We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEsmeralda Lightell
Modified over 2 years ago
© SEESAC, 2006 Name, Organisation, Event Location, Date Monitoring and evaluation during SALW Awareness programmes
© SEESAC, 2006 Part 1 – 30 minutes 1. Define monitoring and evaluation 2. Explain the differences between them 3. Explain why they are important
© SEESAC, 2006 Part minutes 1. Describe the different levels at which monitoring and evaluation can be carried out
© SEESAC, 2006 Part 3 – 40 minutes 1. List some common tools for doing monitoring and evaluation 2. Explain why it is best to use a mix of tools 3. List some common criteria for selecting monitoring and evaluation tools
© SEESAC, 2006 Part 1
© SEESAC, 2006 Exercise 1 1. What is monitoring? 2. What is evaluation? 3. What are the similarities and differences? 4. Is it important to do M&E, and if so, why?
© SEESAC, 2006 An informal explanation: Monitoring and evaluation are two forms of activity which aim to measure how your work is progressing Measurement during a project = monitoring Measurement after a project = evaluation What are monitoring and evaluation?
© SEESAC, 2006 A formal definition (SASP 2)… Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) = Collecting and analysing information…. …to determine whether those groups engaged by a SALW Awareness programme have,….. …as a result of the intervention,…. …changed their awareness of, and attitudes and behaviour towards, SALW,…. … in line with the stated programme objectives.
© SEESAC, 2006 Table 9, (SASP 2)… WHAT IT INVOLVESWHEN IT OCCURS WITHIN THE PROGRAMME CYCLE Monitoring Tracking progress towards the achievement of objectives, in order to identify what is working and what isnt working so well, allowing a degree of adaptability in strategy and tactics as appropriate. Ongoing. Evaluation A more structured and formal process of reviewing achievements, in order to make judgements about past effectiveness and learn from experience to improve future practice. At fixed times – for projects lasting more than 18 months, this would normally include a mid-term review as well as an evaluation conducted at the completion of the project.
© SEESAC, 2006 Why are they important? Test for effectiveness Better appreciation of area where working Learn how events have affected the work Adapt programme both during project life- cycle (M) and before next phase (E) Identify good practice to use elsewhere Information to share with others
The programme cycle Feasibility study Analysing and planning Evaluation Designing activities and materials Field-testing Implementing activities Monitoring and reviewing Needs and capacity assessment Planning for monitoring and evaluation
© SEESAC, 2006 The time difference… RESEARCH + ANALYSIS DESIGNIMPLEMENTEVALUATE - Monitoring -- Evaluation -
© SEESAC, 2006 Part 2
© SEESAC, 2006 Imagine you are doing SALW Awareness …
© SEESAC, 2006 Levels of M&E (SASP 2) LEVEL OF EVALUATION PURPOSEKEY QUESTIONS Activities To assess how well the programme has been organised and whether resources have been used efficiently. Outcomes To identify changes in knowledge, attitudes and behaviour among target groups that can be reasonably attributed to the programme. Impact To explore how a particular programme may have made a difference to the lives of specific groups of people, e.g. better security. - Are we sending people the correct messages? - Are the messages reaching the right people? - Are there any signs that knowledge, attitudes and beliefs are changing? - Are there any signs that behaviour is changing? - What impact has the programme had in terms of security / casualties etc.?
© SEESAC, 2006 Activity monitoring example.. Monitoring a TV spot Watch TV! Monitoring a community meeting Phone the local organiser afterwards
© SEESAC, 2006 Outcome monitoring example… Balkan Youth Union (BYU) 5 th April 2003, central Belgrade BYU and children destroyed 500 toy weapons Puppet show T-shirts MUP information leaflets to support collection
© SEESAC, 2006 RTS and RTV B-92, as well as to the journalists of dailies DANAS, BLIC and POLITIKA
© SEESAC, 2006 Outcome monitoring example… Outcome evaluation by: Letters to BYU (hundreds) Media coverage of interviews with the public
© SEESAC, 2006 Impact monitoring and evaluation… Difficult Other factors Casualty figures Crime levels Observe weapons visibility
© SEESAC, 2006 Six questions… 1. How has your awareness programme reduced the number of weapons casualties resulting from weapons in target communities? 2. Are the messages being promoted reaching the right people? 3. Are there any signs of changes in practice or behaviour? 4. How has your awareness programme changed security in targeted communities? 5. Are there any signs that knowledge, attitudes and beliefs are changing? 6. Are the messages being promoted the right ones?
© SEESAC, 2006 Part 3
© SEESAC, 2006 Things to consider: Cost Staffing Skill-levels Representativeness Geographic coverage Depth of explanation Access to social groups Level of participation
© SEESAC, 2006 Common M&E Tools Interviews Focus groups Questionnaires Secondary (desk) research Participatory methods
© SEESAC, 2006 Group Exercise… Group 1: Cheap Give a deep understanding of target groups feelings about SALW Capture womens views well Group 2: Allow generalisations to be made about the wider population Allow respondents to participate Group 3: Build the skills of respondents Capture information about unexpected impacts
The Project Cycle Management Course presented by Simon Pluess World Alliance of YMCAs.
1 Monitoring and Evaluation What are we talking about? Module 5 Session 8.
Planning is a process which ends up with a plan A plan should give you answers to three questions: What am I trying to achieve? What am I going to do?
Introduction to Impact Assessment This introduction uses the Weavers Triangle, designed by Jane Weaver it has been developed by the Charities Evaluation.
Working with communities in emergencies Module 19.
Promoting Rational Drug Use in the Community Monitoring and evaluation.
“A European network on cervical cancer surveillance and control in the new Member States - AURORA” 3 rd Module: Organization, management and evaluation.
CBR 302 A Hands-On Approach to Qualitative Methods and Analysis.
1 Integrating Qualitative Research into Quantitative Research Module 3 Sessions 10&11.
1 Project Cycle Management and Statistics Module 5.
Evaluation What, How and Why Bother?. What? Evaluation is a daily human activity, an essential step in the process of integrating learning and moving.
Module 2: National IEA process design and organization.
Evaluation in Health Promotion
EVALUATION IN HEALTH PROMOTION
Evaluation Mary Rowlatt MDR Partners. Definition of project evaluation Evaluation focuses on whether the project was effective, achieved its objectives,
Improvement Plan Priority for Learning Community 7 Improvement Priority Action Plan (Details of the approaches used to consult and involve pupils, parents,
Professional Development for School Leaders Technical Assistance Phase 1 Self-Assessment and Plan Design.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Session One Linking Assessment to Functional Outcomes and Accountability Anne Brager, MS, RN Program Supervisor Frederick.
Page 1 First Call for Proposals Improving services in the informal areas, enhancing employability and promoting income generation Training Session (First.
Evaluation of User Interface Design Evaluation is very important in User Interface Design and it is generally considered that there is no way round evaluation.
9-Feb-141 Monitoring & Evaluation in NIE Module 20.
Tools for Change Plan, Do, Study, Act The PDSA Cycle Explained Ronnie Viner Assistant Collaborative Director.
Serve DC Training 9/28/11. Theories of Change and Logic Models Evidence Performance Measurement 101 Reviewing Performance Measures eGrants Tips Serve.
HOW TO EVALUATE A MOBILITY PROJECT Training Unit 11.1 Procedures, tools and roles for the evaluation of a mobility project.
National Remodelling Team (NRT) Remodelling Resources Remodelling in Practice V Autumn 2003 © 2003 National Remodelling Team.
1 National Training Programme for New Governors 2005 Module 2 The Critical Friend.
Monitoring and Evaluating Gender-Based Violence Prevention and Mitigation Programs Anastasia J. Gage Melissa Dunn MODULE II.
Presenting: Unit V1 Who this presentation is suitable for? Internal verifier-candidates working towards Unit V1: Conduct internal quality assurance of.
Ali Jarvis 8 th November 2012 Fostering Understanding, Reducing Prejudice - Case study research findings.
Managing SEN: Monitoring and Evaluation – Gathering Evidence: Making Judgements Day 1.
© 2016 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.