases in 1961 alone 400-500 cases in UK 1959-61 1963 CSM in UK 1968 Medicines Act UK Regulatory Control
Pharmacovigilance Thalidomide was not approved in US However studies were undertaken in US 624 Pregnant women received thalidomide 10 cases of Phocomelia occurred FDA tightened rules to all stages of drug development This required extensive testing in animals first
Before NCE tested in Man Safety Pharmacology in Animals Dog&Rat CNS Activity CVS Activity Respiratory Activity PharmacokineticsDog & Rat usually Absorption Distribution Metabolism Excretion
Before NCE tested in Man Acute Toxicity single dose 2 Species of animlas by 2 routes Usually IV and Oral (or proposed route) Maximum well tolerated dose Repeat dose toxicity Rodent and non-rodent Using route proposed for man Duration depends on proposed duration in man
Before NCE tested in Man Genotoxicity Ames Test- bacteria gene mutation S.Typhi, E.Coli Mouse Lymphoma Cell line – mammalian gene mutation Chinese Hamster Ovary – chromosomal damage Micronucleus Test mammalian in vitro chromosome damage Assay of DNA synthesis in rat liver Reproductive toxicity only if women of child bearing potential
Pharmacovigilance When a new medicine gets a licence On average about 4,000 humans have received it in trials Many have only received it for a short time If an adverse event only occurs in 1: 5,000 No chance to detect it Especially if it occurs rarely in background Pharmacovigilance only starts with licence
VIOXX –Rofecoxib MSD – COX 2 inhibitor In theory less risk of GI bleeds Approved by FDA in 1999 $ 2,500,000,000 per year VIGOR study RR 5 x of AMI compared to naproxen FDA estimate 27,000 excess AMI/deaths between 1999-2003
VIOXX APPROVe study Study in preventing colonic polyps Showed increased CV deaths September 30 th 2004 product withdrawn Cost will probably be $9 billion in sales & $5 billion in law suits
Bayer statin Statin withdrawn due to rhabdomyolisis Dose response curve not properly explored Could have been avoided? Pharmacovigilance does not stop at licensing, indeed it really only starts then
Pharmacovigilance Methods Spontaneous Reporting Cohort Studies Defined size group of patients Followed for defined period of time 10,000 pts recruited from 2500 GPs Non-promotional, only if going to be Rx Doctor reports and ADEs Can come up with new ADEs Hypotheses generating
Pharmacovigilance Methods Case Control studies Hypothesis testing, not generating Select cohort with suspected disease/ADE Select larger cohort without ADE Look for differences in exposure to drug
Pharmacovigilance Methods Computerised databases Prescriptions/Patients Linked To medical adverse events/disease Getting better as I.T. improves Depends on quality of data entered
The interface between the medical profession and the pharmaceutical industry Research State funded = 25 million/year Research Funded by Pharma = 40 million Approx 160 doctors, nurses and scientists are funded by pharma industry Used to be area of growth --now ? Fraud rare but does occur
Medicine Promotion Advertisements Strict Guidelines safe, best, most etc. reminder vs full advertisement Code of practice Complaints procedure
Medicine Promotion Representatives Educational Informative Promotional Not paid by commission Rising standards Must have data sheet Must report ADEs Must not mislead
Medicine Promotion Ssafety Ttolerability Eefficacy Pprice
Medicine Promotion Samples must be in response to signed dated request No more than 6 samples per year Smallest pack available Marked not for resale/free medical sample
Medicine Promotion Sponsorship IPHA code of practice (new 6 th edition) Doctors should not ask for a fee for apt Sponsorship should be appropriate & not out of proportion Sponsored meetings must have educational component No sponsorship for non-medical people